|
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread |
On August 12 2020 03:34 Mohdoo wrote: So are they just not doing another stimulus now..? Trump has said no and McConnel is a coward and not willing to go around Trump. Not much else left to do there.
Besides, Trump has solved everything by issuing his (ineffective/illegal) EO's. so 'problem solved'.
|
On August 12 2020 03:36 svl3 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 12 2020 03:29 Nevuk wrote: We did experience a surge in ER visits due to bleach ingestion/injection after the comments.
Whether he meant it that way or not, at least some Trump fans(not journalists) took it that way.
Most news I read said that he had suggested it, or suggested it as a treatment as their headline. Which is strictly speaking, accurate (though leaves out "suggested investigating") (the least accurate version I saw was "promotes injecting bleach" based on cursory glance at google).
I'll agree it's not a perfect set of headlines and doesn't give him the benefit of the doubt.
If you're complaining that facebook + twitter posts described it poorly, both need to die. Is there a source for the bolded? You're saying the ER visits were over actual bleach ingestions? I never saw this, which is odd given how prolific the story about people having the fish tank cleaner with some form of chloroquine was... No, no injections. Sorry, misspoke. My bad.
It was ingestion in various manners and the bizarre ones died out after a couple days (someone tried a bleach sinus nose rinse and another used bleach + mouthwash mix as mouthwash, BI article) and the biggest effect was people calling hotlines to ask if it was OK to do shortly after he mused. When basically everyone said "don't do it" it seems to have tapered off - with the notable exception that we are using cleaners more anyways, so accidental poisonings were already on the rise (see time article), which some people attributed to Trump's comments (probably mistakenly)
https://time.com/5835244/accidental-poisonings-trump/
https://www.businessinsider.com/maryland-hotline-got-100-calls-about-disinfectant-as-coronavirus-cure-2020-4
On August 12 2020 03:34 Mohdoo wrote: So are they just not doing another stimulus now..? Correct. Trump gave everyone cover to go home by his do nothing executive order.
(Negotiations stalled out when the 2 trillion compromise got kicked out by the GOP, and dems already said the 1 trillion senate was a non-starter, same for senate with house's 3 trillion).
They're all playing chicken with everyone's livelihoods, for a variety of reasons. I can't see them holding through the whole recess with that attitude.
|
|
|
|
|
On August 12 2020 00:15 Wombat_NI wrote:Show nested quote +On August 12 2020 00:02 JimmiC wrote:On August 11 2020 21:30 svl3 wrote:On August 11 2020 21:21 Wombat_NI wrote: The cycle is more akin to Trump says something and if one applies a lens tinting to the generous side one can maybe interpret that he made a salient point about some other thing.
Gaffes are mistakes or misspeak that perhaps historically we’ve been too harsh on lampooning. Happens to the best of us.
Trump just outright doesn’t know what he’s talking about or quite blatantly lies with a startling regularity. Plus it’s not like he’s making a mistake in an off-the-cuff speech half the time it’s coming from what he’s throwing out on Twitter Well, the characterization you give at the end seems to refer to other times and none of those situations apply to what he was being eagerly lampooned for here (eagerly by the media in general, when I searched the quote I got a plethora of happy News articles and happy tweeters eager to "own" Trump). I may be failing in memory, but at the moment, I don't really find Trump doing the equivalent to what Biden did in the above examples (he will naturally favorably interpret things for his own benefit, but are there equivalent examples of blatant manipulative deceptions to objectively misrepresent facts, as in that video?). edit: also, glad you mentioned the lens tinting to the generous side of things point. I think we _should_ do that if attempting to be objective. In doing so, sometimes we may not be able to hold a strong feeling or opinion -- probably a good thing -- and would recognize the limits of making an interpretation off of something tenuous. In 2020 when the News is so polarized and emotion/shock driven, this seems more important. I probably fail to do this myself a lot, tho. Wait you can't think of examples of Trump blatant misrepresenting facts? How about when he took a sharpie to the weather map to include states he said but it didn't? And the weather station had to put out messages to stop people from boarding up their windows and evacuating their houses. Or the time he told people injecting themselves with bleach was a good idea. Or all the bull shit on hydroxychloroquine. Or that Twitter had to put messages next to his untrue tweets. And so on and so forth. The guy is such a compulsive liar it is hard to keep up with them! https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/07/trumps-lies-about-coronavirus/608647/https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/23/opinion/trumps-lies.html?mtrref=www.google.ca&gwh=FE91D6A8AAB270121BC2D29DBB127FB6&gwt=pay&assetType=REGIWALLhttps://www.forbes.com/sites/davidmarkowitz/2020/05/05/trump-is-lying-more-than-ever-just-look-at-the-data/#302ff6621e17https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinion/op-ed/bs-ed-op-0804-trump-truth-20200803-w6u6f3nmdzasrlaj6jlc5jp3a4-story.htmlhttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jul/14/trump-leading-america-lying-anthony-fauciedit: googling trump lies will bring up almost and endless about of articles about it because he does it so bloody much it hard to remember specific ones. He might actually lie more than he tells the truth. Being a billionaire, albeit suspiciously one who likes to boast about it but weirdly not like to prove it via tax returns. Or Trump University being absolutely a legitimate learning institution that was absolutely good value for its paying customers. For the record I don’t think Trump lies very much. It’s so hard to distinguish what is a lie and what is just him being a dumbass, plus his narcissistic tendencies I reckon that he actually thinks he’s correct/telling the truth. When other people lie it’s with misdirection and polish, they’re trying to hide their untruths because well, they know they are trying to lie and want to hide the extent. Trump is so exceedingly blatant that I think he doesn’t even know he’s doing it.
These examples seem rather odd. There seem to be a large number of posters having the consensus he horrifically lies, and here you said "exceedingly blatant" to describe it, but the examples seem really weak.
Trump University? I don't think anyone has defended Trump University, but it is odd to say him advertising it was a lie. What is next, he said Trump steaks (these were real) were the best ever, but someone reported dissatisfaction, hence he is the #1 liar among politicians?
Then him not being a billionaire? You don't know if he isn't, yet this is a sign of a lie? Pretty odd one to choose, if he is such a serial blatant liar. I'd also question the notion that hiding tax returns is primarily for this reason, rather than for many other possible motives. I don't think there is even serious doubt on him being a billionaire, or much reason to focus on it.
I find it odd Trump is characterized as "blatant" but we appear to lack a true clear cut example. And if Trump is, Biden is not? I posted the 1988 video of Biden repeatedly lying blatantly in an undisputed analysis, but it seems there is nothing so straightforwardly equivalent lie to point to with Trump, in comparison. At the end of the day, we are comparing politicians who all lie for a living. To me the question is how trustable his record shows him to be compared to Biden and US politicians in general, and also how material lies or misleading statements have been.
For me, I think some "blatant" lies of POTUS and their admins are things like, 1) "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." Just a simply blatant lie, despite being of dubious relevance. 2) We're sure there are WMDs in Iraq. 3) There is no government spying on Americans or journalists, I promise. (Obama's, paraphrased).
|
On August 12 2020 03:44 Gorsameth wrote:Show nested quote +On August 12 2020 03:34 Mohdoo wrote: So are they just not doing another stimulus now..? Trump has said no and McConnel is a coward and not willing to go around Trump. Not much else left to do there. Besides, Trump has solved everything by issuing his (ineffective/illegal) EO's. so 'problem solved'.
I would give McConnel more credit than that. It's pure political maneuvering to either force democrats to be against aid or give Trump a win so Republicans don't get dumpstered in November.
|
On August 12 2020 04:13 svl3 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 12 2020 00:15 Wombat_NI wrote:On August 12 2020 00:02 JimmiC wrote:On August 11 2020 21:30 svl3 wrote:On August 11 2020 21:21 Wombat_NI wrote: The cycle is more akin to Trump says something and if one applies a lens tinting to the generous side one can maybe interpret that he made a salient point about some other thing.
Gaffes are mistakes or misspeak that perhaps historically we’ve been too harsh on lampooning. Happens to the best of us.
Trump just outright doesn’t know what he’s talking about or quite blatantly lies with a startling regularity. Plus it’s not like he’s making a mistake in an off-the-cuff speech half the time it’s coming from what he’s throwing out on Twitter Well, the characterization you give at the end seems to refer to other times and none of those situations apply to what he was being eagerly lampooned for here (eagerly by the media in general, when I searched the quote I got a plethora of happy News articles and happy tweeters eager to "own" Trump). I may be failing in memory, but at the moment, I don't really find Trump doing the equivalent to what Biden did in the above examples (he will naturally favorably interpret things for his own benefit, but are there equivalent examples of blatant manipulative deceptions to objectively misrepresent facts, as in that video?). edit: also, glad you mentioned the lens tinting to the generous side of things point. I think we _should_ do that if attempting to be objective. In doing so, sometimes we may not be able to hold a strong feeling or opinion -- probably a good thing -- and would recognize the limits of making an interpretation off of something tenuous. In 2020 when the News is so polarized and emotion/shock driven, this seems more important. I probably fail to do this myself a lot, tho. Wait you can't think of examples of Trump blatant misrepresenting facts? How about when he took a sharpie to the weather map to include states he said but it didn't? And the weather station had to put out messages to stop people from boarding up their windows and evacuating their houses. Or the time he told people injecting themselves with bleach was a good idea. Or all the bull shit on hydroxychloroquine. Or that Twitter had to put messages next to his untrue tweets. And so on and so forth. The guy is such a compulsive liar it is hard to keep up with them! https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/07/trumps-lies-about-coronavirus/608647/https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/23/opinion/trumps-lies.html?mtrref=www.google.ca&gwh=FE91D6A8AAB270121BC2D29DBB127FB6&gwt=pay&assetType=REGIWALLhttps://www.forbes.com/sites/davidmarkowitz/2020/05/05/trump-is-lying-more-than-ever-just-look-at-the-data/#302ff6621e17https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinion/op-ed/bs-ed-op-0804-trump-truth-20200803-w6u6f3nmdzasrlaj6jlc5jp3a4-story.htmlhttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jul/14/trump-leading-america-lying-anthony-fauciedit: googling trump lies will bring up almost and endless about of articles about it because he does it so bloody much it hard to remember specific ones. He might actually lie more than he tells the truth. Being a billionaire, albeit suspiciously one who likes to boast about it but weirdly not like to prove it via tax returns. Or Trump University being absolutely a legitimate learning institution that was absolutely good value for its paying customers. For the record I don’t think Trump lies very much. It’s so hard to distinguish what is a lie and what is just him being a dumbass, plus his narcissistic tendencies I reckon that he actually thinks he’s correct/telling the truth. When other people lie it’s with misdirection and polish, they’re trying to hide their untruths because well, they know they are trying to lie and want to hide the extent. Trump is so exceedingly blatant that I think he doesn’t even know he’s doing it. These examples seem rather odd. There seem to be a large number of posters having the consensus he horrifically lies, and here you said "exceedingly blatant" to describe it, but the examples seem really weak. Trump University? I don't think anyone has defended Trump University, but it is odd to say him advertising it was a lie. What is next, he said Trump steaks (these were real) were the best ever, but someone reported dissatisfaction, hence he is the #1 liar among politicians? Then him not being a billionaire? You don't know if he isn't, yet this is a sign of a lie? Pretty odd one to choose, if he is such a serial blatant liar. I'd also question the notion that hiding tax returns is primarily for this reason, rather than for many other possible motives. I don't think there is even serious doubt on him being a billionaire, or much reason to focus on it. I find it odd Trump is characterized as "blatant" but we appear to lack a true clear cut example. And if Trump is, Biden is not? I posted the 1988 video of Biden repeatedly lying blatantly in an undisputed analysis, but it seems there is nothing so straightforwardly equivalent lie to point to with Trump, in comparison. At the end of the day, we are comparing politicians who all lie for a living. To me the question is how trustable his record shows him to be compared to Biden and US politicians in general, and also how material lies or misleading statements have been. For me, I think some "blatant" lies of POTUS and their admins are things like, 1) "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." Just a simply blatant lie, despite being of dubious relevance. 2) We're sure there are WMDs in Iraq. 3) There is no government spying on Americans or journalists, I promise. (Obama's, paraphrased). He's pretty blatant. The crowd sizes were right on his inauguration. His framing on "People are saying ..." are pretty much always followed by something you know he's making up. I can accept the whole blatant part.
The better politicians don't go right up and say it, they're never quoted on it, because it either goes unsaid or is done in back rooms. Pelosi had a rare lapse when she was reported to say "Deborah Birx is the worst. Wow, what horrible hands you're in" and went on to defend it because Birx is a Trump appointee. Better politicians learn to pick better fights and when to walk away. They can stay on message and not self sabotage.
Honestly, Trump has three Democrat led cities with recent riots or looting. Portland didn't end when the feds left, and they're torching police stations with dozens of arrests. Chicago had a major looting spree, and BLM defended it. Seattle police have bodycam footage, and just lost their police chief over recent budget cuts. The massive anti-police sentiment, and bad approach by mayors and governors, has led to exploding crime rates in places like NYC (177% increase). It should be a no-brainer to go all law-and-order, Democrats are just going to be emboldened to spread this crap if they win the White House. And Trump's on twitter attacking his party's senators for making good points, and beefing with John Bolton and Scaramucci. It's political incompetence every week.
|
That Trump is a blatant liar is one of the least possible controversial statements. honestly, if you need help finding any examples, it can only be because you aren’t looking. Donnie can’t go five sentences without lying. It just is what it is.
That and you clearly need to inform yourself of what happened to Trump University. It isn’t a matter of bad reviews. You are brutally misinformed.
he has even lied about how his lawsuits against Trump U went. he has repeatedly claimed he could settle for ‘very little money right now’ but ‘didn’t want to out of principle.’ he settled for over 25 million.
There is nothing under the sun he wouldn’t lie about if it got ratings or money. It would be quite admirable from the business perspective if it weren’t coming from the POTUS. His shareholders must be big fans.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_University
|
Kamala Harris it is, a fine choice imo
|
On August 12 2020 05:23 farvacola wrote: Kamala Harris it is, a fine choice imo The most logical I think. Now they get to defend her AG record.
|
|
|
She's definitely not my favorite option, and there are certainly other candidates who would have been better choices for convincing progressives to vote, but it's this ticket or we get Trump again.
|
On August 12 2020 05:24 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 12 2020 05:23 farvacola wrote: Kamala Harris it is, a fine choice imo The most logical I think. Now they get to defend her AG record. I’m not sure Dems *need* to defend anything, so long as they keep the focus on the here and now, they’ll win.
|
On August 12 2020 05:27 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:She's definitely not my favorite option, and there are certainly other candidates who would have been better choices for convincing progressives to vote, but it's this ticket or we get Trump again.
Hey they don't value my progressive vote enough to earn they won't have to worry, they didn't earn it and won't get it.
I'm VERY done playing the race to the bottom game. I'm tired of playing cynical games in my head and OOPS they play out in reality.
This shit is tiring and these Suck It Up games are bullshit.
|
On August 12 2020 05:27 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:She's definitely not my favorite option, and there are certainly other candidates who would have been better choices for convincing progressives to vote, but it's this ticket or we get Trump again.
It's not Trump again for 4 years, its the Trump dynasty until he dies in office, then they appoint Ivanka and so on. Or it's someone else. I'll take someone else.
|
Northern Ireland26096 Posts
On August 12 2020 04:13 svl3 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 12 2020 00:15 Wombat_NI wrote:On August 12 2020 00:02 JimmiC wrote:On August 11 2020 21:30 svl3 wrote:On August 11 2020 21:21 Wombat_NI wrote: The cycle is more akin to Trump says something and if one applies a lens tinting to the generous side one can maybe interpret that he made a salient point about some other thing.
Gaffes are mistakes or misspeak that perhaps historically we’ve been too harsh on lampooning. Happens to the best of us.
Trump just outright doesn’t know what he’s talking about or quite blatantly lies with a startling regularity. Plus it’s not like he’s making a mistake in an off-the-cuff speech half the time it’s coming from what he’s throwing out on Twitter Well, the characterization you give at the end seems to refer to other times and none of those situations apply to what he was being eagerly lampooned for here (eagerly by the media in general, when I searched the quote I got a plethora of happy News articles and happy tweeters eager to "own" Trump). I may be failing in memory, but at the moment, I don't really find Trump doing the equivalent to what Biden did in the above examples (he will naturally favorably interpret things for his own benefit, but are there equivalent examples of blatant manipulative deceptions to objectively misrepresent facts, as in that video?). edit: also, glad you mentioned the lens tinting to the generous side of things point. I think we _should_ do that if attempting to be objective. In doing so, sometimes we may not be able to hold a strong feeling or opinion -- probably a good thing -- and would recognize the limits of making an interpretation off of something tenuous. In 2020 when the News is so polarized and emotion/shock driven, this seems more important. I probably fail to do this myself a lot, tho. Wait you can't think of examples of Trump blatant misrepresenting facts? How about when he took a sharpie to the weather map to include states he said but it didn't? And the weather station had to put out messages to stop people from boarding up their windows and evacuating their houses. Or the time he told people injecting themselves with bleach was a good idea. Or all the bull shit on hydroxychloroquine. Or that Twitter had to put messages next to his untrue tweets. And so on and so forth. The guy is such a compulsive liar it is hard to keep up with them! https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/07/trumps-lies-about-coronavirus/608647/https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/23/opinion/trumps-lies.html?mtrref=www.google.ca&gwh=FE91D6A8AAB270121BC2D29DBB127FB6&gwt=pay&assetType=REGIWALLhttps://www.forbes.com/sites/davidmarkowitz/2020/05/05/trump-is-lying-more-than-ever-just-look-at-the-data/#302ff6621e17https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinion/op-ed/bs-ed-op-0804-trump-truth-20200803-w6u6f3nmdzasrlaj6jlc5jp3a4-story.htmlhttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jul/14/trump-leading-america-lying-anthony-fauciedit: googling trump lies will bring up almost and endless about of articles about it because he does it so bloody much it hard to remember specific ones. He might actually lie more than he tells the truth. Being a billionaire, albeit suspiciously one who likes to boast about it but weirdly not like to prove it via tax returns. Or Trump University being absolutely a legitimate learning institution that was absolutely good value for its paying customers. For the record I don’t think Trump lies very much. It’s so hard to distinguish what is a lie and what is just him being a dumbass, plus his narcissistic tendencies I reckon that he actually thinks he’s correct/telling the truth. When other people lie it’s with misdirection and polish, they’re trying to hide their untruths because well, they know they are trying to lie and want to hide the extent. Trump is so exceedingly blatant that I think he doesn’t even know he’s doing it. These examples seem rather odd. There seem to be a large number of posters having the consensus he horrifically lies, and here you said "exceedingly blatant" to describe it, but the examples seem really weak. Trump University? I don't think anyone has defended Trump University, but it is odd to say him advertising it was a lie. What is next, he said Trump steaks (these were real) were the best ever, but someone reported dissatisfaction, hence he is the #1 liar among politicians? Then him not being a billionaire? You don't know if he isn't, yet this is a sign of a lie? Pretty odd one to choose, if he is such a serial blatant liar. I'd also question the notion that hiding tax returns is primarily for this reason, rather than for many other possible motives. I don't think there is even serious doubt on him being a billionaire, or much reason to focus on it. I find it odd Trump is characterized as "blatant" but we appear to lack a true clear cut example. And if Trump is, Biden is not? I posted the 1988 video of Biden repeatedly lying blatantly in an undisputed analysis, but it seems there is nothing so straightforwardly equivalent lie to point to with Trump, in comparison. At the end of the day, we are comparing politicians who all lie for a living. To me the question is how trustable his record shows him to be compared to Biden and US politicians in general, and also how material lies or misleading statements have been. For me, I think some "blatant" lies of POTUS and their admins are things like, 1) "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." Just a simply blatant lie, despite being of dubious relevance. 2) We're sure there are WMDs in Iraq. 3) There is no government spying on Americans or journalists, I promise. (Obama's, paraphrased). How many examples does one actually need? You don’t have to watch every video a pornstar has appeared in to make a conclusion that they’re ok having sex on camera.
It would be nigh on a full time job to catalogue and archive his more blatant falsehoods, Jimmy is doing an admirable job albeit on a part-time basis thus far.
My examples were poor ones in terms of pointing out blatant lying admittedly.
|
On August 12 2020 05:23 farvacola wrote: Kamala Harris it is, a fine choice imo Solid - the quintessential "stick it to the left" candidate.
Guess I gotta figure out who else to vote for, given that Biden is out.
|
Oh god, I know many dems who will rather stick it out with Trump than vote in Kamala... who picks an ex cop to be VP when literally the youngest left/dems hate cops.
|
From defunding the police to hiring a cop. And she goes from attacking Biden on forced busing (of all things) to supporting his record.
I expect tons of the "I'm gonna know what to do with this unrest and reform."
The ads showing her threatening parents with jail for their truant kids will be g l o r i u s.
|
Meh. All of the VP options were pretty meh for me (aside from Warren, who was always an unlikely option due to the historical acrimony between Biden and her). Abrams was probably the most charismatic, but I disagree with her policy positions. Harris is about the best of the milquetoast crowd.
|
|
|
|
|
|