|
Although this thread does not function under the same strict guidelines as the USPMT, it is still a general practice on TL to provide a source with an explanation on why it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion. Failure to do so will result in a mod action. |
Pretty close to my own understanding of the situation so I like it and would recommend to people wanting some catch up.
|
|
On July 01 2015 09:07 Jibba wrote: I don't think my view is that it was inherently flawed. Greece, Italy and Spain specifically tried to force Germany to meet higher expansion targets from the very beginning, and Germany just didn't comply. If you went back to 1998 and described Germany's fiscal policy in 2010, everyone would've known it would fail.
Italy and French leaders are the true culprits for what is happening, they got elected with the promise of changing Europe and make a network anti-austerity. They with Spain (but Rahoj is from PP) are the only with the economical power to have a word against German austerity. But soon after some very inspiring speeches for the believers, they hid under Merkel's skirt, and they're still hiding right now. Now Greece is alone in this and is acting like a hunted animal in the corner.Especially the Italian leader Renzi is an amateur with no international charisma at all, he haven't even taken a position on the Greek question just because it will be irrelevant, so taking a side for him will just mean new enemies. Which is stupid, after Greece the weak ring is Italy.
|
On July 01 2015 07:27 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On July 01 2015 07:12 WhiteDog wrote:On June 30 2015 23:01 Gorsameth wrote:On June 30 2015 22:56 phantomlancer23 wrote: Lending money to pay an unsustainble debt must stop.Germans will stop this after they auction everything in Greece it seems there are still a lot of stuff.....anyway if you cant understand that all the World is talking about the blackmailing its not my fault as i said its difficult to admit that you are usury and blackmailer for anyone. Again where is the blackmailing? Give a specific answer please. Well most of you drank the dominant media arguments so much you can't think anymore so what's the point. In your view, the european institutions have been helping Greece all this time and it's the Greek that didn't play their part : the reality is the exact opposite. Greek actually did everything that europe wanted them to, far more than any other european country actually, and didn't get one cent from the european institution since 2012 at least : what the european institution have been doing, with public money, is buying Greek debt from their previous private owners, mostly banks. So we have no been helping Greece, like most of the Germans in this thread believe, we have actually been securing the banks (our very favored banks) from the risks that represented the Greek unsustainability. Now that the debt is entirely owned by public institutions (the IMF, the eurogroup and the ECB), the european institutions are just starting to face what they have created, which is a country completly empty after five years of stupid policies. Stop drinking the socialist cool-aid, and read this: http://www.vox.com/2015/6/8/8747195/greece-crisis-explained/in/8625476 Is it a joke answer ? Because there is nothing in your article about the content of the plan. You're not responding to my point at all.
Here is what I was talking about :
One estimate is that Greece actually subscribed to €156bn worth of new debt in order to get €206bn worth of old debt to be written off, meaning the write-down of €110bn by the banks and others is more than double the true figure of €50bn that was truly written off. Taxpayers are now liable for more than 80% of Greece's debt.[268] One journalist for Der Spiegel noted that the second bailout was not "geared to the requirements of the people of Greece but to the needs of the international financial markets, meaning the banks. How else can one explain the fact that around a quarter of the package won't even arrive in Athens but will flow directly to the country's international creditors?" He accused the banks of "cleverly manipulating the fear that a Greek bankruptcy would trigger a fatal chain reaction" in order to get paid.[269] According to Robert Reich, in the background of the Greek bailouts and debt restructuring lurks Wall Street. While US banks are owed only about €5bn by Greece, they have more significant exposure to the situation via German and French banks, who were significantly exposed to Greek debt. Massively reducing the liabilities of German and French banks with regards to Greece thus also serves to protect US banks.[270]
According to Der Spiegel "more than 80 percent of the rescue package is going to creditors—that is to say, to banks outside of Greece and to the ECB. The billions of taxpayer euros are not saving Greece. They're saving the banks."[271] One study found that the public debt of Greece to foreign governments, including debt to the EU/IMF loan facility and debt through the eurosystem, increased by €130 bn, from €47.8 bn to €180.5 billion, between January 2010 and September 2011.[272] The combined exposure of foreign banks to Greek entities—public and private—was around 80bn euros by mid-February 2012. In 2009 they were in for well over 200bn.[273] The Economist noted that, during 2012 alone, "private-sector bondholders reduced their nominal claims by more than 50%. But the deal did not include the hefty holdings of Greek bonds at the European Central Bank (ECB), and it was sweetened with funds borrowed from official rescuers. For two years those rescuers had pretended Greece was solvent, and provided official loans to pay off bondholders in full. So more than 70% of the debts are now owed to 'official' creditors", i.e. European taxpayers and the IMF.[274] With regard to Germany in particular, a Bloomberg editorial noted that, before its banks reduced its exposure to Greece, "they stood to lose a ton of money if Greece left the euro. Now any losses will be shared with the taxpayers of the entire euro area." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_government-debt_crisis
+ Show Spoiler +
On July 01 2015 08:12 Jibba wrote:Show nested quote +On July 01 2015 07:52 Nyxisto wrote: How is this "modest" or realistic? It's just another way of loading the risk onto other European countries. His whole proposal does not contain one sentence about structural changes that the Greek economy needs to tackle. The EIB isn't really relevant as it's purpose is not to generalize debt risk but fund a handful of specific projects that are in European interest.
I said it earlier but I'll repeat it because people keep being baited into the easy and incorrect solution of blaming Greece: any structural changes that Greece makes will be irrelevant in the current EU. They're not climbing out of this hole given the current circumstances, even if Brussels acquiesces to their proposal. The country that needs to make structural economic changes is Germany and it's unlikely to happen, which dooms the EU. Greece is just the weakest player that let go first, but every other eurozone country is harmed by Germany's austerity and paranoia of becoming the Weimar Republic again. Ya'll are stuck debating the best way to hide a pimple and ignoring what's causing the acne. I agree with you but it's less Germany than the euro. Not increasing wage would have had no effect if there were flexible exchange rate between countries : the deflation in Germany would have triggered an increase of their currency's exchange rate. But since the exchange rate between member of the euro zone are fixe, it create our problem.
It's not like a country's government can easily decide to increase or not the wages too ! In reality, wage are determined by conflicts that are culturally tainted : the climate of social struggle that exist within the society. The northern tend to accept more things and have a less troubled form of social relations. The south is determined by a complicated discussion between the workers and their boss, as the importance of the socialist and communist movement (in Italy and France for exemple) suggest. Nyxisto blame the increase in wage of the Greek despite a rather flat productivity, but in fact this increase in wage corresponded to the highest growth in euro (around 4.2 % on average prior to the crisis) : in such a political country as Greece, it's obvious such a growth is going to lead to an increase in wage (and in fact there were tons of manifestation, and pretty violent ones, between 2000 and 2005 arguing for an increase in min wage). The problem is not the wage increase, but lack of exchange rate, so much that the increase in wage created an increase in inflation that was not matched by the other country and not reflected in exchange rates, destroying the small competitiveness Greece had.
|
On July 01 2015 06:31 Taguchi wrote:Curious that none of you guys comment on the Guardian article which reports that the IMF has sent documents to all German MPs outlining that the debt is unsustainable under even the best case scenario. A lot more in the article of course, most things have been repeated in this thread too. Didn't Merkel say a couple days ago that the debt is sustainable? Was that an outright lie or what? Juncker lying is no big deal, but Merkel?
(Reuters) - Greek debt will miss debt targets set out by creditors in 2012 but an analysis prepared for euro zone finance ministers shows its debt burden is still sustainable without writing off principal -- if Greece gets another three-year bailout.
The analysis, commissioned by the EU creditor governments to help their financing-for-reforms negotiations with Athens, concludes that even in the worst scenario for the Greek economy, the lenders would not have to write off any loans.
Debt relief has been a repeated request from the leftist government in Athens which wants to ease back on austerity.
Under a 2012 bailout agreement, Greece was to reach a debt-to-GDP ratio of 124 percent in 2020 and in 2022 a debt-to-GDP ratio substantially lower than 110 percent, down from 175 percent now.
"It is clear that the policy slippages and uncertainties of the last months have made the achievement of the 2012 targets impossible under any scenario," the analysis, seen by Reuters, said.
"The main factors behind the deterioration of the Debt Sustainability Analysis are the worsening of economic growth, the revised primary balance path, the lower privatisation revenues and possible additional financial needs for the banking sector."
Under the revised forecast and the most optimistic scenario that Athens implements all reforms, Greek is debt to fall to 124 percent only in 2022 from 172.8 pct in 2015.
If it implements the reforms only partially, Greek debt will fall only to 135 percent in 2022 from 174.3 pct in 2015.
In the worst case, which the International Monetary Fund sees as its "baseline", which means most likely, Greek debt would fall only to 142.2 percent in 2022 from 176.7 percent in 2015.
"All scenarios assume a new 3-year programme with concessional financing," the analysis said.
The analysis stresses however, that focusing on the debt-to-GDP ratio does not give an accurate picture of debt sustainability and that this is better reflected by gross financing needs of a country.
Measured like this, Greece has no sustainability problem in any scenario, but would require help to improve the sustainability, via for example an extension of maturities, under the third, least favourable option.
"This gross financing need metric points to no sustainability issues under the first two scenarios," the document said.
"The gross financing needs remain well below 15 percent threshold, a threshold mentioned in IMF guidance for this criterion. Under this scenario, significant reprofiling of the stock of debt and concessional lending terms would improve sustainability," it said.
So it is sustainable granted that there will be a 3rd bailout. source
edit: I already linked this earlier but it was dismissed as untrustworthy because it's by the IMF.
|
On July 01 2015 17:06 WhiteDog wrote:Show nested quote +On July 01 2015 07:27 Acrofales wrote:On July 01 2015 07:12 WhiteDog wrote:On June 30 2015 23:01 Gorsameth wrote:On June 30 2015 22:56 phantomlancer23 wrote: Lending money to pay an unsustainble debt must stop.Germans will stop this after they auction everything in Greece it seems there are still a lot of stuff.....anyway if you cant understand that all the World is talking about the blackmailing its not my fault as i said its difficult to admit that you are usury and blackmailer for anyone. Again where is the blackmailing? Give a specific answer please. Well most of you drank the dominant media arguments so much you can't think anymore so what's the point. In your view, the european institutions have been helping Greece all this time and it's the Greek that didn't play their part : the reality is the exact opposite. Greek actually did everything that europe wanted them to, far more than any other european country actually, and didn't get one cent from the european institution since 2012 at least : what the european institution have been doing, with public money, is buying Greek debt from their previous private owners, mostly banks. So we have no been helping Greece, like most of the Germans in this thread believe, we have actually been securing the banks (our very favored banks) from the risks that represented the Greek unsustainability. Now that the debt is entirely owned by public institutions (the IMF, the eurogroup and the ECB), the european institutions are just starting to face what they have created, which is a country completly empty after five years of stupid policies. Stop drinking the socialist cool-aid, and read this: http://www.vox.com/2015/6/8/8747195/greece-crisis-explained/in/8625476 Is it a joke answer ? Because there is nothing in your article about the content of the plan. You're not responding to my point at all. Here is what I was talking about : Show nested quote +One estimate is that Greece actually subscribed to €156bn worth of new debt in order to get €206bn worth of old debt to be written off, meaning the write-down of €110bn by the banks and others is more than double the true figure of €50bn that was truly written off. Taxpayers are now liable for more than 80% of Greece's debt.[268] One journalist for Der Spiegel noted that the second bailout was not "geared to the requirements of the people of Greece but to the needs of the international financial markets, meaning the banks. How else can one explain the fact that around a quarter of the package won't even arrive in Athens but will flow directly to the country's international creditors?" He accused the banks of "cleverly manipulating the fear that a Greek bankruptcy would trigger a fatal chain reaction" in order to get paid.[269] According to Robert Reich, in the background of the Greek bailouts and debt restructuring lurks Wall Street. While US banks are owed only about €5bn by Greece, they have more significant exposure to the situation via German and French banks, who were significantly exposed to Greek debt. Massively reducing the liabilities of German and French banks with regards to Greece thus also serves to protect US banks.[270]
According to Der Spiegel "more than 80 percent of the rescue package is going to creditors—that is to say, to banks outside of Greece and to the ECB. The billions of taxpayer euros are not saving Greece. They're saving the banks."[271] One study found that the public debt of Greece to foreign governments, including debt to the EU/IMF loan facility and debt through the eurosystem, increased by €130 bn, from €47.8 bn to €180.5 billion, between January 2010 and September 2011.[272] The combined exposure of foreign banks to Greek entities—public and private—was around 80bn euros by mid-February 2012. In 2009 they were in for well over 200bn.[273] The Economist noted that, during 2012 alone, "private-sector bondholders reduced their nominal claims by more than 50%. But the deal did not include the hefty holdings of Greek bonds at the European Central Bank (ECB), and it was sweetened with funds borrowed from official rescuers. For two years those rescuers had pretended Greece was solvent, and provided official loans to pay off bondholders in full. So more than 70% of the debts are now owed to 'official' creditors", i.e. European taxpayers and the IMF.[274] With regard to Germany in particular, a Bloomberg editorial noted that, before its banks reduced its exposure to Greece, "they stood to lose a ton of money if Greece left the euro. Now any losses will be shared with the taxpayers of the entire euro area." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_government-debt_crisis+ Show Spoiler +Show nested quote +On July 01 2015 08:12 Jibba wrote:On July 01 2015 07:52 Nyxisto wrote: How is this "modest" or realistic? It's just another way of loading the risk onto other European countries. His whole proposal does not contain one sentence about structural changes that the Greek economy needs to tackle. The EIB isn't really relevant as it's purpose is not to generalize debt risk but fund a handful of specific projects that are in European interest.
I said it earlier but I'll repeat it because people keep being baited into the easy and incorrect solution of blaming Greece: any structural changes that Greece makes will be irrelevant in the current EU. They're not climbing out of this hole given the current circumstances, even if Brussels acquiesces to their proposal. The country that needs to make structural economic changes is Germany and it's unlikely to happen, which dooms the EU. Greece is just the weakest player that let go first, but every other eurozone country is harmed by Germany's austerity and paranoia of becoming the Weimar Republic again. Ya'll are stuck debating the best way to hide a pimple and ignoring what's causing the acne. I agree with you but it's less Germany than the euro. Not increasing wage would have had no effect if there were flexible exchange rate between countries : the deflation in Germany would have triggered an increase of their currency's exchange rate. But since the exchange rate between member of the euro zone are fixe, it create our problem. It's not like a country's government can easily decide to increase or not the wages too ! In reality, wage are determined by conflicts that are culturally tainted : the climate of social struggle that exist within the society. The northern tend to accept more things and have a less troubled form of social relations. The south is determined by a complicated discussion between the workers and their boss, as the importance of the socialist and communist movement (in Italy and France for exemple) suggest. Nyxisto blame the increase in wage of the Greek despite a rather flat productivity, but in fact this increase in wage corresponded to the highest growth in euro (around 4.2 % on average prior to the crisis) : in such a political country as Greece, it's obvious such a growth is going to lead to an increase in wage. The problem is not the wage increase, but lack of exchange rate, so much that the increase in wage created an increase in inflation that was not matched by the other country and not reflected in exchange rates, destroying the small competitiveness Greece had. Then maybe faking their numbers to get into the Euro was not the smartest thing to do. Those barriers were there for a reason, Greece cheated their way in, and now it is the Euros fault?
|
On July 01 2015 18:12 mahrgell wrote:Show nested quote +On July 01 2015 17:06 WhiteDog wrote:On July 01 2015 07:27 Acrofales wrote:On July 01 2015 07:12 WhiteDog wrote:On June 30 2015 23:01 Gorsameth wrote:On June 30 2015 22:56 phantomlancer23 wrote: Lending money to pay an unsustainble debt must stop.Germans will stop this after they auction everything in Greece it seems there are still a lot of stuff.....anyway if you cant understand that all the World is talking about the blackmailing its not my fault as i said its difficult to admit that you are usury and blackmailer for anyone. Again where is the blackmailing? Give a specific answer please. Well most of you drank the dominant media arguments so much you can't think anymore so what's the point. In your view, the european institutions have been helping Greece all this time and it's the Greek that didn't play their part : the reality is the exact opposite. Greek actually did everything that europe wanted them to, far more than any other european country actually, and didn't get one cent from the european institution since 2012 at least : what the european institution have been doing, with public money, is buying Greek debt from their previous private owners, mostly banks. So we have no been helping Greece, like most of the Germans in this thread believe, we have actually been securing the banks (our very favored banks) from the risks that represented the Greek unsustainability. Now that the debt is entirely owned by public institutions (the IMF, the eurogroup and the ECB), the european institutions are just starting to face what they have created, which is a country completly empty after five years of stupid policies. Stop drinking the socialist cool-aid, and read this: http://www.vox.com/2015/6/8/8747195/greece-crisis-explained/in/8625476 Is it a joke answer ? Because there is nothing in your article about the content of the plan. You're not responding to my point at all. Here is what I was talking about : One estimate is that Greece actually subscribed to €156bn worth of new debt in order to get €206bn worth of old debt to be written off, meaning the write-down of €110bn by the banks and others is more than double the true figure of €50bn that was truly written off. Taxpayers are now liable for more than 80% of Greece's debt.[268] One journalist for Der Spiegel noted that the second bailout was not "geared to the requirements of the people of Greece but to the needs of the international financial markets, meaning the banks. How else can one explain the fact that around a quarter of the package won't even arrive in Athens but will flow directly to the country's international creditors?" He accused the banks of "cleverly manipulating the fear that a Greek bankruptcy would trigger a fatal chain reaction" in order to get paid.[269] According to Robert Reich, in the background of the Greek bailouts and debt restructuring lurks Wall Street. While US banks are owed only about €5bn by Greece, they have more significant exposure to the situation via German and French banks, who were significantly exposed to Greek debt. Massively reducing the liabilities of German and French banks with regards to Greece thus also serves to protect US banks.[270]
According to Der Spiegel "more than 80 percent of the rescue package is going to creditors—that is to say, to banks outside of Greece and to the ECB. The billions of taxpayer euros are not saving Greece. They're saving the banks."[271] One study found that the public debt of Greece to foreign governments, including debt to the EU/IMF loan facility and debt through the eurosystem, increased by €130 bn, from €47.8 bn to €180.5 billion, between January 2010 and September 2011.[272] The combined exposure of foreign banks to Greek entities—public and private—was around 80bn euros by mid-February 2012. In 2009 they were in for well over 200bn.[273] The Economist noted that, during 2012 alone, "private-sector bondholders reduced their nominal claims by more than 50%. But the deal did not include the hefty holdings of Greek bonds at the European Central Bank (ECB), and it was sweetened with funds borrowed from official rescuers. For two years those rescuers had pretended Greece was solvent, and provided official loans to pay off bondholders in full. So more than 70% of the debts are now owed to 'official' creditors", i.e. European taxpayers and the IMF.[274] With regard to Germany in particular, a Bloomberg editorial noted that, before its banks reduced its exposure to Greece, "they stood to lose a ton of money if Greece left the euro. Now any losses will be shared with the taxpayers of the entire euro area." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_government-debt_crisis+ Show Spoiler +On July 01 2015 08:12 Jibba wrote:On July 01 2015 07:52 Nyxisto wrote: How is this "modest" or realistic? It's just another way of loading the risk onto other European countries. His whole proposal does not contain one sentence about structural changes that the Greek economy needs to tackle. The EIB isn't really relevant as it's purpose is not to generalize debt risk but fund a handful of specific projects that are in European interest.
I said it earlier but I'll repeat it because people keep being baited into the easy and incorrect solution of blaming Greece: any structural changes that Greece makes will be irrelevant in the current EU. They're not climbing out of this hole given the current circumstances, even if Brussels acquiesces to their proposal. The country that needs to make structural economic changes is Germany and it's unlikely to happen, which dooms the EU. Greece is just the weakest player that let go first, but every other eurozone country is harmed by Germany's austerity and paranoia of becoming the Weimar Republic again. Ya'll are stuck debating the best way to hide a pimple and ignoring what's causing the acne. I agree with you but it's less Germany than the euro. Not increasing wage would have had no effect if there were flexible exchange rate between countries : the deflation in Germany would have triggered an increase of their currency's exchange rate. But since the exchange rate between member of the euro zone are fixe, it create our problem. It's not like a country's government can easily decide to increase or not the wages too ! In reality, wage are determined by conflicts that are culturally tainted : the climate of social struggle that exist within the society. The northern tend to accept more things and have a less troubled form of social relations. The south is determined by a complicated discussion between the workers and their boss, as the importance of the socialist and communist movement (in Italy and France for exemple) suggest. Nyxisto blame the increase in wage of the Greek despite a rather flat productivity, but in fact this increase in wage corresponded to the highest growth in euro (around 4.2 % on average prior to the crisis) : in such a political country as Greece, it's obvious such a growth is going to lead to an increase in wage. The problem is not the wage increase, but lack of exchange rate, so much that the increase in wage created an increase in inflation that was not matched by the other country and not reflected in exchange rates, destroying the small competitiveness Greece had. Then maybe faking their numbers to get into the Euro was not the smartest thing to do. Those barriers were there for a reason, Greece cheated their way in, and now it is the Euros fault? The euro cause problem to all countries : Portugal, Italy, Spain, France ? Greece is the tip of the iceberg. Only the less political countries (with shitty politician such as Merkel, Schäuble, Martin Schultz, Juncker, Hollande or Jeroen Dijsselbloem that are all, in their own way, a perfect exemple of how pityful politics is in the "north") "profit" from it (their competitiveness only) since they can force a control of wage, increase poverty, without anyone disagreeing.The old and retired people that represent 60 % of those countries electorate will vote for them again anyway.
Corrected
|
Sorry for the intrusion, but this is really annoying me:
Schäuble. The "l" is behind the "b". and there is an Umlaut over the a, but i guess leaving that one out is acceptable if your Keyboard doesn't have those. Just don't have letters randomly jump around in names for no apparent reason.
|
A majority of Greeks would vote 'No' to the terms of a proposed bailout deal by foreign lenders but the lead narrowed significantly after banks were closed this week, according to an opinion poll published on Wednesday.
The poll, conducted between June 28-30 and published in the Efimerida ton Syntakton newspaper, showed 54 percent of those planning to vote in Sunday's referendum would oppose the bailout against 33 percent in favor.
However, a breakdown of results between those polled before and after Sunday's decision to close the banks and impose capital controls showed the gap narrowing.
Of those polled before the announcement of the bank closures, 57 percent said they would vote No against 30 percent for who would vote Yes. Of those polled after, the No's were at 46 percent against 37 percent for Yes.
The poll showed support for 'No' strongest among voters of the ruling leftist Syriza party (77 percent), the far-right Golden Dawn party (80 percent) and the Communist KKE (57 percent).
Support for 'Yes' was strongest among voters of the center-right New Democracy (65 percent), the pro-European centrist To Potami (68 percent) and the center-left Pasok (65 percent).
The poll, by the ProRata institute, showed 86 percent of those surveyed planned to vote, with 50 percent backing Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras' decision to hold a referendum with 38 percent against.
No votes were strongest among the unemployed (62 percent), and more No votes than Yes were polled in all categories classified, comprising entrepreneurs, the self-employed, public and private sector pensioners and employees and housewives.
source
|
Zurich15328 Posts
Germany is "less political" (what does that even mean?) because they follow policy you don't agree with?
Also towards stagnation in Germany, I'd like to point out that is somewhat old news. Wages as well as domestic spending has continuously increased since 2010.
|
So the Greeks seem to be for a No, while Tsipras is now willing to accept practically all the creditor demands? What the hell is going on?
|
On July 01 2015 18:58 zatic wrote: Germany is "less political" (what does that even mean?) because they follow policy you don't agree with?
Also towards stagnation in Germany, I'd like to point out that is somewhat old news. Wages as well as domestic spending has continuously increased since 2010.
Nah, Germany is "less political" because we do not have such a great history of political competence as Greece. Nor did we manage to vote someone like Berlusconi into office 4 times. :[
Also our politics only cater the 60% old and retired, that is why we have an retirement age of 67 instead of 57. Certainly...
|
The debate on Greece is actually two debates based on two different questions: - What should the troika do? - What should Greece do?
The two often get confused and the answer is not the same. If you think that the troika should be more lax towards Greece, you might be tempted to think that Greece should be defiant/confrontational against the troika. For Greece, I highly doubt that is a good choice and that's why I think Syriza is doing an awful job, independently of what I believe the troika should to.
Now, in political debate you can frame it one way or the other. If you're Greece, doing what you can to ensure the debate is focused on the first question is the right move - force people into thinking as a collective. On the other hand, if you start framing it as Greece vs Germany, David vs Goliath, underdog vs Evil Empire, then you're actually pushing the debate towards the second question while alienating everyone else at the same time.
|
On July 01 2015 19:05 mahrgell wrote:Show nested quote +On July 01 2015 18:58 zatic wrote: Germany is "less political" (what does that even mean?) because they follow policy you don't agree with?
Also towards stagnation in Germany, I'd like to point out that is somewhat old news. Wages as well as domestic spending has continuously increased since 2010.
Nah, Germany is "less political" because we do not have such a great history of political competence as Greece. Nor did we manage to vote someone like Berlusconi into office 4 times. :[ Also our politics only cater the 60% old and retired, that is why we have an retirement age of 67 instead of 57. Certainly...
It's funny how my grand mother is still really found of Berlusconi even after the whole mess he has been involved with. I really don't understand the majority of Italian people.
|
On July 01 2015 19:14 warding wrote: The debate on Greece is actually two debates based on two different questions: - What should the troika do? - What should Greece do?
The two often get confused and the answer is not the same. If you think that the troika should be more lax towards Greece, you might be tempted to think that Greece should be defiant/confrontational against the troika. For Greece, I highly doubt that is a good choice and that's why I think Syriza is doing an awful job, independently of what I believe the troika should to.
Now, in political debate you can frame it one way or the other. If you're Greece, doing what you can to ensure the debate is focused on the first question is the right move - force people into thinking as a collective. On the other hand, if you start framing it as Greece vs Germany, David vs Goliath, underdog vs Evil Empire, then you're actually pushing the debate towards the second question while alienating everyone else at the same time. I dont know if it was here or somewhere else that I posted it but this indeed has been a problem with the negotiations from the start. Syriza came to the table having already put down a No, that's a terrible position to take as the weaker party.
If they had come to the table agreeing to the current measures and trying to find a better alternative the story becomes about "should the troika be this harsh to Greece". It allows Greece to build international good will and sympathy which is something they completely lack.
|
On July 01 2015 18:18 WhiteDog wrote:Show nested quote +On July 01 2015 18:12 mahrgell wrote:On July 01 2015 17:06 WhiteDog wrote:On July 01 2015 07:27 Acrofales wrote:On July 01 2015 07:12 WhiteDog wrote:On June 30 2015 23:01 Gorsameth wrote:On June 30 2015 22:56 phantomlancer23 wrote: Lending money to pay an unsustainble debt must stop.Germans will stop this after they auction everything in Greece it seems there are still a lot of stuff.....anyway if you cant understand that all the World is talking about the blackmailing its not my fault as i said its difficult to admit that you are usury and blackmailer for anyone. Again where is the blackmailing? Give a specific answer please. Well most of you drank the dominant media arguments so much you can't think anymore so what's the point. In your view, the european institutions have been helping Greece all this time and it's the Greek that didn't play their part : the reality is the exact opposite. Greek actually did everything that europe wanted them to, far more than any other european country actually, and didn't get one cent from the european institution since 2012 at least : what the european institution have been doing, with public money, is buying Greek debt from their previous private owners, mostly banks. So we have no been helping Greece, like most of the Germans in this thread believe, we have actually been securing the banks (our very favored banks) from the risks that represented the Greek unsustainability. Now that the debt is entirely owned by public institutions (the IMF, the eurogroup and the ECB), the european institutions are just starting to face what they have created, which is a country completly empty after five years of stupid policies. Stop drinking the socialist cool-aid, and read this: http://www.vox.com/2015/6/8/8747195/greece-crisis-explained/in/8625476 Is it a joke answer ? Because there is nothing in your article about the content of the plan. You're not responding to my point at all. Here is what I was talking about : One estimate is that Greece actually subscribed to €156bn worth of new debt in order to get €206bn worth of old debt to be written off, meaning the write-down of €110bn by the banks and others is more than double the true figure of €50bn that was truly written off. Taxpayers are now liable for more than 80% of Greece's debt.[268] One journalist for Der Spiegel noted that the second bailout was not "geared to the requirements of the people of Greece but to the needs of the international financial markets, meaning the banks. How else can one explain the fact that around a quarter of the package won't even arrive in Athens but will flow directly to the country's international creditors?" He accused the banks of "cleverly manipulating the fear that a Greek bankruptcy would trigger a fatal chain reaction" in order to get paid.[269] According to Robert Reich, in the background of the Greek bailouts and debt restructuring lurks Wall Street. While US banks are owed only about €5bn by Greece, they have more significant exposure to the situation via German and French banks, who were significantly exposed to Greek debt. Massively reducing the liabilities of German and French banks with regards to Greece thus also serves to protect US banks.[270]
According to Der Spiegel "more than 80 percent of the rescue package is going to creditors—that is to say, to banks outside of Greece and to the ECB. The billions of taxpayer euros are not saving Greece. They're saving the banks."[271] One study found that the public debt of Greece to foreign governments, including debt to the EU/IMF loan facility and debt through the eurosystem, increased by €130 bn, from €47.8 bn to €180.5 billion, between January 2010 and September 2011.[272] The combined exposure of foreign banks to Greek entities—public and private—was around 80bn euros by mid-February 2012. In 2009 they were in for well over 200bn.[273] The Economist noted that, during 2012 alone, "private-sector bondholders reduced their nominal claims by more than 50%. But the deal did not include the hefty holdings of Greek bonds at the European Central Bank (ECB), and it was sweetened with funds borrowed from official rescuers. For two years those rescuers had pretended Greece was solvent, and provided official loans to pay off bondholders in full. So more than 70% of the debts are now owed to 'official' creditors", i.e. European taxpayers and the IMF.[274] With regard to Germany in particular, a Bloomberg editorial noted that, before its banks reduced its exposure to Greece, "they stood to lose a ton of money if Greece left the euro. Now any losses will be shared with the taxpayers of the entire euro area." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_government-debt_crisis+ Show Spoiler +On July 01 2015 08:12 Jibba wrote:On July 01 2015 07:52 Nyxisto wrote: How is this "modest" or realistic? It's just another way of loading the risk onto other European countries. His whole proposal does not contain one sentence about structural changes that the Greek economy needs to tackle. The EIB isn't really relevant as it's purpose is not to generalize debt risk but fund a handful of specific projects that are in European interest.
I said it earlier but I'll repeat it because people keep being baited into the easy and incorrect solution of blaming Greece: any structural changes that Greece makes will be irrelevant in the current EU. They're not climbing out of this hole given the current circumstances, even if Brussels acquiesces to their proposal. The country that needs to make structural economic changes is Germany and it's unlikely to happen, which dooms the EU. Greece is just the weakest player that let go first, but every other eurozone country is harmed by Germany's austerity and paranoia of becoming the Weimar Republic again. Ya'll are stuck debating the best way to hide a pimple and ignoring what's causing the acne. I agree with you but it's less Germany than the euro. Not increasing wage would have had no effect if there were flexible exchange rate between countries : the deflation in Germany would have triggered an increase of their currency's exchange rate. But since the exchange rate between member of the euro zone are fixe, it create our problem. It's not like a country's government can easily decide to increase or not the wages too ! In reality, wage are determined by conflicts that are culturally tainted : the climate of social struggle that exist within the society. The northern tend to accept more things and have a less troubled form of social relations. The south is determined by a complicated discussion between the workers and their boss, as the importance of the socialist and communist movement (in Italy and France for exemple) suggest. Nyxisto blame the increase in wage of the Greek despite a rather flat productivity, but in fact this increase in wage corresponded to the highest growth in euro (around 4.2 % on average prior to the crisis) : in such a political country as Greece, it's obvious such a growth is going to lead to an increase in wage. The problem is not the wage increase, but lack of exchange rate, so much that the increase in wage created an increase in inflation that was not matched by the other country and not reflected in exchange rates, destroying the small competitiveness Greece had. Then maybe faking their numbers to get into the Euro was not the smartest thing to do. Those barriers were there for a reason, Greece cheated their way in, and now it is the Euros fault? The euro cause problem to all countries : Portugal, Italy, Spain, France ? Greece is the tip of the iceberg. Only the less political countries (with shitty politician such as Merkel, Schäuble, Martin Schultz, Juncker, Hollande or Jeroen Dijsselbloem that are all, in their own way, a perfect exemple of how pityful politics is in the "north") "profit" from it (their competitiveness only) since they can force a control of wage, increase poverty, without anyone disagreeing.The old and retired people that represent 60 % of those countries electorate will vote for them again anyway. Corrected German wage control is a joint decision between its (powerful) trade unions and employer organisations, because the Germans prefer earning less to getting fired. This is probably hard to imagine if you're coming from a country where trade unions regard employers as pure evil and vice versa. In Belgium it is the same thing, and it leads to huge problems. Germany also recently introduced a minimum wage (much to the dismay of the private sector) and capped the amount of rent landlords can ask on their real estate.
If I'm not mistaken, Germany was called the "sick man of Europe" not even ten years ago. Nowadays they're the champion of Europe, and that's largely due to careful, long-term planning and even sacrifice of the people you vilify. It's correct, Germany's wages haven't gone up by much, especially not compared to the likes of Greece. On the other hand did Greece actually have the productivity to back up the wage increases, or did it happen because its politicians wanted to buy votes?
Competitive countries should not handicap themselves because other countries can't get their act together. It's like asking Apple to make their iPads less good so other manufacturers would stand a better chance too, while completely disregarding the fact that by and large android tablets do not sell well because they just aren't as good.
|
From today on in Spain, public demonstrations are illegal unless they are previously accepted by the Government (even if they are pacific). Also tweeting about them is illegal and will be fined (for example tweeting about Greenpeace acts).
Illegal immigrants will be sent back to their countries right away. They already did this, but now it will be legal.
Also uploading movies in Spain is now illegal.
Partido Popular moving towards progress as usual... ffs.
|
+ Show Spoiler +
I can't fucking believe this.
So we have now implemented capital controls (which already bear a dire cost for the economy, including SO MANY cancellations from tourists, loss of trust in the banking system, immense loss of revenue etc) so we can (maybe, hopefully) get a deal protecting 30% reduced VAT in the islands, majority state-owned ADMIE (part of public power corporation) as a standalone corporation instead of fully privatized (meaning it'll get privatized soon enough anyway), and a small postponement of various harsh pension cuts. No mention of taxing profits instead, 0 redistributive measures that were previously the whole point about Syriza's offer. Complete capitulation, 3 days into the referendum process. Un-fucking-believable. We would've been better off with bloody Samaras after all.
I'll come up with creditor answer to this right now: Capital controls mean added contraction for the Greek economy so the 29th June proposal will not be able to deliver on specified program targets. Thus, it will be necessary to adopt new fiscal measures amounting to a couple extra billion. Off wages/pensions, of course. Oh and we don't trust you one bit so you better form a grand coalition government with a technocrat as the PM, let's see... umm... yes, this former Central Banker will do nicely. Have a nice day, thanks for playing in the game!
Syriza just dealt a deathblow to the credibility of leftist movements everywhere. My view, maybe it is wrong, but I really don't see it being wrong.
|
With that new letter, that referendum makes so much sense, yeah!
But honest question, maybe some Greek can answer me: Why is Tsipras so obsessed with that island tax reduction?
|
On July 01 2015 19:45 mahrgell wrote: With that new letter, that referendum makes so much sense, yeah!
But honest question, maybe some Greek can answer me: Why is Tsipras so obsessed with that island tax reduction?
Not greek myself but I can imagine a lower VAT is meant to encourage tourism through lower prices
|
|
|
|