|
Although this thread does not function under the same strict guidelines as the USPMT, it is still a general practice on TL to provide a source with an explanation on why it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion. Failure to do so will result in a mod action. |
On June 27 2018 06:40 sc-darkness wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2018 06:39 Dan HH wrote:On June 27 2018 05:24 sc-darkness wrote:On June 27 2018 05:13 Plansix wrote: Point to immigration and claiming it is the root cause of their rise is myopic. The rise of right wing parties across a large number of nations cannot be linked to a single cause. And ceding ground on issues like immigration does not assure they won’t gain more power. It a simplistic solution to a wildly complex problem. Why did UKIP rise and then quickly disappeared after the last referendum in the UK? I'm not saying they were right though. Because Farage left. Can you name UKIP's current leader without googling it? I couldn't. They disappeared because they don't have a face anymore. Last time I was checking news, UKIP was in decline after the referendum even with Farage as an interim leader. I don't know what you checked, he was interim leader for a single month long after it had already gone to shit without him and a bunch of people left and proposed to disband the party. And he made it as clear as possible that he's only there out of obligation and does not plan to stay.
Any immigration policy changes following Brexit are still in the future, they don't even know what to do about EEA yet. The suggestion that Brexit solved British right wing people's complaints about immigration and that's why UKIP is no longer necessary is incorrect, it's all yet to be decided. So why do their former voters no longer bother wanting to make UKIP have a say in those future immigration policies? Because UKIP doesn't exist, it was always just Farage. The collection of muppets still in that party do not enjoy nearly the same trust as Tories from the voters that are furthest right.
|
On June 27 2018 06:47 Big J wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On June 27 2018 05:41 TheDwf wrote: By the way Big J, how come the far-right was already so high in your country in the 1990's? The story goes like this: The Austrian social-democracy was very strong throughout the 70s and 80s, so they ruled alone and when they lost the 50% they carried on with the tiny FPÖ, which used to be some semi-liberal, semi-nationalist party at that time. A lot of this was due to the influence of the German FDP, which tried to establish them as a liberal party of their kind in Austria. In 1986 young Jörg Haider revolted in the FPÖ which led to the social-democrats breaking up the coalition, because of Haiders Nazi-slang provocations, leading to the so-called Vranitzky doctrine, a party resolution (named after the SPÖ chancellor Vranitzky) which is valid to this day, which forbids the SPÖ to form a coalition with the FPÖ. What followed were endless standstill coalitions in the 90s of the (leading) social-democrats with the conservatives and Haider pretty much inventing modern populism, eating through the conservative voter base, but also becoming popular with "the working man". So in my eyes it's a mixture of the SPÖ-ÖVP standstill and the charismatic, opportunistic character Jörg Haider, that made the FPÖ grow big in the 90s. In 1993 the liberals split from the Haider-FPÖ, founding their own party, which was eventually canibalized by the rise of the (back then) left-liberal Greens led by (the current president) Alexander Van der Bellen In the 1999 election the FPÖ got second place in front of the ÖVP-conservatives (behind the social-democrats) and ÖVP/FPÖ formed a coalition under the leadership of ÖVP-party leader Wolfgang Schüssel and with Haider taking no government role. In the wake of Haider a lot of young opportunists, more liberal than nationalist, took over the leading government roles of the FPÖ. The party lost most of their voter base to the conservatives in the 2003 elections, but they formed another FPÖ/ÖVP government. In 2005 Haider tried to get rid of the Nazi-parts of the party so he and the governing part of the FPÖ with all the opportunists founded a new party called BZÖ, leaving only the outmost Nazi scum in the FPÖ. Turns out the Nazi scum had a lot of rich donors and a very fine strategist/propagandist (current interior minister Herbert Kickl) and they survived. After Haider died in a car accident, driving home from meeting with his secret gay lover in 2008 the BZÖ collapsed, with the FPÖ, now led by true and outright Nazis like Heinz-Christian Strache or Johann Gudenus and 50% German-nationalist fraternity members for members of parliament, taking all the right-wing voters. With their march towards becoming the biggest party only stopped by Sebastian Kurz taking over the ÖVP and taking over all their positions without being an actual (or former) Nazi. Dem amazing FPÖ stories... thanks for the answer.
By the way, I came across this today:
+ Show Spoiler +
Apparently your cops and military are doing exercices in which they simulate the arrival of thousands of persons at the border? (Source in Ger) — Is the mastermind your FPÖ Interior Minister?
|
On June 27 2018 20:15 TheDwf wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2018 06:47 Big J wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On June 27 2018 05:41 TheDwf wrote: By the way Big J, how come the far-right was already so high in your country in the 1990's? The story goes like this: The Austrian social-democracy was very strong throughout the 70s and 80s, so they ruled alone and when they lost the 50% they carried on with the tiny FPÖ, which used to be some semi-liberal, semi-nationalist party at that time. A lot of this was due to the influence of the German FDP, which tried to establish them as a liberal party of their kind in Austria. In 1986 young Jörg Haider revolted in the FPÖ which led to the social-democrats breaking up the coalition, because of Haiders Nazi-slang provocations, leading to the so-called Vranitzky doctrine, a party resolution (named after the SPÖ chancellor Vranitzky) which is valid to this day, which forbids the SPÖ to form a coalition with the FPÖ. What followed were endless standstill coalitions in the 90s of the (leading) social-democrats with the conservatives and Haider pretty much inventing modern populism, eating through the conservative voter base, but also becoming popular with "the working man". So in my eyes it's a mixture of the SPÖ-ÖVP standstill and the charismatic, opportunistic character Jörg Haider, that made the FPÖ grow big in the 90s. In 1993 the liberals split from the Haider-FPÖ, founding their own party, which was eventually canibalized by the rise of the (back then) left-liberal Greens led by (the current president) Alexander Van der Bellen In the 1999 election the FPÖ got second place in front of the ÖVP-conservatives (behind the social-democrats) and ÖVP/FPÖ formed a coalition under the leadership of ÖVP-party leader Wolfgang Schüssel and with Haider taking no government role. In the wake of Haider a lot of young opportunists, more liberal than nationalist, took over the leading government roles of the FPÖ. The party lost most of their voter base to the conservatives in the 2003 elections, but they formed another FPÖ/ÖVP government. In 2005 Haider tried to get rid of the Nazi-parts of the party so he and the governing part of the FPÖ with all the opportunists founded a new party called BZÖ, leaving only the outmost Nazi scum in the FPÖ. Turns out the Nazi scum had a lot of rich donors and a very fine strategist/propagandist (current interior minister Herbert Kickl) and they survived. After Haider died in a car accident, driving home from meeting with his secret gay lover in 2008 the BZÖ collapsed, with the FPÖ, now led by true and outright Nazis like Heinz-Christian Strache or Johann Gudenus and 50% German-nationalist fraternity members for members of parliament, taking all the right-wing voters. With their march towards becoming the biggest party only stopped by Sebastian Kurz taking over the ÖVP and taking over all their positions without being an actual (or former) Nazi. Dem amazing FPÖ stories... thanks for the answer. By the way, I came across this today: + Show Spoiler +Apparently your cops and military are doing exercices in which they simulate the arrival of thousands of persons at the border? ( Source in Ger) — Is the mastermind your FPÖ Interior Minister?
Yes, it's all part of Mr. Kickl's show. All our armed and executive forces and our secret services are in the hands of FPÖ ministries and he uses them very publically. He is currently forming a mounted police corps for publicity reasons, neutralizing ÖVP influence from the secret service BVT and has now created this show with migrant-actors to shoot some fotos for the press.
|
On June 27 2018 06:47 Big J wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2018 05:41 TheDwf wrote: By the way Big J, how come the far-right was already so high in your country in the 1990's? The story goes like this: The Austrian social-democracy was very strong throughout the 70s and 80s, so they ruled alone and when they lost the 50% they carried on with the tiny FPÖ, which used to be some semi-liberal, semi-nationalist party at that time. A lot of this was due to the influence of the German FDP, which tried to establish them as a liberal party of their kind in Austria. In 1986 young Jörg Haider revolted in the FPÖ which led to the social-democrats breaking up the coalition, because of Haiders Nazi-slang provocations, leading to the so-called Vranitzky doctrine, a party resolution (named after the SPÖ chancellor Vranitzky) which is valid to this day, which forbids the SPÖ to form a coalition with the FPÖ. What followed were endless standstill coalitions in the 90s of the (leading) social-democrats with the conservatives and Haider pretty much inventing modern populism, eating through the conservative voter base, but also becoming popular with "the working man". So in my eyes it's a mixture of the SPÖ-ÖVP standstill and the charismatic, opportunistic character Jörg Haider, that made the FPÖ grow big in the 90s. In 1993 the liberals split from the Haider-FPÖ, founding their own party, which was eventually canibalized by the rise of the (back then) left-liberal Greens led by (the current president) Alexander Van der Bellen In the 1999 election the FPÖ got second place in front of the ÖVP-conservatives (behind the social-democrats) and ÖVP/FPÖ formed a coalition under the leadership of ÖVP-party leader Wolfgang Schüssel and with Haider taking no government role. In the wake of Haider a lot of young opportunists, more liberal than nationalist, took over the leading government roles of the FPÖ. The party lost most of their voter base to the conservatives in the 2003 elections, but they formed another FPÖ/ÖVP government. In 2005 Haider tried to get rid of the Nazi-parts of the party so he and the governing part of the FPÖ with all the opportunists founded a new party called BZÖ, leaving only the outmost Nazi scum in the FPÖ. Turns out the Nazi scum had a lot of rich donors and a very fine strategist/propagandist (current interior minister Herbert Kickl) and they survived. After Haider died in a car accident, driving home from meeting with his secret gay lover in 2008 the BZÖ collapsed, with the FPÖ, now led by true and outright Nazis like Heinz-Christian Strache or Johann Gudenus and 50% German-nationalist fraternity members for members of parliament, taking all the right-wing voters. With their march towards becoming the biggest party only stopped by Sebastian Kurz taking over the ÖVP and taking over all their positions without being an actual (or former) Nazi.
Germany saw an unprecedented rise in nationalistic folklore and the parties to back it up in the 90s as well. While your analysis is certainly correct and we can see itself repeat nowadays with the implosion of the classic socialist-democratic and conservative parties pretty much everywhere, I'd like to add the fact at that point in time there was a wave of mass immigration just like today, coming from the Balkan after 1991. And while it was overwhelmingly Turkish people who suffered from terrorist attacks in Germany during the 90s and after, the reason, along with unification and high unemployment in the east, can be found in mass immigration and not just far, but extreme right parties using it to rile up people. Just look at your eastern border, xenophobia is one of the easiest and cheapest ways to sway the masses. You don't even have to get anything else done as long as you keep the level of fear high enough.
|
I don't see any agreement, just a vague promise of one. Seems like the idea of mandatory relocation is finally dead (yay!), but that's more of a silent admittance of defeat of the pro-immigration camp.
Announcing the end of tense summit talks shortly before dawn, the head of the European council, Donald Tusk, tweeted that EU leaders had reached an agreement, including on migration. Hours earlier that outcome had been in doubt, when Italy threatened to veto the entire text unless other EU states did more to help with people arriving on Italian shores. Opposition from Poland, Hungary and other central European states to any hint of mandatory action meant talks dragged through the night. The euro jumped 0.6% on news of the deal, while the French president, Emmanuel Macron, declared that European cooperation “has won the day”. Italy’s prime minister, Giuseppe Conte, said: “We are satisfied. It was a long negotiation but from today Italy is no longer alone.” But the bloc dodged an agreement on controversial refugee quotas, as a quartet of central European countries resisted language on EU-wide responsibility. The outcome is already being seen as a thin deal. (...) On leaving the summit, the German chancellor conceded that “we still have a lot of work to do to bridge the different views”, but said it was “a good signal” that the EU had agreed a common text. Merkel had warned on Thursday that the future of the European Union hinged on whether it could find answers to the “vital questions” posed by migration. Leaders agreed EU countries should help migrants rescued in the Mediterranean to alleviate the burden on Italy and Greece, but the details remained unclear. (...) Finding a more consensual note, EU leaders called for migrant processing centres in north African countries. They agreed to “swiftly explore the concept of regional platforms in close cooperation” with non-EU countries and the UN refugee agency and the International Organisation for Migration, also a UN-backed agency. In essence, this means migrant processing centres in countries such as Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Niger and Tunisia. EU funds would be available to persuade countries to sign on, but so far no countries have agreed, while a couple have ruled themselves out. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jun/29/eu-leaders-summit-migration-doubts
Living in the age of Trump made me expect fireworks like Conte quitting the summit early or Orban calling someone a Soros puppet, but we only got something silly like this exchange below. Fortunately EU politics haven't turned into a reality show yet.
In an attempt to force the issue, Italy’s Conte was accused of hijacking the summit when he threatened to block the entire summit conclusions unless he received more help. “I am a law professor,” Conte told his fellow leaders, protesting about the EU’s working methods, promoting an unusual exchange, according to a source. The Bulgarian prime minister, Boyko Borissov, replied: “Well, I used to be a fireman and this is not how you negotiate.” Sweden’s prime minister, Stefan Löfven, added that he used to be a welder and he did not agree with the Italian’s way of making his point either.
|
“Well, I used to be a fireman and this is not how you negotiate.” is a top tier dunk. Your politicians are way more fun than my current ones.
|
On June 27 2018 07:19 Dan HH wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2018 06:40 sc-darkness wrote:On June 27 2018 06:39 Dan HH wrote:On June 27 2018 05:24 sc-darkness wrote:On June 27 2018 05:13 Plansix wrote: Point to immigration and claiming it is the root cause of their rise is myopic. The rise of right wing parties across a large number of nations cannot be linked to a single cause. And ceding ground on issues like immigration does not assure they won’t gain more power. It a simplistic solution to a wildly complex problem. Why did UKIP rise and then quickly disappeared after the last referendum in the UK? I'm not saying they were right though. Because Farage left. Can you name UKIP's current leader without googling it? I couldn't. They disappeared because they don't have a face anymore. Last time I was checking news, UKIP was in decline after the referendum even with Farage as an interim leader. I don't know what you checked, he was interim leader for a single month long after it had already gone to shit without him and a bunch of people left and proposed to disband the party. And he made it as clear as possible that he's only there out of obligation and does not plan to stay. Any immigration policy changes following Brexit are still in the future, they don't even know what to do about EEA yet. The suggestion that Brexit solved British right wing people's complaints about immigration and that's why UKIP is no longer necessary is incorrect, it's all yet to be decided. So why do their former voters no longer bother wanting to make UKIP have a say in those future immigration policies? Because UKIP doesn't exist, it was always just Farage. The collection of muppets still in that party do not enjoy nearly the same trust as Tories from the voters that are furthest right.
Alright, you want the skinny on UKIP *spits* and Nigel Farage *blesses ground with salt*, and why they've more or less vanished, and where they came from? Here goes, and god defend my soul.
We have a paper called the Daily Fail. Some mistakenly call it the Daily Mail. The Daily Fail hates... well, basically everyone, but especially immigrants. It hates most of you, because you're not English. You're okay if you're American. If your first language isn't English, there's a fair chance the Daily Fail hates you. The Daily Fail also hates the EU, because not only is the EU full of people that it hates (not being English and all that), it's also full of immigrants, and the big bad EU is making us accept immigrants. This is bad. The Daily Fail was deeply sad about this state of affairs.
SO
The solution is clearly to leave the EU! The Daily Fail had been blasting the EU for about... forever, but banging the war drums about leaving for five or ten years or so, only nobody listened because it's the Daily Fail and nobody listens to it when it comes to serious politics. Except for the Conservatives.
Enter He Who Shall No Longer Be Named. HWSNLBN is an arsehole who thought that we'd be better off outside the EU for... business reasons, I think? Honestly, he never had any solid argument. But he didn't like immigrants, you see. Except his wife. She's a good immigrant. Or something. But the Daily Fail saw an ally in HWSNLBN, and a dark pact was born. HWSNLBN became the Daily Fail's man of the people, an arsehole always PRed sat in a pub with a pint of guiness to show what a working man's man he is. Because the Daily Fail is popular mostly with idiots, this worked, and nobody thought it was odd that the man who inherited wads of cash and lives as a millionaire businessman seems to exclusively visit local village pubs to drink shitty guiness rather than actually good guiness like what the Irish have.
At the same time, the Conservative Party was going through a long hangover called THATCHER. After Big Mommy T, the Conservative Party suffered from a complete lack of charisma, due to Big Mommy T having apparently sucked all of the drive, energy, power, and charisma out of the entire party and channelled it all into her living bulldozer of a personality. This allowed THE BLAIR to take over England forever, to various degrees of success, until he thought 'I'm friends with America. We need to be friends with America. Let's help America with its war, because we're friends'. And everyone in England was sad. And then we kicked Blair out because actually we never liked the War in Iraq, and that was BEFORE we found out it was bullshit. (I believe we were about 50/50 on it, it was never popular)
During this period, the Conservatives went through a lot of personality shifts while trying to find an identity after Big Mommy T. This inevitably led some of them to go farther and farther to the right on the political spectrum. And those people agreed with the Daily Fail that the EU was evil. Unfortunately, these people also had a tendency to smell bad and be blatantly racist. This wasn't a problem before, because the whip pretty much pinned them down and declared 'thou shalt vote with the party, or thou shalt be hanged at dawn! And under no circumstances shalt thou hold a press conference where you can be a) seen or ESPECIALLY b) heard.'
Cue David Cameron, a youngish (not 60), floppy haired, non-flamboyant, but deceptively right-of-centre politician with energy, ideas, and a hidden well of charisma that he UNLEASHED UPON GORDON BROWN WITH UNEXPECTED FURY. Gordon Brown was Tony Blair's hand-picked successor, the court vizier waiting in the wings to stab him and steal his throne, if you will. His rise was considered so inevitable that people didn't think an election was even necessary. Here is a link to David Cameron's un-autocued, off the cuff speech after he'd been told just before going on stage that Labour were planning on a snap election since they were so far ahead in the polls:
https://conservative-speeches.sayit.mysociety.org/speech/599778 (it genuinely is worth reading; it's one of the more influential speeches in modern British politics since it almost singlehandedly won him the election)
And overnight the polls shifted, and he went on to thrash Gordon Brown, who suddenly went from arrogantly cocksure of victory to uncertain.
And the Tories were overjoyed. Right? RIGHT???
Well, not really. As you might have noticed in there, he's a bit right of centre, not a hard right Tory. He was supportive of a lot of things they don't like along with things they do like. And that made the anti-EU crowd SAD.
So, along comes He Who Shall No Longer Be Named and says 'tally ho, chums, I'm running a party called UKIP, and all we really do is talk about how much we hate immigrants and how they're murderous terrorist rapists. Want to join?' And they did, and the Tories were SAD. But also HAPPY, because they got rid of some utterly embarrassing fuckheads in the process. But those fuckheads were OVERJOYED, because now they could be SEEN, and HEARD, and this led to numerous embarrassments for UKIP, with 'well, every party has some idiots' being shorthand for 'UKIP is full of idiots' nationwide. But He Who Shall No Longer Be Named was untouched by all of this. The idiots were around him, being constantly told to shut the fuck up by him, much like the oppressive Tories they had fled from, because even he realised these idiots were idiots. But they did give UKIP more power, and that was what they needed to apply pressure on the Tories, even taking away some important areas of the UK at their height.
David Cameron had a plan. The Anti-EU wing of the Tories were growing more and more boisterous, bolstered by the Daily Fail's endless yammering on one hand, UKIP on another, and his own back benchers. The Tories were meant to be the hard immigration party, after all, even though David felt there were more important issues. So facing increasing pressure where the Daily Fail had whipped it up to such a degree that everyone was hammering this one point and the Tories were losing seats to UKIP, he pulled out what he thought would be his trump card. With the worst of the Conservatives gone to UKIP, but the UK still mostly pro EU, he promised a referendum. The one thing UKIP would. Not. Shut. The. Fuck. Up. About.
The plan was simple. Cut their legs out from under them, dispose of the worst of the Tory trash, and proceed. If he waited another few years, the tide would shift, a leave vote would be inevitable. But if he did it now, and Remain won? Well, the issue would be dead for decades.
However, the Tories fell back on an old principle of theirs: RELENTLESS OPPORTUNISTIC BACKSTABBING. Unfortunately, a pair of arseholes called Michael Gove and Boris Johnson were both a little too opportunistic, and dumb enough not to realise this was a serious vote. It is important to realise both of them campaigned for Leave because they were certain that Remain was going to win. The whole plan they had was to be the True Men of The People and make a run on leadership afterward. THEY DID NOT WANT THEIR OWN CAMPAIGNS TO SUCCEED.
But Leave won, due to a confluence of issues, and all that got royally shitted up. especially when David did the only thing a man betrayed by two of his friends could do: he quit and let them sort it the fuck out, since he didn't want the UK to leave and knew full well it was going to be a disaster. I'm sure he's SAD to this day.
And that is why UKIP is now irrelevant. It was a party of grievance, buoyed by the Daily Fail (who more or less stopped banging on about them immediately after the vote), staffed only by Tory refuse and political neophytes, whose grievance got dealt with. Without the Daily Fail's support, a cause to get votes, or any sort of plan beyond that, they had no identity and no role to fulfill in the political sphere of the UK, and so they rapidly ceased to exist. And kept saying racist things. And literally fighting each other in the street over the leadership.
You know, things that are anathema to UK politics, where we still hold leaders to some standards of dignity and expect them to at least look the part of being worthy to lead.
THERE YOU GO.
I'm just writing this post so everyone here has the full story on why Brexit happened and what happened with UKIP and He Who Shall No Longer Be Named, since I've noticed that both topics come up semi-frequently. It's not intended to be talk-downy or to assume you don't know any of it, just a full reference for anyone that happens to only be passingly familiar with UK politics and the names involved.
|
On June 30 2018 06:04 iamthedave wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On June 27 2018 07:19 Dan HH wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2018 06:40 sc-darkness wrote:On June 27 2018 06:39 Dan HH wrote:On June 27 2018 05:24 sc-darkness wrote:On June 27 2018 05:13 Plansix wrote: Point to immigration and claiming it is the root cause of their rise is myopic. The rise of right wing parties across a large number of nations cannot be linked to a single cause. And ceding ground on issues like immigration does not assure they won’t gain more power. It a simplistic solution to a wildly complex problem. Why did UKIP rise and then quickly disappeared after the last referendum in the UK? I'm not saying they were right though. Because Farage left. Can you name UKIP's current leader without googling it? I couldn't. They disappeared because they don't have a face anymore. Last time I was checking news, UKIP was in decline after the referendum even with Farage as an interim leader. I don't know what you checked, he was interim leader for a single month long after it had already gone to shit without him and a bunch of people left and proposed to disband the party. And he made it as clear as possible that he's only there out of obligation and does not plan to stay. Any immigration policy changes following Brexit are still in the future, they don't even know what to do about EEA yet. The suggestion that Brexit solved British right wing people's complaints about immigration and that's why UKIP is no longer necessary is incorrect, it's all yet to be decided. So why do their former voters no longer bother wanting to make UKIP have a say in those future immigration policies? Because UKIP doesn't exist, it was always just Farage. The collection of muppets still in that party do not enjoy nearly the same trust as Tories from the voters that are furthest right. Alright, you want the skinny on UKIP *spits* and Nigel Farage *blesses ground with salt*, and why they've more or less vanished, and where they came from? Here goes, and god defend my soul. We have a paper called the Daily Fail. Some mistakenly call it the Daily Mail. The Daily Fail hates... well, basically everyone, but especially immigrants. It hates most of you, because you're not English. You're okay if you're American. If your first language isn't English, there's a fair chance the Daily Fail hates you. The Daily Fail also hates the EU, because not only is the EU full of people that it hates (not being English and all that), it's also full of immigrants, and the big bad EU is making us accept immigrants. This is bad. The Daily Fail was deeply sad about this state of affairs. SO The solution is clearly to leave the EU! The Daily Fail had been blasting the EU for about... forever, but banging the war drums about leaving for five or ten years or so, only nobody listened because it's the Daily Fail and nobody listens to it when it comes to serious politics. Except for the Conservatives. Enter He Who Shall No Longer Be Named. HWSNLBN is an arsehole who thought that we'd be better off outside the EU for... business reasons, I think? Honestly, he never had any solid argument. But he didn't like immigrants, you see. Except his wife. She's a good immigrant. Or something. But the Daily Fail saw an ally in HWSNLBN, and a dark pact was born. HWSNLBN became the Daily Fail's man of the people, an arsehole always PRed sat in a pub with a pint of guiness to show what a working man's man he is. Because the Daily Fail is popular mostly with idiots, this worked, and nobody thought it was odd that the man who inherited wads of cash and lives as a millionaire businessman seems to exclusively visit local village pubs to drink shitty guiness rather than actually good guiness like what the Irish have. At the same time, the Conservative Party was going through a long hangover called THATCHER. After Big Mommy T, the Conservative Party suffered from a complete lack of charisma, due to Big Mommy T having apparently sucked all of the drive, energy, power, and charisma out of the entire party and channelled it all into her living bulldozer of a personality. This allowed THE BLAIR to take over England forever, to various degrees of success, until he thought 'I'm friends with America. We need to be friends with America. Let's help America with its war, because we're friends'. And everyone in England was sad. And then we kicked Blair out because actually we never liked the War in Iraq, and that was BEFORE we found out it was bullshit. (I believe we were about 50/50 on it, it was never popular) During this period, the Conservatives went through a lot of personality shifts while trying to find an identity after Big Mommy T. This inevitably led some of them to go farther and farther to the right on the political spectrum. And those people agreed with the Daily Fail that the EU was evil. Unfortunately, these people also had a tendency to smell bad and be blatantly racist. This wasn't a problem before, because the whip pretty much pinned them down and declared 'thou shalt vote with the party, or thou shalt be hanged at dawn! And under no circumstances shalt thou hold a press conference where you can be a) seen or ESPECIALLY b) heard.' Cue David Cameron, a youngish (not 60), floppy haired, non-flamboyant, but deceptively right-of-centre politician with energy, ideas, and a hidden well of charisma that he UNLEASHED UPON GORDON BROWN WITH UNEXPECTED FURY. Gordon Brown was Tony Blair's hand-picked successor, the court vizier waiting in the wings to stab him and steal his throne, if you will. His rise was considered so inevitable that people didn't think an election was even necessary. Here is a link to David Cameron's un-autocued, off the cuff speech after he'd been told just before going on stage that Labour were planning on a snap election since they were so far ahead in the polls: https://conservative-speeches.sayit.mysociety.org/speech/599778 (it genuinely is worth reading; it's one of the more influential speeches in modern British politics since it almost singlehandedly won him the election) And overnight the polls shifted, and he went on to thrash Gordon Brown, who suddenly went from arrogantly cocksure of victory to uncertain. And the Tories were overjoyed. Right? RIGHT??? Well, not really. As you might have noticed in there, he's a bit right of centre, not a hard right Tory. He was supportive of a lot of things they don't like along with things they do like. And that made the anti-EU crowd SAD. So, along comes He Who Shall No Longer Be Named and says 'tally ho, chums, I'm running a party called UKIP, and all we really do is talk about how much we hate immigrants and how they're murderous terrorist rapists. Want to join?' And they did, and the Tories were SAD. But also HAPPY, because they got rid of some utterly embarrassing fuckheads in the process. But those fuckheads were OVERJOYED, because now they could be SEEN, and HEARD, and this led to numerous embarrassments for UKIP, with 'well, every party has some idiots' being shorthand for 'UKIP is full of idiots' nationwide. But He Who Shall No Longer Be Named was untouched by all of this. The idiots were around him, being constantly told to shut the fuck up by him, much like the oppressive Tories they had fled from, because even he realised these idiots were idiots. But they did give UKIP more power, and that was what they needed to apply pressure on the Tories, even taking away some important areas of the UK at their height. David Cameron had a plan. The Anti-EU wing of the Tories were growing more and more boisterous, bolstered by the Daily Fail's endless yammering on one hand, UKIP on another, and his own back benchers. The Tories were meant to be the hard immigration party, after all, even though David felt there were more important issues. So facing increasing pressure where the Daily Fail had whipped it up to such a degree that everyone was hammering this one point and the Tories were losing seats to UKIP, he pulled out what he thought would be his trump card. With the worst of the Conservatives gone to UKIP, but the UK still mostly pro EU, he promised a referendum. The one thing UKIP would. Not. Shut. The. Fuck. Up. About. The plan was simple. Cut their legs out from under them, dispose of the worst of the Tory trash, and proceed. If he waited another few years, the tide would shift, a leave vote would be inevitable. But if he did it now, and Remain won? Well, the issue would be dead for decades. However, the Tories fell back on an old principle of theirs: RELENTLESS OPPORTUNISTIC BACKSTABBING. Unfortunately, a pair of arseholes called Michael Gove and Boris Johnson were both a little too opportunistic, and dumb enough not to realise this was a serious vote. It is important to realise both of them campaigned for Leave because they were certain that Remain was going to win. The whole plan they had was to be the True Men of The People and make a run on leadership afterward. THEY DID NOT WANT THEIR OWN CAMPAIGNS TO SUCCEED. But Leave won, due to a confluence of issues, and all that got royally shitted up. especially when David did the only thing a man betrayed by two of his friends could do: he quit and let them sort it the fuck out, since he didn't want the UK to leave and knew full well it was going to be a disaster. I'm sure he's SAD to this day. And that is why UKIP is now irrelevant. It was a party of grievance, buoyed by the Daily Fail (who more or less stopped banging on about them immediately after the vote), staffed only by Tory refuse and political neophytes, whose grievance got dealt with. Without the Daily Fail's support, a cause to get votes, or any sort of plan beyond that, they had no identity and no role to fulfill in the political sphere of the UK, and so they rapidly ceased to exist. And kept saying racist things. And literally fighting each other in the street over the leadership. You know, things that are anathema to UK politics, where we still hold leaders to some standards of dignity and expect them to at least look the part of being worthy to lead. THERE YOU GO. I'm just writing this post so everyone here has the full story on why Brexit happened and what happened with UKIP and He Who Shall No Longer Be Named, since I've noticed that both topics come up semi-frequently. It's not intended to be talk-downy or to assume you don't know any of it, just a full reference for anyone that happens to only be passingly familiar with UK politics and the names involved.
It's a pretty good summary, I just don't think that UKIP's grievances are no longer relevant to the public after the referendum. Since neither immigration policies nor if or how many EU regulations the UK will follow is decided yet. My impression is that most of those 4 million people that voted UKIP in 2015 still care about those two main issues central to the party, but they never knew much about Paul Nuttall, Gerard Batten & co or gave a fuck about what they have to say.
The overwhelming majority of coverage that UKIP were getting pre-2016 was via Farage, who is a charismatic speaker despite saying a lot of nonsense. Previous and following leaders have not enjoyed nearly the same amount of media attention, at lest partly because they're not soundbite generators. They're back to just being 'the slightly more racist Tories'.
|
On June 30 2018 07:01 Dan HH wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2018 06:04 iamthedave wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On June 27 2018 07:19 Dan HH wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2018 06:40 sc-darkness wrote:On June 27 2018 06:39 Dan HH wrote:On June 27 2018 05:24 sc-darkness wrote:On June 27 2018 05:13 Plansix wrote: Point to immigration and claiming it is the root cause of their rise is myopic. The rise of right wing parties across a large number of nations cannot be linked to a single cause. And ceding ground on issues like immigration does not assure they won’t gain more power. It a simplistic solution to a wildly complex problem. Why did UKIP rise and then quickly disappeared after the last referendum in the UK? I'm not saying they were right though. Because Farage left. Can you name UKIP's current leader without googling it? I couldn't. They disappeared because they don't have a face anymore. Last time I was checking news, UKIP was in decline after the referendum even with Farage as an interim leader. I don't know what you checked, he was interim leader for a single month long after it had already gone to shit without him and a bunch of people left and proposed to disband the party. And he made it as clear as possible that he's only there out of obligation and does not plan to stay. Any immigration policy changes following Brexit are still in the future, they don't even know what to do about EEA yet. The suggestion that Brexit solved British right wing people's complaints about immigration and that's why UKIP is no longer necessary is incorrect, it's all yet to be decided. So why do their former voters no longer bother wanting to make UKIP have a say in those future immigration policies? Because UKIP doesn't exist, it was always just Farage. The collection of muppets still in that party do not enjoy nearly the same trust as Tories from the voters that are furthest right. Alright, you want the skinny on UKIP *spits* and Nigel Farage *blesses ground with salt*, and why they've more or less vanished, and where they came from? Here goes, and god defend my soul. We have a paper called the Daily Fail. Some mistakenly call it the Daily Mail. The Daily Fail hates... well, basically everyone, but especially immigrants. It hates most of you, because you're not English. You're okay if you're American. If your first language isn't English, there's a fair chance the Daily Fail hates you. The Daily Fail also hates the EU, because not only is the EU full of people that it hates (not being English and all that), it's also full of immigrants, and the big bad EU is making us accept immigrants. This is bad. The Daily Fail was deeply sad about this state of affairs. SO The solution is clearly to leave the EU! The Daily Fail had been blasting the EU for about... forever, but banging the war drums about leaving for five or ten years or so, only nobody listened because it's the Daily Fail and nobody listens to it when it comes to serious politics. Except for the Conservatives. Enter He Who Shall No Longer Be Named. HWSNLBN is an arsehole who thought that we'd be better off outside the EU for... business reasons, I think? Honestly, he never had any solid argument. But he didn't like immigrants, you see. Except his wife. She's a good immigrant. Or something. But the Daily Fail saw an ally in HWSNLBN, and a dark pact was born. HWSNLBN became the Daily Fail's man of the people, an arsehole always PRed sat in a pub with a pint of guiness to show what a working man's man he is. Because the Daily Fail is popular mostly with idiots, this worked, and nobody thought it was odd that the man who inherited wads of cash and lives as a millionaire businessman seems to exclusively visit local village pubs to drink shitty guiness rather than actually good guiness like what the Irish have. At the same time, the Conservative Party was going through a long hangover called THATCHER. After Big Mommy T, the Conservative Party suffered from a complete lack of charisma, due to Big Mommy T having apparently sucked all of the drive, energy, power, and charisma out of the entire party and channelled it all into her living bulldozer of a personality. This allowed THE BLAIR to take over England forever, to various degrees of success, until he thought 'I'm friends with America. We need to be friends with America. Let's help America with its war, because we're friends'. And everyone in England was sad. And then we kicked Blair out because actually we never liked the War in Iraq, and that was BEFORE we found out it was bullshit. (I believe we were about 50/50 on it, it was never popular) During this period, the Conservatives went through a lot of personality shifts while trying to find an identity after Big Mommy T. This inevitably led some of them to go farther and farther to the right on the political spectrum. And those people agreed with the Daily Fail that the EU was evil. Unfortunately, these people also had a tendency to smell bad and be blatantly racist. This wasn't a problem before, because the whip pretty much pinned them down and declared 'thou shalt vote with the party, or thou shalt be hanged at dawn! And under no circumstances shalt thou hold a press conference where you can be a) seen or ESPECIALLY b) heard.' Cue David Cameron, a youngish (not 60), floppy haired, non-flamboyant, but deceptively right-of-centre politician with energy, ideas, and a hidden well of charisma that he UNLEASHED UPON GORDON BROWN WITH UNEXPECTED FURY. Gordon Brown was Tony Blair's hand-picked successor, the court vizier waiting in the wings to stab him and steal his throne, if you will. His rise was considered so inevitable that people didn't think an election was even necessary. Here is a link to David Cameron's un-autocued, off the cuff speech after he'd been told just before going on stage that Labour were planning on a snap election since they were so far ahead in the polls: https://conservative-speeches.sayit.mysociety.org/speech/599778 (it genuinely is worth reading; it's one of the more influential speeches in modern British politics since it almost singlehandedly won him the election) And overnight the polls shifted, and he went on to thrash Gordon Brown, who suddenly went from arrogantly cocksure of victory to uncertain. And the Tories were overjoyed. Right? RIGHT??? Well, not really. As you might have noticed in there, he's a bit right of centre, not a hard right Tory. He was supportive of a lot of things they don't like along with things they do like. And that made the anti-EU crowd SAD. So, along comes He Who Shall No Longer Be Named and says 'tally ho, chums, I'm running a party called UKIP, and all we really do is talk about how much we hate immigrants and how they're murderous terrorist rapists. Want to join?' And they did, and the Tories were SAD. But also HAPPY, because they got rid of some utterly embarrassing fuckheads in the process. But those fuckheads were OVERJOYED, because now they could be SEEN, and HEARD, and this led to numerous embarrassments for UKIP, with 'well, every party has some idiots' being shorthand for 'UKIP is full of idiots' nationwide. But He Who Shall No Longer Be Named was untouched by all of this. The idiots were around him, being constantly told to shut the fuck up by him, much like the oppressive Tories they had fled from, because even he realised these idiots were idiots. But they did give UKIP more power, and that was what they needed to apply pressure on the Tories, even taking away some important areas of the UK at their height. David Cameron had a plan. The Anti-EU wing of the Tories were growing more and more boisterous, bolstered by the Daily Fail's endless yammering on one hand, UKIP on another, and his own back benchers. The Tories were meant to be the hard immigration party, after all, even though David felt there were more important issues. So facing increasing pressure where the Daily Fail had whipped it up to such a degree that everyone was hammering this one point and the Tories were losing seats to UKIP, he pulled out what he thought would be his trump card. With the worst of the Conservatives gone to UKIP, but the UK still mostly pro EU, he promised a referendum. The one thing UKIP would. Not. Shut. The. Fuck. Up. About. The plan was simple. Cut their legs out from under them, dispose of the worst of the Tory trash, and proceed. If he waited another few years, the tide would shift, a leave vote would be inevitable. But if he did it now, and Remain won? Well, the issue would be dead for decades. However, the Tories fell back on an old principle of theirs: RELENTLESS OPPORTUNISTIC BACKSTABBING. Unfortunately, a pair of arseholes called Michael Gove and Boris Johnson were both a little too opportunistic, and dumb enough not to realise this was a serious vote. It is important to realise both of them campaigned for Leave because they were certain that Remain was going to win. The whole plan they had was to be the True Men of The People and make a run on leadership afterward. THEY DID NOT WANT THEIR OWN CAMPAIGNS TO SUCCEED. But Leave won, due to a confluence of issues, and all that got royally shitted up. especially when David did the only thing a man betrayed by two of his friends could do: he quit and let them sort it the fuck out, since he didn't want the UK to leave and knew full well it was going to be a disaster. I'm sure he's SAD to this day. And that is why UKIP is now irrelevant. It was a party of grievance, buoyed by the Daily Fail (who more or less stopped banging on about them immediately after the vote), staffed only by Tory refuse and political neophytes, whose grievance got dealt with. Without the Daily Fail's support, a cause to get votes, or any sort of plan beyond that, they had no identity and no role to fulfill in the political sphere of the UK, and so they rapidly ceased to exist. And kept saying racist things. And literally fighting each other in the street over the leadership. You know, things that are anathema to UK politics, where we still hold leaders to some standards of dignity and expect them to at least look the part of being worthy to lead. THERE YOU GO. I'm just writing this post so everyone here has the full story on why Brexit happened and what happened with UKIP and He Who Shall No Longer Be Named, since I've noticed that both topics come up semi-frequently. It's not intended to be talk-downy or to assume you don't know any of it, just a full reference for anyone that happens to only be passingly familiar with UK politics and the names involved. It's a pretty good summary, I just don't think that UKIP's grievances are no longer relevant to the public after the referendum. Since neither immigration policies nor if or how many EU regulations the UK will follow is decided yet. My impression is that most of those 4 million people that voted UKIP in 2015 still care about those two main issues central to the party, but they never knew much about Paul Nuttall, Gerard Batten & co or gave a fuck about what they have to say. The overwhelming majority of coverage that UKIP were getting pre-2016 was via Farage, who is a charismatic speaker despite saying a lot of nonsense. Previous and following leaders have not enjoyed nearly the same amount of media attention, at lest partly because they're not soundbite generators. They're back to just being 'the slightly more racist Tories'.
The problem is that UKIP never had an actual platform. It literally was: LEAVE THE EU ----- PROFIT?
The 'issue' that people thought that UKIP stood for, UKIP didn't actually stand for, because UKIP's membership don't even know how immigration policy works, and those who do - the ex-Tories in there - get ignored by the rest who assume they're lying because the actual people who worked in the actual government are telling them things that go against the Daily Fail's narrative (because the UK has always had a pretty tight immigration policy to anyone that wasn't EU). The party just eats itself.
|
On June 30 2018 07:01 Dan HH wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2018 06:04 iamthedave wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On June 27 2018 07:19 Dan HH wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2018 06:40 sc-darkness wrote:On June 27 2018 06:39 Dan HH wrote:On June 27 2018 05:24 sc-darkness wrote:On June 27 2018 05:13 Plansix wrote: Point to immigration and claiming it is the root cause of their rise is myopic. The rise of right wing parties across a large number of nations cannot be linked to a single cause. And ceding ground on issues like immigration does not assure they won’t gain more power. It a simplistic solution to a wildly complex problem. Why did UKIP rise and then quickly disappeared after the last referendum in the UK? I'm not saying they were right though. Because Farage left. Can you name UKIP's current leader without googling it? I couldn't. They disappeared because they don't have a face anymore. Last time I was checking news, UKIP was in decline after the referendum even with Farage as an interim leader. I don't know what you checked, he was interim leader for a single month long after it had already gone to shit without him and a bunch of people left and proposed to disband the party. And he made it as clear as possible that he's only there out of obligation and does not plan to stay. Any immigration policy changes following Brexit are still in the future, they don't even know what to do about EEA yet. The suggestion that Brexit solved British right wing people's complaints about immigration and that's why UKIP is no longer necessary is incorrect, it's all yet to be decided. So why do their former voters no longer bother wanting to make UKIP have a say in those future immigration policies? Because UKIP doesn't exist, it was always just Farage. The collection of muppets still in that party do not enjoy nearly the same trust as Tories from the voters that are furthest right. Alright, you want the skinny on UKIP *spits* and Nigel Farage *blesses ground with salt*, and why they've more or less vanished, and where they came from? Here goes, and god defend my soul. We have a paper called the Daily Fail. Some mistakenly call it the Daily Mail. The Daily Fail hates... well, basically everyone, but especially immigrants. It hates most of you, because you're not English. You're okay if you're American. If your first language isn't English, there's a fair chance the Daily Fail hates you. The Daily Fail also hates the EU, because not only is the EU full of people that it hates (not being English and all that), it's also full of immigrants, and the big bad EU is making us accept immigrants. This is bad. The Daily Fail was deeply sad about this state of affairs. SO The solution is clearly to leave the EU! The Daily Fail had been blasting the EU for about... forever, but banging the war drums about leaving for five or ten years or so, only nobody listened because it's the Daily Fail and nobody listens to it when it comes to serious politics. Except for the Conservatives. Enter He Who Shall No Longer Be Named. HWSNLBN is an arsehole who thought that we'd be better off outside the EU for... business reasons, I think? Honestly, he never had any solid argument. But he didn't like immigrants, you see. Except his wife. She's a good immigrant. Or something. But the Daily Fail saw an ally in HWSNLBN, and a dark pact was born. HWSNLBN became the Daily Fail's man of the people, an arsehole always PRed sat in a pub with a pint of guiness to show what a working man's man he is. Because the Daily Fail is popular mostly with idiots, this worked, and nobody thought it was odd that the man who inherited wads of cash and lives as a millionaire businessman seems to exclusively visit local village pubs to drink shitty guiness rather than actually good guiness like what the Irish have. At the same time, the Conservative Party was going through a long hangover called THATCHER. After Big Mommy T, the Conservative Party suffered from a complete lack of charisma, due to Big Mommy T having apparently sucked all of the drive, energy, power, and charisma out of the entire party and channelled it all into her living bulldozer of a personality. This allowed THE BLAIR to take over England forever, to various degrees of success, until he thought 'I'm friends with America. We need to be friends with America. Let's help America with its war, because we're friends'. And everyone in England was sad. And then we kicked Blair out because actually we never liked the War in Iraq, and that was BEFORE we found out it was bullshit. (I believe we were about 50/50 on it, it was never popular) During this period, the Conservatives went through a lot of personality shifts while trying to find an identity after Big Mommy T. This inevitably led some of them to go farther and farther to the right on the political spectrum. And those people agreed with the Daily Fail that the EU was evil. Unfortunately, these people also had a tendency to smell bad and be blatantly racist. This wasn't a problem before, because the whip pretty much pinned them down and declared 'thou shalt vote with the party, or thou shalt be hanged at dawn! And under no circumstances shalt thou hold a press conference where you can be a) seen or ESPECIALLY b) heard.' Cue David Cameron, a youngish (not 60), floppy haired, non-flamboyant, but deceptively right-of-centre politician with energy, ideas, and a hidden well of charisma that he UNLEASHED UPON GORDON BROWN WITH UNEXPECTED FURY. Gordon Brown was Tony Blair's hand-picked successor, the court vizier waiting in the wings to stab him and steal his throne, if you will. His rise was considered so inevitable that people didn't think an election was even necessary. Here is a link to David Cameron's un-autocued, off the cuff speech after he'd been told just before going on stage that Labour were planning on a snap election since they were so far ahead in the polls: https://conservative-speeches.sayit.mysociety.org/speech/599778 (it genuinely is worth reading; it's one of the more influential speeches in modern British politics since it almost singlehandedly won him the election) And overnight the polls shifted, and he went on to thrash Gordon Brown, who suddenly went from arrogantly cocksure of victory to uncertain. And the Tories were overjoyed. Right? RIGHT??? Well, not really. As you might have noticed in there, he's a bit right of centre, not a hard right Tory. He was supportive of a lot of things they don't like along with things they do like. And that made the anti-EU crowd SAD. So, along comes He Who Shall No Longer Be Named and says 'tally ho, chums, I'm running a party called UKIP, and all we really do is talk about how much we hate immigrants and how they're murderous terrorist rapists. Want to join?' And they did, and the Tories were SAD. But also HAPPY, because they got rid of some utterly embarrassing fuckheads in the process. But those fuckheads were OVERJOYED, because now they could be SEEN, and HEARD, and this led to numerous embarrassments for UKIP, with 'well, every party has some idiots' being shorthand for 'UKIP is full of idiots' nationwide. But He Who Shall No Longer Be Named was untouched by all of this. The idiots were around him, being constantly told to shut the fuck up by him, much like the oppressive Tories they had fled from, because even he realised these idiots were idiots. But they did give UKIP more power, and that was what they needed to apply pressure on the Tories, even taking away some important areas of the UK at their height. David Cameron had a plan. The Anti-EU wing of the Tories were growing more and more boisterous, bolstered by the Daily Fail's endless yammering on one hand, UKIP on another, and his own back benchers. The Tories were meant to be the hard immigration party, after all, even though David felt there were more important issues. So facing increasing pressure where the Daily Fail had whipped it up to such a degree that everyone was hammering this one point and the Tories were losing seats to UKIP, he pulled out what he thought would be his trump card. With the worst of the Conservatives gone to UKIP, but the UK still mostly pro EU, he promised a referendum. The one thing UKIP would. Not. Shut. The. Fuck. Up. About. The plan was simple. Cut their legs out from under them, dispose of the worst of the Tory trash, and proceed. If he waited another few years, the tide would shift, a leave vote would be inevitable. But if he did it now, and Remain won? Well, the issue would be dead for decades. However, the Tories fell back on an old principle of theirs: RELENTLESS OPPORTUNISTIC BACKSTABBING. Unfortunately, a pair of arseholes called Michael Gove and Boris Johnson were both a little too opportunistic, and dumb enough not to realise this was a serious vote. It is important to realise both of them campaigned for Leave because they were certain that Remain was going to win. The whole plan they had was to be the True Men of The People and make a run on leadership afterward. THEY DID NOT WANT THEIR OWN CAMPAIGNS TO SUCCEED. But Leave won, due to a confluence of issues, and all that got royally shitted up. especially when David did the only thing a man betrayed by two of his friends could do: he quit and let them sort it the fuck out, since he didn't want the UK to leave and knew full well it was going to be a disaster. I'm sure he's SAD to this day. And that is why UKIP is now irrelevant. It was a party of grievance, buoyed by the Daily Fail (who more or less stopped banging on about them immediately after the vote), staffed only by Tory refuse and political neophytes, whose grievance got dealt with. Without the Daily Fail's support, a cause to get votes, or any sort of plan beyond that, they had no identity and no role to fulfill in the political sphere of the UK, and so they rapidly ceased to exist. And kept saying racist things. And literally fighting each other in the street over the leadership. You know, things that are anathema to UK politics, where we still hold leaders to some standards of dignity and expect them to at least look the part of being worthy to lead. THERE YOU GO. I'm just writing this post so everyone here has the full story on why Brexit happened and what happened with UKIP and He Who Shall No Longer Be Named, since I've noticed that both topics come up semi-frequently. It's not intended to be talk-downy or to assume you don't know any of it, just a full reference for anyone that happens to only be passingly familiar with UK politics and the names involved. It's a pretty good summary, I just don't think that UKIP's grievances are no longer relevant to the public after the referendum. Since neither immigration policies nor if or how many EU regulations the UK will follow is decided yet. My impression is that most of those 4 million people that voted UKIP in 2015 still care about those two main issues central to the party, but they never knew much about Paul Nuttall, Gerard Batten & co or gave a fuck about what they have to say. The overwhelming majority of coverage that UKIP were getting pre-2016 was via Farage, who is a charismatic speaker despite saying a lot of nonsense. Previous and following leaders have not enjoyed nearly the same amount of media attention, at lest partly because they're not soundbite generators. They're back to just being 'the slightly more racist Tories'.
Saying a lot of nonesense is an easy way for the right-wing to get attention these days. Since the liberal bourgeoise will pick up any logical or factual wrong statement a right-winger produce and discuss it to death, they very easily achieve two things: 1) they mobilize their supporters and gather new ones based on the mass coverage 2) they avoid discussion about their actual politics, as the liberal media is busy with ad hominem attacks and statements that can easily be denied or re-interpreted later
On a strategical level the liberals, in partiular the liberal papers, are bancrupt. They are the best propaganda the right-wing can hope for. Though that has been the case for two centuries now.
|
"How many EU regulations the UK will follow" Just a quick note that EU regulations aren't really a la carte. They're either in the single market or not.
|
On June 30 2018 08:44 Big J wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2018 07:01 Dan HH wrote:On June 30 2018 06:04 iamthedave wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On June 27 2018 07:19 Dan HH wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2018 06:40 sc-darkness wrote:On June 27 2018 06:39 Dan HH wrote:On June 27 2018 05:24 sc-darkness wrote:On June 27 2018 05:13 Plansix wrote: Point to immigration and claiming it is the root cause of their rise is myopic. The rise of right wing parties across a large number of nations cannot be linked to a single cause. And ceding ground on issues like immigration does not assure they won’t gain more power. It a simplistic solution to a wildly complex problem. Why did UKIP rise and then quickly disappeared after the last referendum in the UK? I'm not saying they were right though. Because Farage left. Can you name UKIP's current leader without googling it? I couldn't. They disappeared because they don't have a face anymore. Last time I was checking news, UKIP was in decline after the referendum even with Farage as an interim leader. I don't know what you checked, he was interim leader for a single month long after it had already gone to shit without him and a bunch of people left and proposed to disband the party. And he made it as clear as possible that he's only there out of obligation and does not plan to stay. Any immigration policy changes following Brexit are still in the future, they don't even know what to do about EEA yet. The suggestion that Brexit solved British right wing people's complaints about immigration and that's why UKIP is no longer necessary is incorrect, it's all yet to be decided. So why do their former voters no longer bother wanting to make UKIP have a say in those future immigration policies? Because UKIP doesn't exist, it was always just Farage. The collection of muppets still in that party do not enjoy nearly the same trust as Tories from the voters that are furthest right. Alright, you want the skinny on UKIP *spits* and Nigel Farage *blesses ground with salt*, and why they've more or less vanished, and where they came from? Here goes, and god defend my soul. We have a paper called the Daily Fail. Some mistakenly call it the Daily Mail. The Daily Fail hates... well, basically everyone, but especially immigrants. It hates most of you, because you're not English. You're okay if you're American. If your first language isn't English, there's a fair chance the Daily Fail hates you. The Daily Fail also hates the EU, because not only is the EU full of people that it hates (not being English and all that), it's also full of immigrants, and the big bad EU is making us accept immigrants. This is bad. The Daily Fail was deeply sad about this state of affairs. SO The solution is clearly to leave the EU! The Daily Fail had been blasting the EU for about... forever, but banging the war drums about leaving for five or ten years or so, only nobody listened because it's the Daily Fail and nobody listens to it when it comes to serious politics. Except for the Conservatives. Enter He Who Shall No Longer Be Named. HWSNLBN is an arsehole who thought that we'd be better off outside the EU for... business reasons, I think? Honestly, he never had any solid argument. But he didn't like immigrants, you see. Except his wife. She's a good immigrant. Or something. But the Daily Fail saw an ally in HWSNLBN, and a dark pact was born. HWSNLBN became the Daily Fail's man of the people, an arsehole always PRed sat in a pub with a pint of guiness to show what a working man's man he is. Because the Daily Fail is popular mostly with idiots, this worked, and nobody thought it was odd that the man who inherited wads of cash and lives as a millionaire businessman seems to exclusively visit local village pubs to drink shitty guiness rather than actually good guiness like what the Irish have. At the same time, the Conservative Party was going through a long hangover called THATCHER. After Big Mommy T, the Conservative Party suffered from a complete lack of charisma, due to Big Mommy T having apparently sucked all of the drive, energy, power, and charisma out of the entire party and channelled it all into her living bulldozer of a personality. This allowed THE BLAIR to take over England forever, to various degrees of success, until he thought 'I'm friends with America. We need to be friends with America. Let's help America with its war, because we're friends'. And everyone in England was sad. And then we kicked Blair out because actually we never liked the War in Iraq, and that was BEFORE we found out it was bullshit. (I believe we were about 50/50 on it, it was never popular) During this period, the Conservatives went through a lot of personality shifts while trying to find an identity after Big Mommy T. This inevitably led some of them to go farther and farther to the right on the political spectrum. And those people agreed with the Daily Fail that the EU was evil. Unfortunately, these people also had a tendency to smell bad and be blatantly racist. This wasn't a problem before, because the whip pretty much pinned them down and declared 'thou shalt vote with the party, or thou shalt be hanged at dawn! And under no circumstances shalt thou hold a press conference where you can be a) seen or ESPECIALLY b) heard.' Cue David Cameron, a youngish (not 60), floppy haired, non-flamboyant, but deceptively right-of-centre politician with energy, ideas, and a hidden well of charisma that he UNLEASHED UPON GORDON BROWN WITH UNEXPECTED FURY. Gordon Brown was Tony Blair's hand-picked successor, the court vizier waiting in the wings to stab him and steal his throne, if you will. His rise was considered so inevitable that people didn't think an election was even necessary. Here is a link to David Cameron's un-autocued, off the cuff speech after he'd been told just before going on stage that Labour were planning on a snap election since they were so far ahead in the polls: https://conservative-speeches.sayit.mysociety.org/speech/599778 (it genuinely is worth reading; it's one of the more influential speeches in modern British politics since it almost singlehandedly won him the election) And overnight the polls shifted, and he went on to thrash Gordon Brown, who suddenly went from arrogantly cocksure of victory to uncertain. And the Tories were overjoyed. Right? RIGHT??? Well, not really. As you might have noticed in there, he's a bit right of centre, not a hard right Tory. He was supportive of a lot of things they don't like along with things they do like. And that made the anti-EU crowd SAD. So, along comes He Who Shall No Longer Be Named and says 'tally ho, chums, I'm running a party called UKIP, and all we really do is talk about how much we hate immigrants and how they're murderous terrorist rapists. Want to join?' And they did, and the Tories were SAD. But also HAPPY, because they got rid of some utterly embarrassing fuckheads in the process. But those fuckheads were OVERJOYED, because now they could be SEEN, and HEARD, and this led to numerous embarrassments for UKIP, with 'well, every party has some idiots' being shorthand for 'UKIP is full of idiots' nationwide. But He Who Shall No Longer Be Named was untouched by all of this. The idiots were around him, being constantly told to shut the fuck up by him, much like the oppressive Tories they had fled from, because even he realised these idiots were idiots. But they did give UKIP more power, and that was what they needed to apply pressure on the Tories, even taking away some important areas of the UK at their height. David Cameron had a plan. The Anti-EU wing of the Tories were growing more and more boisterous, bolstered by the Daily Fail's endless yammering on one hand, UKIP on another, and his own back benchers. The Tories were meant to be the hard immigration party, after all, even though David felt there were more important issues. So facing increasing pressure where the Daily Fail had whipped it up to such a degree that everyone was hammering this one point and the Tories were losing seats to UKIP, he pulled out what he thought would be his trump card. With the worst of the Conservatives gone to UKIP, but the UK still mostly pro EU, he promised a referendum. The one thing UKIP would. Not. Shut. The. Fuck. Up. About. The plan was simple. Cut their legs out from under them, dispose of the worst of the Tory trash, and proceed. If he waited another few years, the tide would shift, a leave vote would be inevitable. But if he did it now, and Remain won? Well, the issue would be dead for decades. However, the Tories fell back on an old principle of theirs: RELENTLESS OPPORTUNISTIC BACKSTABBING. Unfortunately, a pair of arseholes called Michael Gove and Boris Johnson were both a little too opportunistic, and dumb enough not to realise this was a serious vote. It is important to realise both of them campaigned for Leave because they were certain that Remain was going to win. The whole plan they had was to be the True Men of The People and make a run on leadership afterward. THEY DID NOT WANT THEIR OWN CAMPAIGNS TO SUCCEED. But Leave won, due to a confluence of issues, and all that got royally shitted up. especially when David did the only thing a man betrayed by two of his friends could do: he quit and let them sort it the fuck out, since he didn't want the UK to leave and knew full well it was going to be a disaster. I'm sure he's SAD to this day. And that is why UKIP is now irrelevant. It was a party of grievance, buoyed by the Daily Fail (who more or less stopped banging on about them immediately after the vote), staffed only by Tory refuse and political neophytes, whose grievance got dealt with. Without the Daily Fail's support, a cause to get votes, or any sort of plan beyond that, they had no identity and no role to fulfill in the political sphere of the UK, and so they rapidly ceased to exist. And kept saying racist things. And literally fighting each other in the street over the leadership. You know, things that are anathema to UK politics, where we still hold leaders to some standards of dignity and expect them to at least look the part of being worthy to lead. THERE YOU GO. I'm just writing this post so everyone here has the full story on why Brexit happened and what happened with UKIP and He Who Shall No Longer Be Named, since I've noticed that both topics come up semi-frequently. It's not intended to be talk-downy or to assume you don't know any of it, just a full reference for anyone that happens to only be passingly familiar with UK politics and the names involved. It's a pretty good summary, I just don't think that UKIP's grievances are no longer relevant to the public after the referendum. Since neither immigration policies nor if or how many EU regulations the UK will follow is decided yet. My impression is that most of those 4 million people that voted UKIP in 2015 still care about those two main issues central to the party, but they never knew much about Paul Nuttall, Gerard Batten & co or gave a fuck about what they have to say. The overwhelming majority of coverage that UKIP were getting pre-2016 was via Farage, who is a charismatic speaker despite saying a lot of nonsense. Previous and following leaders have not enjoyed nearly the same amount of media attention, at lest partly because they're not soundbite generators. They're back to just being 'the slightly more racist Tories'. Saying a lot of nonesense is an easy way for the right-wing to get attention these days. Since the liberal bourgeoise will pick up any logical or factual wrong statement a right-winger produce and discuss it to death, they very easily achieve two things: 1) they mobilize their supporters and gather new ones based on the mass coverage 2) they avoid discussion about their actual politics, as the liberal media is busy with ad hominem attacks and statements that can easily be denied or re-interpreted later On a strategical level the liberals, in partiular the liberal papers, are bancrupt. They are the best propaganda the right-wing can hope for. Though that has been the case for two centuries now.
If that's true, why does the right keep inventing propaganda? The old 'liberals are the right's best weapon' is stupid, lazy nonsense.
This is where 'truth has a liberal bias' comes from; because apparently it's EVIL LEFTIST PROPAGANDA to speak the simple truth about things that actually happened, because those events don't transparently support an agenda. You know, like Trump's inauguration crowd size, which was only a story because the Orange One lied about it.
|
On June 30 2018 18:45 warding wrote: "How many EU regulations the UK will follow" Just a quick note that EU regulations aren't really a la carte. They're either in the single market or not. The 'not' option makes them a la carte, see Switzerland. It's not a choice between 0 or 100%, if the UK is to not be a member of the EEA, they will have to negotiate countless bilateral agreements with the EU which come with taking in some regulations.
|
You might want to freshen up your knowledge about the EU <-> Switzerland contracts/negotiations. Its hardly, if at all, à la card.
|
On July 01 2018 00:26 Velr wrote: You might want to freshen up your knowledge about the EU <-> Switzerland contracts/negotiations. Its hardly, if at all, à la card. It's a simple point, Switzerland adopts a lower amount of EU regulations than Norway, at the expense of reduced market access. The UK has this option as well, it's not an all or nothing.
To expand a little bit, I'm not saying that for example if the UK wants free exchange of financial services with the EU after leaving the EEA, they get to pick which EU financial regulations they have to follow. They do however get to pick what goods and services they want to exchange freely, and by extension, which sets of regulations they have to comply with. If for example they don't pursue an agreement for the free trade of agricultural products with the EU, they don't have to follow EU agricultural regulations.
|
On June 30 2018 23:30 iamthedave wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2018 08:44 Big J wrote:On June 30 2018 07:01 Dan HH wrote:On June 30 2018 06:04 iamthedave wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On June 27 2018 07:19 Dan HH wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2018 06:40 sc-darkness wrote:On June 27 2018 06:39 Dan HH wrote:On June 27 2018 05:24 sc-darkness wrote:On June 27 2018 05:13 Plansix wrote: Point to immigration and claiming it is the root cause of their rise is myopic. The rise of right wing parties across a large number of nations cannot be linked to a single cause. And ceding ground on issues like immigration does not assure they won’t gain more power. It a simplistic solution to a wildly complex problem. Why did UKIP rise and then quickly disappeared after the last referendum in the UK? I'm not saying they were right though. Because Farage left. Can you name UKIP's current leader without googling it? I couldn't. They disappeared because they don't have a face anymore. Last time I was checking news, UKIP was in decline after the referendum even with Farage as an interim leader. I don't know what you checked, he was interim leader for a single month long after it had already gone to shit without him and a bunch of people left and proposed to disband the party. And he made it as clear as possible that he's only there out of obligation and does not plan to stay. Any immigration policy changes following Brexit are still in the future, they don't even know what to do about EEA yet. The suggestion that Brexit solved British right wing people's complaints about immigration and that's why UKIP is no longer necessary is incorrect, it's all yet to be decided. So why do their former voters no longer bother wanting to make UKIP have a say in those future immigration policies? Because UKIP doesn't exist, it was always just Farage. The collection of muppets still in that party do not enjoy nearly the same trust as Tories from the voters that are furthest right. Alright, you want the skinny on UKIP *spits* and Nigel Farage *blesses ground with salt*, and why they've more or less vanished, and where they came from? Here goes, and god defend my soul. We have a paper called the Daily Fail. Some mistakenly call it the Daily Mail. The Daily Fail hates... well, basically everyone, but especially immigrants. It hates most of you, because you're not English. You're okay if you're American. If your first language isn't English, there's a fair chance the Daily Fail hates you. The Daily Fail also hates the EU, because not only is the EU full of people that it hates (not being English and all that), it's also full of immigrants, and the big bad EU is making us accept immigrants. This is bad. The Daily Fail was deeply sad about this state of affairs. SO The solution is clearly to leave the EU! The Daily Fail had been blasting the EU for about... forever, but banging the war drums about leaving for five or ten years or so, only nobody listened because it's the Daily Fail and nobody listens to it when it comes to serious politics. Except for the Conservatives. Enter He Who Shall No Longer Be Named. HWSNLBN is an arsehole who thought that we'd be better off outside the EU for... business reasons, I think? Honestly, he never had any solid argument. But he didn't like immigrants, you see. Except his wife. She's a good immigrant. Or something. But the Daily Fail saw an ally in HWSNLBN, and a dark pact was born. HWSNLBN became the Daily Fail's man of the people, an arsehole always PRed sat in a pub with a pint of guiness to show what a working man's man he is. Because the Daily Fail is popular mostly with idiots, this worked, and nobody thought it was odd that the man who inherited wads of cash and lives as a millionaire businessman seems to exclusively visit local village pubs to drink shitty guiness rather than actually good guiness like what the Irish have. At the same time, the Conservative Party was going through a long hangover called THATCHER. After Big Mommy T, the Conservative Party suffered from a complete lack of charisma, due to Big Mommy T having apparently sucked all of the drive, energy, power, and charisma out of the entire party and channelled it all into her living bulldozer of a personality. This allowed THE BLAIR to take over England forever, to various degrees of success, until he thought 'I'm friends with America. We need to be friends with America. Let's help America with its war, because we're friends'. And everyone in England was sad. And then we kicked Blair out because actually we never liked the War in Iraq, and that was BEFORE we found out it was bullshit. (I believe we were about 50/50 on it, it was never popular) During this period, the Conservatives went through a lot of personality shifts while trying to find an identity after Big Mommy T. This inevitably led some of them to go farther and farther to the right on the political spectrum. And those people agreed with the Daily Fail that the EU was evil. Unfortunately, these people also had a tendency to smell bad and be blatantly racist. This wasn't a problem before, because the whip pretty much pinned them down and declared 'thou shalt vote with the party, or thou shalt be hanged at dawn! And under no circumstances shalt thou hold a press conference where you can be a) seen or ESPECIALLY b) heard.' Cue David Cameron, a youngish (not 60), floppy haired, non-flamboyant, but deceptively right-of-centre politician with energy, ideas, and a hidden well of charisma that he UNLEASHED UPON GORDON BROWN WITH UNEXPECTED FURY. Gordon Brown was Tony Blair's hand-picked successor, the court vizier waiting in the wings to stab him and steal his throne, if you will. His rise was considered so inevitable that people didn't think an election was even necessary. Here is a link to David Cameron's un-autocued, off the cuff speech after he'd been told just before going on stage that Labour were planning on a snap election since they were so far ahead in the polls: https://conservative-speeches.sayit.mysociety.org/speech/599778 (it genuinely is worth reading; it's one of the more influential speeches in modern British politics since it almost singlehandedly won him the election) And overnight the polls shifted, and he went on to thrash Gordon Brown, who suddenly went from arrogantly cocksure of victory to uncertain. And the Tories were overjoyed. Right? RIGHT??? Well, not really. As you might have noticed in there, he's a bit right of centre, not a hard right Tory. He was supportive of a lot of things they don't like along with things they do like. And that made the anti-EU crowd SAD. So, along comes He Who Shall No Longer Be Named and says 'tally ho, chums, I'm running a party called UKIP, and all we really do is talk about how much we hate immigrants and how they're murderous terrorist rapists. Want to join?' And they did, and the Tories were SAD. But also HAPPY, because they got rid of some utterly embarrassing fuckheads in the process. But those fuckheads were OVERJOYED, because now they could be SEEN, and HEARD, and this led to numerous embarrassments for UKIP, with 'well, every party has some idiots' being shorthand for 'UKIP is full of idiots' nationwide. But He Who Shall No Longer Be Named was untouched by all of this. The idiots were around him, being constantly told to shut the fuck up by him, much like the oppressive Tories they had fled from, because even he realised these idiots were idiots. But they did give UKIP more power, and that was what they needed to apply pressure on the Tories, even taking away some important areas of the UK at their height. David Cameron had a plan. The Anti-EU wing of the Tories were growing more and more boisterous, bolstered by the Daily Fail's endless yammering on one hand, UKIP on another, and his own back benchers. The Tories were meant to be the hard immigration party, after all, even though David felt there were more important issues. So facing increasing pressure where the Daily Fail had whipped it up to such a degree that everyone was hammering this one point and the Tories were losing seats to UKIP, he pulled out what he thought would be his trump card. With the worst of the Conservatives gone to UKIP, but the UK still mostly pro EU, he promised a referendum. The one thing UKIP would. Not. Shut. The. Fuck. Up. About. The plan was simple. Cut their legs out from under them, dispose of the worst of the Tory trash, and proceed. If he waited another few years, the tide would shift, a leave vote would be inevitable. But if he did it now, and Remain won? Well, the issue would be dead for decades. However, the Tories fell back on an old principle of theirs: RELENTLESS OPPORTUNISTIC BACKSTABBING. Unfortunately, a pair of arseholes called Michael Gove and Boris Johnson were both a little too opportunistic, and dumb enough not to realise this was a serious vote. It is important to realise both of them campaigned for Leave because they were certain that Remain was going to win. The whole plan they had was to be the True Men of The People and make a run on leadership afterward. THEY DID NOT WANT THEIR OWN CAMPAIGNS TO SUCCEED. But Leave won, due to a confluence of issues, and all that got royally shitted up. especially when David did the only thing a man betrayed by two of his friends could do: he quit and let them sort it the fuck out, since he didn't want the UK to leave and knew full well it was going to be a disaster. I'm sure he's SAD to this day. And that is why UKIP is now irrelevant. It was a party of grievance, buoyed by the Daily Fail (who more or less stopped banging on about them immediately after the vote), staffed only by Tory refuse and political neophytes, whose grievance got dealt with. Without the Daily Fail's support, a cause to get votes, or any sort of plan beyond that, they had no identity and no role to fulfill in the political sphere of the UK, and so they rapidly ceased to exist. And kept saying racist things. And literally fighting each other in the street over the leadership. You know, things that are anathema to UK politics, where we still hold leaders to some standards of dignity and expect them to at least look the part of being worthy to lead. THERE YOU GO. I'm just writing this post so everyone here has the full story on why Brexit happened and what happened with UKIP and He Who Shall No Longer Be Named, since I've noticed that both topics come up semi-frequently. It's not intended to be talk-downy or to assume you don't know any of it, just a full reference for anyone that happens to only be passingly familiar with UK politics and the names involved. It's a pretty good summary, I just don't think that UKIP's grievances are no longer relevant to the public after the referendum. Since neither immigration policies nor if or how many EU regulations the UK will follow is decided yet. My impression is that most of those 4 million people that voted UKIP in 2015 still care about those two main issues central to the party, but they never knew much about Paul Nuttall, Gerard Batten & co or gave a fuck about what they have to say. The overwhelming majority of coverage that UKIP were getting pre-2016 was via Farage, who is a charismatic speaker despite saying a lot of nonsense. Previous and following leaders have not enjoyed nearly the same amount of media attention, at lest partly because they're not soundbite generators. They're back to just being 'the slightly more racist Tories'. Saying a lot of nonesense is an easy way for the right-wing to get attention these days. Since the liberal bourgeoise will pick up any logical or factual wrong statement a right-winger produce and discuss it to death, they very easily achieve two things: 1) they mobilize their supporters and gather new ones based on the mass coverage 2) they avoid discussion about their actual politics, as the liberal media is busy with ad hominem attacks and statements that can easily be denied or re-interpreted later On a strategical level the liberals, in partiular the liberal papers, are bancrupt. They are the best propaganda the right-wing can hope for. Though that has been the case for two centuries now. If that's true, why does the right keep inventing propaganda? The old 'liberals are the right's best weapon' is stupid, lazy nonsense. This is where 'truth has a liberal bias' comes from; because apparently it's EVIL LEFTIST PROPAGANDA to speak the simple truth about things that actually happened, because those events don't transparently support an agenda. You know, like Trump's inauguration crowd size, which was only a story because the Orange One lied about it.
My point is not that it is wrong, my point is that the liberals are more interested in formalities and whether something is true or not, than in the topic itself. Most people however are not interested in discussing whether something was PC enough or how big a crowd size was, but whether they will have X money next month or whether immigration will be stopped.
And opposing those right-wingers with arguments noone cares about is literally the best thing the right can hope for. A badly conceived argument is worse than none.
|
On July 01 2018 01:22 Big J wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2018 23:30 iamthedave wrote:On June 30 2018 08:44 Big J wrote:On June 30 2018 07:01 Dan HH wrote:On June 30 2018 06:04 iamthedave wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On June 27 2018 07:19 Dan HH wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2018 06:40 sc-darkness wrote:On June 27 2018 06:39 Dan HH wrote:On June 27 2018 05:24 sc-darkness wrote:On June 27 2018 05:13 Plansix wrote: Point to immigration and claiming it is the root cause of their rise is myopic. The rise of right wing parties across a large number of nations cannot be linked to a single cause. And ceding ground on issues like immigration does not assure they won’t gain more power. It a simplistic solution to a wildly complex problem. Why did UKIP rise and then quickly disappeared after the last referendum in the UK? I'm not saying they were right though. Because Farage left. Can you name UKIP's current leader without googling it? I couldn't. They disappeared because they don't have a face anymore. Last time I was checking news, UKIP was in decline after the referendum even with Farage as an interim leader. I don't know what you checked, he was interim leader for a single month long after it had already gone to shit without him and a bunch of people left and proposed to disband the party. And he made it as clear as possible that he's only there out of obligation and does not plan to stay. Any immigration policy changes following Brexit are still in the future, they don't even know what to do about EEA yet. The suggestion that Brexit solved British right wing people's complaints about immigration and that's why UKIP is no longer necessary is incorrect, it's all yet to be decided. So why do their former voters no longer bother wanting to make UKIP have a say in those future immigration policies? Because UKIP doesn't exist, it was always just Farage. The collection of muppets still in that party do not enjoy nearly the same trust as Tories from the voters that are furthest right. Alright, you want the skinny on UKIP *spits* and Nigel Farage *blesses ground with salt*, and why they've more or less vanished, and where they came from? Here goes, and god defend my soul. We have a paper called the Daily Fail. Some mistakenly call it the Daily Mail. The Daily Fail hates... well, basically everyone, but especially immigrants. It hates most of you, because you're not English. You're okay if you're American. If your first language isn't English, there's a fair chance the Daily Fail hates you. The Daily Fail also hates the EU, because not only is the EU full of people that it hates (not being English and all that), it's also full of immigrants, and the big bad EU is making us accept immigrants. This is bad. The Daily Fail was deeply sad about this state of affairs. SO The solution is clearly to leave the EU! The Daily Fail had been blasting the EU for about... forever, but banging the war drums about leaving for five or ten years or so, only nobody listened because it's the Daily Fail and nobody listens to it when it comes to serious politics. Except for the Conservatives. Enter He Who Shall No Longer Be Named. HWSNLBN is an arsehole who thought that we'd be better off outside the EU for... business reasons, I think? Honestly, he never had any solid argument. But he didn't like immigrants, you see. Except his wife. She's a good immigrant. Or something. But the Daily Fail saw an ally in HWSNLBN, and a dark pact was born. HWSNLBN became the Daily Fail's man of the people, an arsehole always PRed sat in a pub with a pint of guiness to show what a working man's man he is. Because the Daily Fail is popular mostly with idiots, this worked, and nobody thought it was odd that the man who inherited wads of cash and lives as a millionaire businessman seems to exclusively visit local village pubs to drink shitty guiness rather than actually good guiness like what the Irish have. At the same time, the Conservative Party was going through a long hangover called THATCHER. After Big Mommy T, the Conservative Party suffered from a complete lack of charisma, due to Big Mommy T having apparently sucked all of the drive, energy, power, and charisma out of the entire party and channelled it all into her living bulldozer of a personality. This allowed THE BLAIR to take over England forever, to various degrees of success, until he thought 'I'm friends with America. We need to be friends with America. Let's help America with its war, because we're friends'. And everyone in England was sad. And then we kicked Blair out because actually we never liked the War in Iraq, and that was BEFORE we found out it was bullshit. (I believe we were about 50/50 on it, it was never popular) During this period, the Conservatives went through a lot of personality shifts while trying to find an identity after Big Mommy T. This inevitably led some of them to go farther and farther to the right on the political spectrum. And those people agreed with the Daily Fail that the EU was evil. Unfortunately, these people also had a tendency to smell bad and be blatantly racist. This wasn't a problem before, because the whip pretty much pinned them down and declared 'thou shalt vote with the party, or thou shalt be hanged at dawn! And under no circumstances shalt thou hold a press conference where you can be a) seen or ESPECIALLY b) heard.' Cue David Cameron, a youngish (not 60), floppy haired, non-flamboyant, but deceptively right-of-centre politician with energy, ideas, and a hidden well of charisma that he UNLEASHED UPON GORDON BROWN WITH UNEXPECTED FURY. Gordon Brown was Tony Blair's hand-picked successor, the court vizier waiting in the wings to stab him and steal his throne, if you will. His rise was considered so inevitable that people didn't think an election was even necessary. Here is a link to David Cameron's un-autocued, off the cuff speech after he'd been told just before going on stage that Labour were planning on a snap election since they were so far ahead in the polls: https://conservative-speeches.sayit.mysociety.org/speech/599778 (it genuinely is worth reading; it's one of the more influential speeches in modern British politics since it almost singlehandedly won him the election) And overnight the polls shifted, and he went on to thrash Gordon Brown, who suddenly went from arrogantly cocksure of victory to uncertain. And the Tories were overjoyed. Right? RIGHT??? Well, not really. As you might have noticed in there, he's a bit right of centre, not a hard right Tory. He was supportive of a lot of things they don't like along with things they do like. And that made the anti-EU crowd SAD. So, along comes He Who Shall No Longer Be Named and says 'tally ho, chums, I'm running a party called UKIP, and all we really do is talk about how much we hate immigrants and how they're murderous terrorist rapists. Want to join?' And they did, and the Tories were SAD. But also HAPPY, because they got rid of some utterly embarrassing fuckheads in the process. But those fuckheads were OVERJOYED, because now they could be SEEN, and HEARD, and this led to numerous embarrassments for UKIP, with 'well, every party has some idiots' being shorthand for 'UKIP is full of idiots' nationwide. But He Who Shall No Longer Be Named was untouched by all of this. The idiots were around him, being constantly told to shut the fuck up by him, much like the oppressive Tories they had fled from, because even he realised these idiots were idiots. But they did give UKIP more power, and that was what they needed to apply pressure on the Tories, even taking away some important areas of the UK at their height. David Cameron had a plan. The Anti-EU wing of the Tories were growing more and more boisterous, bolstered by the Daily Fail's endless yammering on one hand, UKIP on another, and his own back benchers. The Tories were meant to be the hard immigration party, after all, even though David felt there were more important issues. So facing increasing pressure where the Daily Fail had whipped it up to such a degree that everyone was hammering this one point and the Tories were losing seats to UKIP, he pulled out what he thought would be his trump card. With the worst of the Conservatives gone to UKIP, but the UK still mostly pro EU, he promised a referendum. The one thing UKIP would. Not. Shut. The. Fuck. Up. About. The plan was simple. Cut their legs out from under them, dispose of the worst of the Tory trash, and proceed. If he waited another few years, the tide would shift, a leave vote would be inevitable. But if he did it now, and Remain won? Well, the issue would be dead for decades. However, the Tories fell back on an old principle of theirs: RELENTLESS OPPORTUNISTIC BACKSTABBING. Unfortunately, a pair of arseholes called Michael Gove and Boris Johnson were both a little too opportunistic, and dumb enough not to realise this was a serious vote. It is important to realise both of them campaigned for Leave because they were certain that Remain was going to win. The whole plan they had was to be the True Men of The People and make a run on leadership afterward. THEY DID NOT WANT THEIR OWN CAMPAIGNS TO SUCCEED. But Leave won, due to a confluence of issues, and all that got royally shitted up. especially when David did the only thing a man betrayed by two of his friends could do: he quit and let them sort it the fuck out, since he didn't want the UK to leave and knew full well it was going to be a disaster. I'm sure he's SAD to this day. And that is why UKIP is now irrelevant. It was a party of grievance, buoyed by the Daily Fail (who more or less stopped banging on about them immediately after the vote), staffed only by Tory refuse and political neophytes, whose grievance got dealt with. Without the Daily Fail's support, a cause to get votes, or any sort of plan beyond that, they had no identity and no role to fulfill in the political sphere of the UK, and so they rapidly ceased to exist. And kept saying racist things. And literally fighting each other in the street over the leadership. You know, things that are anathema to UK politics, where we still hold leaders to some standards of dignity and expect them to at least look the part of being worthy to lead. THERE YOU GO. I'm just writing this post so everyone here has the full story on why Brexit happened and what happened with UKIP and He Who Shall No Longer Be Named, since I've noticed that both topics come up semi-frequently. It's not intended to be talk-downy or to assume you don't know any of it, just a full reference for anyone that happens to only be passingly familiar with UK politics and the names involved. It's a pretty good summary, I just don't think that UKIP's grievances are no longer relevant to the public after the referendum. Since neither immigration policies nor if or how many EU regulations the UK will follow is decided yet. My impression is that most of those 4 million people that voted UKIP in 2015 still care about those two main issues central to the party, but they never knew much about Paul Nuttall, Gerard Batten & co or gave a fuck about what they have to say. The overwhelming majority of coverage that UKIP were getting pre-2016 was via Farage, who is a charismatic speaker despite saying a lot of nonsense. Previous and following leaders have not enjoyed nearly the same amount of media attention, at lest partly because they're not soundbite generators. They're back to just being 'the slightly more racist Tories'. Saying a lot of nonesense is an easy way for the right-wing to get attention these days. Since the liberal bourgeoise will pick up any logical or factual wrong statement a right-winger produce and discuss it to death, they very easily achieve two things: 1) they mobilize their supporters and gather new ones based on the mass coverage 2) they avoid discussion about their actual politics, as the liberal media is busy with ad hominem attacks and statements that can easily be denied or re-interpreted later On a strategical level the liberals, in partiular the liberal papers, are bancrupt. They are the best propaganda the right-wing can hope for. Though that has been the case for two centuries now. If that's true, why does the right keep inventing propaganda? The old 'liberals are the right's best weapon' is stupid, lazy nonsense. This is where 'truth has a liberal bias' comes from; because apparently it's EVIL LEFTIST PROPAGANDA to speak the simple truth about things that actually happened, because those events don't transparently support an agenda. You know, like Trump's inauguration crowd size, which was only a story because the Orange One lied about it. My point is not that it is wrong, my point is that the liberals are more interested in formalities and whether something is true or not, than in the topic itself. Most people however are not interested in discussing whether something was PC enough or how big a crowd size was, but whether they will have X money next month or whether immigration will be stopped.
I'm not sure what point it is that you're trying to make. The right gets up in arms over nothing as well, it's just different nothings. See: kneeling football players. Connection to people making X money next month? See: Uranium 1 'scandal'.
Define 'no one'.
|
Big J is correct, some articles written by journalists with clearly liberal/center-left views are almost as good at promoting the right as rioting far leftists. I mean both opinion pieces and normal reporting, they just can't stop themselves from expressing their disdain for the right while pretending to be objective. To be clear, I'm not talking about fake news but about the focus of "liberal" media and the tone they use when talking about "populists". Even when they're factually correct, somehow they still manage to tell their story in a way that only makes those populists stronger.
|
On July 01 2018 02:21 Sent. wrote: Big J is correct, some articles written by journalists with clearly liberal/center-left views are almost as good at promoting the right as rioting far leftists. I mean both opinion pieces and normal reporting, they just can't stop themselves from expressing their disdain for the right while pretending to be objective. To be clear, I'm not talking about fake news but about the focus of "liberal" media and the tone they use when talking about "populists". Even when they're factually correct, somehow they still manage to tell their story in a way that only makes those populists stronger. aye; this is one of the classical political and sociological conundrums: calling people out on their bad behavior just makes them dig in more. but ignoring it means ignoring the truth and letting evildoers get away with misdeeds.
no good way around it; at least none that's been found as of yet.
|
On July 01 2018 02:21 Sent. wrote: Big J is correct, some articles written by journalists with clearly liberal/center-left views are almost as good at promoting the right as rioting far leftists. I mean both opinion pieces and normal reporting, they just can't stop themselves from expressing their disdain for the right while pretending to be objective. To be clear, I'm not talking about fake news but about the focus of "liberal" media and the tone they use when talking about "populists". Even when they're factually correct, somehow they still manage to tell their story in a way that only makes those populists stronger.
And the tone of the 'right wing' media is more neutral, yes?
You're putting the blame on the wrong source, is my point. Would ignoring populists make them weaker? Or would that strengthen their stance by giving them something to point to and say 'look, they want to ignore and to silence us'?
Report the clear facts? If those facts are in ANY WAY NEGATIVE they will point and say 'look at how they're lying about us'. Facts like 'what they said', for example.
You're blaming the liberal media for a basic interaction between populists and any media of any form. There is no way to deal with populists. That's the problem. Once they're built up momentum, nothing you do can stop them.
|
|
|
|
|
|