• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:14
CEST 13:14
KST 20:14
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202519Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20259Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder2EWC 2025 - Replay Pack2Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced35BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Greatest Players of All Time: 2025 Update Serral wins EWC 2025 Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 EWC 2025 - Replay Pack
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event Esports World Cup 2025
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Which platform caters to men's fashion needs? Help: rep cant save Shield Battery Server New Patch [G] Progamer Settings
Tourneys
[BSL] Non-Korean Championship - Final weekend [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Flash @ Namkraft Laddernet …
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 622 users

South American Politics thread - Page 48

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 46 47 48 49 50 66 Next
des
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
United States507 Posts
November 17 2019 03:46 GMT
#941
If anything term limits are undemocratic, unless your definition of democracy has less to do with achieving the goals of the people and more to do with having a fair shot for the opposition every so often. And if this is what democracy is, I will happily declare myself an opponent of democracy. That the will and welfare of the people should fall second to the rules or nominal multiparty politics is absurdity there just like it's absurdity here.

"The United States is also a one-party state, but with typical American extravagance, they have two of them" - Julius Nyerere

Anyway if you're hung up on the process at this point...I dunno, if rigid adherence to the principles of liberal democracy leads to people being shot in the street that seems like proof positive that that rigid adherence is misguided.
my larvae bring all the zerg to the yard
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12172 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-17 03:47:55
November 17 2019 03:47 GMT
#942
On November 17 2019 12:39 Aquanim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2019 12:33 Nebuchad wrote:...
When you take into account that Morales agreed to new democratic elections with oversight and that the opposition decided within hours that new elections wouldn't cut it and they needed to remove him instead, it starts becoming a lot clearer.

If one takes the OAS report that had been recently released at face value (or close to it), being disinclined to accept elections carried out with Morales remaining in control doesn't seem totally unreasonable. Who knows what "oversight" is going to turn out to mean?


That's a good point, we don't know what the oversight would have been. If the oversight turned out to be shit, then definitely the opposition would have had a good point, and definitely they would have been on the side of democracy. But we aren't going to get to that stage. Because the opposition didn't want us to.
No will to live, no wish to die
Yurie
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
11831 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-17 03:52:53
November 17 2019 03:52 GMT
#943
On November 17 2019 12:46 des wrote:
If anything term limits are undemocratic, unless your definition of democracy has less to do with achieving the goals of the people and more to do with having a fair shot for the opposition every so often. And if this is what democracy is, I will happily declare myself an opponent of democracy. That the will and welfare of the people should fall second to the rules or nominal multiparty politics is absurdity there just like it's absurdity here.

"The United States is also a one-party state, but with typical American extravagance, they have two of them" - Julius Nyerere

Anyway if you're hung up on the process at this point...I dunno, if rigid adherence to the principles of liberal democracy leads to people being shot in the street that seems like proof positive that that rigid adherence is misguided.


I personally find any system that generates a cult of personality is wrong. So any system that picks a strong leader is inherently flawed (outside war times).

The basic discourse being about this person or that person instead of their ideas and policies means that you have a high chance of picking bad leaders. Of course the opposite doesn't promise perfect leaders either but you at least have a goal post to try for.
Aquanim
Profile Joined November 2012
Australia2849 Posts
November 17 2019 03:58 GMT
#944
On November 17 2019 12:46 des wrote:...
Anyway if you're hung up on the process at this point...I dunno, if rigid adherence to the principles of liberal democracy leads to people being shot in the street that seems like proof positive that that rigid adherence is misguided.

Why are the people who attempt to enforce the principles of liberal democracy more at fault for the consequences than the people who tried to break those principles in the first place?

On November 17 2019 12:47 Nebuchad wrote:...
That's a good point, we don't know what the oversight would have been. If the oversight turned out to be shit, then definitely the opposition would have had a good point, and definitely they would have been on the side of democracy. But we aren't going to get to that stage. Because the opposition didn't want us to.

We could argue about how much the opposition/people/police/whoever else should have to bend over and take what they see as the erosion of their country's democratic principles before they are justified in taking actions X/Y/Z in response but I don't think I'd find that conversation very pleasant. As such I think I'll leave it here.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23227 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-17 04:11:10
November 17 2019 04:09 GMT
#945
On November 17 2019 12:58 Aquanim wrote:

We could argue about how much the opposition/people/police/whoever else should have to bend over and take what they see as the erosion of their country's democratic principles before they are justified in taking actions X/Y/Z in response but I don't think I'd find that conversation very pleasant. As such I think I'll leave it here.


That one's probably more at home in the US politics thread anyway

Time will tell where we go from here but the current situation doesn't bode well for indigenous populations in Bolivia
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12172 Posts
November 17 2019 04:21 GMT
#946
On November 17 2019 12:58 Aquanim wrote:
We could argue about how much the opposition/people/police/whoever else should have to bend over and take what they see as the erosion of their country's democratic principles before they are justified in taking actions X/Y/Z in response but I don't think I'd find that conversation very pleasant. As such I think I'll leave it here.


It's fine if you don't want to have the conversation but then you can't draw conclusions based on a certain answer being reached in this conversation that you don't want to have.
No will to live, no wish to die
Aquanim
Profile Joined November 2012
Australia2849 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-17 04:49:32
November 17 2019 04:49 GMT
#947
On November 17 2019 13:21 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2019 12:58 Aquanim wrote:
We could argue about how much the opposition/people/police/whoever else should have to bend over and take what they see as the erosion of their country's democratic principles before they are justified in taking actions X/Y/Z in response but I don't think I'd find that conversation very pleasant. As such I think I'll leave it here.


It's fine if you don't want to have the conversation but then you can't draw conclusions based on a certain answer being reached in this conversation that you don't want to have.

It has not been my intention to do such a thing. I do however reserve the right to object to other people drawing conclusions based on their belief that their answer to that question is unambiguously correct.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12172 Posts
November 17 2019 05:08 GMT
#948
On November 17 2019 13:49 Aquanim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2019 13:21 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2019 12:58 Aquanim wrote:
We could argue about how much the opposition/people/police/whoever else should have to bend over and take what they see as the erosion of their country's democratic principles before they are justified in taking actions X/Y/Z in response but I don't think I'd find that conversation very pleasant. As such I think I'll leave it here.


It's fine if you don't want to have the conversation but then you can't draw conclusions based on a certain answer being reached in this conversation that you don't want to have.

It has not been my intention to do such a thing. I do however reserve the right to object to other people drawing conclusions based on their belief that their answer to that question is unambiguously correct.


You can only say that what happened is unclear if you reach a specific conclusion on this question. Any answer to that question other than "They were right" makes it very clear that their action was wrong.
No will to live, no wish to die
Aquanim
Profile Joined November 2012
Australia2849 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-17 09:13:58
November 17 2019 08:42 GMT
#949
On November 17 2019 14:08 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2019 13:49 Aquanim wrote:
On November 17 2019 13:21 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2019 12:58 Aquanim wrote:
We could argue about how much the opposition/people/police/whoever else should have to bend over and take what they see as the erosion of their country's democratic principles before they are justified in taking actions X/Y/Z in response but I don't think I'd find that conversation very pleasant. As such I think I'll leave it here.


It's fine if you don't want to have the conversation but then you can't draw conclusions based on a certain answer being reached in this conversation that you don't want to have.

It has not been my intention to do such a thing. I do however reserve the right to object to other people drawing conclusions based on their belief that their answer to that question is unambiguously correct.


You can only say that what happened is unclear if you reach a specific conclusion on this question. Any answer to that question other than "They were right" makes it very clear that their action was wrong.

+ Show Spoiler +
I don't really wish to debate the validity of this argument with someone who is so immovably convinced that the protestors/oppposition/whoever are unambiguously in the wrong, either. Seems like a total waste of time.

EDIT: Ok I'll clarify a little bit more. I don't see anything that you or I would say in this conversation that doesn't just boil down to "My opinion is right and your opinion is wrong". I don't see any point in having such a conversation. That does not mean that I think your opinion is right, or that you trying to browbeat me into "If you're not willing to have that conversation you must acknowledge my opinion is right and/or proceed with future conversation on the basis that my opinion is right" is in any way reasonable.

As it is I have already hedged almost everything I have said today + Show Spoiler +
replying to des' hypothetical statement in kind doesn't count
beyond my initial comments about the Bolivian Supreme Court ruling (which I am certain raises red flags). I am already not "draw[ing] conclusions based on certain answers being reached". I am finding your insinuations to the contrary tiresome.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23227 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-17 09:22:58
November 17 2019 09:20 GMT
#950
On November 17 2019 17:42 Aquanim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2019 14:08 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2019 13:49 Aquanim wrote:
On November 17 2019 13:21 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2019 12:58 Aquanim wrote:
We could argue about how much the opposition/people/police/whoever else should have to bend over and take what they see as the erosion of their country's democratic principles before they are justified in taking actions X/Y/Z in response but I don't think I'd find that conversation very pleasant. As such I think I'll leave it here.


It's fine if you don't want to have the conversation but then you can't draw conclusions based on a certain answer being reached in this conversation that you don't want to have.

It has not been my intention to do such a thing. I do however reserve the right to object to other people drawing conclusions based on their belief that their answer to that question is unambiguously correct.


You can only say that what happened is unclear if you reach a specific conclusion on this question. Any answer to that question other than "They were right" makes it very clear that their action was wrong.

+ Show Spoiler +
I don't really wish to debate the validity of this argument with someone who is so immovably convinced that the protestors/oppposition/whoever are unambiguously in the wrong, either. Seems like a total waste of time.

EDIT: Ok I'll clarify a little bit more. I don't see anything that you or I would say in this conversation that doesn't just boil down to "My opinion is right and your opinion is wrong". I don't see any point in having such a conversation. That does not mean that I think your opinion is right, or that you trying to browbeat me into "If you're not willing to have that conversation you must acknowledge my opinion is right and/or proceed with future conversation on the basis that my opinion is right" is in any way reasonable.

As it is I have already hedged almost everything I have said today + Show Spoiler +
replying to des' hypothetical statement in kind doesn't count
beyond my initial comments about the Bolivian Supreme Court ruling (which I am certain raises red flags). I am already not "draw[ing] conclusions based on certain answers being reached". I am finding your insinuations to the contrary tiresome.


Could be a coup completely undermining democracy or freedom fighters heralding democracy (or anywhere in between), but you can't take a position (not interested in discussing it) or draw conclusions about which or about the governments/people that do other than they should be more unsure.

Is that accurate?
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12172 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-17 09:40:02
November 17 2019 09:38 GMT
#951
On November 17 2019 17:42 Aquanim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2019 14:08 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2019 13:49 Aquanim wrote:
On November 17 2019 13:21 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2019 12:58 Aquanim wrote:
We could argue about how much the opposition/people/police/whoever else should have to bend over and take what they see as the erosion of their country's democratic principles before they are justified in taking actions X/Y/Z in response but I don't think I'd find that conversation very pleasant. As such I think I'll leave it here.


It's fine if you don't want to have the conversation but then you can't draw conclusions based on a certain answer being reached in this conversation that you don't want to have.

It has not been my intention to do such a thing. I do however reserve the right to object to other people drawing conclusions based on their belief that their answer to that question is unambiguously correct.


You can only say that what happened is unclear if you reach a specific conclusion on this question. Any answer to that question other than "They were right" makes it very clear that their action was wrong.

+ Show Spoiler +
I don't really wish to debate the validity of this argument with someone who is so immovably convinced that the protestors/oppposition/whoever are unambiguously in the wrong, either. Seems like a total waste of time.

EDIT: Ok I'll clarify a little bit more. I don't see anything that you or I would say in this conversation that doesn't just boil down to "My opinion is right and your opinion is wrong". I don't see any point in having such a conversation. That does not mean that I think your opinion is right, or that you trying to browbeat me into "If you're not willing to have that conversation you must acknowledge my opinion is right and/or proceed with future conversation on the basis that my opinion is right" is in any way reasonable.

As it is I have already hedged almost everything I have said today + Show Spoiler +
replying to des' hypothetical statement in kind doesn't count
beyond my initial comments about the Bolivian Supreme Court ruling (which I am certain raises red flags). I am already not "draw[ing] conclusions based on certain answers being reached". I am finding your insinuations to the contrary tiresome.


I think you're reading too much into what I answered. I'm objecting to you saying both that "it's unclear whether they were justified in going for a coup" and "I don't want to get into whether democracy was sufficiently threatened to merit the intervention of the military". In order to answer that it's unclear whether or not they are justified, you have to posit that democracy was sufficiently threatened. If it wasn't, then the coup would obviously not be justified in those terms. So you say you're unwilling to go into the discussion of a specific point, but your overall position requires having reached some form of conclusion on that specific point. It's impossible for me to argue against your point without going into that discussion. It's okay if we don't argue, we don't have to, but I still had to point it out.
No will to live, no wish to die
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
November 17 2019 15:37 GMT
#952
--- Nuked ---
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23227 Posts
November 17 2019 16:17 GMT
#953
I think you missed the key one regarding whether it is a coup or not

Her chief responsibility as temporary leader though is organising new elections within 90 days, and for this she has shown only limited enthusiasm. On Thursday, politicians from Morales’s party and the interim government said they had struck a deal to pave the way for a new vote in 90 days. But on Friday Áñez said that deal had failed, without providing further explanation


If folks want to wait till there's a questionable election (or no election at all) to make a determination of what happened I get it. If there's not an indisputably legitimate election though, it's a coup, and the people that supported the coup (supported/celebrated Morales ousting) were cheering against democracy is the point.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
November 17 2019 16:56 GMT
#954
--- Nuked ---
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23227 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-17 17:15:55
November 17 2019 17:14 GMT
#955
On November 18 2019 01:56 JimmiC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2019 01:17 GreenHorizons wrote:
I think you missed the key one regarding whether it is a coup or not

Her chief responsibility as temporary leader though is organising new elections within 90 days, and for this she has shown only limited enthusiasm. On Thursday, politicians from Morales’s party and the interim government said they had struck a deal to pave the way for a new vote in 90 days. But on Friday Áñez said that deal had failed, without providing further explanation


If folks want to wait till there's a questionable election (or no election at all) to make a determination of what happened I get it. If there's not an indisputably legitimate election though, it's a coup, and the people that supported the coup (supported/celebrated Morales ousting) were cheering against democracy is the point.

Correct, we are unsure at this point. That is why I posted the article and what it says and what we have been saying and you have been arguing against.


I'm not arguing against being "unsure". No one is sure about anything, everything is probability.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
November 17 2019 18:20 GMT
#956
--- Nuked ---
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23227 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-17 18:55:53
November 17 2019 18:31 GMT
#957
On November 18 2019 03:20 JimmiC wrote:
Then perhaps make statements like "this seems like a... " instead of "this is a..." That is what tells people it is a presumption and not a fact.


I thought we were all operating with that basic understanding of phenomena?

Should be obvious that we're all always arguing what we believe to be the most probably correct assessment (unless it's a joke or whatever).

"We don't know" is always accurate (even after we experience and study something) and comparably unavailing.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
des
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
United States507 Posts
November 18 2019 05:11 GMT
#958
https://www.jornada.com.mx/ultimas/mundo/2019/11/17/gobierno-de-bolivia-ira-por-diputados-201csubversivos201d-leales-a-evo-285.html

The new minister of the interim Government of Bolivia, Arturo Murillo, announced on Sunday the creation of a "special apparatus of the Prosecutor's Office" to stop deputies related to the Movement To Socialism (MAS) of former President Evo Morales, who according to the official version would be committing acts of subversion and sedition.
my larvae bring all the zerg to the yard
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23227 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-18 05:25:54
November 18 2019 05:21 GMT
#959
On November 18 2019 14:11 des wrote:
https://www.jornada.com.mx/ultimas/mundo/2019/11/17/gobierno-de-bolivia-ira-por-diputados-201csubversivos201d-leales-a-evo-285.html

Show nested quote +
The new minister of the interim Government of Bolivia, Arturo Murillo, announced on Sunday the creation of a "special apparatus of the Prosecutor's Office" to stop deputies related to the Movement To Socialism (MAS) of former President Evo Morales, who according to the official version would be committing acts of subversion and sedition.


So their first acts since taking power have been a religiously fanatic swearing themselves in, cops cutting and burning indigenous symbols, cops attacking a reporter and killing protesters, refusing a deal for elections without explanation, and hunting down the opposition.

Sounds like people that should have been condemned rather than portrayed as fighting for democracy or freedom (which doesn't seem to be their concern at all now that they have power). Seems clear to me that it was a ruse for people gullible enough to buy it.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12172 Posts
November 18 2019 05:52 GMT
#960
This is the part where the western media stops reporting.
No will to live, no wish to die
Prev 1 46 47 48 49 50 66 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 17m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Harstem 348
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 26433
Horang2 4470
Flash 1181
Barracks 914
Jaedong 703
Hyun 562
Killer 389
Larva 360
Bisu 349
actioN 317
[ Show more ]
Mini 262
EffOrt 246
Leta 162
Last 154
GuemChi 133
Snow 113
ZerO 108
ToSsGirL 95
Rush 86
Soulkey 75
Zeus 74
sorry 39
Backho 39
yabsab 38
Sharp 29
Sacsri 28
JYJ28
zelot 27
sSak 24
sas.Sziky 22
Hm[arnc] 21
Movie 19
Shinee 15
Noble 13
ajuk12(nOOB) 12
Icarus 11
Aegong 5
Dota 2
Gorgc483
BananaSlamJamma312
Fuzer 301
XcaliburYe290
Counter-Strike
olofmeister2056
x6flipin477
edward149
Other Games
singsing1833
B2W.Neo331
DeMusliM239
Happy205
SortOf80
ZerO(Twitch)11
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1034
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 25
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 61
• davetesta57
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2484
League of Legends
• Jankos331
Other Games
• WagamamaTV235
Upcoming Events
OSC
1h 17m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4h 47m
The PondCast
22h 47m
Online Event
1d 4h
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs TBD
Online Event
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs TBD
[ Show More ]
OSC
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
FEL Cracow 2025
Underdog Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
CC Div. A S7
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
Yuqilin POB S2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.