|
Although this thread does not function under the same strict guidelines as the USPMT, it is still a general practice on TL to provide a source with an explanation on why it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion. Failure to do so will result in a mod action. |
There's no mythical 'what people want'. The usual half-time of a modern scandal is a few weeks before the people move on to something else. Populists don't have access to some sort of deep democratic opinion within the population because those sort of opinions don't exist, they just know what buttons to push to generate that hysteria.
Exactly. What people want is what is determined by an unbiased mechanism. We have two fundamental mechanism (neither unbiased) to determine what people want. One is the democratic market, the other the capitalist market. I'm all ears to improve those or introduce something better (less biased, more tinkered towards representing the opinion of the indivudual). But prematurely calling out to "know what people want", or calling yourself "the middle/consensus party" without going through the process of measuring those opinions is undemocratic and illiberal to the bone.
The result of such a process is the closest to what we know "what people want", not the political offer someone contributes to the process.
|
Penka the Bulgarian cow escapes death sentence after international outcry. Take that Brussels!11 /s
+ Show Spoiler +SOFIA (Reuters) - Bulgaria agreed on Monday to spare the life of Penka the cow after plans to kill her for crossing European Union borders without paperwork triggered an international outcry. Penka wandered away from her herd near the Bulgarian village of Mazarachevo last month and walked out of the bloc into neighboring Serbia. When she was returned two weeks later, authorities said she would have to be put down as she had violated guidelines under which animals entering the European Union have to have papers verifying their health. Penka’s plight prompted protests on social media, particularly in Britain where eurosceptic campaigners and publications held her up as a victim of Brussels bureaucracy. Animal rights campaigners, including former Beatle Sir Paul McCartney, signed petitions asking Bulgaria to save the five-year-old animal. The Bulgarian Food Safety Agency agreed to review the case and said on Monday that lab tests had given her a clean bill of health. “It is expected the animal will be allowed back to her former home in the village of Mazarachevo by the end of the week,” the agency said in a statement. “I read the moos today oh boy! HUGE HUGE HUGE PENKA NEWS. SHE WILL LIVE!!!!!!!!!,” tweeted James Crisp, a journalist with Britain’s Daily Telegraph newspaper, mangling one of the Beatles’ best known songs as he celebrated the announcement. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bulgaria-eu-cow/penka-the-bulgarian-cow-escapes-death-sentence-after-international-outcry-idUSKBN1J71LQ
|
On June 13 2018 03:48 Nyxisto wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2018 23:41 Silvanel wrote: Or just maybe its the other way around? Populist are gaining strenght because they are promising exactly the things that general population wants? When i was very young i belived that people are good and it is system that makes them behave badly. But as i grew older i switched to view that people are bad (in very specific sense of this word) by nature: racism, tribalism and egoism are natural and its the system that keep them in line. And when in democracy enough of tribsmen feel threatend the system bends to tribes will (as it is in democracy by design).
We live in age when some people will have to choose between democracy and humanism. As it seems more and more likely that majority (at least in some countries) will choose its own well being over humanism. There's no mythical 'what people want'. The usual half-time of a modern scandal is a few weeks before the people move on to something else. Populists don't have access to some sort of deep democratic opinion within the population because those sort of opinions don't exist, they just know what buttons to push to generate that hysteria. It's a wrong characterisation to equate fighting populism with fighting democracy because democracy is more than just a riled up population. Democracy has some demands of its citizenry and not just its leadership. democratic citizens ought to make decisions based on facts and rational deliberation, not just feelings or whatever passes through the news headlines.
To be fair, populists do tap into a vein of common interest. That's how it works. The issue is, again, that the issues they promote are often impossibilities, which is why no political parties talk about/offer it.
There were people in England who legitimately believed that Brexit would mean every non-white person was going to leave England, and feel that they have been betrayed by the Conservatives because they're not offering that. And they believe it because UKIP and other even less savoury populist groups strongly intimated that if we weren't in the EU we could do that, nay, we would do it, and the only thing holding us back all this time were those eeeeeeeevil EU regulations.
That's the problem. It isn't even a problem - necessarily - that the causes being championed are often explicitly racist or other -ists. The problem is that the cause is impossible for various reasons. That isn't true politics, it's pure rabble rousing that achieves nothing but social chaos.
Frankly it's pretty disgusting to see people championing the rise of this particular brand of populist across the EU.
So many of them lean towards fascism, in an entirely non-ironic, non-reactionary way. You'd think that history had taught us all a lesson about what happens when fascism takes root in the EU. I'm glad that the worst England's arseholes have accomplished is Brexit, and they've pretty much lost their hold on the populace in its aftermath. I hope the worst that happens on the continent is the status quo gets a kick up the arse. But there's real warning signs coming out of some places. Poland and Italy are both blaring warning signs right now. Spain's recently dodged a legitimate civil war. Germany's throwing up the odd alarm bell too. France had a near miss.
'Tis testing times for the EU. For all our sakes, I hope the bloc comes through okay.
For my own part, I was never a strong Remainer. I voted Remain based on one obvious truth: the leave camp had no idea what to do if we actually voted to leave. It was all rhetoric, empty words, and plain old bullshit. And my observations have proven more accurate than I feared at the time. Brexit has been nothing but a disaster so far, without even the suggestion that things are going to get sorted out in the near future, or a hint that the government has an idea of how to right the ship. All of these things were obvious. But hey. Old news now. The only questions remaining to be answered is how badly we'll be hurt by the severance package, and whether anyone will treat us with respect when we go out to cut new deals.
|
On June 13 2018 05:25 Sent. wrote:Penka the Bulgarian cow escapes death sentence after international outcry. Take that Brussels!11 /s + Show Spoiler +SOFIA (Reuters) - Bulgaria agreed on Monday to spare the life of Penka the cow after plans to kill her for crossing European Union borders without paperwork triggered an international outcry. Penka wandered away from her herd near the Bulgarian village of Mazarachevo last month and walked out of the bloc into neighboring Serbia. When she was returned two weeks later, authorities said she would have to be put down as she had violated guidelines under which animals entering the European Union have to have papers verifying their health. Penka’s plight prompted protests on social media, particularly in Britain where eurosceptic campaigners and publications held her up as a victim of Brussels bureaucracy. Animal rights campaigners, including former Beatle Sir Paul McCartney, signed petitions asking Bulgaria to save the five-year-old animal. The Bulgarian Food Safety Agency agreed to review the case and said on Monday that lab tests had given her a clean bill of health. “It is expected the animal will be allowed back to her former home in the village of Mazarachevo by the end of the week,” the agency said in a statement. “I read the moos today oh boy! HUGE HUGE HUGE PENKA NEWS. SHE WILL LIVE!!!!!!!!!,” tweeted James Crisp, a journalist with Britain’s Daily Telegraph newspaper, mangling one of the Beatles’ best known songs as he celebrated the announcement. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bulgaria-eu-cow/penka-the-bulgarian-cow-escapes-death-sentence-after-international-outcry-idUSKBN1J71LQ A cow being pointlessly killed would definitely be a shame. Good reversal there.
|
On June 13 2018 05:25 Sent. wrote:Penka the Bulgarian cow escapes death sentence after international outcry. Take that Brussels!11 /s + Show Spoiler +SOFIA (Reuters) - Bulgaria agreed on Monday to spare the life of Penka the cow after plans to kill her for crossing European Union borders without paperwork triggered an international outcry. Penka wandered away from her herd near the Bulgarian village of Mazarachevo last month and walked out of the bloc into neighboring Serbia. When she was returned two weeks later, authorities said she would have to be put down as she had violated guidelines under which animals entering the European Union have to have papers verifying their health. Penka’s plight prompted protests on social media, particularly in Britain where eurosceptic campaigners and publications held her up as a victim of Brussels bureaucracy. Animal rights campaigners, including former Beatle Sir Paul McCartney, signed petitions asking Bulgaria to save the five-year-old animal. The Bulgarian Food Safety Agency agreed to review the case and said on Monday that lab tests had given her a clean bill of health. “It is expected the animal will be allowed back to her former home in the village of Mazarachevo by the end of the week,” the agency said in a statement. “I read the moos today oh boy! HUGE HUGE HUGE PENKA NEWS. SHE WILL LIVE!!!!!!!!!,” tweeted James Crisp, a journalist with Britain’s Daily Telegraph newspaper, mangling one of the Beatles’ best known songs as he celebrated the announcement. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bulgaria-eu-cow/penka-the-bulgarian-cow-escapes-death-sentence-after-international-outcry-idUSKBN1J71LQ Major progress on adapting EU regulations
|
On June 13 2018 05:25 Sent. wrote:Penka the Bulgarian cow escapes death sentence after international outcry. Take that Brussels!11 /s + Show Spoiler +SOFIA (Reuters) - Bulgaria agreed on Monday to spare the life of Penka the cow after plans to kill her for crossing European Union borders without paperwork triggered an international outcry. Penka wandered away from her herd near the Bulgarian village of Mazarachevo last month and walked out of the bloc into neighboring Serbia. When she was returned two weeks later, authorities said she would have to be put down as she had violated guidelines under which animals entering the European Union have to have papers verifying their health. Penka’s plight prompted protests on social media, particularly in Britain where eurosceptic campaigners and publications held her up as a victim of Brussels bureaucracy. Animal rights campaigners, including former Beatle Sir Paul McCartney, signed petitions asking Bulgaria to save the five-year-old animal. The Bulgarian Food Safety Agency agreed to review the case and said on Monday that lab tests had given her a clean bill of health. “It is expected the animal will be allowed back to her former home in the village of Mazarachevo by the end of the week,” the agency said in a statement. “I read the moos today oh boy! HUGE HUGE HUGE PENKA NEWS. SHE WILL LIVE!!!!!!!!!,” tweeted James Crisp, a journalist with Britain’s Daily Telegraph newspaper, mangling one of the Beatles’ best known songs as he celebrated the announcement. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bulgaria-eu-cow/penka-the-bulgarian-cow-escapes-death-sentence-after-international-outcry-idUSKBN1J71LQ
Weak bordercontrol as always. They let in the Bombayan Cow, it's only a matter of years now until we won't be seeing normal cars anymore, just flying carpets everywhere!
|
On June 13 2018 05:45 iamthedave wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2018 03:48 Nyxisto wrote:On June 12 2018 23:41 Silvanel wrote: Or just maybe its the other way around? Populist are gaining strenght because they are promising exactly the things that general population wants? When i was very young i belived that people are good and it is system that makes them behave badly. But as i grew older i switched to view that people are bad (in very specific sense of this word) by nature: racism, tribalism and egoism are natural and its the system that keep them in line. And when in democracy enough of tribsmen feel threatend the system bends to tribes will (as it is in democracy by design).
We live in age when some people will have to choose between democracy and humanism. As it seems more and more likely that majority (at least in some countries) will choose its own well being over humanism. There's no mythical 'what people want'. The usual half-time of a modern scandal is a few weeks before the people move on to something else. Populists don't have access to some sort of deep democratic opinion within the population because those sort of opinions don't exist, they just know what buttons to push to generate that hysteria. It's a wrong characterisation to equate fighting populism with fighting democracy because democracy is more than just a riled up population. Democracy has some demands of its citizenry and not just its leadership. democratic citizens ought to make decisions based on facts and rational deliberation, not just feelings or whatever passes through the news headlines. To be fair, populists do tap into a vein of common interest. That's how it works. The issue is, again, that the issues they promote are often impossibilities, which is why no political parties talk about/offer it. + Show Spoiler +There were people in England who legitimately believed that Brexit would mean every non-white person was going to leave England, and feel that they have been betrayed by the Conservatives because they're not offering that. And they believe it because UKIP and other even less savoury populist groups strongly intimated that if we weren't in the EU we could do that, nay, we would do it, and the only thing holding us back all this time were those eeeeeeeevil EU regulations.
That's the problem. It isn't even a problem - necessarily - that the causes being championed are often explicitly racist or other -ists. The problem is that the cause is impossible for various reasons. That isn't true politics, it's pure rabble rousing that achieves nothing but social chaos.
Frankly it's pretty disgusting to see people championing the rise of this particular brand of populist across the EU.
So many of them lean towards fascism, in an entirely non-ironic, non-reactionary way. You'd think that history had taught us all a lesson about what happens when fascism takes root in the EU. I'm glad that the worst England's arseholes have accomplished is Brexit, and they've pretty much lost their hold on the populace in its aftermath. I hope the worst that happens on the continent is the status quo gets a kick up the arse. But there's real warning signs coming out of some places. Poland and Italy are both blaring warning signs right now. Spain's recently dodged a legitimate civil war. Germany's throwing up the odd alarm bell too. France had a near miss.
'Tis testing times for the EU. For all our sakes, I hope the bloc comes through okay.
For my own part, I was never a strong Remainer. I voted Remain based on one obvious truth: the leave camp had no idea what to do if we actually voted to leave. It was all rhetoric, empty words, and plain old bullshit. And my observations have proven more accurate than I feared at the time. Brexit has been nothing but a disaster so far, without even the suggestion that things are going to get sorted out in the near future, or a hint that the government has an idea of how to right the ship. All of these things were obvious. But hey. Old news now. The only questions remaining to be answered is how badly we'll be hurt by the severance package, and whether anyone will treat us with respect when we go out to cut new deals.
There's no essence of common interest among populists. It's really futile to look for one. Take the AfD, which started as a party of academic economics professors that wanted to leave the currency Union, to a party of anti-Europeanism, to a anti-refugee party whose leader jumped ship and tried to start a fringe movement, etc.. the strength of this contentless politics lies in the fact that they can switch to whatever is the current hot topic. For a genuine Volkspartei which claims to represent the substantial interests of the people (i.e the electorate as a whole), it it virtually impossible to try to keep chasing the populist parties. It's like trying to catch the road runner.
Buying into the pessismism and zero sum logic of populism is a self-fulfiling prophecy. If you engage in the discourse at all you've already taken the bait. The first step should be to reject the alarmist and doomsday rhetoric of populists.
|
On June 13 2018 07:14 Nyxisto wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2018 05:45 iamthedave wrote:On June 13 2018 03:48 Nyxisto wrote:On June 12 2018 23:41 Silvanel wrote: Or just maybe its the other way around? Populist are gaining strenght because they are promising exactly the things that general population wants? When i was very young i belived that people are good and it is system that makes them behave badly. But as i grew older i switched to view that people are bad (in very specific sense of this word) by nature: racism, tribalism and egoism are natural and its the system that keep them in line. And when in democracy enough of tribsmen feel threatend the system bends to tribes will (as it is in democracy by design).
We live in age when some people will have to choose between democracy and humanism. As it seems more and more likely that majority (at least in some countries) will choose its own well being over humanism. There's no mythical 'what people want'. The usual half-time of a modern scandal is a few weeks before the people move on to something else. Populists don't have access to some sort of deep democratic opinion within the population because those sort of opinions don't exist, they just know what buttons to push to generate that hysteria. It's a wrong characterisation to equate fighting populism with fighting democracy because democracy is more than just a riled up population. Democracy has some demands of its citizenry and not just its leadership. democratic citizens ought to make decisions based on facts and rational deliberation, not just feelings or whatever passes through the news headlines. To be fair, populists do tap into a vein of common interest. That's how it works. The issue is, again, that the issues they promote are often impossibilities, which is why no political parties talk about/offer it. + Show Spoiler +There were people in England who legitimately believed that Brexit would mean every non-white person was going to leave England, and feel that they have been betrayed by the Conservatives because they're not offering that. And they believe it because UKIP and other even less savoury populist groups strongly intimated that if we weren't in the EU we could do that, nay, we would do it, and the only thing holding us back all this time were those eeeeeeeevil EU regulations.
That's the problem. It isn't even a problem - necessarily - that the causes being championed are often explicitly racist or other -ists. The problem is that the cause is impossible for various reasons. That isn't true politics, it's pure rabble rousing that achieves nothing but social chaos.
Frankly it's pretty disgusting to see people championing the rise of this particular brand of populist across the EU.
So many of them lean towards fascism, in an entirely non-ironic, non-reactionary way. You'd think that history had taught us all a lesson about what happens when fascism takes root in the EU. I'm glad that the worst England's arseholes have accomplished is Brexit, and they've pretty much lost their hold on the populace in its aftermath. I hope the worst that happens on the continent is the status quo gets a kick up the arse. But there's real warning signs coming out of some places. Poland and Italy are both blaring warning signs right now. Spain's recently dodged a legitimate civil war. Germany's throwing up the odd alarm bell too. France had a near miss.
'Tis testing times for the EU. For all our sakes, I hope the bloc comes through okay.
For my own part, I was never a strong Remainer. I voted Remain based on one obvious truth: the leave camp had no idea what to do if we actually voted to leave. It was all rhetoric, empty words, and plain old bullshit. And my observations have proven more accurate than I feared at the time. Brexit has been nothing but a disaster so far, without even the suggestion that things are going to get sorted out in the near future, or a hint that the government has an idea of how to right the ship. All of these things were obvious. But hey. Old news now. The only questions remaining to be answered is how badly we'll be hurt by the severance package, and whether anyone will treat us with respect when we go out to cut new deals. There's no essence of common interest among populists. It's really futile to look for one. Take the AfD, which started as a party of academic economics professors that wanted to leave the currency Union, to a party of anti-Europeanism, to a anti-refugee party whose leader jumped ship and tried to start a fringe movement, etc.. the strength of this contentless politics lies in the fact that they can switch to whatever is the current hot topic. For a genuine Volkspartei which claims to represent the substantial interests of the people (i.e the electorate as a whole), it it virtually impossible to try to keep chasing the populist parties. It's like trying to catch the road runner. Buying into the pessismism and zero sum logic of populism is a self-fulfiling prophecy. If you engage in the discourse at all you've already taken the bait. The first step should be to reject the alarmist and doomsday rhetoric of populists. I’d think the person suggesting not to “engage in the discourse at all” is remarkably ill equipped to pronounce that “there’s no essence of common interest among populists.” How can you find out if you propose simply not even engaging with any of them to find out logic or shared interest? You really think anti-EU and anti-immigration can’t cut across multiple segments of society in finding common interest? Or that a party that has undergone several changes or has some real nasty parts to it can’t also be fundamentally uniting anti-elitist sentiment?
|
you can probably find some anti-elitist or anti-European or anti-immigration sentiment everywhere, but notice what they all have in common? The phrase 'anti', the only thing that unites them across the board is the opposition to particular topics. That might hold together as long as you're only the party of opposition, but it is not the basis for an actual coherent ideological, long-term goal oriented politics.
That's why Boris Johnson looked disappointed as soon as the Brexit vote came in victorious and why the AfD avoids being a party that can govern at all costs, holding responsibility in office is a very different task compared to criticizing the status quo.
Most populist parties are not just populist in the sense of appealing to public sentiment, they do it in a purely destructive way. Okay, so the EU is gone, what exactly do we do then? How do all of the EU countries face Russia, China and the USA? There's no model or answer to that question, all you get is kitsch about European cultures living in harmony without immigrants and bureaucrats in Brussels
|
On June 13 2018 11:14 Nyxisto wrote: you can probably find some anti-elitist or anti-European or anti-immigration sentiment everywhere, but notice what they all have in common? The phrase 'anti', the only thing that unites them across the board is the opposition to particular topics. That might hold together as long as you're only the party of opposition, but it is not the basis for an actual coherent ideological, long-term goal oriented politics.
That's why Boris Johnson looked disappointed as soon as the Brexit vote came in victorious and why the AfD avoids being a party that can govern at all costs, holding responsibility in office is a very different task compared to criticizing the status quo.
Most populist parties are not just populist in the sense of appealing to public sentiment, they do it in a purely destructive way. Okay, so the EU is gone, what exactly do we do then? How do all of the EU countries face Russia, China and the USA? There's no model or answer to that question, all you get is kitsch about European cultures living in harmony without immigrants and bureaucrats in Brussels And what’s more populist than “our rulers have messed up big time and serve their own interests?” You’re just not thinking your proposition through. You say there’s no essence of common interest, but you ignore all the major ones (and disparage their chances of success.) You say it isn’t even worth talking with them, but want to speak for them at every turn. I see your position to be overflowing with contradictions. One of the ways I’d gather you have a good grasp of things (all populist movements are not equal) is to talk in less of these platitudes like “they’re just anti” and “this is how I judge his disappointed look” and “they do it in a purely destructive way.” You could know jack shit about your subject matter and rattle off the same boiler plate anti-populism diatribes ... just as fast and with similar convictions as they can do a number on the EU and migrants.
|
On June 13 2018 11:14 Nyxisto wrote: you can probably find some anti-elitist or anti-European or anti-immigration sentiment everywhere, but notice what they all have in common? The phrase 'anti', the only thing that unites them across the board is the opposition to particular topics. That might hold together as long as you're only the party of opposition, but it is not the basis for an actual coherent ideological, long-term goal oriented politics.
That's why Boris Johnson looked disappointed as soon as the Brexit vote came in victorious and why the AfD avoids being a party that can govern at all costs, holding responsibility in office is a very different task compared to criticizing the status quo.
Most populist parties are not just populist in the sense of appealing to public sentiment, they do it in a purely destructive way. Okay, so the EU is gone, what exactly do we do then? How do all of the EU countries face Russia, China and the USA? There's no model or answer to that question, all you get is kitsch about European cultures living in harmony without immigrants and bureaucrats in Brussels
The only anti-EU parties in my country are pro-Russia, and some of them are very likely to receive money from Russia. Still, we can have a referendum to stay or leave the EU, and it should be overwhelming majority to stay. Either way, I've noticed a pattern - the anti-EU guys often care too much about Russia. E.g. Trump and Le Pen. Also Farage?
|
On June 13 2018 15:11 sc-darkness wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2018 11:14 Nyxisto wrote: you can probably find some anti-elitist or anti-European or anti-immigration sentiment everywhere, but notice what they all have in common? The phrase 'anti', the only thing that unites them across the board is the opposition to particular topics. That might hold together as long as you're only the party of opposition, but it is not the basis for an actual coherent ideological, long-term goal oriented politics.
That's why Boris Johnson looked disappointed as soon as the Brexit vote came in victorious and why the AfD avoids being a party that can govern at all costs, holding responsibility in office is a very different task compared to criticizing the status quo.
Most populist parties are not just populist in the sense of appealing to public sentiment, they do it in a purely destructive way. Okay, so the EU is gone, what exactly do we do then? How do all of the EU countries face Russia, China and the USA? There's no model or answer to that question, all you get is kitsch about European cultures living in harmony without immigrants and bureaucrats in Brussels The only anti-EU parties in my country are pro-Russia, and some of them are very likely to receive money from Russia. Still, we can have a referendum to stay or leave the EU, and it should be overwhelming majority to stay. Either way, I've noticed a pattern - the anti-EU guys often care too much about Russia. E.g. Trump and Le Pen. Also Farage?
I don't think Farage talked about Russia much. I might be wrong there, but I've never noticed it. He was just tapping into good old UK xenophobia. There's some connection between him and Trump, but from what I've read any connection beyond that to Russia is pretty tenuous. Certainly UKIP - his party - never talked about Russia. They were nothing if laser focused on their pet issue.
We were always antsy about being part of the EU, and the Conservative Party was especially so. Farage tapped into that, got backing from the Daily Fail (because the Daily Fail is involved in most horrible political things in the UK), and siphoned off the most extreme members of the Conservative Party to form UKIP, party of scandals, racist rants, and occasional punch ups between its members. But that's okay because Nigel always made sure to be photographed down the pub having a pint. Predictably, once he left the party it collapsed into utter ruin inside a year.
But again, no plan. They pushed us into an incredibly important political move by lying to the populace about what would happen, without ever having to risk actually doing it. Now that it's happened, Farage has become pretty much the most hated man in Britain, with a fairly large chunk of his own supporters now extremely pissed off at him, as well as everyone else who hated him in the first place.
This has a downside when the people who support you were predominantly working class, and the British working class has a rather... straightforward way of expressing its feelings.
So hey. He ruined everyone else's life, but at least he's getting a little of that back in karma.
|
Ruined everyone else's life? In five/ten years GB might be stronger than before. This type of comments are like those people who like to say 'those two got together? that will NEVER work!'. At least wait to see what will happen...
|
On June 13 2018 19:18 SoSexy wrote: Ruined everyone else's life? In five/ten years GB might be stronger than before. This type of comments are like those people who like to say 'those two got together? that will NEVER work!'. At least wait to see what will happen...
I don't have a choice.
But every single person involved is failing to put a positive spin on things. When the people who actively said they were going to give us the best Brexit possible are, mid-Brexit, admitting that things are going badly, you have to be pretty deluded to remain optimistic.
Like I said, my main objection to leaving the EU was the lack of a viable (or indeed any) exit strategy. Things are so far going worse than I feared. I'd assumed by now they'd have hashed out some sort of solid plan, maybe not an ideal situation, but one that gets us out with some tolerable but unfortunate pain. We're still at the 'oh goddammit we forgot about that' stage where new problems keep cropping up.
I mean, have you been following the clusterfuck that is known in more common vernacular as 'The Irish Border Problem'? These are things we should have had in iron before voting to leave.
I'd love to be positive. I would. But my own government is giving me no reason to be positive. Theresa May's career is going to be destroyed by this. It's so bad that she's one of the weakest Prime Ministers we've had in decades, and nobody wants her job. Even the Tories, for whom betrayal from the backbenches is so rote that I one day expect a PM to turn to their backbenches mid-PMQ and declare 'CURSE YOUR SUDDEN BUT INEVITABLE BETRAYAL', are just kind of awkwardly shuffling their feet and waiting for this all to be over before sticking her. Even though everyone in England knows May is a Remainer, and there are multiple hard-leave Tories who would surely be more logical choices for PM during this time.
I'd love for all of Europe to look at what happened in Brexit as a warning sign, and hold their populists to a higher standard. Because people with no understanding of how the world works shouldn't be trying to dictate how it does.
But yes. In five to ten years Britain might be stronger than ever before. I'd love it if someone could tell me how that happens without sounding like they're running a magic bean factory. Because I've listened, and everyone who tries the All is Roses approach does so using predictions that run into massive, instantaneous snags if you think about them for half a second or do some research and see half a dozen roadblocks caused specifically by Brexit.
Have a read of these two articles, one by an Irish paper and one by the Independent (a sort of 'soft-left' paper in the UK, think centre left, but right of The Guardian). Look at how uncertain they are, look at the turmoil within the government; and these were written within the last six months.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/predicting-a-post-brexit-future-is-as-hard-as-ever-1.3445706
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/theresa-may-brexit-vote-tory-party-mp-conservatives-remain-deal-eu-withdrawal-a8396381.html
|
The UK government’s handling of Brexit certainly leaves something to be desired, that much is true. Perhaps an actual Leave leadership would make things better than what looks almost like an active attempt to sabotage the process by the unwilling. We will just have to see.
|
On June 13 2018 21:12 iamthedave wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2018 19:18 SoSexy wrote: Ruined everyone else's life? In five/ten years GB might be stronger than before. This type of comments are like those people who like to say 'those two got together? that will NEVER work!'. At least wait to see what will happen... + Show Spoiler +I don't have a choice.
But every single person involved is failing to put a positive spin on things. When the people who actively said they were going to give us the best Brexit possible are, mid-Brexit, admitting that things are going badly, you have to be pretty deluded to remain optimistic.
Like I said, my main objection to leaving the EU was the lack of a viable (or indeed any) exit strategy. Things are so far going worse than I feared. I'd assumed by now they'd have hashed out some sort of solid plan, maybe not an ideal situation, but one that gets us out with some tolerable but unfortunate pain. We're still at the 'oh goddammit we forgot about that' stage where new problems keep cropping up.
I mean, have you been following the clusterfuck that is known in more common vernacular as 'The Irish Border Problem'? These are things we should have had in iron before voting to leave.
I'd love to be positive. I would. But my own government is giving me no reason to be positive. Theresa May's career is going to be destroyed by this. It's so bad that she's one of the weakest Prime Ministers we've had in decades, and nobody wants her job. Even the Tories, for whom betrayal from the backbenches is so rote that I one day expect a PM to turn to their backbenches mid-PMQ and declare 'CURSE YOUR SUDDEN BUT INEVITABLE BETRAYAL', are just kind of awkwardly shuffling their feet and waiting for this all to be over before sticking her. Even though everyone in England knows May is a Remainer, and there are multiple hard-leave Tories who would surely be more logical choices for PM during this time.
I'd love for all of Europe to look at what happened in Brexit as a warning sign, and hold their populists to a higher standard. Because people with no understanding of how the world works shouldn't be trying to dictate how it does.
But yes. In five to ten years Britain might be stronger than ever before. I'd love it if someone could tell me how that happens without sounding like they're running a magic bean factory. Because I've listened, and everyone who tries the All is Roses approach does so using predictions that run into massive, instantaneous snags if you think about them for half a second or do some research and see half a dozen roadblocks caused specifically by Brexit.
Have a read of these two articles, one by an Irish paper and one by the Independent (a sort of 'soft-left' paper in the UK, think centre left, but right of The Guardian). Look at how uncertain they are, look at the turmoil within the government; and these were written within the last six months. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/predicting-a-post-brexit-future-is-as-hard-as-ever-1.3445706https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/theresa-may-brexit-vote-tory-party-mp-conservatives-remain-deal-eu-withdrawal-a8396381.html And a nation can be stronger on paper and collective while still under serving a large part of its population. Someone who is underpaid, struggling and can’t find a better job does not care how good the national economy is.
|
Things are getting serious between France and Italy. Any ideas on how France should respond, other than pretending their president didn't say anything? I got nothing. Sweden, Germany and Greece are like the only countries "entitled" to criticise others for not taking migrants in.
Italy summons French ambassador in row over migrant rescue boat Italy has summoned the French ambassador after Emmanuel Macron criticised what he called Italy’s “cynicism and irresponsibility” in turning away a migrant rescue ship with more than 600 people on board. Matteo Salvini, Italy’s new anti-migrant interior minister, blocked the Aquarius rescue ship carrying 629 people from docking in its ports at the weekend, prompting international outcry. In a speech to parliament on Wednesday he demanded an apology from the French president and challenged France to take in the migrants it had promised to take under an EU agreement, accusing it of turning back 10,000 migrants at Italy’s northern border. Salvini said France had committed to accepting 9,816 migrants under a 2015 EU redistribution scheme to relieve frontline countries of the pressure of asylum-seekers. The scheme never got off the ground. Salvini said in three years France had accepted only 640 people. “So I ask President Macron to pass from words to action and tomorrow morning welcome the 9,816 France promised to welcome as a sign of concrete generosity and not just words.” https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jun/13/italy-hits-back-at-french-criticism-over-turning-away-migrants-ship-aquarius
|
Let the ambassador hear an earful and move on, probably.
|
Takes hard-line stance on immigration, throws shade at the rest of the EU about the issue.
Summons ambassador the instant someone throws some shade in their direction.
|
Macron is such a brilliant diplomat: cuddling Trump for months for no results, and now triggering a diplomatic quasi-crisis while he has literally ZERO moral high ground given his own migratory policy
On June 14 2018 00:38 Plansix wrote: Takes hard-line stance on immigration, throws shade at the rest of the EU about the issue.
Summons ambassador the instant someone throws some shade in their direction. Salvini's move was obnoxious and irresponsible, but about France he's 100% right
|
|
|
|
|
|