|
In order to maintain some kind of respectable thread quality and to show some respect for those who lost friends in this tragedy, we're forced to enact a hard line policy for this thread. Any posts holding an opinion on who is responsible or making an accusation that is not held by neutral media will be banned. Policy is in effect from page 27 onwards. Specifically, citing a Ukrainian or Russian source for your claims is going to get you banned. Opinions/facts/accusations arising from neutral media sources (i.e. media whose country of origin is not Ukraine, Russia or one of its puppet states) will be permitted. This policy extends to all forms of media; if a youtube video or picture has not come through a neutral media source then don't post it or you'll be banned. If you wish to discuss this policy please use this website feedback thread. Updated policy on aggressive posting and insults. |
On July 21 2014 10:56 Sub40APM wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2014 10:20 Hazzyboy wrote: From day one nothing changed and looks like won't. Was reading through news and found a Ukrainian media posting the supposed photo of Buk which has one missing missile and getting transported on a truck to Russian border. Buk has a number #312 and I decided to check who had such a BUK in their arsenal Russia or Ukraine and was baffled why would own media post so incompetent information about a picture of own BUK and claim it's Russian. There is an online database of Buk missile launchers?
Yeah, that line confused me too. How is he checking if that BUK belongs to Ukraine or Russia...? And if it was Ukrainian, wouldn't that be one of the few that were stolen by the separatists?
|
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
the wise and calculating putin surely also calculated this. where are his royal mentats
|
Britain is preparing to renew those demands on Tuesday against resistance from Paris, which is worried the downing of the MH-17 will swing international attention back on to France’s controversial €1.2bn contract to sell two Mistral-class state-of-the-art helicopter assault ships to Russia. A French official said further “phase two” sanctions could be imposed but stressed that it was not yet “the moment” to move to further, broader sanctions. “For the moment the question of the Mistral contract does not arise,” the official said. “For now the contract is going ahead.”
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/c5eb4ae8-1016-11e4-90c7-00144feabdc0.html?siteedition=intl#axzz384KR1mre
|
On July 21 2014 10:34 micronesia wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2014 10:20 Hazzyboy wrote: P.S. Mind this in history whenever an accidental shot down happens - whoever did it always confess after some time. Again if it was accidental there is not much you can blame during a possible military operation or defense. I don't understand this line of thinking (the part about how it's an accident so not much you can blame)... People who shouldn't have such advanced technology are given the technology. They lack the training, or even some of the components necessary to use it properly. They shoot down a commercial airliner carrying civilians and squawking that it is a civilian plane. The group who used the equipment so irresponsibly, and the people who supplied this group so inappropriately are both heavily to blame. I think nobody should give the US army weapons either. The Iraq war had well over 50000 civilian deaths, no? Clearly it shows the US army is not trained enough to use their weapons systems professionally and should not possess such advanced technology.
Seriously...It's war. Mistakes happen, civilians die. Actually the war in eastern ukraine was remarkable for it's low body count. The Russian annexation of Crimea had a death toll of 3 or something? I can hardly remember any other invasion in the history of mankind with such a low death count... so this must mean the Russian army is the most professional in the world?...
|
On July 21 2014 12:34 REDBLUEGREEN wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2014 10:34 micronesia wrote:On July 21 2014 10:20 Hazzyboy wrote: P.S. Mind this in history whenever an accidental shot down happens - whoever did it always confess after some time. Again if it was accidental there is not much you can blame during a possible military operation or defense. I don't understand this line of thinking (the part about how it's an accident so not much you can blame)... People who shouldn't have such advanced technology are given the technology. They lack the training, or even some of the components necessary to use it properly. They shoot down a commercial airliner carrying civilians and squawking that it is a civilian plane. The group who used the equipment so irresponsibly, and the people who supplied this group so inappropriately are both heavily to blame. I think nobody should give the US army weapons either. The Iraq war had well over 50000 civilian deaths, no? Clearly it shows the US army is not trained enough to use their weapons systems professionally and should not possess such advanced technology. Seriously...It's war. Mistakes happen, civilians die. Actually the war in eastern ukraine was remarkable for it's low body count. The Russian annexation of Crimea had a death toll of 3 or something? I can hardly remember any other invasion in the history of mankind with such a low death count... so this must mean the Russian army is the most professional in the world?... Not as professional as the German army was in Czechoslovakia and Austria. 0 actualities!
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-07-20/russian-billionaires-in-horror-as-putin-risks-isolation.html
Putin’s inner circle, most of whom have a background in the intelligence services, “completely rule out the possibility that Russia is responsible for this and point the finger squarely at the Americans,” said Olga Kryshtanovskaya, a sociologist who studies the country’s elite at the Russian Academy of Sciences in Moscow.
One longtime Putin ally who runs a major state company said Ukrainian forces shot down the plane with U.S. connivance. This amounts to a war against Russia without a formal declaration, the executive said, asking not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter.
|
On July 21 2014 12:34 REDBLUEGREEN wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2014 10:34 micronesia wrote:On July 21 2014 10:20 Hazzyboy wrote: P.S. Mind this in history whenever an accidental shot down happens - whoever did it always confess after some time. Again if it was accidental there is not much you can blame during a possible military operation or defense. I don't understand this line of thinking (the part about how it's an accident so not much you can blame)... People who shouldn't have such advanced technology are given the technology. They lack the training, or even some of the components necessary to use it properly. They shoot down a commercial airliner carrying civilians and squawking that it is a civilian plane. The group who used the equipment so irresponsibly, and the people who supplied this group so inappropriately are both heavily to blame. I think nobody should give the US army weapons either. The Iraq war had well over 50000 civilian deaths, no? Clearly it shows the US army is not trained enough to use their weapons systems professionally and should not possess such advanced technology. Seriously...It's war. Mistakes happen, civilians die. Actually the war in eastern ukraine was remarkable for it's low body count. The Russian annexation of Crimea had a death toll of 3 or something? I can hardly remember any other invasion in the history of mankind with such a low death count... so this must mean the Russian army is the most professional in the world?...
I wonder how the world would have reacted if the rebels simply said they misidentified the plane as Ukrainian, and apologized. I'm not sure if they could really pay any reparations (not sure what their funding situation is like). Certainly things do happen in war; and if the rebels had treated it as simply an accident of war, how would people react?
|
The last thing the "rebels" want to do is admit Russia is giving them advanced weapons. Vladimir might not be so generous to them after that.
|
United States24579 Posts
On July 21 2014 12:34 REDBLUEGREEN wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2014 10:34 micronesia wrote:On July 21 2014 10:20 Hazzyboy wrote: P.S. Mind this in history whenever an accidental shot down happens - whoever did it always confess after some time. Again if it was accidental there is not much you can blame during a possible military operation or defense. I don't understand this line of thinking (the part about how it's an accident so not much you can blame)... People who shouldn't have such advanced technology are given the technology. They lack the training, or even some of the components necessary to use it properly. They shoot down a commercial airliner carrying civilians and squawking that it is a civilian plane. The group who used the equipment so irresponsibly, and the people who supplied this group so inappropriately are both heavily to blame. I think nobody should give the US army weapons either. The Iraq war had well over 50000 civilian deaths, no? Clearly it shows the US army is not trained enough to use their weapons systems professionally and should not possess such advanced technology. Seriously...It's war. Mistakes happen, civilians die. Actually the war in eastern ukraine was remarkable for it's low body count. The Russian annexation of Crimea had a death toll of 3 or something? I can hardly remember any other invasion in the history of mankind with such a low death count... so this must mean the Russian army is the most professional in the world?... I don't think you understand how unnecessary it is for commercial airliners to get shot down. It's not like, oops, someone kinda goofed. A great deal of effort has been put forth internationally, with concurrence from pretty much everyone, to ensure that passenger planes identifying themselves as such do not get inadvertently shot down. For this to happen (assuming the plane was identifying itself, which I see no evidence it wasn't) requires a disgustingly gross negligence.
|
|
Just days after the tragic crash of a Malaysian Airlines flight over eastern Ukraine, Western politicians and media joined together to gain the maximum propaganda value from the disaster. It had to be Russia; it had to be Putin, they said. President Obama held a press conference to claim – even before an investigation – that it was pro-Russian rebels in the region who were responsible. His ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power, did the same at the UN Security Council – just one day after the crash! While western media outlets rush to repeat government propaganda on the event, there are a few things they will not report.
http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2014/july/20/what-the-media-won’t-report-about-malaysian-airlines-flight-mh17.aspx
|
On July 21 2014 14:31 ElMeanYo wrote:Just days after the tragic crash of a Malaysian Airlines flight over eastern Ukraine, Western politicians and media joined together to gain the maximum propaganda value from the disaster. It had to be Russia; it had to be Putin, they said. President Obama held a press conference to claim – even before an investigation – that it was pro-Russian rebels in the region who were responsible. His ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power, did the same at the UN Security Council – just one day after the crash! While western media outlets rush to repeat government propaganda on the event, there are a few things they will not report. http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2014/july/20/what-the-media-won’t-report-about-malaysian-airlines-flight-mh17.aspx The media has literally reported all the things ron paul claims it hasnt reported, except about the claims regarding the syrian gas attacks because that is a value judgement. + Show Spoiler + -- at best there has been one report that I am aware that disputes the Western governments version of events but there is no definite 'false' claim, the reality is that the West didnt want to help Al-Quida linked terrorists in overthrowing Asad and throttled back. But way to start strong with a judgment 'MAXIMUM PROPAGANDA!', then make a number of provable false statements about what has and has not been reported and then at the end of the article finally say "well, I dont know, it could be this it could be that, lets not rush to judgement'
|
On July 21 2014 14:31 ElMeanYo wrote:Just days after the tragic crash of a Malaysian Airlines flight over eastern Ukraine, Western politicians and media joined together to gain the maximum propaganda value from the disaster. It had to be Russia; it had to be Putin, they said. President Obama held a press conference to claim – even before an investigation – that it was pro-Russian rebels in the region who were responsible. His ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power, did the same at the UN Security Council – just one day after the crash! While western media outlets rush to repeat government propaganda on the event, there are a few things they will not report. http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2014/july/20/what-the-media-won’t-report-about-malaysian-airlines-flight-mh17.aspx There are a lot of partial truths in there. While I have no doubt that some of the claims are true, for example, ukraine using the the same AA system. But Ukraine has nothing to shoot at because the people they're fighting against have no aircraft.
|
On July 21 2014 14:56 Amui wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2014 14:31 ElMeanYo wrote:Just days after the tragic crash of a Malaysian Airlines flight over eastern Ukraine, Western politicians and media joined together to gain the maximum propaganda value from the disaster. It had to be Russia; it had to be Putin, they said. President Obama held a press conference to claim – even before an investigation – that it was pro-Russian rebels in the region who were responsible. His ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power, did the same at the UN Security Council – just one day after the crash! While western media outlets rush to repeat government propaganda on the event, there are a few things they will not report. http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2014/july/20/what-the-media-won’t-report-about-malaysian-airlines-flight-mh17.aspx There are a lot of partial truths in there. While I have no doubt that some of the claims are true, for example, ukraine using the the same AA system. But Ukraine has nothing to shoot at because the people they're fighting against have no aircraft. The claim isnt whether the Ukrainian army has an anti air missile system just like the one that brought down the aircraft, ron paul -- or whoever wrote this for him -- is claiming that the western media 'to gain the maximum propaganda' is not reporting such a fact. Which is a provable lie.
Numerous sources have cited that all sides have access to such SAMs. In fact one of the earlier leads on the story has been that the rebels who were celebrating the capture of a number of Ukrainian SAMs of this variety -- after discovering that it was a civilian jet that was brought down -- deleted pictures of the SAMs they've previously been so proud of. Which -- along with just the more generic lines like 'the BUK missile system is a Soviet Era medium range missile system and all sides have them, however the Ukrainian forces have never fired an anti-air weapon in this conflict because the rebels lack an air force.'
|
MH17: Intercepted calls genuine - US
Alleged intercepted phone conversations released by Ukraine's security service of pro-Russian rebels discussing how they shot down Malaysian airliner MH17 are genuine, the US embassy in Kiev says. Ukraine's SBU security agency...
Source: dailymail
|
On July 21 2014 14:56 Amui wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2014 14:31 ElMeanYo wrote:Just days after the tragic crash of a Malaysian Airlines flight over eastern Ukraine, Western politicians and media joined together to gain the maximum propaganda value from the disaster. It had to be Russia; it had to be Putin, they said. President Obama held a press conference to claim – even before an investigation – that it was pro-Russian rebels in the region who were responsible. His ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power, did the same at the UN Security Council – just one day after the crash! While western media outlets rush to repeat government propaganda on the event, there are a few things they will not report. http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2014/july/20/what-the-media-won’t-report-about-malaysian-airlines-flight-mh17.aspx There are a lot of partial truths in there. While I have no doubt that some of the claims are true, for example, ukraine using the the same AA system. But Ukraine has nothing to shoot at because the people they're fighting against have no aircraft. If the anti-government forces do not have any aviation why did Kiev deploy BUK systems around anti-government controlled areas? http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Ukrainian government forces maneuver antiaircraft missile launchers they transported north west from Slavyansk eastern Ukraine Friday July 2014 Photo Dmitry Lovetsky/10004193/story.html + Show Spoiler +
Also six days ago when the a miltary transport was shot down Kiev blamed Russia, stating that the anti-government forces didn't have the capabilities to shot down an aircraft at 23k feet. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/ukraine-russian-rocket-may-have-downed-military-plane/
A Ukrainian military transport plane was shot down Monday along the country's eastern border with Russia, the defense minister said.
Rebels in conflict-wracked eastern Ukraine immediately claimed responsibility for downing the Antonov AN-26 but Ukrainian Defense Minister Valeriy Heletey said the rocket may have been fired from Russia.
Heletey said the plane was flying at an altitude of 21,300 feet, which he said was too high to be reached with the weapons used by the separatists fighting government troops. This was many days after the alleged capture of BUK systems by anti-government forces, which, immediately after were called pilles of junk by ATO officials. http://online.wsj.com/articles/ukraine-knew-of-separatists-air-defense-capabilities-say-officials-1405781508
Ukrainian rebels boasted on social media on June 29 that they gained control of a Buk-M1 system when they overran a Ukrainian armed forces base in the conflict zone in eastern Ukraine, Russian news agency Itar-Tass reported. Mr. Nayda said that Ukrainian armed forces made that system nonoperational back in March, around the time when the fighting in the area kicked off. The core of the missile system remains on the base, but there are no warheads to arm it, he said.
Far from it that there is only one side that could have shot it down. Thats why there needs to be a full impartial investigation, with whoever responsible to be held responsible.
|
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/07/20/what-happens-to-journalists-who-try-to-visit-the-mh17-morgue.html
Earlier that day, we had gone to the Donetsk city morgue looking for bodies from the Flight MH17 catastrophe that had been collected from the site of the crash. Two gunmen waiting outside the morgue ordered us to follow them as soon as we got out of our taxi. "Get in the car," said one of them, pointing at a Lada, after checking our documents.
Later we learned that he, a 20-year-old rebel sniper, was a student who dreamed of becoming a teacher, but now he was following orders. He said he had been commanded to grab every journalist showing up at the morgue. Journalists weren't to poke around among the bodies.
Anton, from Russia Today, asked Borodai why he had to spend a night in the SBU jail. Anton said that while he was in there he saw 50 detainees who had been waiting for days to have their cases heard. Borodai just joked: "If you have not spent a night at SBU, you are not a real journalist."
|
^ Nice picture of menacing looking troops with ski masks on in that article. Maybe they should have edited out the Ukrainian flag if they are going to put it in an article claiming they went into anti-government controlled territories. Really helps to send the message of who are the good and who are the bad guys.
|
On July 21 2014 16:19 zeo wrote: ^ Nice picture of menacing looking troops with ski masks on in that article. Maybe they should have edited out the Ukrainian flag if they are going to put it in an article claiming they went into anti-government controlled territories. Really helps to send the message of who are the good and who are the bad guys. Ya, they should have just put in a photoshoped photo of Hitler.
|
Canada11279 Posts
On July 21 2014 16:19 zeo wrote: ^ Nice picture of menacing looking troops with ski masks on in that article. Maybe they should have edited out the Ukrainian flag if they are going to put it in an article claiming they went into anti-government controlled territories. Really helps to send the message of who are the good and who are the bad guys. ... No seriously ...
Are you claiming the reporters created a fake story about being imprisoned... and they couldn't be bothered to photo-shop a flag out?
|
On July 21 2014 16:28 Falling wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2014 16:19 zeo wrote: ^ Nice picture of menacing looking troops with ski masks on in that article. Maybe they should have edited out the Ukrainian flag if they are going to put it in an article claiming they went into anti-government controlled territories. Really helps to send the message of who are the good and who are the bad guys. ... No seriously ... Are you claiming the reporters created a fake story about being imprisoned... and they couldn't be bothered to photo-shop a flag out? No seriously, they went over there and didn't take a single picture? If I'm reading an article about China, and they put pictures of Tokyo in it, it raises doubts.
This thread needs to uphold a higher standard of sources and actual news from 27 onward just like the modnote says.
|
|
|
|