|
NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. |
German Parliament has voted down a resolution to increase armaments to Ukraine. Not sure if was actual legislation or just a resolution.
The motion called for “an immediate and noticeable increase in German support in terms of quantity and quality”.
Ralf Stegner, MP of Germany's ruling Social Democratic Party (SDP), described the motion as “unnecessary”.
In turn, Johann Wadephul, CDU/CSU parliamentary group vice-chair, stressed that, in view of Russia’s partial mobilisation, Ukraine now needs decisive support.
“This also requires additional weapons systems, especially armoured personnel carriers, infantry fighting vehicles and tanks from industrial stocks that are ready for export,” he told the DPA agency.
To date, no NATO country has supplied Ukraine with Western-designed tanks.
Source
Also the Russian attempt to break the encirclement of Lyman has failed and now Ukraine is pushing into Luhansk region.
|
On October 01 2022 04:26 npnl19 wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Hey KwarK, seems you don't bother did the research, repeating your news propaganda, better go work your cash register ~~ Summary, real people living under shelling, voted. Those who do not believe, go. + Show Spoiler ++ Show Spoiler +User was warned for this post
 Maybe nuke this ASL spoiler?
|
I've heard reports of some Russians being allowed to leave, but I think that we're about to see a lot of slaughter of those scumbags
|
presumably the hope is that they surrender now that the attempted breakout and rescue has failed.
|
I honestly think Russia will use nukes in Ukraine. The sanctions on tech exports mean that they cant sustain a war of attrition, and they dont have the time to rebuild their own industry.
(side note - thats why i always thought the sanctions on gas and oil were dumb beyond belief - the Russian military industrial complex need tech, not paper money, and outside of RTS games those two are not fungible. But too be fair the Russians figured that part out on their own after a few months and shut down the exports themselves, so it wouldn't have mattered very much I guess.)
The people of importance in Russia who would rather make just money in a 'normal' Russia have been murdered and the leaders remaining seem to be all-in on glory or death. I think they will drop nukes until Ukraine agrees to recognize the annexed regions as Russian and then stop the war. Relations between the west and Russia will remain frozen and the world will move on in much the same configuration as the past 6 months, with the West shouting about sanctions and the rest of the world saying 'yea whatever'. Im not sure if the US has enough diplomatic clout to prevent European countries neighboring Russia getting their own nukes in response. Probably not. I also really really wish we hadn't let the US pressure us into giving up our nukes in the 60s.
|
Any good summaries of Putin's speech? I couldn't suffer more than 15 min of it...
|
When you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
|
On October 01 2022 19:01 maybenexttime wrote: Any good summaries of Putin's speech? I couldn't suffer more than 15 min of it... There was a decent summary at twitter. But if you've seen 5 minutes then you've seen it all.
|
On October 01 2022 18:54 KlaCkoN wrote: I honestly think Russia will use nukes in Ukraine. The sanctions on tech exports mean that they cant sustain a war of attrition, and they dont have the time to rebuild their own industry.
(side note - thats why i always thought the sanctions on gas and oil were dumb beyond belief - the Russian military industrial complex need tech, not paper money, and outside of RTS games those two are not fungible. But too be fair the Russians figured that part out on their own after a few months and shut down the exports themselves, so it wouldn't have mattered very much I guess.)
The people of importance in Russia who would rather make just money in a 'normal' Russia have been murdered and the leaders remaining seem to be all-in on glory or death. I think they will drop nukes until Ukraine agrees to recognize the annexed regions as Russian and then stop the war. Relations between the west and Russia will remain frozen and the world will move on in much the same configuration as the past 6 months, with the West shouting about sanctions and the rest of the world saying 'yea whatever'. Im not sure if the US has enough diplomatic clout to prevent European countries neighboring Russia getting their own nukes in response. Probably not. I also really really wish we hadn't let the US pressure us into giving up our nukes in the 60s.
The US/Nato have already informed Russia exactly what will happen if they use a tactical nuke in Ukraine. That much we know from offical statements.
Best guess from experts is Ukraine turning into a no fly zone and air and missile strikes on Russian soldiers untill there are no more left in Ukraine. But there are also rumors about that + sinking all Russian surface ships.
Regardless its likely that tactical nukes would only make them lose the war faster.
Putin migth be desperate and hope for a bluff tho.
|
Or Putin might hope to lose the war faster but to NATO instead of Ukraine. He might feel incentivised to use nukes as losing against NATO may very well be the only he can stay in power. :<
|
|
Supposedly a daily map uploaded by pro Russian Rybar. Shows Lyman completed taken over by Ukraine.
![[image loading]](https://i.redd.it/qwb7yxy2q6r91.jpg)
|
On October 01 2022 18:54 KlaCkoN wrote: I honestly think Russia will use nukes in Ukraine. The sanctions on tech exports mean that they cant sustain a war of attrition, and they dont have the time to rebuild their own industry.
(side note - thats why i always thought the sanctions on gas and oil were dumb beyond belief - the Russian military industrial complex need tech, not paper money, and outside of RTS games those two are not fungible. But too be fair the Russians figured that part out on their own after a few months and shut down the exports themselves, so it wouldn't have mattered very much I guess.)
The people of importance in Russia who would rather make just money in a 'normal' Russia have been murdered and the leaders remaining seem to be all-in on glory or death. I think they will drop nukes until Ukraine agrees to recognize the annexed regions as Russian and then stop the war. Relations between the west and Russia will remain frozen and the world will move on in much the same configuration as the past 6 months, with the West shouting about sanctions and the rest of the world saying 'yea whatever'. Im not sure if the US has enough diplomatic clout to prevent European countries neighboring Russia getting their own nukes in response. Probably not. I also really really wish we hadn't let the US pressure us into giving up our nukes in the 60s.
This is certainly an alternative, some people here seem to almost cheer for Russia to use nukes so Nato can "retaliate". It seems clear Russia is defeated and their army in shambles, level headed leaders should be working on giving them an out. As if they forget a few nukes will turn a large swath of ukraine into a wasteland.
|
On October 01 2022 22:27 GoTuNk! wrote:Show nested quote +On October 01 2022 18:54 KlaCkoN wrote: I honestly think Russia will use nukes in Ukraine. The sanctions on tech exports mean that they cant sustain a war of attrition, and they dont have the time to rebuild their own industry.
(side note - thats why i always thought the sanctions on gas and oil were dumb beyond belief - the Russian military industrial complex need tech, not paper money, and outside of RTS games those two are not fungible. But too be fair the Russians figured that part out on their own after a few months and shut down the exports themselves, so it wouldn't have mattered very much I guess.)
The people of importance in Russia who would rather make just money in a 'normal' Russia have been murdered and the leaders remaining seem to be all-in on glory or death. I think they will drop nukes until Ukraine agrees to recognize the annexed regions as Russian and then stop the war. Relations between the west and Russia will remain frozen and the world will move on in much the same configuration as the past 6 months, with the West shouting about sanctions and the rest of the world saying 'yea whatever'. Im not sure if the US has enough diplomatic clout to prevent European countries neighboring Russia getting their own nukes in response. Probably not. I also really really wish we hadn't let the US pressure us into giving up our nukes in the 60s. This is certainly an alternative, some people here seem to almost cheer for Russia to use nukes so Nato can "retaliate". It seems clear Russia is defeated and their army in shambles, level headed leaders should be working on giving them an out. As if they forget a few nukes will turn a large swath of ukraine into a wasteland. Russia has an out. They can withdraw back into pre-2014 Russia. Putin will not be given a different out because that would involve Ukraine ceding territory.
|
Well looks like Putin has gone all democratic, held a referendum and feels bound to support the will of the people, when will he give the russian people a choice about having a him in charge.
His army is crumbling and he's hiding behind Nuclear weapons because the Ukrainian army is giving him a thorough trouncing he's causing death and destruction to a peaceful democratic state but don't worry his Saddam Hussain, Colonel Gadaffi, Ceausescu moment is coming soon and would come even sooner if our Russian friends took to the streets en masse.
|
Whether it likes it or not it seems the war will soon come to Germany and they will have to help. Now whether that means Command decisions, or more material help is anyone's guess.
The US Pentagon plans to set up a command in the western German city of Wiesbaden to pull together the threads of its training and assistance program for the Ukrainian army, The New York Times reported on Thursday.
The newspaper cited US military and administration officials as saying the mission would be led by a high-ranking US general.
The planned command suggests that Washington expects the threat of Russian aggression toward Ukraine and neighboring countries to be of long duration, current and former senior US officials said, according to the paper.
What would the new command do?
The newspaper said the new command would report to General Christopher G. Cavoli, the top US officer in Europe, and would execute decisions made by the Ukraine Defense Contact Group, a 40-country coalition created by the Defense Department to help Ukraine.
Among other things, it would oversee the instruction of Ukrainian troops at training ranges in Germany in addition to coordinating technical support centers, such as those involved in repairing weapons provided by the US, in other countries, the report said.
The project is modeled on train-and-assist schemes instigated by the US in Iraq and Afghanistan over the past two decades, according to the Times.
Wiesbaden is the US Army's headquarters in Europe.
The Times said the proposal had not yet been discussed by US officials in public partly because it was still not completely honed, but also because they did not want to give further fuel to Russian President Vladimir Putin's narrative that his war is against the US and NATO, not Ukraine.
The US has already provided billions in military assistance to Ukraine as it faces a monthslong invasion by Russian forces.
Source
|
On October 01 2022 22:27 GoTuNk! wrote:Show nested quote +On October 01 2022 18:54 KlaCkoN wrote: I honestly think Russia will use nukes in Ukraine. The sanctions on tech exports mean that they cant sustain a war of attrition, and they dont have the time to rebuild their own industry.
(side note - thats why i always thought the sanctions on gas and oil were dumb beyond belief - the Russian military industrial complex need tech, not paper money, and outside of RTS games those two are not fungible. But too be fair the Russians figured that part out on their own after a few months and shut down the exports themselves, so it wouldn't have mattered very much I guess.)
The people of importance in Russia who would rather make just money in a 'normal' Russia have been murdered and the leaders remaining seem to be all-in on glory or death. I think they will drop nukes until Ukraine agrees to recognize the annexed regions as Russian and then stop the war. Relations between the west and Russia will remain frozen and the world will move on in much the same configuration as the past 6 months, with the West shouting about sanctions and the rest of the world saying 'yea whatever'. Im not sure if the US has enough diplomatic clout to prevent European countries neighboring Russia getting their own nukes in response. Probably not. I also really really wish we hadn't let the US pressure us into giving up our nukes in the 60s. This is certainly an alternative, some people here seem to almost cheer for Russia to use nukes so Nato can "retaliate". It seems clear Russia is defeated and their army in shambles, level headed leaders should be working on giving them an out. As if they forget a few nukes will turn a large swath of ukraine into a wasteland. Can you give an example for someone here cheering for Russia to use nukes? I am sure you didn't just make that up.
|
Would love to see Russian troops encircled in Lyman but I guess it's better for civilians there that they managed to leave the city. Wonder if that story about the Russian command denying their request to retreat from the city was fake or if the command just changed its mind few days later.
|
On October 01 2022 23:34 Sent. wrote: Would love to see Russian troops encircled in Lyman but I guess it's better for civilians there that they managed to leave the city. Wonder if that story about the Russian command denying their request to retreat from the city was fake or if the command just changed its mind few days later.
You also have the option of them just ignoring the command. Though I don't think that is what happened, they tried a breakout with support from the other side of the lines at least once.
|
France preparing to deliver a number of howitzer guns to Ukraine that were originally set for Denmark.
Google Translate:
France is preparing to supply Ukraine with a new series of Caesar guns, taken from an order originally intended for Denmark. This supply could relate to 6 to 12 howitzers out of the fifteen requested by Kyiv. While the technical discussions are being finalized, the maneuver is the subject of a political agreement in principle between the three governments.
Source
Reports of explosions at Belbek airport in Crimea:
Evidence that the Russian retreat wasn't orderly.
NSFW
+ Show Spoiler +
|
|
|
|