• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 16:28
CET 22:28
KST 06:28
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win0Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175Evil Geniuses - shutting down23ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier7Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon [D] Hacker peak in sc2 ? Liquibets sc2 season 30 Evil Geniuses - shutting down
Tourneys
SC4ALL: II Venue Change Announcement! Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps Starcraft 2 Advance [D] the control group Simple Questions/Answers
External Content
Mutation # 551 Robotic Revival Mutation # 550 Graveyard Shift The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles
Brood War
General
List of top players active on ShieldBattery Rollback Netcode in Brood War Sagi.gg Launcher Released BW General Discussion [Megathread] Daily Funny Videos
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [$1250] International ShieldBattery League Small VOD Thread 2.0 KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Stratus: Battle for the sky now on steam Early acc Deus Ex 3!?
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread Dating: How's your luck?
Fan Clubs
Fan Club Resource Thread Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Playlenda
Playlendapro
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8540 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 7119

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7117 7118 7119 7120 7121 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
March 15 2017 00:57 GMT
#142361
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 01:02:02
March 15 2017 01:01 GMT
#142362
that statement reads as if its literally written by Trump
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35174 Posts
March 15 2017 01:03 GMT
#142363
On March 15 2017 10:01 Nyxisto wrote:
that statement reads as if its literally written by Trump

No, it's far too eloquent.
m4ini
Profile Joined February 2014
4215 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 01:08:12
March 15 2017 01:07 GMT
#142364
On March 15 2017 10:03 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 15 2017 10:01 Nyxisto wrote:
that statement reads as if its literally written by Trump

No, it's far too eloquent.


"It is totally illegal" - "dishonest media".

It really isn't that much more eloquent. That being said, i actually agree partially with it. This is a publicity stunt by someone who seems very desperate.

They're a decade old. Who gives a shit.
On track to MA1950A.
Orome
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
Switzerland11984 Posts
March 15 2017 01:13 GMT
#142365
"Totally illegal" is pretty Trump.

The quest to oust Trump through any means possible while also garnering ratings continues. Not a fan, but I guess it's hard to live with him being your country's president day after day.
On a purely personal note, I'd like to show Yellow the beauty of infinitely repeating Starcraft 2 bunkers. -Boxer
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28923 Posts
March 15 2017 01:17 GMT
#142366
'desperate for ratings' is so trump too lol. And hasn't MSNBC been on a upswing rating wise anyway?
Moderator
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 01:37:08
March 15 2017 01:26 GMT
#142367
This doesn't seem to be that much of breaking news. From 2005... really?

edit: Yeah so far this is just seems like a stupid ploy, and Maddow may have even fell into a PR trap.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 01:36:51
March 15 2017 01:36 GMT
#142368
Doesn't seem like anything scandalous. He did a $100 million construction write down to lower his tax rate. So he only paid 24%.

The journalist who got the tax return, David Cay Johnston has had stuff leaked to him from Trump himself before. He has covered Trump for decades.
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15743 Posts
March 15 2017 01:38 GMT
#142369
Am I the only one who feels like maddow is in a worse position now?
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
March 15 2017 01:40 GMT
#142370
Yea she is because this isn't news, unless she has a bombshell which I doubt otherwise she would have revealed at the start.

In short she fell into a PR trap.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Ayaz2810
Profile Joined September 2011
United States2763 Posts
March 15 2017 01:46 GMT
#142371
Why am i watching this?

"he made money and paid taxes on it"

"he wants to change the taxes to pay less taxes on his money.


no shit.
Vrtra Vanquisher/Tiamat Trouncer/World Serpent Slayer
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 01:49:12
March 15 2017 01:47 GMT
#142372
I didn't think Maddow would be this stupid, oddly enough she seems to be slowly realizing she just did Trumps work for him.

"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Karis Vas Ryaar
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States4396 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 02:05:00
March 15 2017 01:57 GMT
#142373
Kasparov called it earlier. albeit with a russian spin. I'm not a big fan of these announcement types. Just keep silent until you get enough and you know it's good. Haven't any of these people read transmetropolitan? Get something 100 percent airtight and pull it out at a press conference.

"I'm not agreeing with a lot of Virus's decisions but they are working" Tasteless. Ipl4 Losers Bracket Virus 2-1 Maru
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44440 Posts
March 15 2017 02:02 GMT
#142374
Two pages of tax returns is a very odd way to describe the 1040. If you're unaware of what the 1040 is, it's the summary page of pretty much all of the other pages of your taxes. The 1040 is "work out all of your capital gains on schedule D, write the total here" etc. The information from hundreds of pages of tax returns is condensed onto the 1040, that's what it's for.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
March 15 2017 02:03 GMT
#142375
Just a reminder how god damn stupid Rachel Maddow looks right now. Day off tomorrow I reckon.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 02:04:55
March 15 2017 02:04 GMT
#142376
this was certainly disappointing given all the hype beforehand
Karis Vas Ryaar
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States4396 Posts
March 15 2017 02:06 GMT
#142377
In more important news

"I'm not agreeing with a lot of Virus's decisions but they are working" Tasteless. Ipl4 Losers Bracket Virus 2-1 Maru
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-15 02:34:58
March 15 2017 02:24 GMT
#142378
On March 15 2017 02:16 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 15 2017 02:02 Gorsameth wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:54 KwarK wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:51 Nebuchad wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:47 KwarK wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:40 Nebuchad wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:30 KwarK wrote:
You're missing the point. This eagerness to insist that Hillary was a bad candidate and therefore America couldn't have been expected to vote for her over Trump is ridiculous. America could have been expected to vote for her over Trump. Hell, America could have been expected to vote for a return to British rule over Trump.


Nobody is saying that America couldn't have been expected to vote for her because of how bad she was. I did expect it, hell I'm pretty sure LL and GH expected it too. We're saying it's absurd to pretend that because Hillary lost to Trump, the conclusion is that America is so fucked up that a race between candidate x and an orange pussygrabing monkey is by definition close and that's the new reality of the country we have to accept.

Just because it happened is no reason to accept that it's reality? Is that genuinely your argument or are you pitching new slogans for Fox News?


Just cool down and read my sentence again. You're better than this.

It's absurd to pretend that just because there was a close race between Hillary (centrist candidate) and Trump (youtube comment section brought to life) we should accept the reality that what Trump says and does is popular?

Am I just not getting this? What are you trying to say here? That Trump getting as many votes as he did isn't reality? Or that it is reality but that we shouldn't accept it?

I believe he is trying to say that other candidates could have scored better then Hillary and could have won where she did not.

Trump does not beat all possible candidates.

(And while that might be factually correct I dont really agree with it. Trump's victory very much shows there is a lot more deplorable/stupid people in the US then we all though/hoped).


Well, let's say that the premise is right. Let's say that America is that fucked up and loves far right extremism just that much. We still want to win next time, right? So logically we should move our discourse even more to the right of where it was now, since we lost because America is fucked up, so we should become a little more fucked up ourselves to appeal to it.

Very schematically, that's what the democratic party has been doing for a while now, and it has lost what, 1000 seats, doing it? The results don't seem to corroborate the premise, so perhaps the premise is wrong.

On March 15 2017 02:36 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 15 2017 02:25 Gorsameth wrote:
On March 15 2017 02:16 Nebuchad wrote:
On March 15 2017 02:02 Gorsameth wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:54 KwarK wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:51 Nebuchad wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:47 KwarK wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:40 Nebuchad wrote:
On March 15 2017 01:30 KwarK wrote:
You're missing the point. This eagerness to insist that Hillary was a bad candidate and therefore America couldn't have been expected to vote for her over Trump is ridiculous. America could have been expected to vote for her over Trump. Hell, America could have been expected to vote for a return to British rule over Trump.


Nobody is saying that America couldn't have been expected to vote for her because of how bad she was. I did expect it, hell I'm pretty sure LL and GH expected it too. We're saying it's absurd to pretend that because Hillary lost to Trump, the conclusion is that America is so fucked up that a race between candidate x and an orange pussygrabing monkey is by definition close and that's the new reality of the country we have to accept.

Just because it happened is no reason to accept that it's reality? Is that genuinely your argument or are you pitching new slogans for Fox News?


Just cool down and read my sentence again. You're better than this.

It's absurd to pretend that just because there was a close race between Hillary (centrist candidate) and Trump (youtube comment section brought to life) we should accept the reality that what Trump says and does is popular?

Am I just not getting this? What are you trying to say here? That Trump getting as many votes as he did isn't reality? Or that it is reality but that we shouldn't accept it?

I believe he is trying to say that other candidates could have scored better then Hillary and could have won where she did not.

Trump does not beat all possible candidates.

(And while that might be factually correct I dont really agree with it. Trump's victory very much shows there is a lot more deplorable/stupid people in the US then we all though/hoped).


Well, let's say that the premise is right. Let's say that America is that fucked up and loves far right extremism just that much. We still want to win next time, right? So logically we should move our discourse even more to the right of where it was now, since we lost because America is fucked up, so we should become a little more fucked up ourselves to appeal to it.

Very schematically, that's what the democratic party has been doing for a while now, and it has lost what, 1000 seats, doing it? The results don't seem to corroborate the premise, so perhaps the premise is wrong.

What? The Democrats over the last 8+ years have tried the high road. They haven't gone 'be more fucked up then the Republicans'. And while doing that they have suffered those losses.

Is the solution to be worse then them? Short term maybe, long term I hope not.

But you can't educate a fool who doesn't want to listen that the stove is hot. You can just explain it to him and then wait for his hand to burn.


You watch the republican party become more and more extreme. Since it's a two party system, you can become a little more right wing and garner support among the right wing people who used to vote republican and think it's too extreme now. You don't go "as fucked up as them", cause there would be no point to do that, they're already doing it, you're not going to win anything with that strategy. Instead you just become a little more right wing and because there's no one else in a two party system, there is no drawback.

That has been the strategy.
It didn't work. I'd rather we give up on this strategy before we give up on America. Cause if we give up on America, better double down on that strategy as that's what's most likely to work if the premise that "America is just that fucked up" is right.

This is simply not true, actually. The increase of party polarization in the US over the last few decades has been extensively documented by political scientists; Democrats in Congress have overall become more liberal, and Republicans have overall become more conservative (to a greater extent than Democrats have become more liberal). Methods of measurement of course vary, but you can for example look at the work of researchers like Adam Bonica, Poole and Rosenthal with their DW-NOMINATE scores, or alternatively look at ADA voting records, etc. (if you're interested in learning more about party polarization and the factors behind it, I recommend Sean Theriault's Party polarization in Congress (2006), Poole and Rosenthal's Ideology and Congress (2007), or Voorheis et al.'s very interesting recent article "Unequal Incomes, Ideology and Gridlock: How Rising Inequality Increases Political Polarization" (2015) -- I can send it to you if you don't have access to it). Of course, you can always find anecdotal examples to suggest the opposite, such as the ACA being essentially the conservatives' answer to the reform the Clintons championed in the 1990s, yet this misses the point -- the Clinton plan didn't pass, and looking at congressional votes over a long period of time paints a much clearer picture.

With regards to the 2016 election, Clinton scored to the left of Obama as a senator, she campaigned on a progressive policy platform, and the Democratic party platform that was adopted at the convention was the most progressive ever. Of course, she still wasn't progressive enough for some in the US population, but in addition to the structural and other factors which impacted her candidacy (including her own campaign's strategic mistakes) -- many of which would have played a role regardless of who was the Democratic nominee --, what hurt her the most wasn't a lack of progressivism (the opposite could be argued) but rather the negative perceptions about her character and honesty (notably the result of years/decades of GOP smears, media negativity and focus on the e-mail story, character attacks from the Sanders camp, and her own reluctance to engage with the media and lack of charisma for certain crowds).

To sum up, the Democrats in Congress have overall been moving towards the left, and there is little to suggest that a candidate to the left of Clinton would have had a better shot at winning the election, all other things being equal.
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
March 15 2017 02:29 GMT
#142379
Turn MSNBC back on to see Rachel Maddow do gymnastics distancing herself from this story.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Slaughter
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
United States20255 Posts
March 15 2017 02:34 GMT
#142380
Seems like a silly move by Maddow. Gives Trump fuel for his dishonest media deflection technique and didn't really show anything.
Never Knows Best.
Prev 1 7117 7118 7119 7120 7121 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PiG Daily
06:20
Best Games of SC
MaxPax vs Clem
SHIN vs TBD
herO vs TBD
PiGStarcraft361
LiquipediaDiscussion
BSL
05:00
RO24 Group F
Cross vs Puma
Artosis vs Spine
ZZZero.O415
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft361
IndyStarCraft 223
Ketroc 58
EmSc Tv 19
StarCraft: Brood War
ZZZero.O 415
ggaemo 23
Shinee 23
Terrorterran 4
LuMiX 1
League of Legends
Doublelift25
Counter-Strike
jkaem77
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu584
Other Games
summit1g10128
tarik_tv6566
Grubby3219
Liquid`RaSZi1959
singsing1678
FrodaN1328
QueenE101
NeuroSwarm53
XaKoH 43
Railgan28
Organizations
Other Games
EGCTV1051
gamesdonequick779
Counter-Strike
PGL89
Other Games
BasetradeTV73
StarCraft 2
EmSc Tv 19
EmSc2Tv 19
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 78
• musti20045 28
• Adnapsc2 19
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Pr0nogo 16
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV623
League of Legends
• Jankos2199
• Nemesis1909
Other Games
• imaqtpie1093
• Shiphtur256
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
1h 33m
Replay Cast
1d 1h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 12h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 14h
YoungYakov vs Lambo
SHIN vs TBD
Percival vs Shameless
Solar vs TBD
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
KCM Race Survival
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
IPSL
5 days
TerrOr vs IJ_Terran
rasowy vs Hazorath
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
IPSL
6 days
Art_Of_Turtle vs KameZerg
Radley vs George
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-11-06
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
Calamity Cup Div. A Season 8
IEM Beijing 2026
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026

Upcoming

Sector 951
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Underdog Cup 2026 Div 2-3
PGL Bucharest 2027
BLAST Bounty Winter 2027
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.