but.. can you take the over on NEVER?
2020 US Election - Page 271
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
FlaShFTW
United States10399 Posts
but.. can you take the over on NEVER? | ||
|
MockHamill
Sweden1798 Posts
Just GG out and take the loss as a man and do not accuse everyone of cheating. | ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
On November 08 2020 11:15 LegalLord wrote: Your mistake is not in seeing student debt as important, but in thinking that it's somehow unique. There are many classes of debts in the US that shackle people to a poor economic situation. Being stuck with student debts is not much different than a car payment, house payment, medical bill, etc., that people can't afford that stops them from making other purchases more beneficial to the consumption-based economy. Each of these are trillion-dollar debt traps that show no sign of slowing down. The only real unique thing about student debt is that it's majority owned by the government, which means I suppose they could write it off if they're up for a haircut of a third of the federal government's assets. They're obviously no more interested in that than in unwinding the circumstances of all the other forms of self-destructive debt the US has spun up over the years for the majority of the population. Not that it matters anyways, since young people don't vote. Not worth wasting the effort it'd take to help them. Uh . . . you can't discharge student loan debt in bankruptcy. Surely you know this and just forgot it. That makes it unlike any of the forms of debt you are comparing it to. Moreover, student debt is not like a mortgage. It doesn't appreciate. You aren't going to build equity in something by paying down student loan debt. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
On November 08 2020 14:05 GreenHorizons wrote: I think the question is whether people that identified he's lost a step or few over the last decade or so are supposed to be included in the critique. Because that'd include people from Andrea Mitchell to Corey Booker to Julian Castro. Retreating to “technically worse than earlier in his life” is nonsense with how many people were saying well beyond that. Democrats slinging mud during a primary is stupid too. Plenty of asshats both here and on various other websites, such as Bernie themed subreddits, all convinced themselves he had late stage dementia. It was dog shit. Anyone who watches Biden’s speech tonight is not able to say there is anything remotely worrying about his mental condition. My point is that desperate, pathetic mud slinging needs to be remembered for what it was. We need to remember who said a bunch of stupid shit and which communities encouraged it. Then we need to rub their faces in it. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
https://www.opb.org/article/2020/11/04/ted-wheeler-sarah-iannarone-teressa-raiford-portland-mayor-election-results/ | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On November 08 2020 16:10 Mohdoo wrote: Retreating to “technically worse than earlier in his life” is nonsense with how many people were saying well beyond that. Democrats slinging mud during a primary is stupid too. Plenty of asshats both here and on various other websites, such as Bernie themed subreddits, all convinced themselves he had late stage dementia. It was dog shit. Anyone who watches Biden’s speech tonight is not able to say there is anything remotely worrying about his mental condition. My point is that desperate, pathetic mud slinging needs to be remembered for what it was. We need to remember who said a bunch of stupid shit and which communities encouraged it. Then we need to rub their faces in it. I can't help but feel that you're strawmanning someone really hard right now. Looking back at the various US Pol / debate threads, I see plenty of references to "cognitive decline" in the abstract, "early-stage dementia" in the more specific, or just general talk about mental state, but that's a whole world of difference from what you're claiming they said now. You may want to be more specific if you have people who you think said that he has "late stage dementia" - a very pointed and aggressive accusation that goes well beyond any of the general claims a lot of people made about potential mental decline. Because there's little evidence that the latter was claimed by a large contingency of "dumb far left dip shits" and one well-spoken speech hardly refutes any of the former claims. So yeah, put up or shut up. This whole thing reeks of deep hypocrisy in that it so very harshly criticizes an attitude that you yourself are very guilty of. | ||
|
BlueBird.
United States3890 Posts
On November 08 2020 16:30 Mohdoo wrote: Funny Portland news: the incumbent mayor, who is basically seen as outdated and unable to fulfill his duties, ended up winning because a silly write in campaign ended up with 13% of the vote, eliminating the Bernie endorsed candidate in doing so. https://www.opb.org/article/2020/11/04/ted-wheeler-sarah-iannarone-teressa-raiford-portland-mayor-election-results/ Teressa is an amazing member of our activist community. She’s also just a really good person. Her and her organization Don’t shoot Portland have done a ton of work here locally and calling it silly does not address what happened this election. Sarah failed to reach the community that you are blaming. Bernie just throwing out an endorsement doesn’t really do it as much as I like Bernie. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
On November 08 2020 16:49 BlueBird. wrote: Teressa is an amazing member of our activist community. She’s also just a really good person. Her and her organization Don’t shoot Portland have done a ton of work here locally and calling it silly does not address what happened this election. Sarah failed to reach the community that you are blaming. Bernie just throwing out an endorsement doesn’t really do it as much as I like Bernie. I agree with everything you are saying. It doesn’t change the fact that the result is amazingly worse than it would have been with Sarah. Wheeler is a total disaster. For those of you not from Portland, this is like Tim Kaine being elected because Bernie and Yang split the vote. Edit: and to be clear, I would have chosen Teressa over Sarah if I felt like there was a remote chance of winning. I was really worried voting for Teressa would lead to wheeler. Here we are lol ![]() | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23946 Posts
On November 08 2020 16:46 LegalLord wrote: I can't help but feel that you're strawmanning someone really hard right now. Looking back at the various US Pol / debate threads, I see plenty of references to "cognitive decline" in the abstract, "early-stage dementia" in the more specific, or just general talk about mental state, but that's a whole world of difference from what you're claiming they said now. You may want to be more specific if you have people who you think said that he has "late stage dementia" - a very pointed and aggressive accusation that goes well beyond any of the general claims a lot of people made about potential mental decline. Because there's little evidence that the latter was claimed by a large contingency of "dumb far left dip shits" and one well-spoken speech hardly refutes any of the former claims. So yeah, put up or shut up. This whole thing reeks of deep hypocrisy in that it so very harshly criticizes an attitude that you yourself are very guilty of. Yeah, that's what I remember. I have no idea what the Bernie themed subreddits were like, but I also wouldn't consider Bernie folks far left. | ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France8078 Posts
But maybe it's inevitable since he generates very visceral enthusiasm, which is of course a quality. As for the whole "Biden is senile / in pronounced mental decline" and so on, it's not very interesting and never was imo. It just tell the story that we all know, namely that the guy must have been a very, very slippery target during those campaigns if his opponents didn't find anything better. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23946 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18291 Posts
On November 08 2020 08:09 Zambrah wrote: We should make a list of what can be accomplished via EO and what has to go through Congress, I'm deeply curious about what I need to be demanding from Biden and what I can safely have no expectations for. Pretty much this. I don't see how it's Biden's job to pass legislation. He's the head of the executive branch. He can obviously discuss what legislation he'd like to see congress pass, but unless they get off their asses and write those bills, it isn't going to happen. Just like the ACA wasn't really Obamacare, but more like PelosiReidCare. Just like how Trump could pull out of the Paris accords because there was never any action from congress making it binding. Biden should "rejoin", but more importantly, push the EPA to do everything in their power to put the USA back on track to meet them. The rest is up to congress. If McTurtle maintains his control over the senate, I don't see how any centrist, let alone progressive, legislation is getting passed. It isn't even that it won't have the votes, it's that he won't even bring these proposals up for voting. Healthcare needs reforming fairly urgently, tho, and with Covid ravaging, it seems there might even be some political will to do something there, even from Republicans. it doesn't look like EO's can do much there, so it's on congress. Passing a universal healthcare bill would be pretty huge, especially if it's a bill that can't be torpedoed by the supreme court. | ||
|
KungKras
Sweden484 Posts
On November 08 2020 13:47 goiflin wrote: Don't know, how many of those do you think Obama is going to attend? Is it possible to see which presidents attend it and when? | ||
|
Slydie
1935 Posts
| ||
|
Simberto
Germany11835 Posts
On November 08 2020 18:35 Acrofales wrote: Pretty much this. I don't see how it's Biden's job to pass legislation. He's the head of the executive branch. He can obviously discuss what legislation he'd like to see congress pass, but unless they get off their asses and write those bills, it isn't going to happen. Just like the ACA wasn't really Obamacare, but more like PelosiReidCare. Just like how Trump could pull out of the Paris accords because there was never any action from congress making it binding. Biden should "rejoin", but more importantly, push the EPA to do everything in their power to put the USA back on track to meet them. The rest is up to congress. If McTurtle maintains his control over the senate, I don't see how any centrist, let alone progressive, legislation is getting passed. It isn't even that it won't have the votes, it's that he won't even bring these proposals up for voting. Healthcare needs reforming fairly urgently, tho, and with Covid ravaging, it seems there might even be some political will to do something there, even from Republicans. it doesn't look like EO's can do much there, so it's on congress. Passing a universal healthcare bill would be pretty huge, especially if it's a bill that can't be torpedoed by the supreme court. The turtle will never let anything get through senate which might make a democrat president look good. Or which would help people. The only thing possible to get through would be major taxcuts for the superrich. Do you honestly think that the turtle would allow a universal healthcare bill through? They would negotiate, turn it into a broken mess that still tries to preserve the broken shit you currently have, and then still not vote on it. If you want good stuff, people need to stop rewarding the shit the regressives pull. | ||
|
Zambrah
United States7393 Posts
EOs, EOs, EOs, focus on midterms, grassroots organizing to get Congress ASAP, but EO EO EO EO EO EO EO in the meantime. No excuses for Biden, no prioritizing based on anything other than how fast Biden can sign shit. | ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9847 Posts
On November 08 2020 19:53 Zambrah wrote: Biden is probably the worst possible choice to enable a presidency that acts decisively without Republican support sadly. Hopefully we can pressure this administration into using it's EO powers to do what it can do, I think we're REALLY going to have to let people know what is possible without Republican support though, they're going to hide behind "uhh... doesnt that require Congress? Not their fault!" and the Democrats are going to continue to coast by on their greasy shitty little asses unless we grease our pans with them and light a fire under their asses. EOs, EOs, EOs, focus on midterms, grassroots organizing to get Congress ASAP, but EO EO EO EO EO EO EO in the meantime. No excuses for Biden, no prioritizing based on anything other than how fast Biden can sign shit. I see AOC has already started on their asses haha. The united democratic party is over i reckon. Time for the arguing to begin again. | ||
|
Zambrah
United States7393 Posts
| ||
|
farvacola
United States18857 Posts
| ||
|
KungKras
Sweden484 Posts
On November 08 2020 20:06 Zambrah wrote: Fuck yeah, unity can suck ass unless it directly serves the American people as far as I'm concerned. And I'm 100% positive that Biden's version of unity doesn't. Agreed. The fight against Trump has ended. The fight against Biden begins now. | ||
| ||
