|
[B] Germany has the respect of Poland, the rest of the European Union, and the whole world, and they did more or less everything mentioned.
Well, dont forget what germany had to apologize for. Nanking was horrible, we won't discuss that fact, but you need to put it in relation with the holocaust. And please, dont try to compare that, or tell me that no matter how big the mistake was, blabla - otherwise i would like to see what the US did for compensation/apology in My Lai, or the two (unnecessary) nukes. Oh, and of course russia, for what they did in Berlin after they won the war.
Won't happen, it actually can't happen. Theres a completely different culture involved (for all these atrocities btw), you can't seriously tell a japanese politician "yeah you need to humiliate yourself and your country", and really think its realistic. Its actually idiotic (not meant personal). Same for the US, justifiying nukes with shallow comments like "saved alot of soldiers lifes" (which is not true, as historians pointed out).
Don't get me wrong, im not defending what japan did at any point in history, but it actually pisses me off that people in an internet forum think that humiliation of politicians, the whole country and the emperor etc will even things out. It will cost lives, nothing else, and all of asia would still think bad of japan (as it is in germany btw, you dont want to know how many times i get called nazi, especially from US fellas).
|
On September 18 2012 15:06 Orek wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 14:21 Xpace wrote: A lot of people are asking what Japan should do. Well, here's a short, incomplete list that acts as a starter:
- The Emperor of Japan, the Prime Minister of Japan, and all members of the Japanese Diet must sign a hand-written, sincere apology letter to all countries whom Japan had killed citizens of, attacked, invaded and occupied. These include the non-Asian countries of Canada, the United States, France, the Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, Russia (formerly the Soviet Union) and the United Kingdom who sent troops to various South East Asian countries for support and were considered belligerents in the war. This will also include formal apologies to countries whose later involvement in the Pacific theater must be commended and acknowledged by the relevant Axis power (Japan): Greece, Norway, Belgium, Brazil, the current states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia (formerly Czechoslovakia), Ukraine, Poland, South Africa, and any other country listed in the Charter of the United Nations under the United Nations Conference on International Organization held between April and July of 1945.
- The Chrysanthemum Throne must send a full envoy with Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda that accompanies Emperor Akihito to Nanjing (Nanking), where he and the Prime Minister must get on their knees and bow with his forehead all the way to the floor (their knees and forehead must be exactly at sea level, facing a natural elevated slope such as the foot of a mountain, in complete humility and submission), for the same amount of time, if not more, that West German Chancellor Willy Brandt knelt in Warsaw. They must also give a speech, directly aimed at all the peoples of the Republic of China (Taiwan), the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Macau (SAR), Hong Kong (SAR), the Republic of the Philippines, the Republic of Indonesia (former Dutch East-Indies), the [constitution of] Malaysia, and the Kingdom of Thailand, that may be aired repeatedly on state channels on the wishes of said governments and given freely to any privately owned corporate broadcasting station, showing complete remorse for the actions of the Imperial Japanese Army in the Pacific theater during World War II. NHK (Nippon Hoso Kyokai, the national channel in Japan) must air this at relevant prime time slots for a minimum of four weeks, and all other relevant terrestrial broadcast stations are expected to air footage at similar, non-intrusive time slots at prime time. All foreign non-Asian nations willing to air the contents this particular address are allowed to do so at their expense.
- Japan must build and donate statues and/or shrines commemorating the victims and the casualties of the Pacific War. Every country affected by Japanese aggression, or suffered Japanese occupation, decides what to do with the memorials. They must rival the grandeur and size of the memorials in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and Japan must actively seek and work with the aforementioned countries for the exact details of the memorials, including, but not limited to, listing the names of all known and recorded casualties and the appropriate symbolism(s) that will be used in each individual, unique memorial which will emphasize regret, apology, a willingness to work for future friendship, and that the events will never be forgotten.
- Japan must acknowledge, in full, the atrocities it had committed during World War II. Sources cited by the Allied powers (particularly Canadian presence in Hong Kong, French and British presence in both Korea and China, Dutch presence in the Philippines and Indonesia, and the overall presence of the former Soviet Union (USSR) and the United States Army, Navy and Air Force in the entire Pacific region from the years 1939 to 1945), as well as sources cited by China and all the relevant participants within the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), even when contradicting Japanese history, must be written and published, mentioned and taught, learned and accepted by all relevant historical academia and governing bodies of education in Japan. All forms of curriculum must include these contents, after appropriation and review by the relevant historians of the United States of America, China, and the Republic of Korea (all three of whom previously led the attempts to convince Japan to not omit these facts in their history for half a century), by latest 2015, marking the 70-year anniversary of the unconditional surrender of the Imperial Japanese Army and the Empire of the Rising Sun to the Allied powers of the West and the East, and the official end of World War II.
Germany has the respect of Poland, the rest of the European Union, and the whole world, and they did more or less everything mentioned. Hmm. I agree with some of those, but I question others. It sounds like you support the idea of "Forget facts, accept everything US, China, and Korea say including fraudulent ones just because you lost the war." To be fair, Japan has been doing pissed poor job at apologizing even for the things that Japanese government admits have happened during WWII. There is no denying that acts against Hague Conventions occured during Imperial Japanese rule, yet Japanese apology toward it doesn't seem sincere. However, that doesn't mean Japan has to do everything victim/winner sides say if that's what you are suggesting.
You're looking at one particular sentence, so I bolded it within my quote. The Japanese CAN teach the facts that they have been teaching all along, but they should INCLUDE the facts given by other countries, not just Korea, China and the United States, as long as it's historical evidence, reviewed and accepted by historians of those institutions, whether or not it's biased. This is just ONE tiny, little thing that students learning history should be aware of.
On September 18 2012 15:03 coverpunch wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 14:21 Xpace wrote: A lot of people are asking what Japan should do. Well, here's a short, incomplete list that acts as a starter:
- The Emperor of Japan, the Prime Minister of Japan, and all members of the Japanese Diet must sign a hand-written, sincere apology letter to all countries whom Japan had killed citizens of, attacked, invaded and occupied. These include the non-Asian countries of Canada, the United States, France, the Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, Russia (formerly the Soviet Union) and the United Kingdom who sent troops to various South East Asian countries for support and were considered belligerents in the war. This will also include formal apologies to countries whose later involvement in the Pacific theater must be commended and acknowledged by the relevant Axis power (Japan): Greece, Norway, Belgium, Brazil, the current states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia (formerly Czechoslovakia), Ukraine, Poland, South Africa, and any other country listed in the Charter of the United Nations under the United Nations Conference on International Organization held between April and July of 1945.
- The Chrysanthemum Throne must send a full envoy with Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda that accompanies Emperor Akihito to Nanjing (Nanking), where he and the Prime Minister must get on their knees and bow with his forehead all the way to the floor (their knees and forehead must be exactly at sea level, facing a natural elevated slope such as the foot of a mountain, in complete humility and submission), for the same amount of time, if not more, that West German Chancellor Willy Brandt knelt in Warsaw. They must also give a speech, directly aimed at all the peoples of the Republic of China (Taiwan), the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Macau (SAR), Hong Kong (SAR), the Republic of the Philippines, the Republic of Indonesia (former Dutch East-Indies), the [constitution of] Malaysia, and the Kingdom of Thailand, that may be aired repeatedly on state channels on the wishes of said governments and given freely to any privately owned corporate broadcasting station, showing complete remorse for the actions of the Imperial Japanese Army in the Pacific theater during World War II. NHK (Nippon Hoso Kyokai, the national channel in Japan) must air this at relevant prime time slots for a minimum of four weeks, and all other relevant terrestrial broadcast stations are expected to air footage at similar, non-intrusive time slots at prime time. All foreign non-Asian nations willing to air the contents this particular address are allowed to do so at their expense.
- Japan must build and donate statues and/or shrines commemorating the victims and the casualties of the Pacific War. Every country affected by Japanese aggression, or suffered Japanese occupation, decides what to do with the memorials. They must rival the grandeur and size of the memorials in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and Japan must actively seek and work with the aforementioned countries for the exact details of the memorials, including, but not limited to, listing the names of all known and recorded casualties and the appropriate symbolism(s) that will be used in each individual, unique memorial which will emphasize regret, apology, a willingness to work for future friendship, and that the events will never be forgotten.
- Japan must acknowledge, in full, the atrocities it had committed during World War II. Sources cited by the Allied powers (particularly Canadian presence in Hong Kong, French and British presence in both Korea and China, Dutch presence in the Philippines and Indonesia, and the overall presence of the former Soviet Union (USSR) and the United States Army, Navy and Air Force in the entire Pacific region from the years 1939 to 1945), as well as sources cited by China and all the relevant participants within the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), even when contradicting Japanese history, must be written and published, mentioned and taught, learned and accepted by all relevant historical academia and governing bodies of education in Japan. All forms of curriculum must include these contents, after appropriation and review by the relevant historians of the United States of America, China, and the Republic of Korea (all three of whom previously led the attempts to convince Japan to not omit these facts in their history for half a century), by latest 2015, marking the 70-year anniversary of the unconditional surrender of the Imperial Japanese Army and the Empire of the Rising Sun to the Allied powers of the West and the East, and the official end of World War II.
Germany has the respect of Poland, the rest of the European Union, and the whole world, and they did more or less everything mentioned. So Japan doesn't get any credit for the things they've done for Asia? Japan is a leading reason for the prosperity and technological progress of people in all Asian countries. If it weren't for the model that Japan provided, South Korea would be just another miserable little speck on the planet. If it weren't for the technology that Japan introduced and traded with Taiwan, it would be a two-bit dictatorship or worse, integrated under the iron fist with which China has repeatedly punched itself in the face. Most significantly, if it weren't for Japan, most of Asia might still be under Western imperialism. These things you want the Japanese to do reek of humiliation, not humility. You're asking Japan to turn over some parts of their sovereignty over to a multilateral commission and you're about 50 years too late for that to ever happen. The US already played that card by treating MacArthur as proconsul of Japan.
"We can rape your women, children, burn and pillage your homes, force you to learn and use our language, force you to use the Yen, subject you to torture and pain, and degrade you on a physical and mental level, but we gave you technology and prosperity! So, call it even?"
Extremities at its worst. And I won't even touch the subject of how Japan itself benefited from all these "wondrous gifts to neighboring Korea and China". And you make it sound like Japan literally handed the wealth to Korea. No, the Koreans worked for it too. The Taiwanese worked for it too. The Chinese worked for it too. Germany, on the other hand, actually had a number they had to reach.
And finally, I'm going to infer that you're Japanese? Or at least, you have roots in Japan? If I'm wrong I apologize, but only a Japanese person would read what I wrote and say "that's humiliating!!!".
When Willy Brandt knelt, half of West Germany's population thought it was "excessive and humiliating". Ask a person who was alive to witness the event if they still think it's excessive today.
On September 18 2012 15:08 Sickkiee wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 14:55 Xpace wrote:On September 18 2012 14:44 Sickkiee wrote:On September 18 2012 14:21 Xpace wrote: A lot of people are asking what Japan should do. Well, here's a short, incomplete list that acts as a starter:
- The Emperor of Japan, the Prime Minister of Japan, and all members of the Japanese Diet must sign a hand-written, sincere apology letter to all countries whom Japan had killed citizens of, attacked, invaded and occupied. These include the non-Asian countries of Canada, the United States, France, the Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, Russia (formerly the Soviet Union) and the United Kingdom who sent troops to various South East Asian countries for support and were considered belligerents in the war. This will also include formal apologies to countries whose later involvement in the Pacific theater must be commended and acknowledged by the relevant Axis power (Japan): Greece, Norway, Belgium, Brazil, the current states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia (formerly Czechoslovakia), Ukraine, Poland, South Africa, and any other country listed in the Charter of the United Nations under the United Nations Conference on International Organization held between April and July of 1945.
- The Chrysanthemum Throne must send a full envoy with Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda that accompanies Emperor Akihito to Nanjing (Nanking), where he and the Prime Minister must get on their knees and bow with his forehead all the way to the floor (their knees and forehead must be exactly at sea level, facing a natural elevated slope such as the foot of a mountain, in complete humility and submission), for the same amount of time, if not more, that West German Chancellor Willy Brandt knelt in Warsaw. They must also give a speech, directly aimed at all the peoples of the Republic of China (Taiwan), the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Macau (SAR), Hong Kong (SAR), the Republic of the Philippines, the Republic of Indonesia (former Dutch East-Indies), the [constitution of] Malaysia, and the Kingdom of Thailand, that may be aired repeatedly on state channels on the wishes of said governments and given freely to any privately owned corporate broadcasting station, showing complete remorse for the actions of the Imperial Japanese Army in the Pacific theater during World War II. NHK (Nippon Hoso Kyokai, the national channel in Japan) must air this at relevant prime time slots for a minimum of four weeks, and all other relevant terrestrial broadcast stations are expected to air footage at similar, non-intrusive time slots at prime time. All foreign non-Asian nations willing to air the contents this particular address are allowed to do so at their expense.
- Japan must build and donate statues and/or shrines commemorating the victims and the casualties of the Pacific War. Every country affected by Japanese aggression, or suffered Japanese occupation, decides what to do with the memorials. They must rival the grandeur and size of the memorials in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and Japan must actively seek and work with the aforementioned countries for the exact details of the memorials, including, but not limited to, listing the names of all known and recorded casualties and the appropriate symbolism(s) that will be used in each individual, unique memorial which will emphasize regret, apology, a willingness to work for future friendship, and that the events will never be forgotten.
- Japan must acknowledge, in full, the atrocities it had committed during World War II. Sources cited by the Allied powers (particularly Canadian presence in Hong Kong, French and British presence in both Korea and China, Dutch presence in the Philippines and Indonesia, and the overall presence of the former Soviet Union (USSR) and the United States Army, Navy and Air Force in the entire Pacific region from the years 1939 to 1945), as well as sources cited by China and all the relevant participants within the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), even when contradicting Japanese history, must be written and published, mentioned and taught, learned and accepted by all relevant historical academia and governing bodies of education in Japan. All forms of curriculum must include these contents, after appropriation and review by the relevant historians of the United States of America, China, and the Republic of Korea (all three of whom previously led the attempts to convince Japan to not omit these facts in their history for half a century), by latest 2015, marking the 70-year anniversary of the unconditional surrender of the Imperial Japanese Army and the Empire of the Rising Sun to the Allied powers of the West and the East, and the official end of World War II.
Germany has the respect of Poland, the rest of the European Union, and the whole world, and they did more or less everything mentioned. It's been how many years now? What makes you think they will do that. Not to mention it won't change much. People will still hate Japanese people being 'arrogant, up themselves' etc etc. Kniefall von Warschau happened in 1970. The war ended in 1945. That's 25 years after. Your past posts and general attitude in this thread is atypical of why there's anti-Japanese sentiment, as mentioned by KwarK. "It won't change much" - well, you're not the judge of that, and on a broader scale, none of us are even remotely capable of predicting if it will "be enough". It's a start, it's a step. And Germany took a LOT of steps. I'm not pointing the finger at you (especially if you're Japanese), but your reaction is pretty much "even though it won't cost us much to do these things, and we're not sacrificing anything physically, we'd rather not because we feel like it won't result into anything (when in actual fact we're simply too prideful)" Actions speak louder than words. Costs them (I am not Japanese but of Polish decent). At our time and age, any country who would do the following would lose all sense of nationality, even if it's for such a terrible crime (do not get me wrong I think it's horrible too, but you're not thinking REALISTICALLY). Sure most people in Japan who I've spoken to about the matter in the past few days feel sorry and apologetic; however why should the present people of Japan have to be forced fed these facts? Are they the people who committed the acts? CAN or WILL they commit them again? You come off like Japan is secretly build an army to rape and massacre the world. I agree with barely half of your 'statement'. The rest is fantasy.
Costs them what? Sense of nationality? Isn't 'sense of nationality' the reason why there's protests in China right now?? National pride and patriotism isn't necessary in today's society. I'm not saying it's USELESS, I'm saying society won't collapse without it.
Did the younger generation of West Germany in 1970 have anything to do with World War II? No. Did they belong to the Nazi regime? No. Did their parents STILL associate themselves with the Nazi regime? An overwhelming majority - No. Did they have the same opinion as you, that it was 'excessive and humiliating'? 48% of them did. 41% thought it was appropriate. 11% had no opinion. Unless the Japanese are so rooted in pride and honor that 100% of them will flat out rage if anything even remotely close to what I wrote would happen, then that's a different story, but I would like someone to affirm their belief that it's a possibility (because that's just... sad).
|
5930 Posts
On September 18 2012 14:56 SmokeMonster wrote: Also, just to be on topic, Diaoyu Islands does not belong to Japan.
Finally, for people saying PRC/Taiwan has to stop hating on Japan because the wars has long since passed, how about no. How many pearl harbour related films/books/TV shows has the US made? Imagine the Japanese come back and doing that to you (but 100x worse) every few decades. You'll still forgive them, eh?
Traditional maps from the Ming Dynasty (?) don't exactly have any reference in modern maritime law, unfortunately. China is welcome to try submitting it to the ICJ but China will absolutely, never, ever do this.
As far as I know, there are three major Pearl Habour movies. From Here to Eternity is a great movie that only uses Pearl Habour as a plot point and not as a major focus, Tora! Tora! Tora! was an American/Japanese co-production, and Michael Bay's movie was hated by just about everyone. So what's your point here? If Australia did a billion movies about the ANZAC-Japanese conflict (yes it was brutal), we'd probably criticize them if they tried painting a jingoistic picture.
|
The bottom line is that there is no way for Japan to redress their image in their neighbors' eyes without sacrificing what they hold dear - ie, their pride - and given that they won't sacrifice what they hold dear, the cycle is just going to continue. Decades of prosperous trade between China and Japan haven't erased the anger and the hatred, and while Korea-Japan relations were improving, we saw how quickly that changed with the Dokdo issue.
Whatever Japan does is going to be scrutinized against its WW 2 record in the foreseeable future, and it's not going to be given a clean slate for decades to come. There are no quick band aid fixes to this issue. In the same way that Israel isn't going to suddenly become buddy buddy with its neighbors, the tension between these countries is going to remain.
|
And finally, I'm going to infer that you're Japanese? Or at least, you have roots in Japan? If I'm wrong I apologize, but only a Japanese person would read what I wrote and say "that's humiliating!!!".
Start apologizing then, because i have no roots at all in japan and still think its humiliating. You actually even said that some things needed to be "submissive and humliating".
|
On September 18 2012 15:04 RavenLoud wrote: As I said, China is not a nation state by European standards. It's a civilization under 2 countries (but the PRC kind of forces everyone to deny it). There is a bigger divide than it should've had due to the Cultural Revolution though.
Both RoC and PRC are China, and HK too.
PRC vs RoC is kind of like North Korea vs South Korea except that the North won 95% of it, then decided to go crazy for a whole decade to destroy their own culture. Yeah I know, but it wasn't you that I was quoting, and the quote didn't show a very consistent definition of the word China - at first it was used to encompass the Chinese civilization but just afterwards it was used to refer to the mainland. And that's what really tires me in all this "Taiwan belongs to China" rhetoric: mainlanders will tell you that Taiwan is a part of China (with China meaning the civilization) because it's hard to disagree with that, but at the same time you can see in their eyes that what they really mean by China is their China. Their government is using the same trick. Taiwan ∈ China and China = PRC thus Taiwan ∈ PRC. I'm sooo tired of that lol, I'm looking for the day a mainlander will grow some balls and jump directly to the end result and tell me straight out "Taiwan should belong to the PRC and we're never going to let them go".
Anyway, as much as the issue bothers me, I'm gonna stop since the thread is about Japan not Taiwan.
|
7-16 million Chinese CIVILIANS died in WW2. No big deal?
|
On September 18 2012 15:27 m4inbrain wrote:Show nested quote +And finally, I'm going to infer that you're Japanese? Or at least, you have roots in Japan? If I'm wrong I apologize, but only a Japanese person would read what I wrote and say "that's humiliating!!!". Start apologizing then, because i have no roots at all in japan and still think its humiliating. You actually even said that some things needed to be "submissive and humliating".
Submissiveness and humiliation are defining qualities of an apology in Japan - it emphasizes sincerity. An apology should not be half-assed. It shouldn't be followed with excuses, and should show full remorse and regret. Since you're not Japanese (and for that I apologize for inferring it, despite the comment not being directed at you at all), you don't understand the culture.
![[image loading]](http://p4.img.cctvpic.com/program/newsupdate/20110422/images/1303472125847_1303472125847_r.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infocus/jpq050911/s_j27_13787233.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://sundaytimes.lk/110424/images/TEPCO.jpg)
The president of TEPCO apologizing to the families by kneeling, showing humiliation and submissiveness, who were forced to evacuate due to the Fukushima Nuclear Reactor crisis (the result of a natural disaster, the 2011 Tsunami).
Humiliation and submissiveness is sometimes needed to keep one's honor. Look into Japanese history. You'll find it a fascinating read.
|
5930 Posts
On September 18 2012 15:25 Azarkon wrote: The bottom line is that there is no way for Japan to redress their image in their neighbors' eyes without sacrificing what they hold dear - ie, their pride - and given that they won't sacrifice what they hold dear, the cycle is just going to continue. Decades of prosperous trade between China and Japan haven't erased the anger and the hatred, and while Korea-Japan relations were improving, we saw how quickly that changed with the Dokdo issue.
Whatever Japan does is going to be scrutinized against its WW 2 record in the foreseeable future, and it's not going to be given a clean slate for decades to come. There are no quick band aid fixes to this issue. In the same way that Israel isn't going to suddenly become buddy buddy with its neighbors, the tension between these countries is going to remain.
Even if they do that, what makes you so sure that countries around the region will forgive them for the problem? At this point, Dokdo is simply an issue created by the South Korean government. Japan has submitted it to the ICJ multiple times and will almost certainly lose if South Korean agrees to take it to the court. It won't happen though because those rocks are a very nice button to press the minute an election comes along.
|
Maybe I'm missing some invisible line drawn between the 1700s and 1895, but couldn't you liken this to Dutch (or Portugese, depending on your interpretation of history) people rioting over Australia? I've been reading articles for the last couple of hours and it seems like Japan settled Senkaku first, and China only wants it now because it has oil, using the fact that it was on a map as an claim (or the Okinawa Trough). Well, the Dutch have a map of Australia from 1606, and Britain claimed the western half in 1770.
That being said, the situation is a tad different, due to the fact there are actually people living in Australia, but we do have vast natural resources. Am I missing something obvious here?
|
On September 18 2012 14:21 Xpace wrote: A lot of people are asking what Japan should do. Well, here's a short, incomplete list that acts as a starter:
- The Emperor of Japan, the Prime Minister of Japan, and all members of the Japanese Diet must sign a hand-written, sincere apology letter to all countries whom Japan had killed citizens of, attacked, invaded and occupied. These include the non-Asian countries of Canada, the United States, France, the Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, Russia (formerly the Soviet Union) and the United Kingdom who sent troops to various South East Asian countries for support and were considered belligerents in the war. This will also include formal apologies to countries whose later involvement in the Pacific theater must be commended and acknowledged by the relevant Axis power (Japan): Greece, Norway, Belgium, Brazil, the current states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia (formerly Czechoslovakia), Ukraine, Poland, South Africa, and any other country listed in the Charter of the United Nations under the United Nations Conference on International Organization held between April and July of 1945.
- The Chrysanthemum Throne must send a full envoy with Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda that accompanies Emperor Akihito to Nanjing (Nanking), where he and the Prime Minister must get on their knees and bow with his forehead all the way to the floor (their knees and forehead must be exactly at sea level, facing a natural elevated slope such as the foot of a mountain, in complete humility and submission), for the same amount of time, if not more, that West German Chancellor Willy Brandt knelt in Warsaw. They must also give a speech, directly aimed at all the peoples of the Republic of China (Taiwan), the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Macau (SAR), Hong Kong (SAR), the Republic of the Philippines, the Republic of Indonesia (former Dutch East-Indies), the [constitution of] Malaysia, and the Kingdom of Thailand, that may be aired repeatedly on state channels on the wishes of said governments and given freely to any privately owned corporate broadcasting station, showing complete remorse for the actions of the Imperial Japanese Army in the Pacific theater during World War II. NHK (Nippon Hoso Kyokai, the national channel in Japan) must air this at relevant prime time slots for a minimum of four weeks, and all other relevant terrestrial broadcast stations are expected to air footage at similar, non-intrusive time slots at prime time. All foreign non-Asian nations willing to air the contents this particular address are allowed to do so at their expense.
- Japan must build and donate statues and/or shrines commemorating the victims and the casualties of the Pacific War. Every country affected by Japanese aggression, or suffered Japanese occupation, decides what to do with the memorials. They must rival the grandeur and size of the memorials in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and Japan must actively seek and work with the aforementioned countries for the exact details of the memorials, including, but not limited to, listing the names of all known and recorded casualties and the appropriate symbolism(s) that will be used in each individual, unique memorial which will emphasize regret, apology, a willingness to work for future friendship, and that the events will never be forgotten.
- Japan must acknowledge, in full, the atrocities it had committed during World War II. Sources cited by the Allied powers (particularly Canadian presence in Hong Kong, French and British presence in both Korea and China, Dutch presence in the Philippines and Indonesia, and the overall presence of the former Soviet Union (USSR) and the United States Army, Navy and Air Force in the entire Pacific region from the years 1939 to 1945), as well as sources cited by China and all the relevant participants within the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), even when contradicting Japanese history, must be written and published, mentioned and taught, learned and accepted by all relevant historical academia and governing bodies of education in Japan. All forms of curriculum must include these contents, after appropriation and review by the relevant historians of the United States of America, China, and the Republic of Korea (all three of whom previously led the attempts to convince Japan to not omit these facts in their history for half a century), by latest 2015, marking the 70-year anniversary of the unconditional surrender of the Imperial Japanese Army and the Empire of the Rising Sun to the Allied powers of the West and the East, and the official end of World War II.
Germany has the respect of Poland, the rest of the European Union, and the whole world, and they did more or less everything mentioned.
The list you put forward sounds rediculously over the top and more towards shaming Japan and teaching them a lesson for what their grandparents or great grandparents did 70 years ago rather than elliciting a genuine apology to repair relations between all parties.
The kneeling is especially distasteful. Willy Brandt was actually alive and an adult during the war, felt a direct connection to the events and did from what I gather a spontaneous symbolic apology. You want to grab the current Emperor and Prime Minister and get them to kneel/beg for forgiveness in the lowest position they possibly can. That level of kneeling/begging is really humiliating in Chinese/Japanese culture and doesn't seem to have the same level of sincerity nor dignity that you would want from a public apology.
|
On September 18 2012 14:36 Womwomwom wrote: In China's case, a vast majority of their maritime claims revolve around people sticking flags on rocks and not much else.
Like how Japan fabricated an an attack on itself to start a war with China and then planted their flag in Manchuria?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mukden_Incident
|
Lets put this into perspective for a second...
3,695,000 civilian casualties in China (lets assume all are from Japan and ignore the Kuomintang/Mao conflict)
Estimates place the Deaths from the great leap forward from 65 million to 70 million in China under Mao. This government party is still in power isnt it?
What Japan did was disgusting during WW2 to the PoWs and the Chinese but forcing this generation which is almost 2 generations removed. Why should they be punished for what their grandparents did? Do Germans today get punished for the holocaust? Do the Jews hate the Germans still? All this is is that China is acting insane again.
Japan is the country that suffered the bombing at Hiroshima/Nagasaki.
Canadians, Americans, Germans, English, Chinese, Japanese, Russians all commited war crimes in WW2. Some obviously in much greater magnitudes than others but no ones hands are completely clean after WW2. This is just nationalistic bullshit with a healthy dose of victors justice.
|
On September 18 2012 15:22 Xpace wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 15:06 Orek wrote:On September 18 2012 14:21 Xpace wrote: A lot of people are asking what Japan should do. Well, here's a short, incomplete list that acts as a starter:
- The Emperor of Japan, the Prime Minister of Japan, and all members of the Japanese Diet must sign a hand-written, sincere apology letter to all countries whom Japan had killed citizens of, attacked, invaded and occupied. These include the non-Asian countries of Canada, the United States, France, the Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, Russia (formerly the Soviet Union) and the United Kingdom who sent troops to various South East Asian countries for support and were considered belligerents in the war. This will also include formal apologies to countries whose later involvement in the Pacific theater must be commended and acknowledged by the relevant Axis power (Japan): Greece, Norway, Belgium, Brazil, the current states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia (formerly Czechoslovakia), Ukraine, Poland, South Africa, and any other country listed in the Charter of the United Nations under the United Nations Conference on International Organization held between April and July of 1945.
- The Chrysanthemum Throne must send a full envoy with Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda that accompanies Emperor Akihito to Nanjing (Nanking), where he and the Prime Minister must get on their knees and bow with his forehead all the way to the floor (their knees and forehead must be exactly at sea level, facing a natural elevated slope such as the foot of a mountain, in complete humility and submission), for the same amount of time, if not more, that West German Chancellor Willy Brandt knelt in Warsaw. They must also give a speech, directly aimed at all the peoples of the Republic of China (Taiwan), the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Macau (SAR), Hong Kong (SAR), the Republic of the Philippines, the Republic of Indonesia (former Dutch East-Indies), the [constitution of] Malaysia, and the Kingdom of Thailand, that may be aired repeatedly on state channels on the wishes of said governments and given freely to any privately owned corporate broadcasting station, showing complete remorse for the actions of the Imperial Japanese Army in the Pacific theater during World War II. NHK (Nippon Hoso Kyokai, the national channel in Japan) must air this at relevant prime time slots for a minimum of four weeks, and all other relevant terrestrial broadcast stations are expected to air footage at similar, non-intrusive time slots at prime time. All foreign non-Asian nations willing to air the contents this particular address are allowed to do so at their expense.
- Japan must build and donate statues and/or shrines commemorating the victims and the casualties of the Pacific War. Every country affected by Japanese aggression, or suffered Japanese occupation, decides what to do with the memorials. They must rival the grandeur and size of the memorials in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and Japan must actively seek and work with the aforementioned countries for the exact details of the memorials, including, but not limited to, listing the names of all known and recorded casualties and the appropriate symbolism(s) that will be used in each individual, unique memorial which will emphasize regret, apology, a willingness to work for future friendship, and that the events will never be forgotten.
- Japan must acknowledge, in full, the atrocities it had committed during World War II. Sources cited by the Allied powers (particularly Canadian presence in Hong Kong, French and British presence in both Korea and China, Dutch presence in the Philippines and Indonesia, and the overall presence of the former Soviet Union (USSR) and the United States Army, Navy and Air Force in the entire Pacific region from the years 1939 to 1945), as well as sources cited by China and all the relevant participants within the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), even when contradicting Japanese history, must be written and published, mentioned and taught, learned and accepted by all relevant historical academia and governing bodies of education in Japan. All forms of curriculum must include these contents, after appropriation and review by the relevant historians of the United States of America, China, and the Republic of Korea (all three of whom previously led the attempts to convince Japan to not omit these facts in their history for half a century), by latest 2015, marking the 70-year anniversary of the unconditional surrender of the Imperial Japanese Army and the Empire of the Rising Sun to the Allied powers of the West and the East, and the official end of World War II.
Germany has the respect of Poland, the rest of the European Union, and the whole world, and they did more or less everything mentioned. Hmm. I agree with some of those, but I question others. It sounds like you support the idea of "Forget facts, accept everything US, China, and Korea say including fraudulent ones just because you lost the war." To be fair, Japan has been doing pissed poor job at apologizing even for the things that Japanese government admits have happened during WWII. There is no denying that acts against Hague Conventions occured during Imperial Japanese rule, yet Japanese apology toward it doesn't seem sincere. However, that doesn't mean Japan has to do everything victim/winner sides say if that's what you are suggesting. You're looking at one particular sentence, so I bolded it within my quote. The Japanese CAN teach the facts that they have been teaching all along, but they should INCLUDE the facts given by other countries, not just Korea, China and the United States, as long as it's historical evidence, reviewed and accepted by historians of those institutions, whether or not it's biased. This is just ONE tiny, little thing that students learning history should be aware of. Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 15:03 coverpunch wrote:On September 18 2012 14:21 Xpace wrote: A lot of people are asking what Japan should do. Well, here's a short, incomplete list that acts as a starter:
- The Emperor of Japan, the Prime Minister of Japan, and all members of the Japanese Diet must sign a hand-written, sincere apology letter to all countries whom Japan had killed citizens of, attacked, invaded and occupied. These include the non-Asian countries of Canada, the United States, France, the Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, Russia (formerly the Soviet Union) and the United Kingdom who sent troops to various South East Asian countries for support and were considered belligerents in the war. This will also include formal apologies to countries whose later involvement in the Pacific theater must be commended and acknowledged by the relevant Axis power (Japan): Greece, Norway, Belgium, Brazil, the current states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia (formerly Czechoslovakia), Ukraine, Poland, South Africa, and any other country listed in the Charter of the United Nations under the United Nations Conference on International Organization held between April and July of 1945.
- The Chrysanthemum Throne must send a full envoy with Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda that accompanies Emperor Akihito to Nanjing (Nanking), where he and the Prime Minister must get on their knees and bow with his forehead all the way to the floor (their knees and forehead must be exactly at sea level, facing a natural elevated slope such as the foot of a mountain, in complete humility and submission), for the same amount of time, if not more, that West German Chancellor Willy Brandt knelt in Warsaw. They must also give a speech, directly aimed at all the peoples of the Republic of China (Taiwan), the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Macau (SAR), Hong Kong (SAR), the Republic of the Philippines, the Republic of Indonesia (former Dutch East-Indies), the [constitution of] Malaysia, and the Kingdom of Thailand, that may be aired repeatedly on state channels on the wishes of said governments and given freely to any privately owned corporate broadcasting station, showing complete remorse for the actions of the Imperial Japanese Army in the Pacific theater during World War II. NHK (Nippon Hoso Kyokai, the national channel in Japan) must air this at relevant prime time slots for a minimum of four weeks, and all other relevant terrestrial broadcast stations are expected to air footage at similar, non-intrusive time slots at prime time. All foreign non-Asian nations willing to air the contents this particular address are allowed to do so at their expense.
- Japan must build and donate statues and/or shrines commemorating the victims and the casualties of the Pacific War. Every country affected by Japanese aggression, or suffered Japanese occupation, decides what to do with the memorials. They must rival the grandeur and size of the memorials in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and Japan must actively seek and work with the aforementioned countries for the exact details of the memorials, including, but not limited to, listing the names of all known and recorded casualties and the appropriate symbolism(s) that will be used in each individual, unique memorial which will emphasize regret, apology, a willingness to work for future friendship, and that the events will never be forgotten.
- Japan must acknowledge, in full, the atrocities it had committed during World War II. Sources cited by the Allied powers (particularly Canadian presence in Hong Kong, French and British presence in both Korea and China, Dutch presence in the Philippines and Indonesia, and the overall presence of the former Soviet Union (USSR) and the United States Army, Navy and Air Force in the entire Pacific region from the years 1939 to 1945), as well as sources cited by China and all the relevant participants within the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), even when contradicting Japanese history, must be written and published, mentioned and taught, learned and accepted by all relevant historical academia and governing bodies of education in Japan. All forms of curriculum must include these contents, after appropriation and review by the relevant historians of the United States of America, China, and the Republic of Korea (all three of whom previously led the attempts to convince Japan to not omit these facts in their history for half a century), by latest 2015, marking the 70-year anniversary of the unconditional surrender of the Imperial Japanese Army and the Empire of the Rising Sun to the Allied powers of the West and the East, and the official end of World War II.
Germany has the respect of Poland, the rest of the European Union, and the whole world, and they did more or less everything mentioned. So Japan doesn't get any credit for the things they've done for Asia? Japan is a leading reason for the prosperity and technological progress of people in all Asian countries. If it weren't for the model that Japan provided, South Korea would be just another miserable little speck on the planet. If it weren't for the technology that Japan introduced and traded with Taiwan, it would be a two-bit dictatorship or worse, integrated under the iron fist with which China has repeatedly punched itself in the face. Most significantly, if it weren't for Japan, most of Asia might still be under Western imperialism. These things you want the Japanese to do reek of humiliation, not humility. You're asking Japan to turn over some parts of their sovereignty over to a multilateral commission and you're about 50 years too late for that to ever happen. The US already played that card by treating MacArthur as proconsul of Japan. "We can rape your women, children, burn and pillage your homes, force you to learn and use our language, force you to use the Yen, subject you to torture and pain, and degrade you on a physical and mental level, but we gave you technology and prosperity! So, call it even?" Extremities at its worst. And I won't even touch the subject of how Japan itself benefited from all these "wondrous gifts to neighboring Korea and China". And you make it sound like Japan literally handed the wealth to Korea. No, the Koreans worked for it too. The Taiwanese worked for it too. The Chinese worked for it too. Germany, on the other hand, actually had a number they had to reach. And finally, I'm going to infer that you're Japanese? Or at least, you have roots in Japan? If I'm wrong I apologize, but only a Japanese person would read what I wrote and say "that's humiliating!!!". When Willy Brandt knelt, half of West Germany's population thought it was "excessive and humiliating". Ask a person who was alive to witness the event if they still think it's excessive today. Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 15:08 Sickkiee wrote:On September 18 2012 14:55 Xpace wrote:On September 18 2012 14:44 Sickkiee wrote:On September 18 2012 14:21 Xpace wrote: A lot of people are asking what Japan should do. Well, here's a short, incomplete list that acts as a starter:
- The Emperor of Japan, the Prime Minister of Japan, and all members of the Japanese Diet must sign a hand-written, sincere apology letter to all countries whom Japan had killed citizens of, attacked, invaded and occupied. These include the non-Asian countries of Canada, the United States, France, the Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, Russia (formerly the Soviet Union) and the United Kingdom who sent troops to various South East Asian countries for support and were considered belligerents in the war. This will also include formal apologies to countries whose later involvement in the Pacific theater must be commended and acknowledged by the relevant Axis power (Japan): Greece, Norway, Belgium, Brazil, the current states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia (formerly Czechoslovakia), Ukraine, Poland, South Africa, and any other country listed in the Charter of the United Nations under the United Nations Conference on International Organization held between April and July of 1945.
- The Chrysanthemum Throne must send a full envoy with Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda that accompanies Emperor Akihito to Nanjing (Nanking), where he and the Prime Minister must get on their knees and bow with his forehead all the way to the floor (their knees and forehead must be exactly at sea level, facing a natural elevated slope such as the foot of a mountain, in complete humility and submission), for the same amount of time, if not more, that West German Chancellor Willy Brandt knelt in Warsaw. They must also give a speech, directly aimed at all the peoples of the Republic of China (Taiwan), the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Macau (SAR), Hong Kong (SAR), the Republic of the Philippines, the Republic of Indonesia (former Dutch East-Indies), the [constitution of] Malaysia, and the Kingdom of Thailand, that may be aired repeatedly on state channels on the wishes of said governments and given freely to any privately owned corporate broadcasting station, showing complete remorse for the actions of the Imperial Japanese Army in the Pacific theater during World War II. NHK (Nippon Hoso Kyokai, the national channel in Japan) must air this at relevant prime time slots for a minimum of four weeks, and all other relevant terrestrial broadcast stations are expected to air footage at similar, non-intrusive time slots at prime time. All foreign non-Asian nations willing to air the contents this particular address are allowed to do so at their expense.
- Japan must build and donate statues and/or shrines commemorating the victims and the casualties of the Pacific War. Every country affected by Japanese aggression, or suffered Japanese occupation, decides what to do with the memorials. They must rival the grandeur and size of the memorials in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and Japan must actively seek and work with the aforementioned countries for the exact details of the memorials, including, but not limited to, listing the names of all known and recorded casualties and the appropriate symbolism(s) that will be used in each individual, unique memorial which will emphasize regret, apology, a willingness to work for future friendship, and that the events will never be forgotten.
- Japan must acknowledge, in full, the atrocities it had committed during World War II. Sources cited by the Allied powers (particularly Canadian presence in Hong Kong, French and British presence in both Korea and China, Dutch presence in the Philippines and Indonesia, and the overall presence of the former Soviet Union (USSR) and the United States Army, Navy and Air Force in the entire Pacific region from the years 1939 to 1945), as well as sources cited by China and all the relevant participants within the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), even when contradicting Japanese history, must be written and published, mentioned and taught, learned and accepted by all relevant historical academia and governing bodies of education in Japan. All forms of curriculum must include these contents, after appropriation and review by the relevant historians of the United States of America, China, and the Republic of Korea (all three of whom previously led the attempts to convince Japan to not omit these facts in their history for half a century), by latest 2015, marking the 70-year anniversary of the unconditional surrender of the Imperial Japanese Army and the Empire of the Rising Sun to the Allied powers of the West and the East, and the official end of World War II.
Germany has the respect of Poland, the rest of the European Union, and the whole world, and they did more or less everything mentioned. It's been how many years now? What makes you think they will do that. Not to mention it won't change much. People will still hate Japanese people being 'arrogant, up themselves' etc etc. Kniefall von Warschau happened in 1970. The war ended in 1945. That's 25 years after. Your past posts and general attitude in this thread is atypical of why there's anti-Japanese sentiment, as mentioned by KwarK. "It won't change much" - well, you're not the judge of that, and on a broader scale, none of us are even remotely capable of predicting if it will "be enough". It's a start, it's a step. And Germany took a LOT of steps. I'm not pointing the finger at you (especially if you're Japanese), but your reaction is pretty much "even though it won't cost us much to do these things, and we're not sacrificing anything physically, we'd rather not because we feel like it won't result into anything (when in actual fact we're simply too prideful)" Actions speak louder than words. Costs them (I am not Japanese but of Polish decent). At our time and age, any country who would do the following would lose all sense of nationality, even if it's for such a terrible crime (do not get me wrong I think it's horrible too, but you're not thinking REALISTICALLY). Sure most people in Japan who I've spoken to about the matter in the past few days feel sorry and apologetic; however why should the present people of Japan have to be forced fed these facts? Are they the people who committed the acts? CAN or WILL they commit them again? You come off like Japan is secretly build an army to rape and massacre the world. I agree with barely half of your 'statement'. The rest is fantasy. Costs them what? Sense of nationality? Isn't 'sense of nationality' the reason why there's protests in China right now?? National pride and patriotism isn't necessary in today's society. I'm not saying it's USELESS, I'm saying society won't collapse without it. Did the younger generation of West Germany in 1970 have anything to do with World War II? No. Did they belong to the Nazi regime? No. Did their parents STILL associate themselves with the Nazi regime? An overwhelming majority - No. Did they have the same opinion as you, that it was 'excessive and humiliating'? 48% of them did. 41% thought it was appropriate. 11% had no opinion. Unless the Japanese are so rooted in pride and honor that 100% of them will flat out rage if anything even remotely close to what I wrote would happen, then that's a different story, but I would like someone to affirm their belief that it's a possibility (because that's just... sad).
Jesus christ you cannot compare Japan to Germany with compared atrocities. Japan committed arguably only the Nanking incident. Germany committed many, many more than affected millions of people.
How can you force Japan to subject to the same, if not worse humiliation for something isn't even on the same freaking level as the holocaust.
As I said, I do agree Japan should sincerely, as do many Japanese people agree. But that isn't going to rid the hatred and animosity. 15-20 years and 50 years is a very, very, very large gap.
I still have family in Poland and America that do not hate, per say, Germany - but harbor distrust of them; however misplaced it may be.
|
On September 18 2012 15:36 Womwomwom wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 15:25 Azarkon wrote: The bottom line is that there is no way for Japan to redress their image in their neighbors' eyes without sacrificing what they hold dear - ie, their pride - and given that they won't sacrifice what they hold dear, the cycle is just going to continue. Decades of prosperous trade between China and Japan haven't erased the anger and the hatred, and while Korea-Japan relations were improving, we saw how quickly that changed with the Dokdo issue.
Whatever Japan does is going to be scrutinized against its WW 2 record in the foreseeable future, and it's not going to be given a clean slate for decades to come. There are no quick band aid fixes to this issue. In the same way that Israel isn't going to suddenly become buddy buddy with its neighbors, the tension between these countries is going to remain. Even if they do that, what makes you so sure that countries around the region will forgive them for the problem? At this point, Dokdo is simply an issue created by the South Korean government. Japan has submitted it to the ICJ multiple times and will almost certainly lose if South Korean agrees to take it to the court. It won't happen though because those rocks are a very nice button to press the minute an election comes along.
It's hard for Japan to achieve forgiveness, yes. But at the same time, Japan doesn't want forgiveness. What it wants is for its neighbors to stop bothering it about WW 2.
Japan doesn't feel remorse. A country that feels genuine remorse is going to try to obtain forgiveness, whatever the costs, because the weight of guilt is too great to bear.
Japan has barely tried. I have to say that they just don't care.
|
On September 18 2012 15:35 Xpace wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 15:27 m4inbrain wrote:And finally, I'm going to infer that you're Japanese? Or at least, you have roots in Japan? If I'm wrong I apologize, but only a Japanese person would read what I wrote and say "that's humiliating!!!". Start apologizing then, because i have no roots at all in japan and still think its humiliating. You actually even said that some things needed to be "submissive and humliating". Submissiveness and humiliation are defining qualities of an apology in Japan. Since you're not Japanese (and for that I apologize for inferring that you are), you don't understand the culture. ![[image loading]](http://p4.img.cctvpic.com/program/newsupdate/20110422/images/1303472125847_1303472125847_r.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infocus/jpq050911/s_j27_13787233.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://sundaytimes.lk/110424/images/TEPCO.jpg) The president of TEPCO apologizing to the families by kneeling, showing humiliation and submissiveness, who were forced to evacuate due to the Fukushima Nuclear Reactor crisis (the result of a natural disaster, the 2011 Tsunami). Humiliation and submissiveness is sometimes needed to keep one's honor. Look into Japanese history. You'll find it a fascinating read.
Yeah. I can see japanese apologizing to other japanese. But what you are proposing is not from one individual to another. You dont lose your "national pride" (and japan is pretty, uhm.. "collective-thinking"? Apologize for the bad wording, guess you know what i mean by that).
I actually read alot of stuff about japanese culture, especially regarding the time right after WW2 (less war-stuff, more about the depression and stuff like that). Alot of soldiers commited suicide (not Kamikaze) after hearing that japan surrendered. Not because the personal honor was tainted, but the honor of nippon. What you are proposing is actually not honoring the dead, but humiliating the living, im sorry.
|
On September 18 2012 15:44 weishime wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 14:21 Xpace wrote: A lot of people are asking what Japan should do. Well, here's a short, incomplete list that acts as a starter:
- The Emperor of Japan, the Prime Minister of Japan, and all members of the Japanese Diet must sign a hand-written, sincere apology letter to all countries whom Japan had killed citizens of, attacked, invaded and occupied. These include the non-Asian countries of Canada, the United States, France, the Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, Russia (formerly the Soviet Union) and the United Kingdom who sent troops to various South East Asian countries for support and were considered belligerents in the war. This will also include formal apologies to countries whose later involvement in the Pacific theater must be commended and acknowledged by the relevant Axis power (Japan): Greece, Norway, Belgium, Brazil, the current states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia (formerly Czechoslovakia), Ukraine, Poland, South Africa, and any other country listed in the Charter of the United Nations under the United Nations Conference on International Organization held between April and July of 1945.
- The Chrysanthemum Throne must send a full envoy with Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda that accompanies Emperor Akihito to Nanjing (Nanking), where he and the Prime Minister must get on their knees and bow with his forehead all the way to the floor (their knees and forehead must be exactly at sea level, facing a natural elevated slope such as the foot of a mountain, in complete humility and submission), for the same amount of time, if not more, that West German Chancellor Willy Brandt knelt in Warsaw. They must also give a speech, directly aimed at all the peoples of the Republic of China (Taiwan), the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Macau (SAR), Hong Kong (SAR), the Republic of the Philippines, the Republic of Indonesia (former Dutch East-Indies), the [constitution of] Malaysia, and the Kingdom of Thailand, that may be aired repeatedly on state channels on the wishes of said governments and given freely to any privately owned corporate broadcasting station, showing complete remorse for the actions of the Imperial Japanese Army in the Pacific theater during World War II. NHK (Nippon Hoso Kyokai, the national channel in Japan) must air this at relevant prime time slots for a minimum of four weeks, and all other relevant terrestrial broadcast stations are expected to air footage at similar, non-intrusive time slots at prime time. All foreign non-Asian nations willing to air the contents this particular address are allowed to do so at their expense.
- Japan must build and donate statues and/or shrines commemorating the victims and the casualties of the Pacific War. Every country affected by Japanese aggression, or suffered Japanese occupation, decides what to do with the memorials. They must rival the grandeur and size of the memorials in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and Japan must actively seek and work with the aforementioned countries for the exact details of the memorials, including, but not limited to, listing the names of all known and recorded casualties and the appropriate symbolism(s) that will be used in each individual, unique memorial which will emphasize regret, apology, a willingness to work for future friendship, and that the events will never be forgotten.
- Japan must acknowledge, in full, the atrocities it had committed during World War II. Sources cited by the Allied powers (particularly Canadian presence in Hong Kong, French and British presence in both Korea and China, Dutch presence in the Philippines and Indonesia, and the overall presence of the former Soviet Union (USSR) and the United States Army, Navy and Air Force in the entire Pacific region from the years 1939 to 1945), as well as sources cited by China and all the relevant participants within the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), even when contradicting Japanese history, must be written and published, mentioned and taught, learned and accepted by all relevant historical academia and governing bodies of education in Japan. All forms of curriculum must include these contents, after appropriation and review by the relevant historians of the United States of America, China, and the Republic of Korea (all three of whom previously led the attempts to convince Japan to not omit these facts in their history for half a century), by latest 2015, marking the 70-year anniversary of the unconditional surrender of the Imperial Japanese Army and the Empire of the Rising Sun to the Allied powers of the West and the East, and the official end of World War II.
Germany has the respect of Poland, the rest of the European Union, and the whole world, and they did more or less everything mentioned. The list you put forward sounds rediculously over the top and more towards shaming Japan and teaching them a lesson for what their grandparents or great grandparents did 70 years ago rather than elliciting a genuine apology to repair relations between all parties. The kneeling is especially distasteful. Willy Brandt was actually alive and an adult during the war, felt a direct connection to the events and did from what I gather a spontaneous symbolic apology. You want to grab the current Emperor and Prime Minister and get them to kneel/beg for forgiveness in the lowest position they possibly can. That level of kneeling/begging is really humiliating in Chinese/Japanese culture and doesn't seem to have the same level of sincerity nor dignity that you would want from a public apology.
In Chinese/Japanese culture, it's not common for the descendants to pay for the sins of their ancestors. That's an old custom, one that isn't practiced today, thus strengthening the symbolism.
+ Show Spoiler +On September 18 2012 15:27 m4inbrain wrote:Show nested quote +And finally, I'm going to infer that you're Japanese? Or at least, you have roots in Japan? If I'm wrong I apologize, but only a Japanese person would read what I wrote and say "that's humiliating!!!". Start apologizing then, because i have no roots at all in japan and still think its humiliating. You actually even said that some things needed to be "submissive and humliating". Submissiveness and humiliation are defining qualities of an apology in Japan - it emphasizes sincerity. An apology should not be half-assed. It shouldn't be followed with excuses, and should show full remorse and regret. Since you're not Japanese (and for that I apologize for inferring it, despite the comment not being directed at you at all), you don't understand the culture. ![[image loading]](http://p4.img.cctvpic.com/program/newsupdate/20110422/images/1303472125847_1303472125847_r.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infocus/jpq050911/s_j27_13787233.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://sundaytimes.lk/110424/images/TEPCO.jpg) The president of TEPCO apologizing to the families by kneeling, showing humiliation and submissiveness, who were forced to evacuate due to the Fukushima Nuclear Reactor crisis (the result of a natural disaster, the 2011 Tsunami). Humiliation and submissiveness is sometimes needed to keep one's honor. Look into Japanese history. You'll find it a fascinating read.
Honor is as important a quality as pride, is it not?
I don't expect westerners to understand. I remember the reactions of Americans when Obama did this:
![[image loading]](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_sH-DctCRHoc/SwDWqflUPqI/AAAAAAAABHA/xCIj9h5KIas/s1600/obama-bows-to-japanese-emperor-akihito.jpg)
Different cultures, different trains of thought.
|
5930 Posts
On September 18 2012 15:44 xelnaga_empire wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 14:36 Womwomwom wrote: In China's case, a vast majority of their maritime claims revolve around people sticking flags on rocks and not much else.
Like how Japan fabricated an an attack on itself to start a war with China and then planted their flag in Manchuria? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mukden_Incident
China knows they can't do anything about the islands through international court so guess why they're sending 1,000 fishing boats to the islands? Casus belli is a common excuse for land grabbing so I'm not sure what you're trying to do (you must think I'm a pro-Japanese sock puppet huh).
On September 18 2012 15:47 Azarkon wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 15:36 Womwomwom wrote:On September 18 2012 15:25 Azarkon wrote: The bottom line is that there is no way for Japan to redress their image in their neighbors' eyes without sacrificing what they hold dear - ie, their pride - and given that they won't sacrifice what they hold dear, the cycle is just going to continue. Decades of prosperous trade between China and Japan haven't erased the anger and the hatred, and while Korea-Japan relations were improving, we saw how quickly that changed with the Dokdo issue.
Whatever Japan does is going to be scrutinized against its WW 2 record in the foreseeable future, and it's not going to be given a clean slate for decades to come. There are no quick band aid fixes to this issue. In the same way that Israel isn't going to suddenly become buddy buddy with its neighbors, the tension between these countries is going to remain. Even if they do that, what makes you so sure that countries around the region will forgive them for the problem? At this point, Dokdo is simply an issue created by the South Korean government. Japan has submitted it to the ICJ multiple times and will almost certainly lose if South Korean agrees to take it to the court. It won't happen though because those rocks are a very nice button to press the minute an election comes along. It's hard for Japan to achieve forgiveness, yes. But at the same time, Japan doesn't want forgiveness. What it wants is for its neighbors to stop bothering it about WW 2. Japan doesn't feel remorse. A country that feels genuine remorse is going to try to obtain forgiveness, whatever the costs, because the weight of guilt is too great to bear. Japan has barely tried. I have to say that they just don't care.
I don't disagree they can do far more. But if South Korea can't even deal with the non-issue that is Dokdo, what makes you think that apologizing (which Japanese liberal groups have done in their own will) will magically change the status quo? The ruling elite see the status quo as beneficial for the local residents so why push a different angle?
The region is not remotely close to being like Europe. I'm not sure why people keep talking about Germany.
|
However unconfortable it might be for Japanese people, Japanese Prime Minister's apology by getting on his knees and bow with his forehead all the way to the floor in dogeza style is acceptable line at least for legitimate dead and suffered. Japan acknowledges that Imperial Japanese brought suffering to some asian countries, so I don't think head of the government's apology in the most remorseful way in Eastern Asian culture is asking too much. What is unacceptable is Japan having to apologize for things they didn't do or was legal at the time just because it lost the war. Losing war = automatic blame for everything is the last thing Japan wants.
|
On September 18 2012 15:46 tokicheese wrote: Lets put this into perspective for a second...
3,695,000 civilian casualties in China (lets assume all are from Japan and ignore the Kuomintang/Mao conflict)
Estimates place the Deaths from the great leap forward from 65 million to 70 million in China under Mao. This government party is still in power isnt it?
What Japan did was disgusting during WW2 to the PoWs and the Chinese but forcing this generation which is almost 2 generations removed. Why should they be punished for what their grandparents did? Do Germans today get punished for the holocaust? Do the Jews hate the Germans still? All this is is that China is acting insane again.
Japan is the country that suffered the bombing at Hiroshima/Nagasaki.
Canadians, Americans, Germans, English, Chinese, Japanese, Russians all commited war crimes in WW2. Some obviously in much greater magnitudes than others but no ones hands are completely clean after WW2. This is just nationalistic bullshit with a healthy dose of victors justice.
No, because Germany has apologized and have paid for their previous injustices towards the victims of the Nazi regime.
On September 18 2012 15:47 Sickkiee wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 15:22 Xpace wrote:On September 18 2012 15:06 Orek wrote:On September 18 2012 14:21 Xpace wrote: A lot of people are asking what Japan should do. Well, here's a short, incomplete list that acts as a starter:
- The Emperor of Japan, the Prime Minister of Japan, and all members of the Japanese Diet must sign a hand-written, sincere apology letter to all countries whom Japan had killed citizens of, attacked, invaded and occupied. These include the non-Asian countries of Canada, the United States, France, the Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, Russia (formerly the Soviet Union) and the United Kingdom who sent troops to various South East Asian countries for support and were considered belligerents in the war. This will also include formal apologies to countries whose later involvement in the Pacific theater must be commended and acknowledged by the relevant Axis power (Japan): Greece, Norway, Belgium, Brazil, the current states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia (formerly Czechoslovakia), Ukraine, Poland, South Africa, and any other country listed in the Charter of the United Nations under the United Nations Conference on International Organization held between April and July of 1945.
- The Chrysanthemum Throne must send a full envoy with Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda that accompanies Emperor Akihito to Nanjing (Nanking), where he and the Prime Minister must get on their knees and bow with his forehead all the way to the floor (their knees and forehead must be exactly at sea level, facing a natural elevated slope such as the foot of a mountain, in complete humility and submission), for the same amount of time, if not more, that West German Chancellor Willy Brandt knelt in Warsaw. They must also give a speech, directly aimed at all the peoples of the Republic of China (Taiwan), the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Macau (SAR), Hong Kong (SAR), the Republic of the Philippines, the Republic of Indonesia (former Dutch East-Indies), the [constitution of] Malaysia, and the Kingdom of Thailand, that may be aired repeatedly on state channels on the wishes of said governments and given freely to any privately owned corporate broadcasting station, showing complete remorse for the actions of the Imperial Japanese Army in the Pacific theater during World War II. NHK (Nippon Hoso Kyokai, the national channel in Japan) must air this at relevant prime time slots for a minimum of four weeks, and all other relevant terrestrial broadcast stations are expected to air footage at similar, non-intrusive time slots at prime time. All foreign non-Asian nations willing to air the contents this particular address are allowed to do so at their expense.
- Japan must build and donate statues and/or shrines commemorating the victims and the casualties of the Pacific War. Every country affected by Japanese aggression, or suffered Japanese occupation, decides what to do with the memorials. They must rival the grandeur and size of the memorials in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and Japan must actively seek and work with the aforementioned countries for the exact details of the memorials, including, but not limited to, listing the names of all known and recorded casualties and the appropriate symbolism(s) that will be used in each individual, unique memorial which will emphasize regret, apology, a willingness to work for future friendship, and that the events will never be forgotten.
- Japan must acknowledge, in full, the atrocities it had committed during World War II. Sources cited by the Allied powers (particularly Canadian presence in Hong Kong, French and British presence in both Korea and China, Dutch presence in the Philippines and Indonesia, and the overall presence of the former Soviet Union (USSR) and the United States Army, Navy and Air Force in the entire Pacific region from the years 1939 to 1945), as well as sources cited by China and all the relevant participants within the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), even when contradicting Japanese history, must be written and published, mentioned and taught, learned and accepted by all relevant historical academia and governing bodies of education in Japan. All forms of curriculum must include these contents, after appropriation and review by the relevant historians of the United States of America, China, and the Republic of Korea (all three of whom previously led the attempts to convince Japan to not omit these facts in their history for half a century), by latest 2015, marking the 70-year anniversary of the unconditional surrender of the Imperial Japanese Army and the Empire of the Rising Sun to the Allied powers of the West and the East, and the official end of World War II.
Germany has the respect of Poland, the rest of the European Union, and the whole world, and they did more or less everything mentioned. Hmm. I agree with some of those, but I question others. It sounds like you support the idea of "Forget facts, accept everything US, China, and Korea say including fraudulent ones just because you lost the war." To be fair, Japan has been doing pissed poor job at apologizing even for the things that Japanese government admits have happened during WWII. There is no denying that acts against Hague Conventions occured during Imperial Japanese rule, yet Japanese apology toward it doesn't seem sincere. However, that doesn't mean Japan has to do everything victim/winner sides say if that's what you are suggesting. You're looking at one particular sentence, so I bolded it within my quote. The Japanese CAN teach the facts that they have been teaching all along, but they should INCLUDE the facts given by other countries, not just Korea, China and the United States, as long as it's historical evidence, reviewed and accepted by historians of those institutions, whether or not it's biased. This is just ONE tiny, little thing that students learning history should be aware of. On September 18 2012 15:03 coverpunch wrote:On September 18 2012 14:21 Xpace wrote: A lot of people are asking what Japan should do. Well, here's a short, incomplete list that acts as a starter:
- The Emperor of Japan, the Prime Minister of Japan, and all members of the Japanese Diet must sign a hand-written, sincere apology letter to all countries whom Japan had killed citizens of, attacked, invaded and occupied. These include the non-Asian countries of Canada, the United States, France, the Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, Russia (formerly the Soviet Union) and the United Kingdom who sent troops to various South East Asian countries for support and were considered belligerents in the war. This will also include formal apologies to countries whose later involvement in the Pacific theater must be commended and acknowledged by the relevant Axis power (Japan): Greece, Norway, Belgium, Brazil, the current states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia (formerly Czechoslovakia), Ukraine, Poland, South Africa, and any other country listed in the Charter of the United Nations under the United Nations Conference on International Organization held between April and July of 1945.
- The Chrysanthemum Throne must send a full envoy with Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda that accompanies Emperor Akihito to Nanjing (Nanking), where he and the Prime Minister must get on their knees and bow with his forehead all the way to the floor (their knees and forehead must be exactly at sea level, facing a natural elevated slope such as the foot of a mountain, in complete humility and submission), for the same amount of time, if not more, that West German Chancellor Willy Brandt knelt in Warsaw. They must also give a speech, directly aimed at all the peoples of the Republic of China (Taiwan), the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Macau (SAR), Hong Kong (SAR), the Republic of the Philippines, the Republic of Indonesia (former Dutch East-Indies), the [constitution of] Malaysia, and the Kingdom of Thailand, that may be aired repeatedly on state channels on the wishes of said governments and given freely to any privately owned corporate broadcasting station, showing complete remorse for the actions of the Imperial Japanese Army in the Pacific theater during World War II. NHK (Nippon Hoso Kyokai, the national channel in Japan) must air this at relevant prime time slots for a minimum of four weeks, and all other relevant terrestrial broadcast stations are expected to air footage at similar, non-intrusive time slots at prime time. All foreign non-Asian nations willing to air the contents this particular address are allowed to do so at their expense.
- Japan must build and donate statues and/or shrines commemorating the victims and the casualties of the Pacific War. Every country affected by Japanese aggression, or suffered Japanese occupation, decides what to do with the memorials. They must rival the grandeur and size of the memorials in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and Japan must actively seek and work with the aforementioned countries for the exact details of the memorials, including, but not limited to, listing the names of all known and recorded casualties and the appropriate symbolism(s) that will be used in each individual, unique memorial which will emphasize regret, apology, a willingness to work for future friendship, and that the events will never be forgotten.
- Japan must acknowledge, in full, the atrocities it had committed during World War II. Sources cited by the Allied powers (particularly Canadian presence in Hong Kong, French and British presence in both Korea and China, Dutch presence in the Philippines and Indonesia, and the overall presence of the former Soviet Union (USSR) and the United States Army, Navy and Air Force in the entire Pacific region from the years 1939 to 1945), as well as sources cited by China and all the relevant participants within the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), even when contradicting Japanese history, must be written and published, mentioned and taught, learned and accepted by all relevant historical academia and governing bodies of education in Japan. All forms of curriculum must include these contents, after appropriation and review by the relevant historians of the United States of America, China, and the Republic of Korea (all three of whom previously led the attempts to convince Japan to not omit these facts in their history for half a century), by latest 2015, marking the 70-year anniversary of the unconditional surrender of the Imperial Japanese Army and the Empire of the Rising Sun to the Allied powers of the West and the East, and the official end of World War II.
Germany has the respect of Poland, the rest of the European Union, and the whole world, and they did more or less everything mentioned. So Japan doesn't get any credit for the things they've done for Asia? Japan is a leading reason for the prosperity and technological progress of people in all Asian countries. If it weren't for the model that Japan provided, South Korea would be just another miserable little speck on the planet. If it weren't for the technology that Japan introduced and traded with Taiwan, it would be a two-bit dictatorship or worse, integrated under the iron fist with which China has repeatedly punched itself in the face. Most significantly, if it weren't for Japan, most of Asia might still be under Western imperialism. These things you want the Japanese to do reek of humiliation, not humility. You're asking Japan to turn over some parts of their sovereignty over to a multilateral commission and you're about 50 years too late for that to ever happen. The US already played that card by treating MacArthur as proconsul of Japan. "We can rape your women, children, burn and pillage your homes, force you to learn and use our language, force you to use the Yen, subject you to torture and pain, and degrade you on a physical and mental level, but we gave you technology and prosperity! So, call it even?" Extremities at its worst. And I won't even touch the subject of how Japan itself benefited from all these "wondrous gifts to neighboring Korea and China". And you make it sound like Japan literally handed the wealth to Korea. No, the Koreans worked for it too. The Taiwanese worked for it too. The Chinese worked for it too. Germany, on the other hand, actually had a number they had to reach. And finally, I'm going to infer that you're Japanese? Or at least, you have roots in Japan? If I'm wrong I apologize, but only a Japanese person would read what I wrote and say "that's humiliating!!!". When Willy Brandt knelt, half of West Germany's population thought it was "excessive and humiliating". Ask a person who was alive to witness the event if they still think it's excessive today. On September 18 2012 15:08 Sickkiee wrote:On September 18 2012 14:55 Xpace wrote:On September 18 2012 14:44 Sickkiee wrote:On September 18 2012 14:21 Xpace wrote: A lot of people are asking what Japan should do. Well, here's a short, incomplete list that acts as a starter:
- The Emperor of Japan, the Prime Minister of Japan, and all members of the Japanese Diet must sign a hand-written, sincere apology letter to all countries whom Japan had killed citizens of, attacked, invaded and occupied. These include the non-Asian countries of Canada, the United States, France, the Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, Russia (formerly the Soviet Union) and the United Kingdom who sent troops to various South East Asian countries for support and were considered belligerents in the war. This will also include formal apologies to countries whose later involvement in the Pacific theater must be commended and acknowledged by the relevant Axis power (Japan): Greece, Norway, Belgium, Brazil, the current states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia (formerly Czechoslovakia), Ukraine, Poland, South Africa, and any other country listed in the Charter of the United Nations under the United Nations Conference on International Organization held between April and July of 1945.
- The Chrysanthemum Throne must send a full envoy with Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda that accompanies Emperor Akihito to Nanjing (Nanking), where he and the Prime Minister must get on their knees and bow with his forehead all the way to the floor (their knees and forehead must be exactly at sea level, facing a natural elevated slope such as the foot of a mountain, in complete humility and submission), for the same amount of time, if not more, that West German Chancellor Willy Brandt knelt in Warsaw. They must also give a speech, directly aimed at all the peoples of the Republic of China (Taiwan), the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Macau (SAR), Hong Kong (SAR), the Republic of the Philippines, the Republic of Indonesia (former Dutch East-Indies), the [constitution of] Malaysia, and the Kingdom of Thailand, that may be aired repeatedly on state channels on the wishes of said governments and given freely to any privately owned corporate broadcasting station, showing complete remorse for the actions of the Imperial Japanese Army in the Pacific theater during World War II. NHK (Nippon Hoso Kyokai, the national channel in Japan) must air this at relevant prime time slots for a minimum of four weeks, and all other relevant terrestrial broadcast stations are expected to air footage at similar, non-intrusive time slots at prime time. All foreign non-Asian nations willing to air the contents this particular address are allowed to do so at their expense.
- Japan must build and donate statues and/or shrines commemorating the victims and the casualties of the Pacific War. Every country affected by Japanese aggression, or suffered Japanese occupation, decides what to do with the memorials. They must rival the grandeur and size of the memorials in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and Japan must actively seek and work with the aforementioned countries for the exact details of the memorials, including, but not limited to, listing the names of all known and recorded casualties and the appropriate symbolism(s) that will be used in each individual, unique memorial which will emphasize regret, apology, a willingness to work for future friendship, and that the events will never be forgotten.
- Japan must acknowledge, in full, the atrocities it had committed during World War II. Sources cited by the Allied powers (particularly Canadian presence in Hong Kong, French and British presence in both Korea and China, Dutch presence in the Philippines and Indonesia, and the overall presence of the former Soviet Union (USSR) and the United States Army, Navy and Air Force in the entire Pacific region from the years 1939 to 1945), as well as sources cited by China and all the relevant participants within the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), even when contradicting Japanese history, must be written and published, mentioned and taught, learned and accepted by all relevant historical academia and governing bodies of education in Japan. All forms of curriculum must include these contents, after appropriation and review by the relevant historians of the United States of America, China, and the Republic of Korea (all three of whom previously led the attempts to convince Japan to not omit these facts in their history for half a century), by latest 2015, marking the 70-year anniversary of the unconditional surrender of the Imperial Japanese Army and the Empire of the Rising Sun to the Allied powers of the West and the East, and the official end of World War II.
Germany has the respect of Poland, the rest of the European Union, and the whole world, and they did more or less everything mentioned. It's been how many years now? What makes you think they will do that. Not to mention it won't change much. People will still hate Japanese people being 'arrogant, up themselves' etc etc. Kniefall von Warschau happened in 1970. The war ended in 1945. That's 25 years after. Your past posts and general attitude in this thread is atypical of why there's anti-Japanese sentiment, as mentioned by KwarK. "It won't change much" - well, you're not the judge of that, and on a broader scale, none of us are even remotely capable of predicting if it will "be enough". It's a start, it's a step. And Germany took a LOT of steps. I'm not pointing the finger at you (especially if you're Japanese), but your reaction is pretty much "even though it won't cost us much to do these things, and we're not sacrificing anything physically, we'd rather not because we feel like it won't result into anything (when in actual fact we're simply too prideful)" Actions speak louder than words. Costs them (I am not Japanese but of Polish decent). At our time and age, any country who would do the following would lose all sense of nationality, even if it's for such a terrible crime (do not get me wrong I think it's horrible too, but you're not thinking REALISTICALLY). Sure most people in Japan who I've spoken to about the matter in the past few days feel sorry and apologetic; however why should the present people of Japan have to be forced fed these facts? Are they the people who committed the acts? CAN or WILL they commit them again? You come off like Japan is secretly build an army to rape and massacre the world. I agree with barely half of your 'statement'. The rest is fantasy. Costs them what? Sense of nationality? Isn't 'sense of nationality' the reason why there's protests in China right now?? National pride and patriotism isn't necessary in today's society. I'm not saying it's USELESS, I'm saying society won't collapse without it. Did the younger generation of West Germany in 1970 have anything to do with World War II? No. Did they belong to the Nazi regime? No. Did their parents STILL associate themselves with the Nazi regime? An overwhelming majority - No. Did they have the same opinion as you, that it was 'excessive and humiliating'? 48% of them did. 41% thought it was appropriate. 11% had no opinion. Unless the Japanese are so rooted in pride and honor that 100% of them will flat out rage if anything even remotely close to what I wrote would happen, then that's a different story, but I would like someone to affirm their belief that it's a possibility (because that's just... sad). Jesus christ you cannot compare Japan to Germany with compared atrocities. Japan committed arguably only the Nanking incident. Germany committed many, many more than affected millions of people. How can you force Japan to subject to the same, if not worse humiliation for something isn't even on the same freaking level as the holocaust. As I said, I do agree Japan should sincerely, as do many Japanese people agree. But that isn't going to rid the hatred and animosity. 15-20 years and 50 years is a very, very, very large gap. I still have family in Poland and America that do not hate, per say, Germany - but harbor distrust of them; however misplaced it may be.
JUST Nanking? How about Unit 731? Or how about the comfort women that are still alive today? The holocaust were CIVILIAN casualties. The Chinese suffered MORE CIVILIAN CASUALTIES. Worse or not is NOT THE ISSUE HERE.
|
|
|
|
|
|