| Forum Index > General Forum |
Do not discuss gun control, or the right to own/use guns in this thread. Please take any such discussion to this thread or you will be banned. | ||
|
Trumpet
United States1936 Posts
On December 25 2012 22:27 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: What is expensive about one bullet to the head? The system needs to be streamlined. The legal costs of putting someone on death row and processing a death sentence far outweigh prison costs. Killing someone takes, as it should, enormously more effort in the courts. Those convicted on death row spend an average 178 months, close to 15 years, awaiting execution. | ||
|
MountainDewJunkie
United States10346 Posts
| ||
|
elKaDor
Sweden376 Posts
There will always be this kind of shit when mentally retarded people can buy a gun like an child buys candy User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
Dreamer.T
United States3584 Posts
| ||
|
deth2munkies
United States4051 Posts
Give it a rest, send your condolences and move on, and try to enjoy Christmas knowing that you are fortunate. Edit: Saw the mod thing, seems kind of ridiculous because the debate was started in the OP, but edited. | ||
|
Virtue
United States318 Posts
On December 25 2012 11:08 CaffeineFree-_- wrote: The media didn't blame games, the NRA did. The media was the first group to blame video games. There was even a thread about it on here because they were trying to blame Starcraft. Some Democrat senators also blamed video games before the NRA and have proposed a bill to fund a study into the impact of violent video games on children. I think if anything needs to be looked at a bit more, its the support for mentally ill people in the US. Gun control and Video games just seem to be false paths to a solution for these sorts of killings. | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
 My heart mourns in this sad sad event, i hope the families pull through in this awful awful time | ||
|
XenOmega
Canada2822 Posts
On December 26 2012 01:26 Trumpet wrote: The legal costs of putting someone on death row and processing a death sentence far outweigh prison costs. Killing someone takes, as it should, enormously more effort in the courts. Those convicted on death row spend an average 178 months, close to 15 years, awaiting execution. Yea, you can't just put put one bullet into the guy's brain that easily. Unlike criminals, we, as a society, see ourselves on the high moral ground, so we do not act on emotions or on hatred or on desire of vengeance ; but we seek justice (Whatever that means!) I don't know for the US, but in Canada, even when one is guilty of a crime, if found to be "mad" or psychologically troubled, that person will not be guilty in a criminal way. For the sake of discussion, if we had the death penalty, the persons who are not criminally guilty probably wouldn't be executed And finally, the reason why it takes so long to send someone to their death is because you want to be 100% sure that there isn't a mistake. A mistake = 1 innocent life taken away. I think there have been many cases, or suspicious cases in your history. | ||
|
simmeh
Canada2511 Posts
The killers words from the 3 page letter police found. what a psycho... | ||
|
Ettick
United States2434 Posts
People need to at least do some research into things before they say them. | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3576 Posts
| ||
|
SkelA
Macedonia13081 Posts
| ||
|
Diminisherqc
Canada220 Posts
On December 26 2012 07:32 Ettick wrote: I love how even the OP confuses an AR-15 with an assault rifle. People need to at least do some research into things before they say them. are you serious ...an ar-15 is basicly a m-16 labeled as semi-automatic for civilian sales...if you tell me a m-16 is not an assault rifle you are lieing to your self even if your playing on words from wikipedia **The AR-15 was first built by ArmaLite as a selective fire rifle for the United States armed forces. Because of financial problems, ArmaLite sold the AR-15 design to Colt. The select-fire AR-15 entered the US military system as the M16 rifle. Colt then marketed the Colt AR-15 as a semi-automatic version of the M16 rifle for civilian sales in 1963** | ||
|
Ettick
United States2434 Posts
On December 26 2012 07:49 Diminisherqc wrote: are you serious ...an ar-15 is basicly a m-16 labeled as semi-automatic for civilian sales...if you tell me a m-16 is not an assault rifle you are lieing to your self even if your playing on words from wikipedia **The AR-15 was first built by ArmaLite as a selective fire rifle for the United States armed forces. Because of financial problems, ArmaLite sold the AR-15 design to Colt. The select-fire AR-15 entered the US military system as the M16 rifle. Colt then marketed the Colt AR-15 as a semi-automatic version of the M16 rifle for civilian sales in 1963** Is a civilian AR-15 a select fire gun? Last time I checked, it isn't. Also, in case you don't know, an assault rifle is defined as a select fire rifle that fires an intermediate cartridge. An AR-15, being only semi-auto, is a military style semiautomatic rifle. | ||
|
HoLe
Canada183 Posts
Merry xmas I guess. People make me fucking yack. | ||
|
Diminisherqc
Canada220 Posts
On December 26 2012 07:49 Ettick wrote: Is a civilian AR-15 a select fire gun? Last time I checked, it isn't. Also, in case you don't know, an assault rifle is defined as a select fire rifle that fires an intermediate cartridge. An AR-15, being only semi-auto, is a military style semiautomatic rifle. btw do we know if ti was a civilian ar 15 or not ? ok as i said ,it's been tweaked to not be called an assault rifle,but if your not using it no one can tell its not select fire,admit were nto too far off it,so to go and call people that they dont check theyre fact is pushing it way above the top.Its not like people are calling a .22 an assault rifle lol | ||
|
HoLe
Canada183 Posts
On December 26 2012 07:49 Ettick wrote: Is a civilian AR-15 a select fire gun? Last time I checked, it isn't. Also, in case you don't know, an assault rifle is defined as a select fire rifle that fires an intermediate cartridge. An AR-15, being only semi-auto, is a military style semiautomatic rifle. Dude, he obviously knows. He said "the select-fire AR-15 entered the US military..." He never said ALL AR-15s are select fire for sucks sake. The point he's trying to make is that there is obviously a crossover between civilian weaponry and military firearms. And the line between the two categories is so thin its almost negligible. Stop putting words in people's mouths and give a little bit of charity to the case others are trying to make, maybe try rereading also. | ||
|
Diminisherqc
Canada220 Posts
| ||
|
Ettick
United States2434 Posts
On December 26 2012 08:05 Diminisherqc wrote: btw do we know if ti was a civilian ar 15 or not ? ok as i said ,it's been tweaked to not be called an assault rifle,but if your not using it no one can tell its not select fire,admit were nto too far off it,so to go and call people that they dont check theyre fact is pushing it way above the top.Its not like people are calling a .22 an assault rifle lol .22 and .223 are quite different calibers actually... | ||
|
Diminisherqc
Canada220 Posts
On December 26 2012 08:11 Ettick wrote: .22 and .223 are quite different calibers actually... ok but why are you adding a caliber... when i never mentioned it ? i stricly mentionned .22 wich is not an assault rifle at all as i was using it to compare ,to top it off you ignored my answer and the one above me  **edit for bad english ** | ||
| ||
|
|
GSL
Replay Cast
WardiTV Weekly
PiGosaur Cup
The PondCast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
