• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:26
CEST 20:26
KST 03:26
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202534Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder8EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced50BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Serral wins EWC 2025 Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 Classic: "It's a thick wall to break through to become world champ" Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation
Tourneys
LiuLi Cup Weeklies and Monthlies Info Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Which top zerg/toss will fail in qualifiers? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ 2025 Season 2 Ladder map pool Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2 [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 1 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
The Link Between Fitness and…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 737 users

Russo-Ukrainian War Thread - Page 172

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 170 171 172 173 174 833 Next
NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.
plasmidghost
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Belgium16168 Posts
July 23 2022 23:22 GMT
#3421
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?
Yugoslavia will always live on in my heart
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21685 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-23 23:28:56
July 23 2022 23:27 GMT
#3422
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?
If its coming from official US defence sources I don't see why it shouldn't be accurate.

But 85% of current active military is not the same as 85% of potential forces.

We know their recruitment is scrapping the bottom of the barrel and they have withdrawn forces from the Finnish border to send to Ukraine.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35147 Posts
July 24 2022 00:21 GMT
#3423
On July 24 2022 07:15 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 04:37 plasmidghost wrote:
Absolutely incredible news. If this holds up, how long do y'all think Russia can last in Ukraine? If this is their expenditure at the moment, it can't be past like, September, right?


Running out of smart munitions just means you start hitting a bunch of things near your target. You keep firing but more civilians die.

Hell, they'd get more inaccurate just from firing off that many rounds before even taking older rounds into account.
r00ty
Profile Joined November 2010
Germany1056 Posts
July 24 2022 09:57 GMT
#3424
Example of Russian artillery tactics from early june:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


That doesn't seem very effective.
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11507 Posts
July 24 2022 10:12 GMT
#3425
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.
xM(Z
Profile Joined November 2006
Romania5281 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-24 11:39:02
July 24 2022 11:36 GMT
#3426
some excerpts:
According to diplomats, under the terms of the deal:

Russia will not target ports while shipments are in transit
Ukrainian vessels will guide cargo ships through waters that have been mined
Turkey - supported by the United Nations - will inspect ships, to allay Russian fears of weapons smuggling
Russian exports of grain and fertiliser via the Black Sea will be facilitated.

The deal is valid for 120 days and the United Nations expects it to be renewed unless the war has ended by then. Work is to get underway immediately to establish inspection teams and staffing a Joint Coordination Center (JCC) in Istanbul overseen by members of all four parties to the agreement.

Ukrainian ports require about 10 days to prepare, so it will take a few weeks before vessels are moving in and out. "We are looking at a very quick rate of implementation," the official said.

Negotiations began in April when U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres raised the idea in separate meetings with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelenskiy of Ukraine.

it seems like Ukraine made a deal with Turkey and then Russia made a deal with Turkey; there were no direct Ukrainian-Russian deals/accords.

the line with "shipments in transit" is weird. if/when there is no (grain)transit, can russians bomb the ports?.

(edit: i would put the recent withdrawal of russian ships from the Black Sea under this deal too)
And my fury stands ready. I bring all your plans to nought. My bleak heart beats steady. 'Tis you whom I have sought.
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17257 Posts
July 24 2022 14:35 GMT
#3427
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?


You have to take into account that Russia hasn't sent their regular army there. Mostly just conscripts and regional forces (people they don't have to put casualty reports for public). At the beginning of conflict Russia had what, 200k troops sent there? With 40k dead you'd assume that at least twice that number are wounded or otherwise incapable of fighting, making it around 120k incapacitated troops so I'd estimate it at about 60%. That's just the troops, not sure about vehicles and other assets.

On July 24 2022 19:12 Simberto wrote:
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.


Yeah, but at the same time you don't see any trench lines or burned down armor there. So it seems like an excessive force to saturate an area. We don't really know the context but if it was to say rout a small unit of Ukrainians then it's extremely ineffective (expending thousands of artillery rounds to try and hunt down 20 people or so).
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
July 24 2022 16:28 GMT
#3428
Poland has agreed to buy S. Korean armaments etc. Makes me wonder if Poland is acting as a middle man and will quietly let Ukraine "borrow them" seeing how I don't think S. Korean hardware is not NATO specs etc.

Poland is gearing up to purchase tanks, howitzers and fighter planes from South Korea as it looks to bolster its armed forces.

"We're signing contracts next week," Polish Defense Minister Mariusz Blaszczak said in a tweet on Friday.

The agreement includes 48 FA-50 light combat fighter jets, 180 K2 "Black Panther" tanks and an unspecified number of K9 howitzers, wPolityce website reported, quoting Blaszczak.

"With this contract, we will significantly increase Poland's security and the strength of the Polish Army. Fast delivery and industry development are key! We reconciled the often divergent interests of soldiers and the arms industry," Blaszczak said in his tweet.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Sent.
Profile Joined June 2012
Poland9197 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-24 16:44:42
July 24 2022 16:41 GMT
#3429
Nah, we're filling up the space left by the Soviet gear we sent Ukraine. The Abrams tank deal was disappointing in certain aspects so decision was made to buy different tanks instead of going all-in on the American tanks.

There were also some talks about nuclear energy cooperation with Korean companies so maybe our government believes there's something to gain from developing a closer relationship with Korea.
You're now breathing manually
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11507 Posts
July 24 2022 16:44 GMT
#3430
On July 24 2022 23:35 Manit0u wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?


You have to take into account that Russia hasn't sent their regular army there. Mostly just conscripts and regional forces (people they don't have to put casualty reports for public). At the beginning of conflict Russia had what, 200k troops sent there? With 40k dead you'd assume that at least twice that number are wounded or otherwise incapable of fighting, making it around 120k incapacitated troops so I'd estimate it at about 60%. That's just the troops, not sure about vehicles and other assets.

Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 19:12 Simberto wrote:
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.


Yeah, but at the same time you don't see any trench lines or burned down armor there. So it seems like an excessive force to saturate an area. We don't really know the context but if it was to say rout a small unit of Ukrainians then it's extremely ineffective (expending thousands of artillery rounds to try and hunt down 20 people or so).


True, if that is the case.

I want Russia to fail as quickly as possible as the next guy, but i am just a bit more careful, and a "wait and see" type of guy. There seems to be way too much "Russia will fail basically next week" stuff going on.

I don't know the context, so i don't try to use it to make some kind of point. And Russia firing a lot of artillery rounds doesn't mean that they won't be able to keep doing that.

I am of the firm opinion that if the west wanted, they could crush Russia with pure industrial might. The west can simply invest a lot more money over a much longer period of time than Russia can. But as long as Russia wants it to, this war will keep going. And i think there are quite a few far too optimistic takes around.
Deleted User 137586
Profile Joined January 2011
7859 Posts
July 24 2022 17:22 GMT
#3431
On July 25 2022 01:41 Sent. wrote:
Nah, we're filling up the space left by the Soviet gear we sent Ukraine. The Abrams tank deal was disappointing in certain aspects so decision was made to buy different tanks instead of going all-in on the American tanks.

There were also some talks about nuclear energy cooperation with Korean companies so maybe our government believes there's something to gain from developing a closer relationship with Korea.


Yeah, this is it

Estonia is also sending older stuff and replacing it with S Korean upgrades.
Cry 'havoc' and let slip the dogs of war
Ardias
Profile Joined January 2014
Russian Federation610 Posts
July 24 2022 17:39 GMT
#3432
On July 24 2022 23:35 Manit0u wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?


You have to take into account that Russia hasn't sent their regular army there. Mostly just conscripts and regional forces (people they don't have to put casualty reports for public). At the beginning of conflict Russia had what, 200k troops sent there? With 40k dead you'd assume that at least twice that number are wounded or otherwise incapable of fighting, making it around 120k incapacitated troops so I'd estimate it at about 60%. That's just the troops, not sure about vehicles and other assets.

Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 19:12 Simberto wrote:
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.


Yeah, but at the same time you don't see any trench lines or burned down armor there. So it seems like an excessive force to saturate an area. We don't really know the context but if it was to say rout a small unit of Ukrainians then it's extremely ineffective (expending thousands of artillery rounds to try and hunt down 20 people or so).

It's the opposite. Russia sent only regular troops there, while conscripts remained in Russia, since it's legally prohibited to use them outside Russian border. That's why I think referendums on Russia-controlled territories are important, they will allow Kremlin to use conscripts in defence of these territories in accordance with Russian law.
Mess with the best or die like the rest.
Silvanel
Profile Blog Joined March 2003
Poland4729 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-24 17:48:52
July 24 2022 17:45 GMT
#3433
@Ghanburighan
Poland has already worked with S. Korea in military sector (Krab is built on Korean chassis). Also, Abrams is too heavy to be used in some areas of Poland, so if we want the option to use tanks everywhere we need another type. Judging by the size of the deal, there is probably some tech transfer involved. In my opinion, we will be building a Polish version of K2 and/or K9. Those purchases won't leave our borders.
Pathetic Greta hater.
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17257 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-24 18:03:46
July 24 2022 18:01 GMT
#3434
On July 25 2022 02:39 Ardias wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 23:35 Manit0u wrote:
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?


You have to take into account that Russia hasn't sent their regular army there. Mostly just conscripts and regional forces (people they don't have to put casualty reports for public). At the beginning of conflict Russia had what, 200k troops sent there? With 40k dead you'd assume that at least twice that number are wounded or otherwise incapable of fighting, making it around 120k incapacitated troops so I'd estimate it at about 60%. That's just the troops, not sure about vehicles and other assets.

On July 24 2022 19:12 Simberto wrote:
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.


Yeah, but at the same time you don't see any trench lines or burned down armor there. So it seems like an excessive force to saturate an area. We don't really know the context but if it was to say rout a small unit of Ukrainians then it's extremely ineffective (expending thousands of artillery rounds to try and hunt down 20 people or so).

It's the opposite. Russia sent only regular troops there, while conscripts remained in Russia, since it's legally prohibited to use them outside Russian border. That's why I think referendums on Russia-controlled territories are important, they will allow Kremlin to use conscripts in defence of these territories in accordance with Russian law.


Then how come the people reporting back home or captured by the Ukrainians are saying they were basically drafted and sent to the front without even having any training at all? Most of the Russian forces were people conscripted in the LPR/DNR, conscripts from rural areas or forces of other republics (Chechens, Wagner Group etc.). Aside from a few units of their regular troops in the form of VDV, some marines and spetsnaz there weren't really any signs of their regular army. Most pictures we get are those groups of people with random mismatched equipment and very few wearing any modern gear, body armor or even uniform outfits.

Unless you want to tell me that regular infantrymen in Russia go into combat wearing sneakers and colorful school backpacks?

Maybe there are some regular troops but I think they're being held back and away from the front. There were also reports that Russia didn't want to send people from around Moscow region etc. as they'd have to report casualties on them and it wouldn't sit well with people.
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21685 Posts
July 24 2022 18:05 GMT
#3435
On July 25 2022 03:01 Manit0u wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2022 02:39 Ardias wrote:
On July 24 2022 23:35 Manit0u wrote:
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?


You have to take into account that Russia hasn't sent their regular army there. Mostly just conscripts and regional forces (people they don't have to put casualty reports for public). At the beginning of conflict Russia had what, 200k troops sent there? With 40k dead you'd assume that at least twice that number are wounded or otherwise incapable of fighting, making it around 120k incapacitated troops so I'd estimate it at about 60%. That's just the troops, not sure about vehicles and other assets.

On July 24 2022 19:12 Simberto wrote:
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.


Yeah, but at the same time you don't see any trench lines or burned down armor there. So it seems like an excessive force to saturate an area. We don't really know the context but if it was to say rout a small unit of Ukrainians then it's extremely ineffective (expending thousands of artillery rounds to try and hunt down 20 people or so).

It's the opposite. Russia sent only regular troops there, while conscripts remained in Russia, since it's legally prohibited to use them outside Russian border. That's why I think referendums on Russia-controlled territories are important, they will allow Kremlin to use conscripts in defence of these territories in accordance with Russian law.


Then how come the people reporting back home or captured by the Ukrainians are saying they were basically drafted and sent to the front without even having any training at all? Most of the Russian forces were people conscripted in the LPR/DNR, conscripts from rural areas or forces of other republics (Chechens, Wagner Group etc.). Aside from a few units of their regular troops in the form of VDV, some marines and spetsnaz there weren't really any signs of their regular army. Most pictures we get are those groups of people with random mismatched equipment and very few wearing any modern gear, body armor or even uniform outfits.

Unless you want to tell me that regular infantrymen in Russia go into combat wearing sneakers and colorful school backpacks?
Its legal technicalities.

Russia has a mandatory conscription, those conscripts cannot, legally, be send into Ukraine.

LPR/DNR are not official Russian provinces, conscripts there are not bound by such rules. Nor are ad-hoc units Russia is trying to hastily put together by offering people very high monetary incentives.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Artesimo
Profile Joined February 2015
Germany546 Posts
July 24 2022 18:06 GMT
#3436
On July 25 2022 02:39 Ardias wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 23:35 Manit0u wrote:
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?


You have to take into account that Russia hasn't sent their regular army there. Mostly just conscripts and regional forces (people they don't have to put casualty reports for public). At the beginning of conflict Russia had what, 200k troops sent there? With 40k dead you'd assume that at least twice that number are wounded or otherwise incapable of fighting, making it around 120k incapacitated troops so I'd estimate it at about 60%. That's just the troops, not sure about vehicles and other assets.

On July 24 2022 19:12 Simberto wrote:
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.


Yeah, but at the same time you don't see any trench lines or burned down armor there. So it seems like an excessive force to saturate an area. We don't really know the context but if it was to say rout a small unit of Ukrainians then it's extremely ineffective (expending thousands of artillery rounds to try and hunt down 20 people or so).

It's the opposite. Russia sent only regular troops there, while conscripts remained in Russia, since it's legally prohibited to use them outside Russian border. That's why I think referendums on Russia-controlled territories are important, they will allow Kremlin to use conscripts in defence of these territories in accordance with Russian law.


I think a big problem is that in the media, and subsequently in here, russian forces and DNR and LNR forces keep getting mixed up /bundled together, and then things that are true in regards to some of these 3 get apllied to the others as well.

Like DNR and LNR are absolutely scraping the bottom of the manpower barrel while russia faces the problem you hinted at there where they have problems recruiting/getting forces in, without dropping the 'special military operation' act.

Its very hard to distinguish between russian forces and russian proxy forces in reportings.
Sent.
Profile Joined June 2012
Poland9197 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-24 18:51:21
July 24 2022 18:43 GMT
#3437
Well it is hard to understand why Kremlin is so reluctant to use Russia's core manpower while using ethnic Russians from their puppet states in eastern Ukraine like an 19th century imperialist power would use people from its African or Asian colonies.
You're now breathing manually
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11507 Posts
July 24 2022 19:06 GMT
#3438
Is it, though? Seems pretty easy to understand.
maybenexttime
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Poland5558 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-24 19:39:19
July 24 2022 19:23 GMT
#3439
On July 25 2022 03:43 Sent. wrote:
Well it is hard to understand why Kremlin is so reluctant to use Russia's core manpower while using ethnic Russians from their puppet states in eastern Ukraine like an 19th century imperialist power would use people from its African or Asian colonies.

Because most Russians are couch patriots by design. They don't mind a genocide next door, as long as they don't have to get their hands dirty.
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11507 Posts
July 24 2022 19:25 GMT
#3440
On July 25 2022 04:23 maybenexttime wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2022 03:43 Sent. wrote:
Well it is hard to understand why Kremlin is so reluctant to use Russia's core manpower while using ethnic Russians from their puppet states in eastern Ukraine like an 19th century imperialist power would use people from its African or Asian colonies.

Because most Russians are couch patriots by design. They don't mine a genocide next door, as long as they don't have to get their hands dirty.


Also, Russia is what matters to Putin. Russians get angry if lots of Russians die. If lots of people from some puppet state die, that doesn't really impact Russia itself a lot.
Prev 1 170 171 172 173 174 833 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV European League
16:00
Playoffs Day 2
HeRoMaRinE vs SKillousLIVE!
ByuN vs TBD
WardiTV877
LiquipediaDiscussion
PSISTORM Gaming Misc
15:55
FSL TeamLeague week8: IC vs RR
Freeedom63
Liquipedia
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
12:00
Playoff - Day 1/2
Fengzi vs DewaltLIVE!
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
JuggernautJason122
IndyStarCraft 90
BRAT_OK 69
SteadfastSC 54
ProTech45
MindelVK 38
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 30314
Mini 733
ggaemo 481
firebathero 208
sas.Sziky 83
Zeus 71
Mong 60
Rock 39
HiyA 30
Dota 2
qojqva3939
420jenkins868
Counter-Strike
fl0m4972
ScreaM1828
sgares438
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor587
Liquid`Hasu518
Other Games
Beastyqt742
Dendi642
Hui .140
Trikslyr50
QueenE46
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1601
StarCraft 2
angryscii 0
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH97
• printf 47
• tFFMrPink 18
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 15
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 4336
• Nemesis1662
League of Legends
• Jankos1541
Other Games
• imaqtpie868
• Shiphtur213
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
15h 34m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
19h 34m
Bonyth vs TBD
WardiTV European League
21h 34m
Wardi Open
1d 16h
OSC
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
6 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
FEL Cracow 2025
Underdog Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
HCC Europe
CC Div. A S7
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CAC 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.