• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:24
CEST 12:24
KST 19:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task30
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0EWC 2025 Regional Qualifier Results26
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation StarCraft 1 & 2 Added to Xbox Game Pass Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing CN community: Firefly accused of suspicious activities How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports?
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu BW General Discussion StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 2
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread What do you want from future RTS games? Armies of Exigo - YesYes? Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 41103 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 5008

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5006 5007 5008 5009 5010 5012 Next
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting!

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.


If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread
Sadist
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States7215 Posts
17 hours ago
#100141
On June 10 2025 01:42 LightSpectra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2025 01:33 Sadist wrote:
Im not trying to find a reasonable middle im just pointing out that we should be specific in what our issues are with ICE and what they are doing. Enforcing immigration law is not inherently evil. What can be evil is how you go about doing it etc


Laws can be evil, and enforcing evil laws is evil. Nowadays we view the protesters who civilly disobeyed laws enforcing slavery and racial segregation as heroes, and the people who wrote and enforced those laws as being villains. Deporting an 11-year-old girl with brain cancer to a place she'll surely die is evil, even if it's lawful.

This country was founded upon a rebellion against taxes, quartering, etc. that were completely lawful to impose on a British colony. It's wildly hypocritical to live in a civilization with all sorts of benefits that were procured by heroic people breaking unjust laws in the past while simultaneously saying "it's the law, there's nothing we can do" in the present.



I didnt say laws couldnt be evil. I said enforcing immigration law is not inherently evil. Every country on earth does it. Its a huge part of actually being a country.

If you believe any immigration laws are by default evil I dont know what to tell you but theres no point in further discussion.

How do you go from where you are to where you want to be? I think you have to have an enthusiasm for life. You have to have a dream, a goal and you have to be willing to work for it. Jim Valvano
LightSpectra
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States1207 Posts
17 hours ago
#100142
There are exactly zero mainstream Democrats or liberals or progressives saying "any immigration laws are by default evil," so there's no point in even responding to that. It's a blatant strawman that adds nothing to the conversation.
2006 Shinhan Bank OSL Season 3 was the greatest tournament of all time
Sadist
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States7215 Posts
17 hours ago
#100143
On June 10 2025 02:09 LightSpectra wrote:
There are exactly zero mainstream Democrats or liberals or progressives saying "any immigration laws are by default evil," so there's no point in even responding to that. It's a blatant strawman that adds nothing to the conversation.



You were the one that started this!

How do you go from where you are to where you want to be? I think you have to have an enthusiasm for life. You have to have a dream, a goal and you have to be willing to work for it. Jim Valvano
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23066 Posts
17 hours ago
#100144
The president suggesting one of his czars arrest Democrat politicians isn't a sign of a healthy democracy, is it?

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday suggested that he would support an arrest of California Governor Gavin Newsom amid pro-immigration protests in the state, which prompted the president to deploy the National Guard.

On Saturday, Tom Homan, the administration's border czar, threatened to arrest anyone who obstructs immigration enforcement efforts in the state, including Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass.

Newsom responded during an NBC News interview by challenging Homan to "just get it over with" and move ahead with the arrest.

Asked on Monday about Newsom daring Homan to arrest him, Trump said, "I would."


www.yahoo.com
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
oBlade
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States5472 Posts
17 hours ago
#100145
On June 10 2025 01:34 LightSpectra wrote:
Guy that resorts to whataboutisms, strawmen, Schrödinger reasoning every single post in lieu of reading sources people show him thinks a few fragments of out-of-context legal code is a killer reply to the Trump administration literally telling Congress and judges that they're not beholden to any law when it comes to anything even remotely related to foreign policy.

Nearest I can tell from the reference is you're talking about the administration's position that a court couldn't order the return of Garcia because courts can't order the executive branch to do certain foreign policy actions.

That claim is largely true. The same reason a court can't order the president to declare war on a country, a court can't really order a prisoner exchange, a trade deal, or getting a prisoner back. The thing about Garcia is that because he was in El Salvador's custody at the request and agreement with the US, there's an argument that he was in constructive custody of the US no matter where he was physically.

But the claim was not that the president doesn't have to follow any laws. It was that courts can't run foreign policy. If there wasn't any responsibility to the law he wouldn't have bothered fucking specifically going through the invocation of this and that law and title authority and naming them as using them.

Since LA hasn't seceded yet, ICE raids there aren't foreign policy. So the Garcia case isn't directly relevant.

Add any context you like. There's only one US Code. If you don't know how law works, which I would never suspect, basically whenever a law gets passed it gets squeezed into the code. So "US law" isn't the entire list of every bill that ever passed, it's the encyclopediafication of every part of every law that gets passed by subject and subsection. Basically the same information, but reorganized. Title 8 is the one about immigration. Another subsection of it is where it says people going through immigration proceedings can have a lawyer - but not at the expensive of the government. Really interesting.

Does that mean the law broke its own due process? Miranda rights right? I thought everyone gets a free lawyer if they can't afford one? Well, that applies to crimes. Illegal immigration isn't one. Do you want to make it one? Then there'd be public defenders abound. Or if the Supreme Court ruled something like the 6th amendment right to counsel also applies to people in civil administrative immigration proceedings.

If you look closer, you can find the sections that authorize when you can deport people without any trial or any hearing with an immigration judge. Legally. It's really cool. Want me to help you find them?

On June 10 2025 01:42 LightSpectra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2025 01:33 Sadist wrote:
Im not trying to find a reasonable middle im just pointing out that we should be specific in what our issues are with ICE and what they are doing. Enforcing immigration law is not inherently evil. What can be evil is how you go about doing it etc


Laws can be evil, and enforcing evil laws is evil. Nowadays we view the protesters who civilly disobeyed laws enforcing slavery and racial segregation as heroes, and the people who wrote and enforced those laws as being villains. Deporting an 11-year-old girl with brain cancer to a place she'll surely die is evil, even if it's lawful.

This country was founded upon a rebellion against taxes, quartering, etc. that were completely lawful to impose on a British colony. It's wildly hypocritical to live in a civilization with all sorts of benefits that were procured by heroic people breaking unjust laws in the past while simultaneously saying "it's the law, there's nothing we can do" in the present.

Paradoxically, laws can even be illegal, most easily backed up when the top court rules so. Less easily backed up by "That's UNLAWFUL!" immediately scrubbed by "Well, okay it's legal but out of context."
"I read it. You know how to read, you ignorant fuck?" - Andy Dufresne
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11442 Posts
17 hours ago
#100146
On June 10 2025 02:15 GreenHorizons wrote:
The president suggesting one of his czars arrest Democrat politicians isn't a sign of a healthy democracy, is it?

Show nested quote +
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday suggested that he would support an arrest of California Governor Gavin Newsom amid pro-immigration protests in the state, which prompted the president to deploy the National Guard.

On Saturday, Tom Homan, the administration's border czar, threatened to arrest anyone who obstructs immigration enforcement efforts in the state, including Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass.

Newsom responded during an NBC News interview by challenging Homan to "just get it over with" and move ahead with the arrest.

Asked on Monday about Newsom daring Homan to arrest him, Trump said, "I would."


www.yahoo.com


No, totally a normal thing.
BlackJack
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States10379 Posts
17 hours ago
#100147
On June 10 2025 01:11 Sadist wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2025 00:53 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 05 2025 01:26 LightSpectra wrote:
On June 05 2025 01:20 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 04 2025 19:05 baal wrote:
On June 04 2025 08:59 Mohdoo wrote:
Yeah, its another example of republicans being experts in culture war at this point. They are the Sparta of culture war. They essentially normalize each other while also making each other look more reasonable in comparison. They each get to use each other as a "fall guy" to shed their baggage for some % of people.

This situation has made me realize why so many people thought TV wrestling was real.


I always find it funny when people assume hyper competence from obviously very flawed politicians.

Republicans think left wing ideologues infiltrated academia 40 years ago to infect young minds into the rise of socialist, and democrats think right wingers are brain washing young men with Joe Rogans and Andrew Tates but these things just happen organically.

They are not playing 4D Chess, they are playing checkers and badly, but out biased belief systems make us too invested and thus too blind to see how badly they are actually playing.


Yeah I don't think it's 4d chess, it's just checkers (thought this sounded familiar)

Wrestling is real. It's not a video game. Owen Hart actually died and getting hit actually hurts. They are however performers playing roles. Politicians are similar in that this is all a performance to them but real people are really getting hurt and dying as a consequence.

Musk, Rogan, and Trump/his successor are going to dominate the Overton Window and libs will try to find policy that lands somewhere between those three with Rogan (generally) being the "advocate" for human rights.

I don't even think they are doing this consciously, I think to them it really does feel like conflict. But more like friends trying to beat each other in a frivolous game than some sort of major clash.

I haven't seen any Musk, Trump, or Rogan talking points going mainstream among liberals.+ Show Spoiler +
The only person attempting to do that is Gavin Newsom and his popularity has been crashing as a result.



It's subtle, but it's there.

On June 10 2025 00:33 Sadist wrote:
On June 10 2025 00:02 Magic Powers wrote:
On June 09 2025 23:45 Sadist wrote:
On June 09 2025 23:26 Magic Powers wrote:
On June 09 2025 21:42 Sadist wrote:
On June 09 2025 21:24 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On June 09 2025 21:16 Sadist wrote:
So I am curious what the rationale for not treating illegal immigrants the same way you would if someone had a warrant for their arrest. What i mean by this is if you have a warrant and you get pulled over, arrested for something else, etc per my understanding you would be arrested for said warrant.

I can understand the thought process that if you check someones immigration status when they report a crime, are pulled over, are arrested for something else, etc that you could discourage people from interacting with police or reporting crimes. However, if thats the case how would immigration actually enforce immigration laws on illegal immigrants?

Seperately, its pretty clear ICE are escalating things unnecessarily. Plain clothes agents, grabbing people aggressively, face masks, etc. My concern is the well is poisoned on both sides of the immigration issue and we are never going to move forward.


Unfortunately, Trump and other Republican leaders treat illegal immigrants as sub-human and worthless, so it's unsurprising when illegal immigrants aren't afforded rights or respect.



I guess what im saying is if an illegal immigrant is arrested for a crime and goes infront of a judge, even if the charges are dropped why would they not be held for being an illegal immigrant? Thats how my understanding of a warrant would work. Again i get the downsides of doing this (illegal immigrants would avoid police and not come forward as witnesses etc) but in practical terms how would we enforce immigration laws?


They're not being brought to court for alleged crimes. They're brought to court for being immigrants, then the courts dismiss the claims, then they get arrested in spite of their case being dismissed.



If they are legal immigrants obviously they should be left alone but if they are illegal immigrants IMO they should be detained even if the charges are dropped from an unrelated case. It should be done with some common decency like not roughing up people, talking to them like human beings, wearing uniforms without face coverings, etc. I would fully expect if I as an American was an illegal immigrant in another country I would get the boot if I was caught or charged with something unrelated.


I disagree very strongly. There's a reason why cases get dismissed on the basis of police misconduct. This is meant to prevent abuse of authority. If protocol isn't being followed, the suspect can often simply go free, regardless of any proof of guilt.
Same situation here. If ICE gets the desired result of deporting illegal immigrants by unlawfully snatching suspects of the streets, then not only is that in and of itself an illegal activity committed by ICE, but it also creates a situation where suspects are at a severe disadvantage due to not having sufficient legal representation (as mentioned in an earlier post of mine). If you allow one criminal activity, you allow two, and so forth. It results in perfectly legal immigrants being arrested and some of them even deported.

On top of that it also creates an extremely hostile climate which leads to more violent protests, which leads to more violent enforcement, which is an escalation that helps absolutely no one.

You cannot ever reward illegal behavior by the executive branch. If you do that, you create a police state, regardless of how many illegal migrants get deported at the end of it. This is completely unlawful, immoral and extremely damaging to the communities.

By the way, it is estimated that illegal immigrants make up roughly 3% of the American population.
Anyone arguing that these people are a problem is the real problem.




I feel like we are talking past each other. I dont condone what it looks like ICE is doing. Im just pointing out that to an average american citizen, its going to be confusing why ICE apprehending someone at a court house is a big deal. IMO The big deal is no due process or the way they behave. Not the actual act of arresting someone who is illegal and deporting them after they get due process.


Thinking ICE should exist is a right-wing position. Using phrases like "arresting someone who is illegal" is right wing.



Im not right wing. Im not using words like undocumented immigrants or pretending like enforcing immigration law is right wing.


Nice try, bud. You're not convincing us. You don't believe in open borders and you think enforcing immigration law is okay. You have failed the purity test. You are undeniably right-wing which by the way is also now synonymous with fascist, racist, misogynist and transphobic so enjoy those labels as well.
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13837 Posts
17 hours ago
#100148
On June 10 2025 02:15 GreenHorizons wrote:
The president suggesting one of his czars arrest Democrat politicians isn't a sign of a healthy democracy, is it?

Show nested quote +
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday suggested that he would support an arrest of California Governor Gavin Newsom amid pro-immigration protests in the state, which prompted the president to deploy the National Guard.

On Saturday, Tom Homan, the administration's border czar, threatened to arrest anyone who obstructs immigration enforcement efforts in the state, including Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass.

Newsom responded during an NBC News interview by challenging Homan to "just get it over with" and move ahead with the arrest.

Asked on Monday about Newsom daring Homan to arrest him, Trump said, "I would."


www.yahoo.com

Is this something that goes past your red line where not supporting kamala was a mistake?
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
LightSpectra
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States1207 Posts
17 hours ago
#100149
On June 10 2025 02:12 Sadist wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2025 02:09 LightSpectra wrote:
There are exactly zero mainstream Democrats or liberals or progressives saying "any immigration laws are by default evil," so there's no point in even responding to that. It's a blatant strawman that adds nothing to the conversation.



You were the one that started this!


Where did I say "any immigration laws are by default evil"? I think it's ethical to deport people who are undocumented and have been found in a U.S. court to have committed a felony, OR are undocumented and there's an international warrant for their arrest. What I've been saying is grossly immoral is ICE operating as secret police and bypassing the courts.
2006 Shinhan Bank OSL Season 3 was the greatest tournament of all time
Sadist
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States7215 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-06-09 17:37:01
16 hours ago
#100150
On June 10 2025 02:21 LightSpectra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2025 02:12 Sadist wrote:
On June 10 2025 02:09 LightSpectra wrote:
There are exactly zero mainstream Democrats or liberals or progressives saying "any immigration laws are by default evil," so there's no point in even responding to that. It's a blatant strawman that adds nothing to the conversation.



You were the one that started this!


Where did I say "any immigration laws are by default evil"? I think it's ethical to deport people who are undocumented and have been found in a U.S. court to have committed a felony, OR are undocumented and there's an international warrant for their arrest. What I've been saying is grossly immoral is ICE operating as secret police and bypassing the courts.


Edit:

I explained that enforcing immigration law is not inherently evil but how you go about it can be. You chimed in saying laws can be evil and enforcing evil laws is evil. That seems like a straw man to me, or that you think our current immigration laws are evil. Id need you to be more specific about what parts you disagree with as I am not an expert.



So you dont think its OK to deport someone here illegally if they havent committed a crime? By all means prioritize criminals but ideally if you are not here legally and are caught you are deported or brought before some court or something to explain your extenuating circumstances.

I think thats fairly common in all countries. Obviously ICE/Trump admin not letting people speak to lawyers etc or simply revoking a visa/status because the Biden admin issued it is horrible.

How do you go from where you are to where you want to be? I think you have to have an enthusiasm for life. You have to have a dream, a goal and you have to be willing to work for it. Jim Valvano
KT_Elwood
Profile Joined July 2015
Germany874 Posts
16 hours ago
#100151
On June 10 2025 00:22 LightSpectra wrote:
oBlade seeming genuinely confused that people are skeptical about ICE's ability to tell if someone is undocumented just by looking at them on the street is top-tier comedy.


Speak a foreign language = deport them now, let god sort the good ones out.

Beat a cop to death= deathrow

Beat a cop to death - wearing a MAGA hat = get paid to do it legally.
"First he eats our dogs, and then he taxes the penguins... Donald Trump truly is the Donald Trump of our generation. " -DPB
LightSpectra
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States1207 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-06-09 17:49:05
16 hours ago
#100152
On June 10 2025 02:34 Sadist wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2025 02:21 LightSpectra wrote:
On June 10 2025 02:12 Sadist wrote:
On June 10 2025 02:09 LightSpectra wrote:
There are exactly zero mainstream Democrats or liberals or progressives saying "any immigration laws are by default evil," so there's no point in even responding to that. It's a blatant strawman that adds nothing to the conversation.



You were the one that started this!


Where did I say "any immigration laws are by default evil"? I think it's ethical to deport people who are undocumented and have been found in a U.S. court to have committed a felony, OR are undocumented and there's an international warrant for their arrest. What I've been saying is grossly immoral is ICE operating as secret police and bypassing the courts.


Edit:

I explained that enforcing immigration law is not inherently evil but how you go about it can be. You chimed in saying laws can be evil and enforcing evil laws is evil. That seems like a straw man to me, or that you think our current immigration laws are evil. Id need you to be more specific about what parts you disagree with as I am not an expert.



So you dont think its OK to deport someone here illegally if they havent committed a crime? By all means prioritize criminals but ideally if you are not here legally and are caught you are deported or brought before some court or something to explain your extenuating circumstances.

I think thats fairly common in all countries. Obviously ICE/Trump admin not letting people speak to lawyers etc or simply revoking a visa/status because the Biden admin issued it is horrible.


No, I don't think unlawfully crossing the border or overstaying a visa is enough of a justification to put someone through the traumatizing situation of snatching them from their friends and family, devastating their community, and authorizing masked cops to violate people's human rights without a warrant. There is no moral justification for this. If you want to restrict immigration for purely economic reasons then you can start heavily fining and taxing companies caught utilizing undocumented labor; but conveniently most of those companies (which includes Mar-a-Lago!) are Republican donors and it's extremely rare for them to see any sort of penalty.

Let's be real, Republicans do not give a fuck about immigrants committing crimes or undercutting wages. ICE would be deporting a lot more white people and not """accidentally""" deporting U.S. citizens and people with valid green cards/visas with Latino backgrounds if that were the case.

I explained that enforcing immigration law is not inherently evil but how you go about it can be. You chimed in saying laws can be evil and enforcing evil laws is evil. That seems like a straw man to me, or that you think our current immigration laws are evil. Id need you to be more specific about what parts you disagree with as I am not an expert.


Current immigration laws and enforcement are evil, but that doesn't mean all immigration enforcement is inherently evil. France should've deported Roman Polanski for evading justice. The U.S. should not have deported an 11-year-old girl with brain cancer.
2006 Shinhan Bank OSL Season 3 was the greatest tournament of all time
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42428 Posts
16 hours ago
#100153
On June 10 2025 00:51 oBlade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2025 00:35 LightSpectra wrote:
While not quite as funny, oBlade thinking leftists supported ICE when Biden was president is also comedic.

Edit: especially since a few pages ago he was saying Biden and Mayorkas were not even enforcing immigration law.

They have one advantage, they at least thought the border was more real than you do.

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2025 00:51 LightSpectra wrote:
Schrödinger's judicial system. Simultaneously it's too burdensome to find enough proof to get a warrant for raids, but ICE definitely has enough proof to arrest people on the street.


Immigration officers write warrants for raids. This is absurd.

Wasn’t there a very high profile case recently when they did a raid, couldn’t find the target, but found another brown person, identified them as not the target, and shipped them off anyway?
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland24814 Posts
16 hours ago
#100154
On June 10 2025 02:20 BlackJack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2025 01:11 Sadist wrote:
On June 10 2025 00:53 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 05 2025 01:26 LightSpectra wrote:
On June 05 2025 01:20 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 04 2025 19:05 baal wrote:
On June 04 2025 08:59 Mohdoo wrote:
Yeah, its another example of republicans being experts in culture war at this point. They are the Sparta of culture war. They essentially normalize each other while also making each other look more reasonable in comparison. They each get to use each other as a "fall guy" to shed their baggage for some % of people.

This situation has made me realize why so many people thought TV wrestling was real.


I always find it funny when people assume hyper competence from obviously very flawed politicians.

Republicans think left wing ideologues infiltrated academia 40 years ago to infect young minds into the rise of socialist, and democrats think right wingers are brain washing young men with Joe Rogans and Andrew Tates but these things just happen organically.

They are not playing 4D Chess, they are playing checkers and badly, but out biased belief systems make us too invested and thus too blind to see how badly they are actually playing.


Yeah I don't think it's 4d chess, it's just checkers (thought this sounded familiar)

Wrestling is real. It's not a video game. Owen Hart actually died and getting hit actually hurts. They are however performers playing roles. Politicians are similar in that this is all a performance to them but real people are really getting hurt and dying as a consequence.

Musk, Rogan, and Trump/his successor are going to dominate the Overton Window and libs will try to find policy that lands somewhere between those three with Rogan (generally) being the "advocate" for human rights.

I don't even think they are doing this consciously, I think to them it really does feel like conflict. But more like friends trying to beat each other in a frivolous game than some sort of major clash.

I haven't seen any Musk, Trump, or Rogan talking points going mainstream among liberals.+ Show Spoiler +
The only person attempting to do that is Gavin Newsom and his popularity has been crashing as a result.



It's subtle, but it's there.

On June 10 2025 00:33 Sadist wrote:
On June 10 2025 00:02 Magic Powers wrote:
On June 09 2025 23:45 Sadist wrote:
On June 09 2025 23:26 Magic Powers wrote:
On June 09 2025 21:42 Sadist wrote:
On June 09 2025 21:24 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On June 09 2025 21:16 Sadist wrote:
So I am curious what the rationale for not treating illegal immigrants the same way you would if someone had a warrant for their arrest. What i mean by this is if you have a warrant and you get pulled over, arrested for something else, etc per my understanding you would be arrested for said warrant.

I can understand the thought process that if you check someones immigration status when they report a crime, are pulled over, are arrested for something else, etc that you could discourage people from interacting with police or reporting crimes. However, if thats the case how would immigration actually enforce immigration laws on illegal immigrants?

Seperately, its pretty clear ICE are escalating things unnecessarily. Plain clothes agents, grabbing people aggressively, face masks, etc. My concern is the well is poisoned on both sides of the immigration issue and we are never going to move forward.


Unfortunately, Trump and other Republican leaders treat illegal immigrants as sub-human and worthless, so it's unsurprising when illegal immigrants aren't afforded rights or respect.



I guess what im saying is if an illegal immigrant is arrested for a crime and goes infront of a judge, even if the charges are dropped why would they not be held for being an illegal immigrant? Thats how my understanding of a warrant would work. Again i get the downsides of doing this (illegal immigrants would avoid police and not come forward as witnesses etc) but in practical terms how would we enforce immigration laws?


They're not being brought to court for alleged crimes. They're brought to court for being immigrants, then the courts dismiss the claims, then they get arrested in spite of their case being dismissed.



If they are legal immigrants obviously they should be left alone but if they are illegal immigrants IMO they should be detained even if the charges are dropped from an unrelated case. It should be done with some common decency like not roughing up people, talking to them like human beings, wearing uniforms without face coverings, etc. I would fully expect if I as an American was an illegal immigrant in another country I would get the boot if I was caught or charged with something unrelated.


I disagree very strongly. There's a reason why cases get dismissed on the basis of police misconduct. This is meant to prevent abuse of authority. If protocol isn't being followed, the suspect can often simply go free, regardless of any proof of guilt.
Same situation here. If ICE gets the desired result of deporting illegal immigrants by unlawfully snatching suspects of the streets, then not only is that in and of itself an illegal activity committed by ICE, but it also creates a situation where suspects are at a severe disadvantage due to not having sufficient legal representation (as mentioned in an earlier post of mine). If you allow one criminal activity, you allow two, and so forth. It results in perfectly legal immigrants being arrested and some of them even deported.

On top of that it also creates an extremely hostile climate which leads to more violent protests, which leads to more violent enforcement, which is an escalation that helps absolutely no one.

You cannot ever reward illegal behavior by the executive branch. If you do that, you create a police state, regardless of how many illegal migrants get deported at the end of it. This is completely unlawful, immoral and extremely damaging to the communities.

By the way, it is estimated that illegal immigrants make up roughly 3% of the American population.
Anyone arguing that these people are a problem is the real problem.




I feel like we are talking past each other. I dont condone what it looks like ICE is doing. Im just pointing out that to an average american citizen, its going to be confusing why ICE apprehending someone at a court house is a big deal. IMO The big deal is no due process or the way they behave. Not the actual act of arresting someone who is illegal and deporting them after they get due process.


Thinking ICE should exist is a right-wing position. Using phrases like "arresting someone who is illegal" is right wing.



Im not right wing. Im not using words like undocumented immigrants or pretending like enforcing immigration law is right wing.


Nice try, bud. You're not convincing us. You don't believe in open borders and you think enforcing immigration law is okay. You have failed the purity test. You are undeniably right-wing which by the way is also now synonymous with fascist, racist, misogynist and transphobic so enjoy those labels as well.

It’s remarkable your capacity to interject in such a manner in a thread where people are largely saying the opposite.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42428 Posts
16 hours ago
#100155
On June 10 2025 03:02 WombaT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2025 02:20 BlackJack wrote:
On June 10 2025 01:11 Sadist wrote:
On June 10 2025 00:53 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 05 2025 01:26 LightSpectra wrote:
On June 05 2025 01:20 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 04 2025 19:05 baal wrote:
On June 04 2025 08:59 Mohdoo wrote:
Yeah, its another example of republicans being experts in culture war at this point. They are the Sparta of culture war. They essentially normalize each other while also making each other look more reasonable in comparison. They each get to use each other as a "fall guy" to shed their baggage for some % of people.

This situation has made me realize why so many people thought TV wrestling was real.


I always find it funny when people assume hyper competence from obviously very flawed politicians.

Republicans think left wing ideologues infiltrated academia 40 years ago to infect young minds into the rise of socialist, and democrats think right wingers are brain washing young men with Joe Rogans and Andrew Tates but these things just happen organically.

They are not playing 4D Chess, they are playing checkers and badly, but out biased belief systems make us too invested and thus too blind to see how badly they are actually playing.


Yeah I don't think it's 4d chess, it's just checkers (thought this sounded familiar)

Wrestling is real. It's not a video game. Owen Hart actually died and getting hit actually hurts. They are however performers playing roles. Politicians are similar in that this is all a performance to them but real people are really getting hurt and dying as a consequence.

Musk, Rogan, and Trump/his successor are going to dominate the Overton Window and libs will try to find policy that lands somewhere between those three with Rogan (generally) being the "advocate" for human rights.

I don't even think they are doing this consciously, I think to them it really does feel like conflict. But more like friends trying to beat each other in a frivolous game than some sort of major clash.

I haven't seen any Musk, Trump, or Rogan talking points going mainstream among liberals.+ Show Spoiler +
The only person attempting to do that is Gavin Newsom and his popularity has been crashing as a result.



It's subtle, but it's there.

On June 10 2025 00:33 Sadist wrote:
On June 10 2025 00:02 Magic Powers wrote:
On June 09 2025 23:45 Sadist wrote:
On June 09 2025 23:26 Magic Powers wrote:
On June 09 2025 21:42 Sadist wrote:
On June 09 2025 21:24 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
[quote]

Unfortunately, Trump and other Republican leaders treat illegal immigrants as sub-human and worthless, so it's unsurprising when illegal immigrants aren't afforded rights or respect.



I guess what im saying is if an illegal immigrant is arrested for a crime and goes infront of a judge, even if the charges are dropped why would they not be held for being an illegal immigrant? Thats how my understanding of a warrant would work. Again i get the downsides of doing this (illegal immigrants would avoid police and not come forward as witnesses etc) but in practical terms how would we enforce immigration laws?


They're not being brought to court for alleged crimes. They're brought to court for being immigrants, then the courts dismiss the claims, then they get arrested in spite of their case being dismissed.



If they are legal immigrants obviously they should be left alone but if they are illegal immigrants IMO they should be detained even if the charges are dropped from an unrelated case. It should be done with some common decency like not roughing up people, talking to them like human beings, wearing uniforms without face coverings, etc. I would fully expect if I as an American was an illegal immigrant in another country I would get the boot if I was caught or charged with something unrelated.


I disagree very strongly. There's a reason why cases get dismissed on the basis of police misconduct. This is meant to prevent abuse of authority. If protocol isn't being followed, the suspect can often simply go free, regardless of any proof of guilt.
Same situation here. If ICE gets the desired result of deporting illegal immigrants by unlawfully snatching suspects of the streets, then not only is that in and of itself an illegal activity committed by ICE, but it also creates a situation where suspects are at a severe disadvantage due to not having sufficient legal representation (as mentioned in an earlier post of mine). If you allow one criminal activity, you allow two, and so forth. It results in perfectly legal immigrants being arrested and some of them even deported.

On top of that it also creates an extremely hostile climate which leads to more violent protests, which leads to more violent enforcement, which is an escalation that helps absolutely no one.

You cannot ever reward illegal behavior by the executive branch. If you do that, you create a police state, regardless of how many illegal migrants get deported at the end of it. This is completely unlawful, immoral and extremely damaging to the communities.

By the way, it is estimated that illegal immigrants make up roughly 3% of the American population.
Anyone arguing that these people are a problem is the real problem.




I feel like we are talking past each other. I dont condone what it looks like ICE is doing. Im just pointing out that to an average american citizen, its going to be confusing why ICE apprehending someone at a court house is a big deal. IMO The big deal is no due process or the way they behave. Not the actual act of arresting someone who is illegal and deporting them after they get due process.


Thinking ICE should exist is a right-wing position. Using phrases like "arresting someone who is illegal" is right wing.



Im not right wing. Im not using words like undocumented immigrants or pretending like enforcing immigration law is right wing.


Nice try, bud. You're not convincing us. You don't believe in open borders and you think enforcing immigration law is okay. You have failed the purity test. You are undeniably right-wing which by the way is also now synonymous with fascist, racist, misogynist and transphobic so enjoy those labels as well.

It’s remarkable your capacity to interject in such a manner in a thread where people are largely saying the opposite.

Blackjack is unusual here in that he doesn’t come here for any kind of politics, he uses the topic to unload his debilitating contrarianism so that he can go through life without picking a fight every time someone says “good morning” when the morning is okay at best.

Engaging him is a mistake because of the mistaken assumption that his own position is the one contrary to the one he is arguing against. It’s not, he doesn’t generally bring a position, and that makes the whole effort futile.

It’s important to his well-being so it’s best to just let him be.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
LightSpectra
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States1207 Posts
15 hours ago
#100156
Thanks for the warning.
2006 Shinhan Bank OSL Season 3 was the greatest tournament of all time
Magic Powers
Profile Joined April 2012
Austria3788 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-06-09 18:43:59
15 hours ago
#100157
On June 10 2025 01:34 LightSpectra wrote:
Guy that resorts to whataboutisms, strawmen, Schrödinger reasoning every single post in lieu of reading sources people show him thinks a few fragments of out-of-context legal code is a killer reply to the Trump administration literally telling Congress and judges that they're not beholden to any law when it comes to anything even remotely related to foreign policy.

In other news, I just had a really good béchamel lasagna for lunch.


My fear is that you bought the lasagna from illegal immigrants, hence I now support a police state. Hand over the fork before I arrest your nephew for studying in America while protesting against genocide.
If you want to do the right thing, 80% of your job is done if you don't do the wrong thing.
Magic Powers
Profile Joined April 2012
Austria3788 Posts
15 hours ago
#100158
For anyone wondering what happened that allowed the Nazis to come to power.

This.

This is what happened.
If you want to do the right thing, 80% of your job is done if you don't do the wrong thing.
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13837 Posts
15 hours ago
#100159
On June 10 2025 03:55 Magic Powers wrote:
For anyone wondering what happened that allowed the Nazis to come to power.

This.

This is what happened.

Unironically they had ANTIFA destabilizing the state trying to go for a communist revolution like the soviets, and were funded/organized by them.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
BlackJack
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States10379 Posts
15 hours ago
#100160
On June 10 2025 03:02 WombaT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2025 02:20 BlackJack wrote:
On June 10 2025 01:11 Sadist wrote:
On June 10 2025 00:53 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 05 2025 01:26 LightSpectra wrote:
On June 05 2025 01:20 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 04 2025 19:05 baal wrote:
On June 04 2025 08:59 Mohdoo wrote:
Yeah, its another example of republicans being experts in culture war at this point. They are the Sparta of culture war. They essentially normalize each other while also making each other look more reasonable in comparison. They each get to use each other as a "fall guy" to shed their baggage for some % of people.

This situation has made me realize why so many people thought TV wrestling was real.


I always find it funny when people assume hyper competence from obviously very flawed politicians.

Republicans think left wing ideologues infiltrated academia 40 years ago to infect young minds into the rise of socialist, and democrats think right wingers are brain washing young men with Joe Rogans and Andrew Tates but these things just happen organically.

They are not playing 4D Chess, they are playing checkers and badly, but out biased belief systems make us too invested and thus too blind to see how badly they are actually playing.


Yeah I don't think it's 4d chess, it's just checkers (thought this sounded familiar)

Wrestling is real. It's not a video game. Owen Hart actually died and getting hit actually hurts. They are however performers playing roles. Politicians are similar in that this is all a performance to them but real people are really getting hurt and dying as a consequence.

Musk, Rogan, and Trump/his successor are going to dominate the Overton Window and libs will try to find policy that lands somewhere between those three with Rogan (generally) being the "advocate" for human rights.

I don't even think they are doing this consciously, I think to them it really does feel like conflict. But more like friends trying to beat each other in a frivolous game than some sort of major clash.

I haven't seen any Musk, Trump, or Rogan talking points going mainstream among liberals.+ Show Spoiler +
The only person attempting to do that is Gavin Newsom and his popularity has been crashing as a result.



It's subtle, but it's there.

On June 10 2025 00:33 Sadist wrote:
On June 10 2025 00:02 Magic Powers wrote:
On June 09 2025 23:45 Sadist wrote:
On June 09 2025 23:26 Magic Powers wrote:
On June 09 2025 21:42 Sadist wrote:
On June 09 2025 21:24 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
[quote]

Unfortunately, Trump and other Republican leaders treat illegal immigrants as sub-human and worthless, so it's unsurprising when illegal immigrants aren't afforded rights or respect.



I guess what im saying is if an illegal immigrant is arrested for a crime and goes infront of a judge, even if the charges are dropped why would they not be held for being an illegal immigrant? Thats how my understanding of a warrant would work. Again i get the downsides of doing this (illegal immigrants would avoid police and not come forward as witnesses etc) but in practical terms how would we enforce immigration laws?


They're not being brought to court for alleged crimes. They're brought to court for being immigrants, then the courts dismiss the claims, then they get arrested in spite of their case being dismissed.



If they are legal immigrants obviously they should be left alone but if they are illegal immigrants IMO they should be detained even if the charges are dropped from an unrelated case. It should be done with some common decency like not roughing up people, talking to them like human beings, wearing uniforms without face coverings, etc. I would fully expect if I as an American was an illegal immigrant in another country I would get the boot if I was caught or charged with something unrelated.


I disagree very strongly. There's a reason why cases get dismissed on the basis of police misconduct. This is meant to prevent abuse of authority. If protocol isn't being followed, the suspect can often simply go free, regardless of any proof of guilt.
Same situation here. If ICE gets the desired result of deporting illegal immigrants by unlawfully snatching suspects of the streets, then not only is that in and of itself an illegal activity committed by ICE, but it also creates a situation where suspects are at a severe disadvantage due to not having sufficient legal representation (as mentioned in an earlier post of mine). If you allow one criminal activity, you allow two, and so forth. It results in perfectly legal immigrants being arrested and some of them even deported.

On top of that it also creates an extremely hostile climate which leads to more violent protests, which leads to more violent enforcement, which is an escalation that helps absolutely no one.

You cannot ever reward illegal behavior by the executive branch. If you do that, you create a police state, regardless of how many illegal migrants get deported at the end of it. This is completely unlawful, immoral and extremely damaging to the communities.

By the way, it is estimated that illegal immigrants make up roughly 3% of the American population.
Anyone arguing that these people are a problem is the real problem.




I feel like we are talking past each other. I dont condone what it looks like ICE is doing. Im just pointing out that to an average american citizen, its going to be confusing why ICE apprehending someone at a court house is a big deal. IMO The big deal is no due process or the way they behave. Not the actual act of arresting someone who is illegal and deporting them after they get due process.


Thinking ICE should exist is a right-wing position. Using phrases like "arresting someone who is illegal" is right wing.



Im not right wing. Im not using words like undocumented immigrants or pretending like enforcing immigration law is right wing.


Nice try, bud. You're not convincing us. You don't believe in open borders and you think enforcing immigration law is okay. You have failed the purity test. You are undeniably right-wing which by the way is also now synonymous with fascist, racist, misogynist and transphobic so enjoy those labels as well.

It’s remarkable your capacity to interject in such a manner in a thread where people are largely saying the opposite.


You think people are saying the opposite? LightSpectra says illegal immigrants should be deported if they've committed a felony. That's what? Maybe 2% of illegal immigrants? A felony is a serious crime which maybe calls for a more serious punishment than "alright mister, you're going to have to leave now." You think GH is on board with deporting people that are living here illegally? Seriously?

Sadist has been in on TL longer than anyone in this thread and he's also been a left/center-left guy the entire time. Insisting he's pushing right-wing trash for his position that, paraphrasing, "Trump/ICE are going about this all wrong but if you're living in a country illegally you shouldn't expect to be allowed to stay" is absurd. This comes after someone accused GH of pushing right-wing propaganda that Kamala Harris is a "DEI-Hire" for his opinion that she's not a good politician/candidate.

In Gavin Newsom's latest podcast he talks about having close friends that now won't speak to him because of the crime of calling biological males in women's sports "an issue of fairness" and believing it's unfair to allow biological males compete against women. This is a guy that basically paved the way for gay marriage by ordering marriage licenses to be issues to same-sex couples in 2004 when it was still illegal in his state and around the country. He's what you might call an "ally" to the LGBT movement but now he's being called a transphobe for his radical position that women's spaces are for women.

Jon Stewart said he faced an immediate and intense backlash for the absurd position of believing the wuhan coronavirus pandemic originated in the wuhan lab that studies coronaviruses. Crazy, I know. Same for Bill Maher who often talks about getting accused of joining MAGA anytime he strays from modern leftist ideology despite the fact he has been a lifelong liberal with unchanged beliefs.

It's pushing people out of their party and it's losing elections. Joe Rogan used to be a pot-smoking Bernie Sanders supporter. Elon Musk was a relatively apolitical environmentalist. Now they are perhaps the two biggest people to help Trump get elected. The Republicans already had their civil war of sorts and unfortunately the crazy side won and Liz Cheney is no more. The rest of them have fallen in line behind Trump. The left needs to sort out their schism and hopefully this time the crazy side will lose but based on how the moderates kowtow to them I doubt it.
Prev 1 5006 5007 5008 5009 5010 5012 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
10:00
StarCraft Evolution League #13
CranKy Ducklings67
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 228
ProTech77
Lowko65
EnDerr 15
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 32762
Sea 5752
Jaedong 1968
Bisu 794
Pusan 496
actioN 312
BeSt 268
EffOrt 230
Stork 201
Leta 116
[ Show more ]
ZerO 100
Dewaltoss 100
Light 85
Mini 81
Mong 77
Hyun 73
Larva 62
GoRush 48
ToSsGirL 46
Mind 40
Sharp 39
Movie 26
Backho 24
sSak 17
Sacsri 15
Dota 2
XcaliburYe583
BananaSlamJamma417
XaKoH 338
League of Legends
JimRising 500
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss1317
Stewie2K856
x6flipin379
allub197
Other Games
singsing823
Happy413
crisheroes300
Mew2King213
Pyrionflax165
ZerO(Twitch)12
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream5792
Other Games
gamesdonequick650
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 10
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Rasowy 12
• Airneanach4
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota295
League of Legends
• Stunt601
Other Games
• WagamamaTV121
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
36m
PiGosaur Monday
13h 36m
GSL Code S
23h 6m
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
Online Event
1d 13h
Replay Cast
1d 15h
GSL Code S
1d 23h
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
1d 23h
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
OSC
3 days
[ Show More ]
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
Cheesadelphia
4 days
CSO Cup
4 days
GSL Code S
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.