• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 20:33
CET 02:33
KST 10:33
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT29Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book19Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
Team Liquid Map Contest - Preparation Notice6Weekly Cups (Feb 23-Mar 1): herO doubles, 2v2 bonanza1Weekly Cups (Feb 16-22): MaxPax doubles0Weekly Cups (Feb 9-15): herO doubles up2ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/0258
StarCraft 2
General
Vitality disbanding their sc2-team How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game? Team Liquid Map Contest - Preparation Notice ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker
Tourneys
PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $5,000 WardiTV Winter Championship 2026 Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026] Map Editor closed ?
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 515 Together Forever Mutation # 514 Ulnar New Year Mutation # 513 Attrition Warfare
Brood War
General
BSL 22 Map Contest — Submissions OPEN to March 10 battle.net problems Are you ready for ASL 21? Hype VIDEO BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash's ASL S21 & Future Plans Announcement
Tourneys
ASL Season 21 Qualifiers March 7-8 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues BWCL Season 64 Announcement [BSL22] Open Qualifier #1 - Sunday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Zealot bombing is no longer popular?
Other Games
General Games
No Man's Sky (PS4 and PC) Path of Exile PC Games Sales Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Mexico's Drug War Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Laptop capable of using Photoshop Lightroom?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
Gaming-Related Deaths
TrAiDoS
ONE GREAT AMERICAN MARINE…
XenOsky
Unintentional protectionism…
Uldridge
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1767 users

Russo-Ukrainian War Thread - Page 172

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 170 171 172 173 174 920 Next
NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.
plasmidghost
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Belgium16168 Posts
July 23 2022 23:22 GMT
#3421
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?
Yugoslavia will always live on in my heart
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands22125 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-23 23:28:56
July 23 2022 23:27 GMT
#3422
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?
If its coming from official US defence sources I don't see why it shouldn't be accurate.

But 85% of current active military is not the same as 85% of potential forces.

We know their recruitment is scrapping the bottom of the barrel and they have withdrawn forces from the Finnish border to send to Ukraine.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35172 Posts
July 24 2022 00:21 GMT
#3423
On July 24 2022 07:15 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 04:37 plasmidghost wrote:
Absolutely incredible news. If this holds up, how long do y'all think Russia can last in Ukraine? If this is their expenditure at the moment, it can't be past like, September, right?


Running out of smart munitions just means you start hitting a bunch of things near your target. You keep firing but more civilians die.

Hell, they'd get more inaccurate just from firing off that many rounds before even taking older rounds into account.
r00ty
Profile Joined November 2010
Germany1066 Posts
July 24 2022 09:57 GMT
#3424
Example of Russian artillery tactics from early june:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


That doesn't seem very effective.
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11764 Posts
July 24 2022 10:12 GMT
#3425
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.
xM(Z
Profile Joined November 2006
Romania5299 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-24 11:39:02
July 24 2022 11:36 GMT
#3426
some excerpts:
According to diplomats, under the terms of the deal:

Russia will not target ports while shipments are in transit
Ukrainian vessels will guide cargo ships through waters that have been mined
Turkey - supported by the United Nations - will inspect ships, to allay Russian fears of weapons smuggling
Russian exports of grain and fertiliser via the Black Sea will be facilitated.

The deal is valid for 120 days and the United Nations expects it to be renewed unless the war has ended by then. Work is to get underway immediately to establish inspection teams and staffing a Joint Coordination Center (JCC) in Istanbul overseen by members of all four parties to the agreement.

Ukrainian ports require about 10 days to prepare, so it will take a few weeks before vessels are moving in and out. "We are looking at a very quick rate of implementation," the official said.

Negotiations began in April when U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres raised the idea in separate meetings with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelenskiy of Ukraine.

it seems like Ukraine made a deal with Turkey and then Russia made a deal with Turkey; there were no direct Ukrainian-Russian deals/accords.

the line with "shipments in transit" is weird. if/when there is no (grain)transit, can russians bomb the ports?.

(edit: i would put the recent withdrawal of russian ships from the Black Sea under this deal too)
And my fury stands ready. I bring all your plans to nought. My bleak heart beats steady. 'Tis you whom I have sought.
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17685 Posts
July 24 2022 14:35 GMT
#3427
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?


You have to take into account that Russia hasn't sent their regular army there. Mostly just conscripts and regional forces (people they don't have to put casualty reports for public). At the beginning of conflict Russia had what, 200k troops sent there? With 40k dead you'd assume that at least twice that number are wounded or otherwise incapable of fighting, making it around 120k incapacitated troops so I'd estimate it at about 60%. That's just the troops, not sure about vehicles and other assets.

On July 24 2022 19:12 Simberto wrote:
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.


Yeah, but at the same time you don't see any trench lines or burned down armor there. So it seems like an excessive force to saturate an area. We don't really know the context but if it was to say rout a small unit of Ukrainians then it's extremely ineffective (expending thousands of artillery rounds to try and hunt down 20 people or so).
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
July 24 2022 16:28 GMT
#3428
Poland has agreed to buy S. Korean armaments etc. Makes me wonder if Poland is acting as a middle man and will quietly let Ukraine "borrow them" seeing how I don't think S. Korean hardware is not NATO specs etc.

Poland is gearing up to purchase tanks, howitzers and fighter planes from South Korea as it looks to bolster its armed forces.

"We're signing contracts next week," Polish Defense Minister Mariusz Blaszczak said in a tweet on Friday.

The agreement includes 48 FA-50 light combat fighter jets, 180 K2 "Black Panther" tanks and an unspecified number of K9 howitzers, wPolityce website reported, quoting Blaszczak.

"With this contract, we will significantly increase Poland's security and the strength of the Polish Army. Fast delivery and industry development are key! We reconciled the often divergent interests of soldiers and the arms industry," Blaszczak said in his tweet.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Sent.
Profile Joined June 2012
Poland9284 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-24 16:44:42
July 24 2022 16:41 GMT
#3429
Nah, we're filling up the space left by the Soviet gear we sent Ukraine. The Abrams tank deal was disappointing in certain aspects so decision was made to buy different tanks instead of going all-in on the American tanks.

There were also some talks about nuclear energy cooperation with Korean companies so maybe our government believes there's something to gain from developing a closer relationship with Korea.
You're now breathing manually
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11764 Posts
July 24 2022 16:44 GMT
#3430
On July 24 2022 23:35 Manit0u wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?


You have to take into account that Russia hasn't sent their regular army there. Mostly just conscripts and regional forces (people they don't have to put casualty reports for public). At the beginning of conflict Russia had what, 200k troops sent there? With 40k dead you'd assume that at least twice that number are wounded or otherwise incapable of fighting, making it around 120k incapacitated troops so I'd estimate it at about 60%. That's just the troops, not sure about vehicles and other assets.

Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 19:12 Simberto wrote:
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.


Yeah, but at the same time you don't see any trench lines or burned down armor there. So it seems like an excessive force to saturate an area. We don't really know the context but if it was to say rout a small unit of Ukrainians then it's extremely ineffective (expending thousands of artillery rounds to try and hunt down 20 people or so).


True, if that is the case.

I want Russia to fail as quickly as possible as the next guy, but i am just a bit more careful, and a "wait and see" type of guy. There seems to be way too much "Russia will fail basically next week" stuff going on.

I don't know the context, so i don't try to use it to make some kind of point. And Russia firing a lot of artillery rounds doesn't mean that they won't be able to keep doing that.

I am of the firm opinion that if the west wanted, they could crush Russia with pure industrial might. The west can simply invest a lot more money over a much longer period of time than Russia can. But as long as Russia wants it to, this war will keep going. And i think there are quite a few far too optimistic takes around.
Deleted User 137586
Profile Joined January 2011
7859 Posts
July 24 2022 17:22 GMT
#3431
On July 25 2022 01:41 Sent. wrote:
Nah, we're filling up the space left by the Soviet gear we sent Ukraine. The Abrams tank deal was disappointing in certain aspects so decision was made to buy different tanks instead of going all-in on the American tanks.

There were also some talks about nuclear energy cooperation with Korean companies so maybe our government believes there's something to gain from developing a closer relationship with Korea.


Yeah, this is it

Estonia is also sending older stuff and replacing it with S Korean upgrades.
Cry 'havoc' and let slip the dogs of war
Ardias
Profile Joined January 2014
Russian Federation617 Posts
July 24 2022 17:39 GMT
#3432
On July 24 2022 23:35 Manit0u wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?


You have to take into account that Russia hasn't sent their regular army there. Mostly just conscripts and regional forces (people they don't have to put casualty reports for public). At the beginning of conflict Russia had what, 200k troops sent there? With 40k dead you'd assume that at least twice that number are wounded or otherwise incapable of fighting, making it around 120k incapacitated troops so I'd estimate it at about 60%. That's just the troops, not sure about vehicles and other assets.

Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 19:12 Simberto wrote:
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.


Yeah, but at the same time you don't see any trench lines or burned down armor there. So it seems like an excessive force to saturate an area. We don't really know the context but if it was to say rout a small unit of Ukrainians then it's extremely ineffective (expending thousands of artillery rounds to try and hunt down 20 people or so).

It's the opposite. Russia sent only regular troops there, while conscripts remained in Russia, since it's legally prohibited to use them outside Russian border. That's why I think referendums on Russia-controlled territories are important, they will allow Kremlin to use conscripts in defence of these territories in accordance with Russian law.
Mess with the best or die like the rest.
Silvanel
Profile Blog Joined March 2003
Poland4742 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-24 17:48:52
July 24 2022 17:45 GMT
#3433
@Ghanburighan
Poland has already worked with S. Korea in military sector (Krab is built on Korean chassis). Also, Abrams is too heavy to be used in some areas of Poland, so if we want the option to use tanks everywhere we need another type. Judging by the size of the deal, there is probably some tech transfer involved. In my opinion, we will be building a Polish version of K2 and/or K9. Those purchases won't leave our borders.
Pathetic Greta hater.
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17685 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-24 18:03:46
July 24 2022 18:01 GMT
#3434
On July 25 2022 02:39 Ardias wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 23:35 Manit0u wrote:
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?


You have to take into account that Russia hasn't sent their regular army there. Mostly just conscripts and regional forces (people they don't have to put casualty reports for public). At the beginning of conflict Russia had what, 200k troops sent there? With 40k dead you'd assume that at least twice that number are wounded or otherwise incapable of fighting, making it around 120k incapacitated troops so I'd estimate it at about 60%. That's just the troops, not sure about vehicles and other assets.

On July 24 2022 19:12 Simberto wrote:
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.


Yeah, but at the same time you don't see any trench lines or burned down armor there. So it seems like an excessive force to saturate an area. We don't really know the context but if it was to say rout a small unit of Ukrainians then it's extremely ineffective (expending thousands of artillery rounds to try and hunt down 20 people or so).

It's the opposite. Russia sent only regular troops there, while conscripts remained in Russia, since it's legally prohibited to use them outside Russian border. That's why I think referendums on Russia-controlled territories are important, they will allow Kremlin to use conscripts in defence of these territories in accordance with Russian law.


Then how come the people reporting back home or captured by the Ukrainians are saying they were basically drafted and sent to the front without even having any training at all? Most of the Russian forces were people conscripted in the LPR/DNR, conscripts from rural areas or forces of other republics (Chechens, Wagner Group etc.). Aside from a few units of their regular troops in the form of VDV, some marines and spetsnaz there weren't really any signs of their regular army. Most pictures we get are those groups of people with random mismatched equipment and very few wearing any modern gear, body armor or even uniform outfits.

Unless you want to tell me that regular infantrymen in Russia go into combat wearing sneakers and colorful school backpacks?

Maybe there are some regular troops but I think they're being held back and away from the front. There were also reports that Russia didn't want to send people from around Moscow region etc. as they'd have to report casualties on them and it wouldn't sit well with people.
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands22125 Posts
July 24 2022 18:05 GMT
#3435
On July 25 2022 03:01 Manit0u wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2022 02:39 Ardias wrote:
On July 24 2022 23:35 Manit0u wrote:
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?


You have to take into account that Russia hasn't sent their regular army there. Mostly just conscripts and regional forces (people they don't have to put casualty reports for public). At the beginning of conflict Russia had what, 200k troops sent there? With 40k dead you'd assume that at least twice that number are wounded or otherwise incapable of fighting, making it around 120k incapacitated troops so I'd estimate it at about 60%. That's just the troops, not sure about vehicles and other assets.

On July 24 2022 19:12 Simberto wrote:
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.


Yeah, but at the same time you don't see any trench lines or burned down armor there. So it seems like an excessive force to saturate an area. We don't really know the context but if it was to say rout a small unit of Ukrainians then it's extremely ineffective (expending thousands of artillery rounds to try and hunt down 20 people or so).

It's the opposite. Russia sent only regular troops there, while conscripts remained in Russia, since it's legally prohibited to use them outside Russian border. That's why I think referendums on Russia-controlled territories are important, they will allow Kremlin to use conscripts in defence of these territories in accordance with Russian law.


Then how come the people reporting back home or captured by the Ukrainians are saying they were basically drafted and sent to the front without even having any training at all? Most of the Russian forces were people conscripted in the LPR/DNR, conscripts from rural areas or forces of other republics (Chechens, Wagner Group etc.). Aside from a few units of their regular troops in the form of VDV, some marines and spetsnaz there weren't really any signs of their regular army. Most pictures we get are those groups of people with random mismatched equipment and very few wearing any modern gear, body armor or even uniform outfits.

Unless you want to tell me that regular infantrymen in Russia go into combat wearing sneakers and colorful school backpacks?
Its legal technicalities.

Russia has a mandatory conscription, those conscripts cannot, legally, be send into Ukraine.

LPR/DNR are not official Russian provinces, conscripts there are not bound by such rules. Nor are ad-hoc units Russia is trying to hastily put together by offering people very high monetary incentives.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Artesimo
Profile Joined February 2015
Germany567 Posts
July 24 2022 18:06 GMT
#3436
On July 25 2022 02:39 Ardias wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 23:35 Manit0u wrote:
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?


You have to take into account that Russia hasn't sent their regular army there. Mostly just conscripts and regional forces (people they don't have to put casualty reports for public). At the beginning of conflict Russia had what, 200k troops sent there? With 40k dead you'd assume that at least twice that number are wounded or otherwise incapable of fighting, making it around 120k incapacitated troops so I'd estimate it at about 60%. That's just the troops, not sure about vehicles and other assets.

On July 24 2022 19:12 Simberto wrote:
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.


Yeah, but at the same time you don't see any trench lines or burned down armor there. So it seems like an excessive force to saturate an area. We don't really know the context but if it was to say rout a small unit of Ukrainians then it's extremely ineffective (expending thousands of artillery rounds to try and hunt down 20 people or so).

It's the opposite. Russia sent only regular troops there, while conscripts remained in Russia, since it's legally prohibited to use them outside Russian border. That's why I think referendums on Russia-controlled territories are important, they will allow Kremlin to use conscripts in defence of these territories in accordance with Russian law.


I think a big problem is that in the media, and subsequently in here, russian forces and DNR and LNR forces keep getting mixed up /bundled together, and then things that are true in regards to some of these 3 get apllied to the others as well.

Like DNR and LNR are absolutely scraping the bottom of the manpower barrel while russia faces the problem you hinted at there where they have problems recruiting/getting forces in, without dropping the 'special military operation' act.

Its very hard to distinguish between russian forces and russian proxy forces in reportings.
Sent.
Profile Joined June 2012
Poland9284 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-24 18:51:21
July 24 2022 18:43 GMT
#3437
Well it is hard to understand why Kremlin is so reluctant to use Russia's core manpower while using ethnic Russians from their puppet states in eastern Ukraine like an 19th century imperialist power would use people from its African or Asian colonies.
You're now breathing manually
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11764 Posts
July 24 2022 19:06 GMT
#3438
Is it, though? Seems pretty easy to understand.
maybenexttime
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Poland5757 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-24 19:39:19
July 24 2022 19:23 GMT
#3439
On July 25 2022 03:43 Sent. wrote:
Well it is hard to understand why Kremlin is so reluctant to use Russia's core manpower while using ethnic Russians from their puppet states in eastern Ukraine like an 19th century imperialist power would use people from its African or Asian colonies.

Because most Russians are couch patriots by design. They don't mind a genocide next door, as long as they don't have to get their hands dirty.
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11764 Posts
July 24 2022 19:25 GMT
#3440
On July 25 2022 04:23 maybenexttime wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2022 03:43 Sent. wrote:
Well it is hard to understand why Kremlin is so reluctant to use Russia's core manpower while using ethnic Russians from their puppet states in eastern Ukraine like an 19th century imperialist power would use people from its African or Asian colonies.

Because most Russians are couch patriots by design. They don't mine a genocide next door, as long as they don't have to get their hands dirty.


Also, Russia is what matters to Putin. Russians get angry if lots of Russians die. If lots of people from some puppet state die, that doesn't really impact Russia itself a lot.
Prev 1 170 171 172 173 174 920 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
LiuLi Cup Grand Finals Playoff
CranKy Ducklings109
LiquipediaDiscussion
Patches Events
23:00
Open cup capped at 5400 MMR
PiGStarcraft440
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft426
WinterStarcraft352
RuFF_SC2 135
ProTech134
SpeCial 76
ROOTCatZ 20
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 4943
Bisu 4619
Dota 2
monkeys_forever408
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox426
Mew2King57
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor169
Other Games
summit1g8516
FrodaN3108
JimRising 499
C9.Mang0269
KnowMe238
ToD156
ViBE80
Chillindude12
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 200
• davetesta87
• musti20045 29
• HeavenSC 22
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5465
Other Games
• Scarra717
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
8h 27m
RSL Revival
8h 27m
Classic vs TriGGeR
Cure vs Cham
WardiTV Winter Champion…
10h 27m
OSC
10h 57m
BSL
18h 27m
Replay Cast
22h 27m
Replay Cast
1d 7h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 15h
OSC
1d 22h
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 21: Qualifier #1
PiG Sty Festival 7.0
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
Spring Cup 2026
ASL Season 21: Qualifier #2
RSL Revival: Season 4
WardiTV Winter 2026
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
CSLAN 4
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
NationLESS Cup
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.