|
On November 05 2020 04:42 GoShox wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2020 04:39 pmh wrote: Its simply amazing how cnn can fill 24 hours+ with this lol. John king must have repeated everything he has been saying at least 10+ times by now. Its a waiting game now kinda,barely any news coming in. The guy is a beast. I went to sleep at ~2:30 my time, woke up at ~9:20 and haven't watched a second of CNN without him present
Cocaine is a hell of a drug.
|
On November 05 2020 04:35 Shingi11 wrote: So the question becomes how do moderates and progressive move forward together. Its become clear that progressive will not hold their nose and vote for a candidate they don't want unlike the republican party that will vote for literal garage if it has a R next. Moderate dems need to stop hoping that pipe dream happen after 2 elections of progressives showing there displeasure while progressive need to understand a large part of the country has a very big aversion to them. The big question is how we beige that gap.
The progressive plan should be something like this:
Go for the jugular and rip all the establishment corporatists to shreds in the democratic primary in the hope of taking over the party.
If that fails: Vote democrat in the presidential election and use large scale protests and strikes and any and all other forms of pressure to get some policy consessions if the corporatist wins over the republican. And fight hard to primary establishment democrats in congressional races.
So in short. Fight when you can. Ally when it's necessary.
|
On November 05 2020 04:23 Nebuchad wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2020 04:12 Biff The Understudy wrote:On November 05 2020 04:10 Nebuchad wrote:On November 05 2020 04:02 Nebuchad wrote: As some of you might remember, I work in a newspaper, and I just wanted to say once again that the coverage of the US that we give is INSANELY bad.
I've just started reading this and there are like 4 factually incorrect informations. We're publishing that Trump is in good shape, that Biden is very favoured in Arizona but it's unclear in Wisconsin and Michigan - of course Biden should win all of those but his percentage chance of winning Wisconsin and Michigan is higher than his percentage chance of winning Arizona. No mention of Georgia or NC at all. We interviewed an expert who says it's "likely" that the rest of the votes are mail-in ballots (...)
I can't do anything about this so I'm just going to whine here.
This one comes from our journalists but usually we get articles from Libération and they are atrocious as well. Closing on Trump solidifying his base of poor white voters when he's been improving in every other category and losing with white men. It's not even malicious, they just literally have no idea what they're saying. I wish it was malicious ffs. Weird. How is that? Is it a local newspaper? It is, yeah. But usually we get our international articles from Libération and what they write there about the US is preeetty shit as well. I feel you. Had too much to do today to check how we're going to present the election tomorrow (we're mostly using dpa-content) but when I finished the local part of the front page I saw a placeholder title about Trump's call for a SCOTUS-decision and while that won't stand the responsible journalists rarely reflect what they are doing. If it is a lie they'll tell you: "But we have to report what was said and people only need to turn 2 pages and read 100 lines and there'll be explained that it's a lie and nobody will ever fall for that." Twitter is all just internet-nonsense (when that comes up I usually go through the pages and ask them why x,y and z wasn't reported last week, when my nonsense-bubble told me about it).
Journalism is in a horrible spot and yeah at our place... I'm sorry I'm not strong enough to change that.
|
On November 05 2020 04:48 KungKras wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2020 04:35 Shingi11 wrote: So the question becomes how do moderates and progressive move forward together. Its become clear that progressive will not hold their nose and vote for a candidate they don't want unlike the republican party that will vote for literal garage if it has a R next. Moderate dems need to stop hoping that pipe dream happen after 2 elections of progressives showing there displeasure while progressive need to understand a large part of the country has a very big aversion to them. The big question is how we beige that gap. The progressive plan should be something like this: Go for the jugular and rip all the establishment corporatists to shreds in the democratic primary in the hope if taking over the party. If that fails: Vote democrat in the presidential election and use large scale protests and strikes and any and all other forms of pressure to get some policy consessions if the corporatist wins over the republican. And fight hard to primary establishment democrats in congressional races. So in short. Fight when you can. Ally when it's necessary.
Or just do all of the above no matter who is in power. Organize, Strike, while refusing to listen to neoliberals. That teach everyone about solidarity. I think all of this will be more effective towards millennial, and Gen Z'ers. As they are warped 24 hour news like the older society seems to be.
|
The Trump Campaign is starting to flood supporters with "DEFEND DEMOCRACY!" emails
|
On November 05 2020 04:35 Shingi11 wrote: So the question becomes how do moderates and progressive move forward together. Its become clear that progressive will not hold their nose and vote for a candidate they don't want unlike the republican party that will vote for literal garage if it has a R next. Moderate dems need to stop hoping that pipe dream happen after 2 elections of progressives showing there displeasure while progressive need to understand a large part of the country has a very big aversion to them. The big question is how we beige that gap.
Biggest hope is probably to get the Republican party to keep going right until they go too far and no longer get seats. Then you end up with the Democratic party splitting into two and the left half of that split can be further left than the current one. Risk is if this slow slide to the right doesn't lose support but gains it, then you no longer have a democracy.
|
On November 05 2020 04:48 KungKras wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2020 04:35 Shingi11 wrote: So the question becomes how do moderates and progressive move forward together. Its become clear that progressive will not hold their nose and vote for a candidate they don't want unlike the republican party that will vote for literal garage if it has a R next. Moderate dems need to stop hoping that pipe dream happen after 2 elections of progressives showing there displeasure while progressive need to understand a large part of the country has a very big aversion to them. The big question is how we beige that gap. The progressive plan should be something like this: Go for the jugular and rip all the establishment corporatists to shreds in the democratic primary in the hope if taking over the party. If that fails: Vote democrat in the presidential election and use large scale protests and strikes and any and all other forms of pressure to get some policy consessions if the corporatist wins over the republican. And fight hard to primary establishment democrats in congressional races. So in short. Fight when you can. Ally when it's necessary.
Progressives have shown they will bleed out on there own sword if they don't get what they want.
Not to say it is all there fault. While they are still in the minority of the dems, moderates need to not just ignore them. They have enough of a voice that it needs to start being heard.
|
On November 05 2020 04:56 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2020 04:48 KungKras wrote:On November 05 2020 04:35 Shingi11 wrote: So the question becomes how do moderates and progressive move forward together. Its become clear that progressive will not hold their nose and vote for a candidate they don't want unlike the republican party that will vote for literal garage if it has a R next. Moderate dems need to stop hoping that pipe dream happen after 2 elections of progressives showing there displeasure while progressive need to understand a large part of the country has a very big aversion to them. The big question is how we beige that gap. The progressive plan should be something like this: Go for the jugular and rip all the establishment corporatists to shreds in the democratic primary in the hope if taking over the party. If that fails: Vote democrat in the presidential election and use large scale protests and strikes and any and all other forms of pressure to get some policy consessions if the corporatist wins over the republican. And fight hard to primary establishment democrats in congressional races. So in short. Fight when you can. Ally when it's necessary. Or just do all of the above no matter who is in power. Organize, Strike, while refusing to listen to neoliberals. Refusing to listen is a grrrreat strategy.
It's not the establishment corporate neoliberal elite or whatnot that progressive need to convince. It's folks that at the moment they are scaring away.
|
On November 05 2020 04:58 Yurie wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2020 04:35 Shingi11 wrote: So the question becomes how do moderates and progressive move forward together. Its become clear that progressive will not hold their nose and vote for a candidate they don't want unlike the republican party that will vote for literal garage if it has a R next. Moderate dems need to stop hoping that pipe dream happen after 2 elections of progressives showing there displeasure while progressive need to understand a large part of the country has a very big aversion to them. The big question is how we beige that gap. Biggest hope is probably to get the Republican party to keep going right until they go too far and no longer get seats. Then you end up with the Democratic party splitting into two and the left half of that split can be further left than the current one. Risk is if this slow slide to the right doesn't lose support but gains it, then you no longer have a democracy.
God that is scary prospect though. Dems are just barely treading water at the moment. With a split you risk Republicans just sweeping everything
|
United States10402 Posts
PA updated: Biden only trails by 400k votes now. Still almost 20% left.
|
United States10402 Posts
Nate Cohn from NYT feels pretty confident that Arizona and PA should be in the Biden column after all the votes are counted. The new PA updates are in line with Biden managing to catch up.
|
On November 05 2020 05:03 FlaShFTW wrote: PA updated: Biden only trails by 400k votes now. Still almost 20% left.
At the rate it's going, is it likely that PA will flip to Biden?
|
|
|
On November 05 2020 04:38 m4ini wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2020 04:35 Shingi11 wrote: So the question becomes how do moderates and progressive move forward together. Its become clear that progressive will not hold their nose and vote for a candidate they don't want unlike the republican party that will vote for literal garage if it has a R next. Moderate dems need to stop hoping that pipe dream happen after 2 elections of progressives showing there displeasure while progressive need to understand a large part of the country has a very big aversion to them. The big question is how we beige that gap. Put up the most progressive candidate you can find in 4, maybe 8 years. Watch said candidate either win by a landslide, or get absolutely vaporised in the election. And then: take the hint. Progressives need to find a message of socialist policies that resonate for rural America. That’s tough. I also honestly think Democrats need to retreat a bit on abortion. The idea of “the woman is completely the only person who matters” isn’t a winning argument
|
On November 05 2020 04:50 smr wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2020 04:23 Nebuchad wrote:On November 05 2020 04:12 Biff The Understudy wrote:On November 05 2020 04:10 Nebuchad wrote:On November 05 2020 04:02 Nebuchad wrote: As some of you might remember, I work in a newspaper, and I just wanted to say once again that the coverage of the US that we give is INSANELY bad.
I've just started reading this and there are like 4 factually incorrect informations. We're publishing that Trump is in good shape, that Biden is very favoured in Arizona but it's unclear in Wisconsin and Michigan - of course Biden should win all of those but his percentage chance of winning Wisconsin and Michigan is higher than his percentage chance of winning Arizona. No mention of Georgia or NC at all. We interviewed an expert who says it's "likely" that the rest of the votes are mail-in ballots (...)
I can't do anything about this so I'm just going to whine here.
This one comes from our journalists but usually we get articles from Libération and they are atrocious as well. Closing on Trump solidifying his base of poor white voters when he's been improving in every other category and losing with white men. It's not even malicious, they just literally have no idea what they're saying. I wish it was malicious ffs. Weird. How is that? Is it a local newspaper? It is, yeah. But usually we get our international articles from Libération and what they write there about the US is preeetty shit as well. I feel you. Had too much to do today to check how we're going to present the election tomorrow (we're mostly using dpa-content) but when I finished the local part of the front page I saw a placeholder title about Trump's call for a SCOTUS-decision and while that won't stand the responsible journalists rarely reflect what they are doing. If it is a lie they'll tell you: "But we have to report what was said and people only need to turn 2 pages and read 100 lines and there'll be explained that it's a lie and nobody will ever fall for that." Twitter is all just internet-nonsense (when that comes up I usually go through the pages and ask them why x,y and z wasn't reported last week, when my nonsense-bubble told me about it). Journalism is in a horrible spot and yeah at our place... I'm sorry I'm not strong enough to change that.
A few years ago some leftist tried to go spit on Trump at one of his rallies, and Trump said that it was an attack by a radical muslim. So we published that Trump had said that. I tried to get them to include the fact that it was not true, because it was obviously not true, but that was dangerous, so we didn't. And of course it's not important news, so we never mentioned the incident again.
Which means that as far as our readers know, Trump was attacked by a radical muslim at one of his rallies. o/.
|
On November 05 2020 05:14 Mohdoo wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2020 04:38 m4ini wrote:On November 05 2020 04:35 Shingi11 wrote: So the question becomes how do moderates and progressive move forward together. Its become clear that progressive will not hold their nose and vote for a candidate they don't want unlike the republican party that will vote for literal garage if it has a R next. Moderate dems need to stop hoping that pipe dream happen after 2 elections of progressives showing there displeasure while progressive need to understand a large part of the country has a very big aversion to them. The big question is how we beige that gap. Put up the most progressive candidate you can find in 4, maybe 8 years. Watch said candidate either win by a landslide, or get absolutely vaporised in the election. And then: take the hint. Progressives need to find a message of socialist policies that resonate for rural America. That’s tough. I also honestly think Democrats need to retreat a bit on abortion. The idea of “the woman is completely the only person who matters” isn’t a winning argument
I honestly think Republicans need to retreat a bit on abortion. The idea of "the fetus is completely the only person who matters" isn't a winning argument.
|
On November 05 2020 05:10 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2020 05:03 FlaShFTW wrote: PA updated: Biden only trails by 400k votes now. Still almost 20% left. At the rate it's going, is it likely that PA will flip to Biden?
At this point my impression is that it will be close, but not flipping to Biden would require the remaining sample of mail-in ballots to be worse for him than the already processed ones. Which, unfortunately, is entirely possible, and won't be known until Friday.
|
I think ranked voting and having more parties than two would deal a big blow to the bullshit gridlock we have. Imagine if we had more choices than d and r.
|
PA is going to be an important buffer. Biden does not need it but Trump is going to pull some dictatorship stuff. Give Biden some wiggle room from the Trump malarkey.
|
On November 05 2020 05:14 Mohdoo wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2020 04:38 m4ini wrote:On November 05 2020 04:35 Shingi11 wrote: So the question becomes how do moderates and progressive move forward together. Its become clear that progressive will not hold their nose and vote for a candidate they don't want unlike the republican party that will vote for literal garage if it has a R next. Moderate dems need to stop hoping that pipe dream happen after 2 elections of progressives showing there displeasure while progressive need to understand a large part of the country has a very big aversion to them. The big question is how we beige that gap. Put up the most progressive candidate you can find in 4, maybe 8 years. Watch said candidate either win by a landslide, or get absolutely vaporised in the election. And then: take the hint. Progressives need to find a message of socialist policies that resonate for rural America. That’s tough. I also honestly think Democrats need to retreat a bit on abortion. The idea of “the woman is completely the only person who matters” isn’t a winning argument
It actually is though.
And more importantly, if you change your message from "the woman matters" to "the woman matters sometimes", voters will pick up on that. You also lose with young people who absolutely think that a woman should be able to decide over her own body.
It's not gonna fly.
All this of course is within reason, i don't think an abortion in the 8th month is reasonable.
|
|
|
|
|
|