• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:22
CEST 13:22
KST 20:22
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy9[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple1BSL Season 236Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon101Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10
StarCraft 2
General
Who is an ideal candidate for a lower body lift pr Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? The Death of Cheese: From a Professional Cheeser
Tourneys
Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSTL Announcement RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 544 Double Trouble The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses Mutation # 542 The Ascended
Brood War
General
NaDa's Body BW General Discussion BSL Season 23 screpdb: new Starcraft reporting tool an AI researcher's take on the ladder bot
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro8 Day 2 [ASL22] Ro16 Group D [ASL22] Ro8 Day 1 [IPSL] IPSL is Back With Winter 26-27!
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Diablo IV Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine All you football fans (soccer)!
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Gaming Intensity, Problemati…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9115 users

UK Politics Mega-thread - Page 225

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 223 224 225 226 227 648 Next
In order to ensure that this thread meets TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we ask that everyone please adhere to this mod note.

Posts containing only Tweets or articles adds nothing to the discussions. Therefore, when providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments will be actioned upon.

All in all, please continue to enjoy posting in TL General and partake in discussions as much as you want! But please be respectful when posting or replying to someone. There is a clear difference between constructive criticism/discussion and just plain being rude and insulting.

https://www.registertovote.service.gov.uk
Dan HH
Profile Joined July 2012
Romania9246 Posts
September 24 2016 11:23 GMT
#4481
Labour leadership: Jeremy Corbyn defeats Owen Smith

Mr Corbyn won 61.8% of the total vote, a larger margin of victory than last year.

In a result announced on the eve of Labour's party conference in Liverpool, Mr Corbyn won 313,209 votes, compared with Mr Smith's 193,229.


http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-37461219
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
September 24 2016 13:20 GMT
#4482
On September 24 2016 20:23 Dan HH wrote:
Show nested quote +
Labour leadership: Jeremy Corbyn defeats Owen Smith

Mr Corbyn won 61.8% of the total vote, a larger margin of victory than last year.

In a result announced on the eve of Labour's party conference in Liverpool, Mr Corbyn won 313,209 votes, compared with Mr Smith's 193,229.


http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-37461219

And the rage is real:

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
Reaps
Profile Joined June 2012
United Kingdom1280 Posts
September 24 2016 15:01 GMT
#4483
Tory's must be jumping for joy.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
September 24 2016 15:44 GMT
#4484
On September 24 2016 20:23 Dan HH wrote:
Show nested quote +
Labour leadership: Jeremy Corbyn defeats Owen Smith

Mr Corbyn won 61.8% of the total vote, a larger margin of victory than last year.

In a result announced on the eve of Labour's party conference in Liverpool, Mr Corbyn won 313,209 votes, compared with Mr Smith's 193,229.


http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-37461219

For all the effort put into trying to oust Corbyn, it's surprising how badly it's all failing.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Lonyo
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United Kingdom3884 Posts
September 24 2016 16:27 GMT
#4485
On September 25 2016 00:44 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2016 20:23 Dan HH wrote:
Labour leadership: Jeremy Corbyn defeats Owen Smith

Mr Corbyn won 61.8% of the total vote, a larger margin of victory than last year.

In a result announced on the eve of Labour's party conference in Liverpool, Mr Corbyn won 313,209 votes, compared with Mr Smith's 193,229.


http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-37461219

For all the effort put into trying to oust Corbyn, it's surprising how badly it's all failing.

The people wanting to get rid of Corbyn are the MPs. The people who want him to be in power are the labour party membership.

Since the two have opposing views, the only viable options now are either recruit lots of new more centrist people to the party to balance out the leftists and then push for yet another leadership election next year, for MPs to leave the party, or to go along with an internally self destructive party where the party membership and the majority of the party representatives don't get along.
HOLY CHECK!
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
September 24 2016 16:34 GMT
#4486
On September 25 2016 01:27 Lonyo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 25 2016 00:44 LegalLord wrote:
On September 24 2016 20:23 Dan HH wrote:
Labour leadership: Jeremy Corbyn defeats Owen Smith

Mr Corbyn won 61.8% of the total vote, a larger margin of victory than last year.

In a result announced on the eve of Labour's party conference in Liverpool, Mr Corbyn won 313,209 votes, compared with Mr Smith's 193,229.


http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-37461219

For all the effort put into trying to oust Corbyn, it's surprising how badly it's all failing.

The people wanting to get rid of Corbyn are the MPs. The people who want him to be in power are the labour party membership.

Since the two have opposing views, the only viable options now are either recruit lots of new more centrist people to the party to balance out the leftists and then push for yet another leadership election next year, for MPs to leave the party, or to go along with an internally self destructive party where the party membership and the majority of the party representatives don't get along.

How exactly did it happen that the party membership and MPs are so strongly misaligned on the issues?
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Dan HH
Profile Joined July 2012
Romania9246 Posts
September 24 2016 16:46 GMT
#4487
On September 25 2016 01:34 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 25 2016 01:27 Lonyo wrote:
On September 25 2016 00:44 LegalLord wrote:
On September 24 2016 20:23 Dan HH wrote:
Labour leadership: Jeremy Corbyn defeats Owen Smith

Mr Corbyn won 61.8% of the total vote, a larger margin of victory than last year.

In a result announced on the eve of Labour's party conference in Liverpool, Mr Corbyn won 313,209 votes, compared with Mr Smith's 193,229.


http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-37461219

For all the effort put into trying to oust Corbyn, it's surprising how badly it's all failing.

The people wanting to get rid of Corbyn are the MPs. The people who want him to be in power are the labour party membership.

Since the two have opposing views, the only viable options now are either recruit lots of new more centrist people to the party to balance out the leftists and then push for yet another leadership election next year, for MPs to leave the party, or to go along with an internally self destructive party where the party membership and the majority of the party representatives don't get along.

How exactly did it happen that the party membership and MPs are so strongly misaligned on the issues?

Their membership tripled from 2015, went from ~220k to ~640k
Lonyo
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United Kingdom3884 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-24 17:14:53
September 24 2016 17:10 GMT
#4488
[image loading]


[image loading]
HOLY CHECK!
RoomOfMush
Profile Joined March 2015
1296 Posts
September 24 2016 17:13 GMT
#4489
On September 25 2016 01:46 Dan HH wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 25 2016 01:34 LegalLord wrote:
On September 25 2016 01:27 Lonyo wrote:
On September 25 2016 00:44 LegalLord wrote:
On September 24 2016 20:23 Dan HH wrote:
Labour leadership: Jeremy Corbyn defeats Owen Smith

Mr Corbyn won 61.8% of the total vote, a larger margin of victory than last year.

In a result announced on the eve of Labour's party conference in Liverpool, Mr Corbyn won 313,209 votes, compared with Mr Smith's 193,229.


http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-37461219

For all the effort put into trying to oust Corbyn, it's surprising how badly it's all failing.

The people wanting to get rid of Corbyn are the MPs. The people who want him to be in power are the labour party membership.

Since the two have opposing views, the only viable options now are either recruit lots of new more centrist people to the party to balance out the leftists and then push for yet another leadership election next year, for MPs to leave the party, or to go along with an internally self destructive party where the party membership and the majority of the party representatives don't get along.

How exactly did it happen that the party membership and MPs are so strongly misaligned on the issues?

Their membership tripled from 2015, went from ~220k to ~640k

Why did that happen? Was there some significant change in policy (maybe its easier now to get membership?) or some other major event that triggered it?
Lonyo
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United Kingdom3884 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-24 17:19:19
September 24 2016 17:16 GMT
#4490
On September 25 2016 02:13 RoomOfMush wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 25 2016 01:46 Dan HH wrote:
On September 25 2016 01:34 LegalLord wrote:
On September 25 2016 01:27 Lonyo wrote:
On September 25 2016 00:44 LegalLord wrote:
On September 24 2016 20:23 Dan HH wrote:
Labour leadership: Jeremy Corbyn defeats Owen Smith

Mr Corbyn won 61.8% of the total vote, a larger margin of victory than last year.

In a result announced on the eve of Labour's party conference in Liverpool, Mr Corbyn won 313,209 votes, compared with Mr Smith's 193,229.


http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-37461219

For all the effort put into trying to oust Corbyn, it's surprising how badly it's all failing.

The people wanting to get rid of Corbyn are the MPs. The people who want him to be in power are the labour party membership.

Since the two have opposing views, the only viable options now are either recruit lots of new more centrist people to the party to balance out the leftists and then push for yet another leadership election next year, for MPs to leave the party, or to go along with an internally self destructive party where the party membership and the majority of the party representatives don't get along.

How exactly did it happen that the party membership and MPs are so strongly misaligned on the issues?

Their membership tripled from 2015, went from ~220k to ~640k

Why did that happen? Was there some significant change in policy (maybe its easier now to get membership?) or some other major event that triggered it?

Labour lost the election and the Tories won a commons majority.
Milliband resigned from the labour party and they had a leadership election.
The "common people" haven't seen much benefit from post-recession recovery.
Corbyn was a candidate for Labour leadership on a leftist platform.
Disenfranchised people could join the Labour party for £3 and were then allowed to vote for the new Labour leader.
Thousands of lefties joined to vote for Corbyn.

All those people felt like joining the party for a nominal fee and then voting for Corbyn for leader would give an left wing alternative to the right wing Conservatives, rather than the not-very-different-to-the-Tories Labour under Milliband (and his precursors).

Key part was that joining was a £3 fee only, so not much of a challenge to join up.
HOLY CHECK!
Dan HH
Profile Joined July 2012
Romania9246 Posts
September 24 2016 17:28 GMT
#4491
On September 25 2016 02:13 RoomOfMush wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 25 2016 01:46 Dan HH wrote:
On September 25 2016 01:34 LegalLord wrote:
On September 25 2016 01:27 Lonyo wrote:
On September 25 2016 00:44 LegalLord wrote:
On September 24 2016 20:23 Dan HH wrote:
Labour leadership: Jeremy Corbyn defeats Owen Smith

Mr Corbyn won 61.8% of the total vote, a larger margin of victory than last year.

In a result announced on the eve of Labour's party conference in Liverpool, Mr Corbyn won 313,209 votes, compared with Mr Smith's 193,229.


http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-37461219

For all the effort put into trying to oust Corbyn, it's surprising how badly it's all failing.

The people wanting to get rid of Corbyn are the MPs. The people who want him to be in power are the labour party membership.

Since the two have opposing views, the only viable options now are either recruit lots of new more centrist people to the party to balance out the leftists and then push for yet another leadership election next year, for MPs to leave the party, or to go along with an internally self destructive party where the party membership and the majority of the party representatives don't get along.

How exactly did it happen that the party membership and MPs are so strongly misaligned on the issues?

Their membership tripled from 2015, went from ~220k to ~640k

Why did that happen? Was there some significant change in policy (maybe its easier now to get membership?) or some other major event that triggered it?

Largely due to the polarizing effect of Corbyn, there were several waves of new members, some joined to help him win, some to take him down. Then there was one huge wave after the EU referendum, 130k joined in the 2 weeks after Brexit, but last I saw the people from this wave weren't allowed to vote in this week's leadership election.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/john-mcdonnell-jeremy-corbyn-appeal-court-ruling-labour-a7188006.html
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
September 24 2016 17:48 GMT
#4492
Partly because Labour was seen as the same as the Conservatives and the lowering of the membership fee. Due to the first past the post system, it is easier to represent yourself by changing the second most popular party, than to support a weaker party.
Dan HH
Profile Joined July 2012
Romania9246 Posts
September 24 2016 18:50 GMT
#4493
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
September 24 2016 21:21 GMT
#4494
On September 25 2016 03:50 Dan HH wrote:
https://twitter.com/ComResPolls/status/779749811520012288

Do people like May or is she just getting the benefit of the doubt for being new?

She seems ok, but a lot of people here seemed not to like the idea of her being PM.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
bardtown
Profile Joined June 2011
England2313 Posts
September 24 2016 22:29 GMT
#4495
On September 25 2016 06:21 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 25 2016 03:50 Dan HH wrote:
https://twitter.com/ComResPolls/status/779749811520012288

Do people like May or is she just getting the benefit of the doubt for being new?

She seems ok, but a lot of people here seemed not to like the idea of her being PM.


She's getting a huge boost from being the only competent leader of any of the major parties, but being new probably helps. Playing a very quiet role in the referendum also helped her a lot.
Dan HH
Profile Joined July 2012
Romania9246 Posts
September 25 2016 09:07 GMT
#4496
The bosses of several of America’s biggest banks and corporations have warned Theresa May they will pre-emptively shift operations into Europe unless she can provide early clarity on the future shape of EU-UK relations, The Telegraph has learned.

The ultimatum was delivered at a round-table meeting with Mrs May in New York this week attended by a host of key US investors, including major City investors such as Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and BlackRock.

According to an account of the meeting obtained by The Telegraph, Mrs May declined to provide information about how the British government would approach the Brexit negotiations, other than pursuing a deal that was “in the national interest”.

There followed “frank exchanges” in which bosses warned they could not wait to discover the final outcome of the two-year Article 50 negotiations before making major investment decisions that could see thousands of UK jobs shift to Europe.

“The message was clear from at least some of those present: if Theresa May cannot provide some early clarity about where the negotiations will end up, the only way to avoid that uncertainty would be a move towards Europe – there will not be time to wait,” said the City source with knowledge of the meeting.

[...]

UK Treasury officials are now heavily pre-occupied with how to put in place transitional arrangements that – they readily concede – will only be possible with the political good will of the other 27 EU member states.

“A final deal could take years to negotiate, the real question everyone is focussing on now is what you do in between times that provides confidence and certainty to all business,” said an official with knowledge of the UK preparations.

The difficulties will be both practical and political, however, as European capitals continue to harden their stance ahead of future negotiations, ruling out any “cherry-picking” by the British side when it comes to accessing the single market.

Professor Alan Winters, director of the UK Trade Policy Observatory, has suggested that continuing existing arrangements for three years after Brexit could give space for a deal to be nailed down – but concedes this would require continuing to accept EU free movement during that transitional period.

The Telegraph understands that Mr Hammond has already cautioned bank bosses that delaying taking back control of borders for three years would be politically impossible, a position that would leave British negotiators ultimately reliant on EU goodwill.

[...]


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/24/brexit-warning-us-bank-bosses-from-goldman-sachs-morgan-stanley/
Lonyo
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United Kingdom3884 Posts
September 25 2016 10:02 GMT
#4497
They need to plan years in advance, they operate in Europe and have European customers. Nothing unreasonable about it. Anyone in a similar situation would require clarity, and if you don't know what will happen for sure, you have to look at the potential risks and take the most sensible decisions based on the facts you have available.

If they choose to move operations to Europe, they have greater certainty over their future operations. If they stay in the UK they in 2-3 years time they could get caught out by Brexit and it could have a negative impact, since it will take time to transition operations.
HOLY CHECK!
BurningSera
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Ireland19621 Posts
September 25 2016 12:05 GMT
#4498
Theresa May is quiet solely because of one reason, she realises that she might need to put up with Tory in future so it was a mere politic strategy.

and her being quiet is exactly the reason why brexit is more worrying than before, when the bloody negotiating team consist of most of the people speak for their own benefit/career, how will that end well?
is 2017, stop being lame, fuck's sakes. 'Can't wait for the rise of the cakes and humanity's last stand tbqh.'
bardtown
Profile Joined June 2011
England2313 Posts
September 25 2016 13:52 GMT
#4499
On September 25 2016 21:05 BurningSera wrote:
Theresa May is quiet solely because of one reason, she realises that she might need to put up with Tory in future so it was a mere politic strategy.

and her being quiet is exactly the reason why brexit is more worrying than before, when the bloody negotiating team consist of most of the people speak for their own benefit/career, how will that end well?


I said that she was quiet during the campaign. She's always been considered a eurosceptic, but was under huge pressure to support Remain, so that makes sense. I wouldn't say she's been quiet since then, exactly. It's just that there's not much to say. All the focus is on the technical restructuring of government to prepare for the process. I think she's said enough - as well as appointing the right people - to show that her government are willing to go for a hard Brexit if needed. This is the single most important factor for going into negotiations with a powerful position. If the government are not willing to withdraw fully, then they have essentially nothing going into negotiations.

Hard Brexit looks increasingly likely to me, and that's good. I genuinely believe the EU is completely unsustainable and the less dependent we are on them, the better it will be for us in the long run.
Jockmcplop
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom9999 Posts
September 25 2016 13:57 GMT
#4500
Theresa May is a eurosceptic for one reason and one reason only:
The humiliation she suffered from the ECHR while trying to deport a terrorist to a country where he would be tortured. She has used this as a platform to campaign for the dismantling of any kind of human rights charter in the UK and getting out of Europe is the first step.
Simply put, if she had the talent, ability, or work ethic to do her job properly int he first place instead of flopping around and failing completely - embarrassing her government in the process - brexit under May would be a different proposition indeed.
RIP Meatloaf <3
Prev 1 223 224 225 226 227 648 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Kung Fu Cup
11:00
2026 Week 24
IntoTheiNu 484
RotterdaM177
Rex71
SteadfastSC48
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko367
RotterdaM 177
ProTech136
Has 93
Rex 71
SteadfastSC 48
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 4310
Shuttle 3950
firebathero 1604
Bisu 759
BeSt 438
Stork 296
Light 182
Mini 151
Rush 129
Last 118
[ Show more ]
PianO 79
hero 46
Snow 43
Shinee 40
Hyun 39
ToSsGirL 35
Bale 32
HiyA 30
Shine 29
Sharp 29
JYJ 28
sorry 24
zelot 23
Aegong 22
Hm[arnc] 19
Sexy 18
ajuk12(nOOB) 12
Noble 8
Dota 2
Gorgc4850
Dendi258
Counter-Strike
kRYSTAL_53
Other Games
olofmeister1056
B2W.Neo412
XBOCT354
crisheroes276
DeMusliM171
Livibee145
Mew2King82
QueenE34
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream9107
StarCraft: Brood War
Afreeca ASL 465
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• mYiSmile127
• StrangeGG 26
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• WagamamaTV107
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
22h 38m
Replay Cast
1d 12h
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
GSL
3 days
Yamato Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Soma vs Jaedong
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Leta vs Soulkey
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Calamity Invitational
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Custodian Cup
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.