|
Any and all updates regarding the COVID-19 will need a source provided. Please do your part in helping us to keep this thread maintainable and under control.
It is YOUR responsibility to fully read through the sources that you link, and you MUST provide a brief summary explaining what the source is about. Do not expect other people to do the work for you.
Conspiracy theories and fear mongering will absolutely not be tolerated in this thread. Expect harsh mod actions if you try to incite fear needlessly.
This is not a politics thread! You are allowed to post information regarding politics if it's related to the coronavirus, but do NOT discuss politics in here.
Added a disclaimer on page 662. Many need to post better. |
https://www.instagram.com/p/CTN6ThVIKBl/?utm_medium=copy_link
Hawaii requiring vaccine card or proof of negative test to enter gyms, restaurants etc.
For the anti vax guys having to take a test (aka shove a long stick up ur nose) I don’t feel bad for. I do feel bad for the ones who are not eligible for health reasons (or the like) though.
|
On August 31 2021 10:33 Emnjay808 wrote:https://www.instagram.com/p/CTN6ThVIKBl/?utm_medium=copy_linkHawaii requiring vaccine card or proof of negative test to enter gyms, restaurants etc. For the anti vax guys having to take a test (aka shove a long stick up ur nose) I don’t feel bad for. I do feel bad for the ones who are not eligible for health reasons (or the like) though.
Glad to hear that anti-vaxxers' lives and luxuries are being disrupted with penalties and consequences, especially since they can literally end these additional frustrations at any time, by getting vaccinated.
I agree that those who are immunocompromised and ineligible are in a shitty situation. Don't know if they can be exempt from some of these regulations, somehow... although for their own safety, maybe they shouldn't be exempt.
|
On August 31 2021 10:33 Emnjay808 wrote:https://www.instagram.com/p/CTN6ThVIKBl/?utm_medium=copy_linkHawaii requiring vaccine card or proof of negative test to enter gyms, restaurants etc. For the anti vax guys having to take a test (aka shove a long stick up ur nose) I don’t feel bad for. I do feel bad for the ones who are not eligible for health reasons (or the like) though. I liked the logic British Columbia used. If you aren’t able to be medically vaccinated, you should definitely not be going to the gym in the middle of a pandemic. Especially during a big spike. I buy it. When people have reactions to a vaccine it is the immune system reacting. That response will always be worse from the actual infection, so if you can’t get the vax, you’re fucked if you got covid. So you better just stay home lol
|
On August 31 2021 12:36 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Glad to hear that anti-vaxxers' lives and luxuries are being disrupted with penalties and consequences, especially since they can literally end these additional frustrations at any time, by getting vaccinated. I agree that those who are immunocompromised and ineligible are in a shitty situation. Don't know if they can be exempt from some of these regulations, somehow... although for their own safety, maybe they shouldn't be exempt.
They probably shouldn't be allowed to leave their house at all. You know, for their own safety.
|
A friend of mine, had been vaccinted only two times as a child. First went fine, but on second one he had severe negative reaction and collapsed. He works in hospital now (maintaining equipment). He is one of the persons for which vaccine is considered riskier than covid.
|
On August 31 2021 14:08 Mohdoo wrote:I liked the logic British Columbia used. If you aren’t able to be medically vaccinated, you should definitely not be going to the gym in the middle of a pandemic. Especially during a big spike. I buy it. When people have reactions to a vaccine it is the immune system reacting. That response will always be worse from the actual infection, so if you can’t get the vax, you’re fucked if you got covid. So you better just stay home lol No. You can also have some weird allergy. But, obviously, as the architect of a utopian society you couldn't possibly take such details into consideration...
How many people can't take the vaccine for medical reasons by the way?
|
On August 31 2021 19:44 Elroi wrote:Show nested quote +On August 31 2021 14:08 Mohdoo wrote:On August 31 2021 10:33 Emnjay808 wrote:https://www.instagram.com/p/CTN6ThVIKBl/?utm_medium=copy_linkHawaii requiring vaccine card or proof of negative test to enter gyms, restaurants etc. For the anti vax guys having to take a test (aka shove a long stick up ur nose) I don’t feel bad for. I do feel bad for the ones who are not eligible for health reasons (or the like) though. I liked the logic British Columbia used. If you aren’t able to be medically vaccinated, you should definitely not be going to the gym in the middle of a pandemic. Especially during a big spike. I buy it. When people have reactions to a vaccine it is the immune system reacting. That response will always be worse from the actual infection, so if you can’t get the vax, you’re fucked if you got covid. So you better just stay home lol No. You can also have some weird allergy. But, obviously, as the architect of a utopian society you couldn't possibly take such details into consideration... How many people can't take the vaccine for medical reasons by the way?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/victoriaforster/2021/08/19/what-are-the-medical-exemptions-for-not-getting-a-covid-19-vaccine/
if we're talking solely about allergies, 5 in a million (potentially an overestimate) might get anaphylaxis. Since the anaphylaxis is rapid onset but easily treatable, they make you wait 15-30 minutes after getting vaccinated for safety reasons.
|
On August 31 2021 20:00 Anc13nt wrote:Show nested quote +On August 31 2021 19:44 Elroi wrote:On August 31 2021 14:08 Mohdoo wrote:On August 31 2021 10:33 Emnjay808 wrote:https://www.instagram.com/p/CTN6ThVIKBl/?utm_medium=copy_linkHawaii requiring vaccine card or proof of negative test to enter gyms, restaurants etc. For the anti vax guys having to take a test (aka shove a long stick up ur nose) I don’t feel bad for. I do feel bad for the ones who are not eligible for health reasons (or the like) though. I liked the logic British Columbia used. If you aren’t able to be medically vaccinated, you should definitely not be going to the gym in the middle of a pandemic. Especially during a big spike. I buy it. When people have reactions to a vaccine it is the immune system reacting. That response will always be worse from the actual infection, so if you can’t get the vax, you’re fucked if you got covid. So you better just stay home lol No. You can also have some weird allergy. But, obviously, as the architect of a utopian society you couldn't possibly take such details into consideration... How many people can't take the vaccine for medical reasons by the way? https://www.forbes.com/sites/victoriaforster/2021/08/19/what-are-the-medical-exemptions-for-not-getting-a-covid-19-vaccine/if we're talking solely about allergies, 5 in a million (potentially an overestimate) might get anaphylaxis. Since the anaphylaxis is rapid onset but easily treatable, they make you wait 15-30 minutes after getting vaccinated for safety reasons. lol it sounds like we're discussing a non-issue again:
There are no known medical conditions which absolutely prevent a person from getting a Covid-19 vaccine. You'd have to be really unlucky to be both one of the 5 in one million to be allergic and being at risk for severe covid since the two are unrelated.
|
Northern Ireland25510 Posts
On August 31 2021 12:36 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Glad to hear that anti-vaxxers' lives and luxuries are being disrupted with penalties and consequences, especially since they can literally end these additional frustrations at any time, by getting vaccinated. I agree that those who are immunocompromised and ineligible are in a shitty situation. Don't know if they can be exempt from some of these regulations, somehow... although for their own safety, maybe they shouldn't be exempt. I’m sure there must be some solution.
Be it a vaccination process for the exemptions that encompasses doing it in a clinical setting and having an extended monitoring period. If that’s a roadblock anyway.
I would presume (perhaps wrongly) that if processes that would safeguard against adverse reactions were in place, that would assuage a fair bit of reluctance in certain groups, and if we got that group sorted, the remainder of people for whom the vaccine is still not recommended is so small as to be able to be effectively ignored, as the cohort would be so small at that stage.
I know two immunocompromised people and both rather enthusiastically got the vaccine as soon as they could, but I’m sure there’s some who are worried and could be reassured if there was a form of vaccine administration that came with a longer period of being monitored for any adverse effects.
|
|
Norway28675 Posts
Lol I could kinda picture that working out.. or maybe a targeted suit towards some influential anti vaxx guru.
|
On August 31 2021 23:44 JimmiC wrote: As long as all the people that can do then those that can't will be safe. Its not the rules fucking those people, its the same selfish people fucking them that are the rest of us.
Perhaps the answer in the US is to have the immunocompromised sue the antivaxxers.
I had a discussion with a guy who was saying vaccines shouldn't be mandatory because he has a medical condition that prevents him from being vaccinated. Then I told him he should of course not be required to get it and that the only way we can keep him safe is if the people who don't have reactions get vaccinated. At that point it became clear he did not have a medical condition that prevents him from being vaccinated XD
|
Northern Ireland25510 Posts
On September 01 2021 01:38 Mohdoo wrote:Show nested quote +On August 31 2021 23:44 JimmiC wrote: As long as all the people that can do then those that can't will be safe. Its not the rules fucking those people, its the same selfish people fucking them that are the rest of us.
Perhaps the answer in the US is to have the immunocompromised sue the antivaxxers. I had a discussion with a guy who was saying vaccines shouldn't be mandatory because he has a medical condition that prevents him from being vaccinated. Then I told him he should of course not be required to get it and that the only way we can keep him safe is if the people who don't have reactions get vaccinated. At that point it became clear he did not have a medical condition that prevents him from being vaccinated XD Quel fucking surprise!
Next you’re going to tell me all the folks with an exemption lanyard for wearing a mask have no reason whatsoever beyond ‘I don’t like them’.
|
On August 31 2021 20:36 Elroi wrote:Show nested quote +On August 31 2021 20:00 Anc13nt wrote:On August 31 2021 19:44 Elroi wrote:On August 31 2021 14:08 Mohdoo wrote:On August 31 2021 10:33 Emnjay808 wrote:https://www.instagram.com/p/CTN6ThVIKBl/?utm_medium=copy_linkHawaii requiring vaccine card or proof of negative test to enter gyms, restaurants etc. For the anti vax guys having to take a test (aka shove a long stick up ur nose) I don’t feel bad for. I do feel bad for the ones who are not eligible for health reasons (or the like) though. I liked the logic British Columbia used. If you aren’t able to be medically vaccinated, you should definitely not be going to the gym in the middle of a pandemic. Especially during a big spike. I buy it. When people have reactions to a vaccine it is the immune system reacting. That response will always be worse from the actual infection, so if you can’t get the vax, you’re fucked if you got covid. So you better just stay home lol No. You can also have some weird allergy. But, obviously, as the architect of a utopian society you couldn't possibly take such details into consideration... How many people can't take the vaccine for medical reasons by the way? https://www.forbes.com/sites/victoriaforster/2021/08/19/what-are-the-medical-exemptions-for-not-getting-a-covid-19-vaccine/if we're talking solely about allergies, 5 in a million (potentially an overestimate) might get anaphylaxis. Since the anaphylaxis is rapid onset but easily treatable, they make you wait 15-30 minutes after getting vaccinated for safety reasons. lol it sounds like we're discussing a non-issue again: Show nested quote +There are no known medical conditions which absolutely prevent a person from getting a Covid-19 vaccine. You'd have to be really unlucky to be both one of the 5 in one million to be allergic and being at risk for severe covid since the two are unrelated.
Yes, it does sound like a non-issue, doesn't it? But it's still not going to deter people from using it as a talking point for mandated vaccines while they conveniently ignore the reality that breakthrough infections exist.
|
edit: misread, delete plz
|
This is a large part of why hospitals are being overrun in places with low vaccination rates. Yeah, you can still get infected, but the chances of you needing hospitalization around 10x to 50x lower depending on your age (in BC anyways). Things like this are where the government should mostly make the decision for you rather than leaving it up to the population. There's going to be stubborn and stupid people that don't get the vaccines, but at least you can push the stupid and lazy towards getting vaccinated.
|
As a person who likes statistics, vaccines are a no brainer if you go by the numbers. Surprisingly, UK and Spain had large recent waves of cases despite a high vaccine %, but the numbers of deaths and hospitalizations were much lower this time.
The big question for me is, how and when do we return to normal life? Afaik, Denmark is the first country who said that October 1st, all COVID measures will end.
What is the point chasing low numbers with mass testing and quarantines if the worst case scenario is similar to an average flu season? This is if the vaccine % is high enough.
The recovery of our minds is going to take years! I don't think the downsides of inducing as much fear as possible through media were well reflected on.
Even when the numbers are looking great, the Spanish government is sponsoring Facebook ads where they count historic deaths and cases, much of which happened a long time ago😠
|
Northern Ireland25510 Posts
On September 01 2021 07:30 Slydie wrote: As a person who likes statistics, vaccines are a no brainer if you go by the numbers. Surprisingly, UK and Spain had large recent waves of cases despite a high vaccine %, but the numbers of deaths and hospitalizations were much lower this time.
The big question for me is, how and when do we return to normal life? Afaik, Denmark is the first country who said that October 1st, all COVID measures will end.
What is the point chasing low numbers with mass testing and quarantines if the worst case scenario is similar to an average flu season? This is if the vaccine % is high enough.
The recovery of our minds is going to take years! I don't think the downsides of inducing as much fear as possible through media were well reflected on.
Even when the numbers are looking great, the Spanish government is sponsoring Facebook ads where they count historic deaths and cases, much of which happened a long time ago😠 Is the U.K. having a pretty hefty raft of cases surprising?
I mean we’ve opened up a lot and from my understanding vaccines don’t inhibit the spread/contraction of delta to a massive degree. But do limit the onset of severe health complications massively, so with our rather effective vaccination program we’re doing grand.
It has some effect in overall caseload too, to my layman’s understanding anyway. Northern Ireland having higher per capita cases than England despite opening up considerably more slowly is probably largely explicable by a lower vaccination rate.
I’m assuming the plan is to muddle on and just open up and return things to normal when the vaccination rates are high enough. And hope some particularly nasty variant doesn’t crop up.
I don’t know, I don’t see much point pushing to keep the spread low in some areas while being entirely lax in others. From what I’ve heard oversight in ensuring compliance in foreign travel guidelines is borderline non-existent, to take one area.
|
On September 01 2021 07:30 Slydie wrote: As a person who likes statistics, vaccines are a no brainer if you go by the numbers. Surprisingly, UK and Spain had large recent waves of cases despite a high vaccine %, but the numbers of deaths and hospitalizations were much lower this time.
The big question for me is, how and when do we return to normal life? Afaik, Denmark is the first country who said that October 1st, all COVID measures will end.
What is the point chasing low numbers with mass testing and quarantines if the worst case scenario is similar to an average flu season? This is if the vaccine % is high enough.
The recovery of our minds is going to take years! I don't think the downsides of inducing as much fear as possible through media were well reflected on.
Even when the numbers are looking great, the Spanish government is sponsoring Facebook ads where they count historic deaths and cases, much of which happened a long time ago😠
because COVID has much higher r0 and has much more potential than say, the flu, to evolve into something even more dangerous or infectious than delta
|
On September 01 2021 07:54 WombaT wrote:Show nested quote +On September 01 2021 07:30 Slydie wrote: As a person who likes statistics, vaccines are a no brainer if you go by the numbers. Surprisingly, UK and Spain had large recent waves of cases despite a high vaccine %, but the numbers of deaths and hospitalizations were much lower this time.
The big question for me is, how and when do we return to normal life? Afaik, Denmark is the first country who said that October 1st, all COVID measures will end.
What is the point chasing low numbers with mass testing and quarantines if the worst case scenario is similar to an average flu season? This is if the vaccine % is high enough.
The recovery of our minds is going to take years! I don't think the downsides of inducing as much fear as possible through media were well reflected on.
Even when the numbers are looking great, the Spanish government is sponsoring Facebook ads where they count historic deaths and cases, much of which happened a long time ago😠 Is the U.K. having a pretty hefty raft of cases surprising? I mean we’ve opened up a lot and from my understanding vaccines don’t inhibit the spread/contraction of delta to a massive degree. But do limit the onset of severe health complications massively, so with our rather effective vaccination program we’re doing grand. It has some effect in overall caseload too, to my layman’s understanding anyway. Northern Ireland having higher per capita cases than England despite opening up considerably more slowly is probably largely explicable by a lower vaccination rate. I’m assuming the plan is to muddle on and just open up and return things to normal when the vaccination rates are high enough. And hope some particularly nasty variant doesn’t crop up. I don’t know, I don’t see much point pushing to keep the spread low in some areas while being entirely lax in others. From what I’ve heard oversight in ensuring compliance in foreign travel guidelines is borderline non-existent, to take one area.
https://www.publichealthontario.ca/-/media/documents/ncov/epi/covid-19-epi-confirmed-cases-post-vaccination.pdf?la=en
depends on vaccine. I am not too sure about AstraZeneca but in Canada, most people got Pfizer and Moderna. Read page 3 of the link to see the impressive efficacy of the vaccines. Unless one has legitimate medical reasons (emphasis on legitimate) not to get a vaccine, one has to be very irrational not to get a MRNA vaccine. I can understand a person younger than 60, especially women, not wanting to get AstraZeneca because of the blood clot risk but that's about it. However, the fear mongering about MRNA vaccine causing myocarditis or anaphylaxis is unreasonable.
|
|
|
|