• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:18
CEST 08:18
KST 15:18
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A: Rogue, Percival, Solar, Zoun11[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Inheritors16[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt2: All Star10Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists21[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Fresh Flow9
Community News
2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers25Maestros of the Game 2 announced92026 GSL Tour plans announced15Weekly Cups (April 6-12): herO doubles, "Villains" prevail1MaNa leaves Team Liquid25
StarCraft 2
General
Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A: Rogue, Percival, Solar, Zoun Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool MaNa leaves Team Liquid Maestros of the Game 2 announced
Tourneys
GSL Code S Season 1 (2026) SC2 INu's Battles#15 <BO.9 2Matches> WardiTV Spring Cup RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event SEL Masters #6 - Solar vs Classic (SC: Evo)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 523 Firewall Mutation # 522 Flip My Base Mutation # 521 Memorable Boss
Brood War
General
Pros React To: Leta vs Tulbo (ASL S21, Ro.8) ASL21 General Discussion [TOOL] Starcraft Chat Translator JaeDong's ASL S21 Ro16 Post-Review Missed out on ASL tickets - what are my options?
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro8 Day 2 [ASL21] Ro8 Day 1 ASL Season 21 LIVESTREAM with English Commentary [ASL21] Ro16 Group D
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Any training maps people recommend?
Other Games
General Games
Daigo vs Menard Best of 10 Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV Diablo IV
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread 3D technology/software discussion Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion McBoner: A hockey love story
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
streaming software Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Sexual Health Of Gamers
TrAiDoS
lurker extra damage testi…
StaticNine
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2046 users

Russo-Ukrainian War Thread - Page 172

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 170 171 172 173 174 927 Next
NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.
Deleted User 173346
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
16169 Posts
July 23 2022 23:22 GMT
#3421
--- Nuked ---
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands22308 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-23 23:28:56
July 23 2022 23:27 GMT
#3422
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?
If its coming from official US defence sources I don't see why it shouldn't be accurate.

But 85% of current active military is not the same as 85% of potential forces.

We know their recruitment is scrapping the bottom of the barrel and they have withdrawn forces from the Finnish border to send to Ukraine.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35172 Posts
July 24 2022 00:21 GMT
#3423
On July 24 2022 07:15 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 04:37 plasmidghost wrote:
Absolutely incredible news. If this holds up, how long do y'all think Russia can last in Ukraine? If this is their expenditure at the moment, it can't be past like, September, right?


Running out of smart munitions just means you start hitting a bunch of things near your target. You keep firing but more civilians die.

Hell, they'd get more inaccurate just from firing off that many rounds before even taking older rounds into account.
r00ty
Profile Joined November 2010
Germany1070 Posts
July 24 2022 09:57 GMT
#3424
Example of Russian artillery tactics from early june:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


That doesn't seem very effective.
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11824 Posts
July 24 2022 10:12 GMT
#3425
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.
xM(Z
Profile Joined November 2006
Romania5299 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-24 11:39:02
July 24 2022 11:36 GMT
#3426
some excerpts:
According to diplomats, under the terms of the deal:

Russia will not target ports while shipments are in transit
Ukrainian vessels will guide cargo ships through waters that have been mined
Turkey - supported by the United Nations - will inspect ships, to allay Russian fears of weapons smuggling
Russian exports of grain and fertiliser via the Black Sea will be facilitated.

The deal is valid for 120 days and the United Nations expects it to be renewed unless the war has ended by then. Work is to get underway immediately to establish inspection teams and staffing a Joint Coordination Center (JCC) in Istanbul overseen by members of all four parties to the agreement.

Ukrainian ports require about 10 days to prepare, so it will take a few weeks before vessels are moving in and out. "We are looking at a very quick rate of implementation," the official said.

Negotiations began in April when U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres raised the idea in separate meetings with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelenskiy of Ukraine.

it seems like Ukraine made a deal with Turkey and then Russia made a deal with Turkey; there were no direct Ukrainian-Russian deals/accords.

the line with "shipments in transit" is weird. if/when there is no (grain)transit, can russians bomb the ports?.

(edit: i would put the recent withdrawal of russian ships from the Black Sea under this deal too)
And my fury stands ready. I bring all your plans to nought. My bleak heart beats steady. 'Tis you whom I have sought.
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17740 Posts
July 24 2022 14:35 GMT
#3427
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?


You have to take into account that Russia hasn't sent their regular army there. Mostly just conscripts and regional forces (people they don't have to put casualty reports for public). At the beginning of conflict Russia had what, 200k troops sent there? With 40k dead you'd assume that at least twice that number are wounded or otherwise incapable of fighting, making it around 120k incapacitated troops so I'd estimate it at about 60%. That's just the troops, not sure about vehicles and other assets.

On July 24 2022 19:12 Simberto wrote:
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.


Yeah, but at the same time you don't see any trench lines or burned down armor there. So it seems like an excessive force to saturate an area. We don't really know the context but if it was to say rout a small unit of Ukrainians then it's extremely ineffective (expending thousands of artillery rounds to try and hunt down 20 people or so).
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
July 24 2022 16:28 GMT
#3428
Poland has agreed to buy S. Korean armaments etc. Makes me wonder if Poland is acting as a middle man and will quietly let Ukraine "borrow them" seeing how I don't think S. Korean hardware is not NATO specs etc.

Poland is gearing up to purchase tanks, howitzers and fighter planes from South Korea as it looks to bolster its armed forces.

"We're signing contracts next week," Polish Defense Minister Mariusz Blaszczak said in a tweet on Friday.

The agreement includes 48 FA-50 light combat fighter jets, 180 K2 "Black Panther" tanks and an unspecified number of K9 howitzers, wPolityce website reported, quoting Blaszczak.

"With this contract, we will significantly increase Poland's security and the strength of the Polish Army. Fast delivery and industry development are key! We reconciled the often divergent interests of soldiers and the arms industry," Blaszczak said in his tweet.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Sent.
Profile Joined June 2012
Poland9297 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-24 16:44:42
July 24 2022 16:41 GMT
#3429
Nah, we're filling up the space left by the Soviet gear we sent Ukraine. The Abrams tank deal was disappointing in certain aspects so decision was made to buy different tanks instead of going all-in on the American tanks.

There were also some talks about nuclear energy cooperation with Korean companies so maybe our government believes there's something to gain from developing a closer relationship with Korea.
You're now breathing manually
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11824 Posts
July 24 2022 16:44 GMT
#3430
On July 24 2022 23:35 Manit0u wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?


You have to take into account that Russia hasn't sent their regular army there. Mostly just conscripts and regional forces (people they don't have to put casualty reports for public). At the beginning of conflict Russia had what, 200k troops sent there? With 40k dead you'd assume that at least twice that number are wounded or otherwise incapable of fighting, making it around 120k incapacitated troops so I'd estimate it at about 60%. That's just the troops, not sure about vehicles and other assets.

Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 19:12 Simberto wrote:
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.


Yeah, but at the same time you don't see any trench lines or burned down armor there. So it seems like an excessive force to saturate an area. We don't really know the context but if it was to say rout a small unit of Ukrainians then it's extremely ineffective (expending thousands of artillery rounds to try and hunt down 20 people or so).


True, if that is the case.

I want Russia to fail as quickly as possible as the next guy, but i am just a bit more careful, and a "wait and see" type of guy. There seems to be way too much "Russia will fail basically next week" stuff going on.

I don't know the context, so i don't try to use it to make some kind of point. And Russia firing a lot of artillery rounds doesn't mean that they won't be able to keep doing that.

I am of the firm opinion that if the west wanted, they could crush Russia with pure industrial might. The west can simply invest a lot more money over a much longer period of time than Russia can. But as long as Russia wants it to, this war will keep going. And i think there are quite a few far too optimistic takes around.
Deleted User 137586
Profile Joined January 2011
7859 Posts
July 24 2022 17:22 GMT
#3431
On July 25 2022 01:41 Sent. wrote:
Nah, we're filling up the space left by the Soviet gear we sent Ukraine. The Abrams tank deal was disappointing in certain aspects so decision was made to buy different tanks instead of going all-in on the American tanks.

There were also some talks about nuclear energy cooperation with Korean companies so maybe our government believes there's something to gain from developing a closer relationship with Korea.


Yeah, this is it

Estonia is also sending older stuff and replacing it with S Korean upgrades.
Cry 'havoc' and let slip the dogs of war
Ardias
Profile Joined January 2014
Russian Federation618 Posts
July 24 2022 17:39 GMT
#3432
On July 24 2022 23:35 Manit0u wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?


You have to take into account that Russia hasn't sent their regular army there. Mostly just conscripts and regional forces (people they don't have to put casualty reports for public). At the beginning of conflict Russia had what, 200k troops sent there? With 40k dead you'd assume that at least twice that number are wounded or otherwise incapable of fighting, making it around 120k incapacitated troops so I'd estimate it at about 60%. That's just the troops, not sure about vehicles and other assets.

Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 19:12 Simberto wrote:
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.


Yeah, but at the same time you don't see any trench lines or burned down armor there. So it seems like an excessive force to saturate an area. We don't really know the context but if it was to say rout a small unit of Ukrainians then it's extremely ineffective (expending thousands of artillery rounds to try and hunt down 20 people or so).

It's the opposite. Russia sent only regular troops there, while conscripts remained in Russia, since it's legally prohibited to use them outside Russian border. That's why I think referendums on Russia-controlled territories are important, they will allow Kremlin to use conscripts in defence of these territories in accordance with Russian law.
Mess with the best or die like the rest.
Silvanel
Profile Blog Joined March 2003
Poland4751 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-24 17:48:52
July 24 2022 17:45 GMT
#3433
@Ghanburighan
Poland has already worked with S. Korea in military sector (Krab is built on Korean chassis). Also, Abrams is too heavy to be used in some areas of Poland, so if we want the option to use tanks everywhere we need another type. Judging by the size of the deal, there is probably some tech transfer involved. In my opinion, we will be building a Polish version of K2 and/or K9. Those purchases won't leave our borders.
Pathetic Greta hater.
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17740 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-24 18:03:46
July 24 2022 18:01 GMT
#3434
On July 25 2022 02:39 Ardias wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 23:35 Manit0u wrote:
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?


You have to take into account that Russia hasn't sent their regular army there. Mostly just conscripts and regional forces (people they don't have to put casualty reports for public). At the beginning of conflict Russia had what, 200k troops sent there? With 40k dead you'd assume that at least twice that number are wounded or otherwise incapable of fighting, making it around 120k incapacitated troops so I'd estimate it at about 60%. That's just the troops, not sure about vehicles and other assets.

On July 24 2022 19:12 Simberto wrote:
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.


Yeah, but at the same time you don't see any trench lines or burned down armor there. So it seems like an excessive force to saturate an area. We don't really know the context but if it was to say rout a small unit of Ukrainians then it's extremely ineffective (expending thousands of artillery rounds to try and hunt down 20 people or so).

It's the opposite. Russia sent only regular troops there, while conscripts remained in Russia, since it's legally prohibited to use them outside Russian border. That's why I think referendums on Russia-controlled territories are important, they will allow Kremlin to use conscripts in defence of these territories in accordance with Russian law.


Then how come the people reporting back home or captured by the Ukrainians are saying they were basically drafted and sent to the front without even having any training at all? Most of the Russian forces were people conscripted in the LPR/DNR, conscripts from rural areas or forces of other republics (Chechens, Wagner Group etc.). Aside from a few units of their regular troops in the form of VDV, some marines and spetsnaz there weren't really any signs of their regular army. Most pictures we get are those groups of people with random mismatched equipment and very few wearing any modern gear, body armor or even uniform outfits.

Unless you want to tell me that regular infantrymen in Russia go into combat wearing sneakers and colorful school backpacks?

Maybe there are some regular troops but I think they're being held back and away from the front. There were also reports that Russia didn't want to send people from around Moscow region etc. as they'd have to report casualties on them and it wouldn't sit well with people.
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands22308 Posts
July 24 2022 18:05 GMT
#3435
On July 25 2022 03:01 Manit0u wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2022 02:39 Ardias wrote:
On July 24 2022 23:35 Manit0u wrote:
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?


You have to take into account that Russia hasn't sent their regular army there. Mostly just conscripts and regional forces (people they don't have to put casualty reports for public). At the beginning of conflict Russia had what, 200k troops sent there? With 40k dead you'd assume that at least twice that number are wounded or otherwise incapable of fighting, making it around 120k incapacitated troops so I'd estimate it at about 60%. That's just the troops, not sure about vehicles and other assets.

On July 24 2022 19:12 Simberto wrote:
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.


Yeah, but at the same time you don't see any trench lines or burned down armor there. So it seems like an excessive force to saturate an area. We don't really know the context but if it was to say rout a small unit of Ukrainians then it's extremely ineffective (expending thousands of artillery rounds to try and hunt down 20 people or so).

It's the opposite. Russia sent only regular troops there, while conscripts remained in Russia, since it's legally prohibited to use them outside Russian border. That's why I think referendums on Russia-controlled territories are important, they will allow Kremlin to use conscripts in defence of these territories in accordance with Russian law.


Then how come the people reporting back home or captured by the Ukrainians are saying they were basically drafted and sent to the front without even having any training at all? Most of the Russian forces were people conscripted in the LPR/DNR, conscripts from rural areas or forces of other republics (Chechens, Wagner Group etc.). Aside from a few units of their regular troops in the form of VDV, some marines and spetsnaz there weren't really any signs of their regular army. Most pictures we get are those groups of people with random mismatched equipment and very few wearing any modern gear, body armor or even uniform outfits.

Unless you want to tell me that regular infantrymen in Russia go into combat wearing sneakers and colorful school backpacks?
Its legal technicalities.

Russia has a mandatory conscription, those conscripts cannot, legally, be send into Ukraine.

LPR/DNR are not official Russian provinces, conscripts there are not bound by such rules. Nor are ad-hoc units Russia is trying to hastily put together by offering people very high monetary incentives.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Artesimo
Profile Joined February 2015
Germany572 Posts
July 24 2022 18:06 GMT
#3436
On July 25 2022 02:39 Ardias wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 24 2022 23:35 Manit0u wrote:
On July 24 2022 08:22 plasmidghost wrote:
I had meant to point out the Russians using 85% of their military in Ukraine so far, but that makes me wonder, how accurate would that statement be?


You have to take into account that Russia hasn't sent their regular army there. Mostly just conscripts and regional forces (people they don't have to put casualty reports for public). At the beginning of conflict Russia had what, 200k troops sent there? With 40k dead you'd assume that at least twice that number are wounded or otherwise incapable of fighting, making it around 120k incapacitated troops so I'd estimate it at about 60%. That's just the troops, not sure about vehicles and other assets.

On July 24 2022 19:12 Simberto wrote:
Quantity has a quality of its own.

I wouldn't wanna be in that field while that is going on.


Yeah, but at the same time you don't see any trench lines or burned down armor there. So it seems like an excessive force to saturate an area. We don't really know the context but if it was to say rout a small unit of Ukrainians then it's extremely ineffective (expending thousands of artillery rounds to try and hunt down 20 people or so).

It's the opposite. Russia sent only regular troops there, while conscripts remained in Russia, since it's legally prohibited to use them outside Russian border. That's why I think referendums on Russia-controlled territories are important, they will allow Kremlin to use conscripts in defence of these territories in accordance with Russian law.


I think a big problem is that in the media, and subsequently in here, russian forces and DNR and LNR forces keep getting mixed up /bundled together, and then things that are true in regards to some of these 3 get apllied to the others as well.

Like DNR and LNR are absolutely scraping the bottom of the manpower barrel while russia faces the problem you hinted at there where they have problems recruiting/getting forces in, without dropping the 'special military operation' act.

Its very hard to distinguish between russian forces and russian proxy forces in reportings.
Sent.
Profile Joined June 2012
Poland9297 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-24 18:51:21
July 24 2022 18:43 GMT
#3437
Well it is hard to understand why Kremlin is so reluctant to use Russia's core manpower while using ethnic Russians from their puppet states in eastern Ukraine like an 19th century imperialist power would use people from its African or Asian colonies.
You're now breathing manually
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11824 Posts
July 24 2022 19:06 GMT
#3438
Is it, though? Seems pretty easy to understand.
maybenexttime
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Poland5807 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-24 19:39:19
July 24 2022 19:23 GMT
#3439
On July 25 2022 03:43 Sent. wrote:
Well it is hard to understand why Kremlin is so reluctant to use Russia's core manpower while using ethnic Russians from their puppet states in eastern Ukraine like an 19th century imperialist power would use people from its African or Asian colonies.

Because most Russians are couch patriots by design. They don't mind a genocide next door, as long as they don't have to get their hands dirty.
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11824 Posts
July 24 2022 19:25 GMT
#3440
On July 25 2022 04:23 maybenexttime wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2022 03:43 Sent. wrote:
Well it is hard to understand why Kremlin is so reluctant to use Russia's core manpower while using ethnic Russians from their puppet states in eastern Ukraine like an 19th century imperialist power would use people from its African or Asian colonies.

Because most Russians are couch patriots by design. They don't mine a genocide next door, as long as they don't have to get their hands dirty.


Also, Russia is what matters to Putin. Russians get angry if lots of Russians die. If lots of people from some puppet state die, that doesn't really impact Russia itself a lot.
Prev 1 170 171 172 173 174 927 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 42m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 143
ProTech124
Livibee 58
StarCraft: Brood War
Mind 1209
Hm[arnc] 314
Pusan 186
Bale 26
ZergMaN 17
yabsab 7
Icarus 6
Dota 2
monkeys_forever686
NeuroSwarm189
League of Legends
JimRising 717
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1341
Other Games
summit1g7186
WinterStarcraft574
C9.Mang0534
Sick156
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick553
BasetradeTV236
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream132
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1088
• Stunt431
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
2h 42m
Escore
3h 42m
INu's Battles
4h 42m
Classic vs ByuN
SHIN vs ByuN
OSC
6h 42m
Big Brain Bouts
9h 42m
Replay Cast
17h 42m
Replay Cast
1d 2h
RSL Revival
1d 3h
Classic vs GgMaChine
Rogue vs Maru
WardiTV Invitational
1d 4h
IPSL
1d 9h
Ret vs Art_Of_Turtle
Radley vs TBD
[ Show More ]
BSL
1d 12h
Replay Cast
1d 17h
RSL Revival
2 days
herO vs TriGGeR
NightMare vs Solar
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
BSL
2 days
IPSL
2 days
eOnzErG vs TBD
G5 vs Nesh
Patches Events
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Jaedong vs Light
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Snow vs Flash
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
GSL
5 days
Classic vs Cure
Maru vs Rogue
GSL
6 days
SHIN vs Zoun
ByuN vs herO
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-04-29
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Escore Tournament S2: W5
KK 2v2 League Season 1
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
2026 GSL S1
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
2026 GSL S2
RSL Revival: Season 5
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.