|
On August 08 2013 05:31 ComaDose wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 05:19 sc2superfan101 wrote: We let the North Koreans, who routinely imprison and murder their own citizens by the tens of thousands play in the Olympics...
but pass a law against the gays, and that's where we put our foot down.
Wasn't the whole point of the Olympics to be a distinctly non-political event? do you think enforcing a new controversial law on invited athletes is less political than being upset about it? Every single country enforces their laws on the athletes who come to participate.
|
On August 08 2013 05:39 sc2superfan101 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 05:31 ComaDose wrote:On August 08 2013 05:19 sc2superfan101 wrote: We let the North Koreans, who routinely imprison and murder their own citizens by the tens of thousands play in the Olympics...
but pass a law against the gays, and that's where we put our foot down.
Wasn't the whole point of the Olympics to be a distinctly non-political event? do you think enforcing a new controversial law on invited athletes is less political than being upset about it? Every single country enforces their laws on the athletes who come to participate. are you responding to my question? is your point that we should be fixing the bigger social injustices surrounding the Olympics first? or that we should ignore all problems with the Olympics?
|
On August 08 2013 05:39 sc2superfan101 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 05:31 ComaDose wrote:On August 08 2013 05:19 sc2superfan101 wrote: We let the North Koreans, who routinely imprison and murder their own citizens by the tens of thousands play in the Olympics...
but pass a law against the gays, and that's where we put our foot down.
Wasn't the whole point of the Olympics to be a distinctly non-political event? do you think enforcing a new controversial law on invited athletes is less political than being upset about it? Every single country enforces their laws on the athletes who come to participate.
And considering that this is a broadly worded anti-free speech law, our citizens are at risk. That makes pretty damn political.
|
On August 08 2013 05:46 ComaDose wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 05:39 sc2superfan101 wrote:On August 08 2013 05:31 ComaDose wrote:On August 08 2013 05:19 sc2superfan101 wrote: We let the North Koreans, who routinely imprison and murder their own citizens by the tens of thousands play in the Olympics...
but pass a law against the gays, and that's where we put our foot down.
Wasn't the whole point of the Olympics to be a distinctly non-political event? do you think enforcing a new controversial law on invited athletes is less political than being upset about it? Every single country enforces their laws on the athletes who come to participate. are you responding to my question? is your point that we should be fixing the bigger social injustices surrounding the Olympics first? or that we should ignore all problems with the Olympics? My point is that athletics (and athletes) in general should stay out of Geo-political debates. Russia has some ridiculous laws, and this is one of them. You won't get any argument there out of me. Should we use the Olympics as a tool to solve political disputes or make political statements about Russia's nonsensical policies? No.
|
On August 08 2013 05:17 Denda Reloaded wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 05:07 Ghostcom wrote:On August 08 2013 01:17 DoubleReed wrote:On August 08 2013 01:10 Ghostcom wrote:On August 08 2013 00:52 Denda Reloaded wrote:On August 08 2013 00:50 ETisME wrote:On August 08 2013 00:14 KwarK wrote:On August 08 2013 00:01 ETisME wrote:everyone seems to mis-reading this. It's not about population growth or equal right limited freedom etc Russia letting snowden to stay resident in the country is a public slap to the US, even if Putin said something like don't leak anything about our friend, the US and you can stay. Basically the US needs something as a retribution, this is one of them. The cleverness of this is actually Russia is NOT rejecting the gays, they are merely saying no to propaganda. This way, even though Russia will be the ugly man here, they aren't gonna get that bad of an image. And the US will be slapping its own face if it takes about Russia is limiting freedom of speech because of Snowden case US has already been humiliating itself a lot because of Snowden, including forcing a presidential plane of another country to land because of a false report that Snowden might be on the plane http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/02/world/americas/bolivia-presidential-plane Or it could be that discriminating against homosexuals is objectively wrong, regardless of what is going on with Snowden. And institutional homophobia in Russia goes far beyond this, although this law defines anything that indicates homosexuality might be a valid life choice as propaganda which is pretty horrific. It's indefensible, it's immoral, it's certainly not protecting children and it has literally nothing to do with Snowden. I am not arguing about whether Russia is treating gays fairly or not. I know how good you can write about what Russia is doing is immoral etc but that's not the point. Most of these big announcements aren't just there suddenly and of no reason at all. Just look at this thread in general. Quite a number of people are already saying Russia isn't doing too bad, they are rejecting the gay's entry, they are against propaganda. Russia is trying to please the US to get over some of the damage the Snowden case has caused. Politics and international relationship are a lot more complicated than a simple event or ideology the russian police stopped recording hate crimes if f.e. gays are beaten to death. u can kill gays and get away with it. is that what u call "being against propaganda"? it's more than that I somehow doubt the police actually don't care if someone is murdered. They might not record the murder as a "hatecrime", but surely they can't ignore a body? Please note, I have absolutely no clue - it just seems mindblowing if they cover up murders. They don't have to cover it up as just not really devote resources to it. They just have to not particularly care. Edit: this isn't at all unusual for cops in any country. Think of it from their point of view. "Why should I care if some [insert slur] gets murdered?" That line of thought is just so alien to me. My mind has once again been boggled data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" Thanks for explaining to both of you though. np <33 it's only 80% as fucked up as it sounds maybe, coz some countries actually kill 4 beign gay Please don't take this personal, but could you please stop using numbers as words and generally type in that weird IM style? Because it really hurts my brain to read your posts just because of that.
On August 08 2013 00:49 DoubleReed wrote: Russia also has an incredibly high death rate, especially men. Life expentancy of men is massively disparate from women. You want to talk about longevity, start there.
Maybe stressing over where people put their penises is killing them.
Life expectency should be irrelevant beyong its influence on the reproduction rate. Everyone dies at some point, the interesting question for sustained population change is how many children they make on average before dying. Sure, if everyone suddenly lives double as long, you get a one-time boost in population, but that is it. Especially considering that people beyond a certain age rarely reproduce at all.
|
On August 08 2013 05:50 sc2superfan101 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 05:46 ComaDose wrote:On August 08 2013 05:39 sc2superfan101 wrote:On August 08 2013 05:31 ComaDose wrote:On August 08 2013 05:19 sc2superfan101 wrote: We let the North Koreans, who routinely imprison and murder their own citizens by the tens of thousands play in the Olympics...
but pass a law against the gays, and that's where we put our foot down.
Wasn't the whole point of the Olympics to be a distinctly non-political event? do you think enforcing a new controversial law on invited athletes is less political than being upset about it? Every single country enforces their laws on the athletes who come to participate. are you responding to my question? is your point that we should be fixing the bigger social injustices surrounding the Olympics first? or that we should ignore all problems with the Olympics? My point is that athletics (and athletes) in general should stay out of Geo-political debates. Russia has some ridiculous laws, and this is one of them. You won't get any argument there out of me. Should we use the Olympics as a tool to solve political disputes or make political statements about Russia's nonsensical policies? No. why should athletes stay out of political debates? i assume you mean more so than the average citizen. i agree that if an athlete causes a fuss there it would be unprofessional. but there are athletes that this law directly oppresses
|
United States41958 Posts
On August 08 2013 05:50 sc2superfan101 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 05:46 ComaDose wrote:On August 08 2013 05:39 sc2superfan101 wrote:On August 08 2013 05:31 ComaDose wrote:On August 08 2013 05:19 sc2superfan101 wrote: We let the North Koreans, who routinely imprison and murder their own citizens by the tens of thousands play in the Olympics...
but pass a law against the gays, and that's where we put our foot down.
Wasn't the whole point of the Olympics to be a distinctly non-political event? do you think enforcing a new controversial law on invited athletes is less political than being upset about it? Every single country enforces their laws on the athletes who come to participate. are you responding to my question? is your point that we should be fixing the bigger social injustices surrounding the Olympics first? or that we should ignore all problems with the Olympics? My point is that athletics (and athletes) in general should stay out of Geo-political debates. Russia has some ridiculous laws, and this is one of them. You won't get any argument there out of me. Should we use the Olympics as a tool to solve political disputes or make political statements about Russia's nonsensical policies? No. The sports boycott over Apartheid was influential regarding ending it. Athletes have more of a role than most to raise awareness and take a public stand.
|
On August 08 2013 06:17 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 05:50 sc2superfan101 wrote:On August 08 2013 05:46 ComaDose wrote:On August 08 2013 05:39 sc2superfan101 wrote:On August 08 2013 05:31 ComaDose wrote:On August 08 2013 05:19 sc2superfan101 wrote: We let the North Koreans, who routinely imprison and murder their own citizens by the tens of thousands play in the Olympics...
but pass a law against the gays, and that's where we put our foot down.
Wasn't the whole point of the Olympics to be a distinctly non-political event? do you think enforcing a new controversial law on invited athletes is less political than being upset about it? Every single country enforces their laws on the athletes who come to participate. are you responding to my question? is your point that we should be fixing the bigger social injustices surrounding the Olympics first? or that we should ignore all problems with the Olympics? My point is that athletics (and athletes) in general should stay out of Geo-political debates. Russia has some ridiculous laws, and this is one of them. You won't get any argument there out of me. Should we use the Olympics as a tool to solve political disputes or make political statements about Russia's nonsensical policies? No. The sports boycott over Apartheid was influential regarding ending it. Athletes have more of a role than most to raise awareness and take a public stand. There is some debate to be had over whether those boycotts were morally acceptable or not, regardless of the outcome.
I disagree that athletes should generally take a stand on any particular issue. They are rarely informed or qualified, and simply add to the buzzing noise of "pop politics".
|
On August 08 2013 05:19 sc2superfan101 wrote: We let the North Koreans, who routinely imprison and murder their own citizens by the tens of thousands play in the Olympics...
but pass a law against the gays, and that's where we put our foot down.
Wasn't the whole point of the Olympics to be a distinctly non-political event?
no, the opposite.
and we shouldnt let the north koreans or the worst arabic states compete either. but 2 wrongs doesnt make make a right.
|
I really don't get why this is a deal-breaker? Isn't gay rights about tolerance and open mindedness? And, if it is, then aren't we supposed to be tolerant and open-minded towards those who don't support gay rights?
RIP in peace post-modern tolerance. *places hand on heart, looks down in earnest sadness*
|
United States41958 Posts
On August 08 2013 06:39 ftm wrote: I really don't get why this is a deal-breaker? Isn't gay rights about tolerance and open mindedness? And, if it is, then aren't we supposed to be tolerant and open-minded towards those who don't support gay rights?
RIP in peace post-modern tolerance. *places hand on heart, looks down in earnest sadness* Gay rights protect humans, ideas don't get protection.
|
On August 08 2013 06:39 ftm wrote: I really don't get why this is a deal-breaker? Isn't gay rights about tolerance and open mindedness? And, if it is, then aren't we supposed to be tolerant and open-minded towards those who don't support gay rights?
RIP in peace post-modern tolerance. *places hand on heart, looks down in earnest sadness* no its about equality for everyone.
|
On August 08 2013 06:39 ftm wrote: I really don't get why this is a deal-breaker? Isn't gay rights about tolerance and open mindedness? And, if it is, then aren't we supposed to be tolerant and open-minded towards those who don't support gay rights?
RIP in peace post-modern tolerance. *places hand on heart, looks down in earnest sadness*
Not acknowledging gay rights is seeking to lessen the freedom of a certain group of people. Gay rights advocate for maximizing the rights of all people, whereas anti-gay rights seek to minimize the rights of a certain group. They are not equivalent ideas. I understand that this silly "argument" is common for trolling, but its old at this point.
|
On August 08 2013 06:39 ftm wrote: I really don't get why this is a deal-breaker? Isn't gay rights about tolerance and open mindedness? And, if it is, then aren't we supposed to be tolerant and open-minded towards those who don't support gay rights?
RIP in peace post-modern tolerance. *places hand on heart, looks down in earnest sadness* No, that's dumb. You don't support tolerance and open mindedness but also support intolerance and closed mindedness of other people.
What the hell is this new "Your not open minded at all. You are not in support of other people CHOICE repress gays and remove their ability to protest and speak freely. What kind of progressive are you?"(sneer face)
|
i wonder how this will transition. majority of russians are anti-gay, so if change was to come, how? someone progressive becoming leader? and if pro-gay/equality does gain momentum, how will it get played out? slowly increasing awareness and convincing the populous or will it meet opposition right away at the first hint? any chance of russian civil war depending on whose in power?
|
On August 08 2013 06:48 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 06:39 ftm wrote: I really don't get why this is a deal-breaker? Isn't gay rights about tolerance and open mindedness? And, if it is, then aren't we supposed to be tolerant and open-minded towards those who don't support gay rights?
RIP in peace post-modern tolerance. *places hand on heart, looks down in earnest sadness* No, that's dumb. You don't support tolerance and open mindedness but also support intolerance and closed mindedness of other people. What the hell is this new "Your not open minded at all. You are not in support of other people CHOICE repress gays and remove their ability to protest and speak freely. What kind of progressive are you?"(sneer face) At least they are not hiding behind anti-Americanism or anti-Western sentiment as some of my "buddies" like to do. But from what I saw, it seems to be used as a silencing mechanism similar to the "children in Africa," and the "can we move on and stop talking about" statements.
|
On August 08 2013 06:37 turdburgler wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 05:19 sc2superfan101 wrote: We let the North Koreans, who routinely imprison and murder their own citizens by the tens of thousands play in the Olympics...
but pass a law against the gays, and that's where we put our foot down.
Wasn't the whole point of the Olympics to be a distinctly non-political event? no, the opposite. and we shouldnt let the north koreans or the worst arabic states compete either. but 2 wrongs doesnt make make a right.
And some of those Arab states would think America shouldn't be able to compete because they defied international laws to start wars and cost many lives. You don't get to impose your morals on other countries.
|
On August 08 2013 05:50 sc2superfan101 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 05:46 ComaDose wrote:On August 08 2013 05:39 sc2superfan101 wrote:On August 08 2013 05:31 ComaDose wrote:On August 08 2013 05:19 sc2superfan101 wrote: We let the North Koreans, who routinely imprison and murder their own citizens by the tens of thousands play in the Olympics...
but pass a law against the gays, and that's where we put our foot down.
Wasn't the whole point of the Olympics to be a distinctly non-political event? do you think enforcing a new controversial law on invited athletes is less political than being upset about it? Every single country enforces their laws on the athletes who come to participate. are you responding to my question? is your point that we should be fixing the bigger social injustices surrounding the Olympics first? or that we should ignore all problems with the Olympics? My point is that athletics (and athletes) in general should stay out of Geo-political debates. Russia has some ridiculous laws, and this is one of them. You won't get any argument there out of me. Should we use the Olympics as a tool to solve political disputes or make political statements about Russia's nonsensical policies? No.
Everyone has a right to protest, including athletes. Athletes are people too, and they have rights. Why shouldn't they use the olympics as a tool to voice their concerns? Aside from the fact that they might end up in a Russian jail, who exactly does it hurt? All the people at home who like being entertained? A country's national pride in its medal count? Its the athletes themselves who stand to lose anything. I say if they're willing to put it on the line to express their beliefs in a high-profile way they should have the right. I would be interested in hearing what reasons you have, because so far it just seems to be a personal opinion based on arbitrary preferences.
I agree that people generally shouldn't comment on complex affairs that they know nothing about, but this is a law that is obviously wrong to any sane individual. Athletes are just as capable as anyone else in this regard.
|
On August 08 2013 06:39 ftm wrote: I really don't get why this is a deal-breaker? Isn't gay rights about tolerance and open mindedness? And, if it is, then aren't we supposed to be tolerant and open-minded towards those who don't support gay rights?
RIP in peace post-modern tolerance. *places hand on heart, looks down in earnest sadness*
?????
What the hell are you talking about? This is a law that bans open support for gay rights. It's an anti-free-speech law. And you're saying it's intolerant to reject that????? I have to be tolerant of people silencing me???? What the hell kind of warped language are you using?
You shouldn't be able to use words with the way you treat them.
|
On August 08 2013 07:17 radscorpion9 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 05:50 sc2superfan101 wrote:On August 08 2013 05:46 ComaDose wrote:On August 08 2013 05:39 sc2superfan101 wrote:On August 08 2013 05:31 ComaDose wrote:On August 08 2013 05:19 sc2superfan101 wrote: We let the North Koreans, who routinely imprison and murder their own citizens by the tens of thousands play in the Olympics...
but pass a law against the gays, and that's where we put our foot down.
Wasn't the whole point of the Olympics to be a distinctly non-political event? do you think enforcing a new controversial law on invited athletes is less political than being upset about it? Every single country enforces their laws on the athletes who come to participate. are you responding to my question? is your point that we should be fixing the bigger social injustices surrounding the Olympics first? or that we should ignore all problems with the Olympics? My point is that athletics (and athletes) in general should stay out of Geo-political debates. Russia has some ridiculous laws, and this is one of them. You won't get any argument there out of me. Should we use the Olympics as a tool to solve political disputes or make political statements about Russia's nonsensical policies? No. Everyone has a right to protest, including athletes. Athletes are people too, and they have rights. Why shouldn't they use the olympics as a tool to voice their concerns? Aside from the fact that they might end up in a Russian jail, who exactly does it hurt? All the people at home who like being entertained? A country's national pride in its medal count? Its the athletes themselves who stand to lose anything. I say if they're willing to put it on the line to express their beliefs in a high-profile way they should have the right. I would be interested in hearing what reasons you have, because so far it just seems to be a personal opinion based on arbitrary preferences. I agree that people generally shouldn't comment on complex affairs that they know nothing about, but this is a law that is obviously wrong to any sane individual. Athletes are just as capable as anyone else in this regard.
did you just call majority of russians insane?
just saying, people just love to ride their high horse with their higher moral values and shit on anyone that doesnt think "rationally". people are shaped by the environment they live in, fortunately america has seen plenty of blood to learn their lesson, yet you expect others who hasnt gone through "puberty"(certain experience) to understand and if they dont understand, they're bigoted idiots
to russians, this is sane, rational thing to do, protecting what they think is correct. it takes time for them as whole to change their mind supporting equality for all, becoming progressive, however that doesnt mean you get to call them idiots, bigots, fools going back in time. they're just being human.
|
|
|
|