|
This is a tragic event. Let's not derail the thread with a gun control debate. Posts from page 9 onward will be moderated for steering the discussion towards gun control. |
Quite surprising that you read all these reports about people who commit acts like these, and they were a child/student "who you would never think would do such a thing".
Funny that.
My heart goes out to all those who were affected by this horrible incident.
Edit: Media sources shouldn't have to do some "strict" procedure or anything when it comes to verifying sources during an event like this. Someone should just not be a fucking no brain idiot and not ring up "for the sake of it" to "show how easy it is to get on the phone to the news". Makes you wonder if he paid someone so he could be that much of an idiot.
|
i mean that society would allow us to perform the execution. tbh, i consider it a natural right of mankind to be allowed to execute criminals who engage in acts of mass destruction/mayhem.
i think it would help prevent people from doing these kinds of things, yes. they clearly have a warped view of "common sense" anyway, but even a dog is afraid to die.
i doubt that empty rhetoric and nice sounding platitudes are ever going to be a solution for anything. and no i will not excuse your prejudice. if you hold it than go ahead, but the tables can be turned. "i suspect that you live in a relatively secular society, which could explain your misunderstanding of reality".... but then why would i say that when its wildly off-topic and adds nothing to the discussion?
altough using such fancy words you sound so stupid, ill let you win this argument because i really cba discussing this any further with you.
enjoy promoting fear inducing states and calling out death penalties mate, im going back to laddering now.
User was warned for this post
|
if he suicides himself or if death penalty would allow death by suicide, no one would be to blame, no 'new' crimminals will be born. ...but i guess that wont be good either 'cause: what about the revenge?
|
On July 22 2012 04:13 yookstah wrote: Quite surprising that you read all these reports about people who commit acts like these, and they were a child/student "who you would never think would do such a thing".
Funny that.
My heart goes out to all those who were affected by this horrible incident.
Edit: Media sources shouldn't have to do some "strict" procedure or anything when it comes to verifying sources during an event like this. Someone should just not be a fucking no brain idiot and not ring up "for the sake of it" to "show how easy it is to get on the phone to the news". Makes you wonder if he paid someone so he could be that much of an idiot. That's true about most horrible crime. There was a serial rapist putting the fear in a swedish town some years ago and it turned out it was a "familiy man" that no one suspected could do such things. You can see the same tendencies for a lot of similar crimes. I guess it boils down to that horrible people don't always have horns on their head (sadly).
|
On July 22 2012 04:34 Hemling wrote:Show nested quote + i mean that society would allow us to perform the execution. tbh, i consider it a natural right of mankind to be allowed to execute criminals who engage in acts of mass destruction/mayhem.
i think it would help prevent people from doing these kinds of things, yes. they clearly have a warped view of "common sense" anyway, but even a dog is afraid to die.
i doubt that empty rhetoric and nice sounding platitudes are ever going to be a solution for anything. and no i will not excuse your prejudice. if you hold it than go ahead, but the tables can be turned. "i suspect that you live in a relatively secular society, which could explain your misunderstanding of reality".... but then why would i say that when its wildly off-topic and adds nothing to the discussion?
altough using such fancy words you sound so stupid, ill let you win this argument because i really cba discussing this any further with you. enjoy promoting fear inducing states and calling out death penalties mate, im going back to laddering now. kk wish you weren't so abrasive about it, but its all cool. i forgive you. (btw which words were fancy? was it platitude?)
enjoy your laddering.
|
On July 22 2012 04:34 xM(Z wrote: if he suicides himself or if death penalty would allow death by suicide, no one would be to blame, no 'new' crimminals will be born. ...but i guess that wont be good either 'cause: what about the revenge?
Why call it "revenge" and not "justice"?
|
Lalalaland34483 Posts
|
On July 22 2012 04:03 Reaps wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2012 03:59 Xiphos wrote:On July 22 2012 03:53 FeUerFlieGe wrote:On July 22 2012 03:35 Hemling wrote:On July 22 2012 03:26 YouMake wrote: The guy was seriously fucking insane. I'm 100% on board for the death penalty. You shot 70 people and kill 12 of them and leave another 38 in the balance of life and death, i dont feel like you deserve to breathe the air on this planet. would you mind killing him yourself? would you mind getting executed after that for killing a man? do you think it will prevent something like this happening again? why not just lock him up and spend the rest of his days to evaluate his mind so we can find the cause of these kinds of horrific acts. Yes! More people in jails! Not like they are overflowing already. I really think that they should give like 10 years of redemption time to the prisoners in order for them to prove that they are still capable to contributing to the society with some sort of high school courses studies and/or factory work. And after that, they can be release back if they have done exceptionally well in them by scoring high in them. If they still wouldn't change their attitude in things, get rid of them. Yes I do mean capital punishment since they are already nuisance to the society. Lol what? giving mass murder's a second chance? jesus where do you people come from. Not to mention its not hard to change you're attitude when you know you're gonna get released. Espically when they are smart like Holmes apperntly was. Sorry but what a stupid post.
What a stupid poster. Didn't even read about the context of what I wrote and to what msg was I referring to.
|
The only thing I can say is this: I support the death penalty in these type of cases because of the "It's not fair" rule. It's not fair that he is allowed to breathe after killing innocents, it's not fair that he has food, water and shelter while so many do not.
So by my it's not fair ruling, I personally believe that he should be put to death because he has taken more than he could ever put back.
|
I think the shooter should be taken to guantonimo bay and given the most "cruel and unusal punishments" that the military can fathom!
|
On July 22 2012 04:46 Goozen wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2012 04:34 xM(Z wrote: if he suicides himself or if death penalty would allow death by suicide, no one would be to blame, no 'new' crimminals will be born. ...but i guess that wont be good either 'cause: what about the revenge? Why call it "revenge" and not "justice"? because 'justice' is subjective. revenge (or pity) is the one that satisfies peoples ego, that gives them closure. justice, in this case, is just something to hide behind.
|
I remember the shooting in Arizona when Rep. Giffords got shot, so many in the media were jumping over the idea that Sarah Palin and Tea Party groups had inspired that violence. With this scenario, we have a similar situation, some crazy asshole shoots up a bunch of people, yet this guy is dressed like a character from the movie that is playing, tells the cops he is the 'Joker' upon his arrest, and maybe I've missed it, but nobody has made a single reference to the movie contributing in any way. It would be very different if it was a Michael Moore production wherein someone dressed as Sarah Palin came in shooting, yelling 'You Betcha' repeatedly.
|
On July 22 2012 06:02 xM(Z wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2012 04:46 Goozen wrote:On July 22 2012 04:34 xM(Z wrote: if he suicides himself or if death penalty would allow death by suicide, no one would be to blame, no 'new' crimminals will be born. ...but i guess that wont be good either 'cause: what about the revenge? Why call it "revenge" and not "justice"? because 'justice' is subjective. revenge (or pity) is the one that satisfies peoples ego, that gives them closure. justice, in this case, is just something to hide behind. It is about neither justice nor revenge, it's about harm reduction.
And harm reduction would entail never allowing this individual to EVER threaten any innocent civilian again. Which should exclude the possibility for a perceived rehabilitation. You should rehabilitate thieves, maybe the occasional murderer, but not a mass murdering psychopath like this. And even if you could, I don't know why anyone would want to. Will this person ever redeem himself for the lives he has taken? Of course not. It would be best for victims, government, and if we had a sane system, taxpayers, for his existence to cease.
And I know the counter argument that always follow... But there is little point in even bringing up the issue of doubt about guilt. Is anyone, including the killer, disputing his guilt in this case?
|
On July 22 2012 07:52 jdseemoreglass wrote: And I know the counter argument that always follow... But there is little point in even bringing up the issue of doubt about guilt. Is anyone, including the killer, disputing his guilt in this case?
Only if under our laws, he's considered "legally insane" and therefore not legally responsible for his actions ...
|
On July 22 2012 07:50 Kaitlin wrote: I remember the shooting in Arizona when Rep. Giffords got shot, so many in the media were jumping over the idea that Sarah Palin and Tea Party groups had inspired that violence. With this scenario, we have a similar situation, some crazy asshole shoots up a bunch of people, yet this guy is dressed like a character from the movie that is playing, tells the cops he is the 'Joker' upon his arrest, and maybe I've missed it, but nobody has made a single reference to the movie contributing in any way. It would be very different if it was a Michael Moore production wherein someone dressed as Sarah Palin came in shooting, yelling 'You Betcha' repeatedly.
Situations aren't similar at all. Gabby Giffords was targeted, and seeing as she's a liberal politician, it isn't a stretch to say the shooting was politically motivated. Do you think it wasn't?
This on the other hand, seems completely random. A batman-obsessed wannabe comic book villain.
|
On July 22 2012 08:57 Leporello wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2012 07:50 Kaitlin wrote: I remember the shooting in Arizona when Rep. Giffords got shot, so many in the media were jumping over the idea that Sarah Palin and Tea Party groups had inspired that violence. With this scenario, we have a similar situation, some crazy asshole shoots up a bunch of people, yet this guy is dressed like a character from the movie that is playing, tells the cops he is the 'Joker' upon his arrest, and maybe I've missed it, but nobody has made a single reference to the movie contributing in any way. It would be very different if it was a Michael Moore production wherein someone dressed as Sarah Palin came in shooting, yelling 'You Betcha' repeatedly. Situations aren't similar at all. Gabby Giffords was targeted, and seeing as she's a liberal politician, it isn't a stretch to say the shooting was politically motivated. Do you think it wasn't? This on the other hand, seems completely random. A batman-obsessed wannabe comic book villain.
How is it random when someone proclaims they are "The Joker", shows up in dyed red hair, shooting up a cinema full of people watching the Batman debut ? That doesn't appear "random" at all. I wouldn't say it does or doesn't have political motivations, based only on those observations, but it's hardly random. It's clearly inspired by the movie. Why no outrage about that aspect ?
|
On July 21 2012 23:42 DoubleReed wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2012 23:23 LaSt)ChAnCe wrote:On July 21 2012 22:44 Cutlery wrote:On July 21 2012 00:29 jdseemoreglass wrote:On July 21 2012 00:28 Cutlery wrote: I hope the survivng victims have health insurance?? Why, you think the ambulance is going to ask for their insurance card before they treat the gunshots? No, but it would suck to have been shot and deal with that, and on top of everything know that their lives will be pretty much changed forever because they'll have to spend the rest of it to pay that one bill. God forbid any tax money went to help victims of accidents. the hospital bills will be paid by the cinema, i would be willing to bet money on it edit - and/or concerned outsiders The cinema? How is the cinema culpable at all? did you read what i said? at no point did i say that the cinema is deserving of blame
i said they'd pay.. because it happened at their site and they will do it, not that they have to (they may have to, too) but that they will (if for no other reason than because it's the right thing to do)
or, as i said, other people will - the victims and their families won't need to
|
On July 22 2012 08:09 Kaitlin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2012 07:52 jdseemoreglass wrote: And I know the counter argument that always follow... But there is little point in even bringing up the issue of doubt about guilt. Is anyone, including the killer, disputing his guilt in this case? Only if under our laws, he's considered "legally insane" and therefore not legally responsible for his actions ... If he is insane, then I can only hope for his sake that he is never cured enough to understand the horror he has wrought.
|
On July 22 2012 07:50 Kaitlin wrote: I remember the shooting in Arizona when Rep. Giffords got shot, so many in the media were jumping over the idea that Sarah Palin and Tea Party groups had inspired that violence. With this scenario, we have a similar situation, some crazy asshole shoots up a bunch of people, yet this guy is dressed like a character from the movie that is playing, tells the cops he is the 'Joker' upon his arrest, and maybe I've missed it, but nobody has made a single reference to the movie contributing in any way. It would be very different if it was a Michael Moore production wherein someone dressed as Sarah Palin came in shooting, yelling 'You Betcha' repeatedly. Don't worry, within hours ABC news was reporting that someone in the Denver tea party: had the same name and maybe might have possibly been the person but they didn't know for sure and hadn't checked but were letting you know anyway just case.
|
On July 22 2012 00:51 Warri wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2012 00:22 Okiesmokie wrote:On July 21 2012 23:42 DoubleReed wrote:On July 21 2012 23:23 LaSt)ChAnCe wrote:On July 21 2012 22:44 Cutlery wrote:On July 21 2012 00:29 jdseemoreglass wrote:On July 21 2012 00:28 Cutlery wrote: I hope the survivng victims have health insurance?? Why, you think the ambulance is going to ask for their insurance card before they treat the gunshots? No, but it would suck to have been shot and deal with that, and on top of everything know that their lives will be pretty much changed forever because they'll have to spend the rest of it to pay that one bill. God forbid any tax money went to help victims of accidents. the hospital bills will be paid by the cinema, i would be willing to bet money on it edit - and/or concerned outsiders The cinema? How is the cinema culpable at all? Because they didn't have the proper security to prevent someone from walking in the back door to the theater? I really don't understand why theaters don't have increased security for midnight screenings of big movies. Dafuq? Just because it was a theater this time doesnt mean its gonna be a theater next time. Do we have to have bigtime screening in every shopping mall, every school, every club, every bath now? That isn't what I said at all. I said the theater should have employed more security officers during a midnight screening of a big movie. It's just common sense to me that they would attempt to enforce the safety of the movie-goers when they know for a fact there will be a large amount of people there, that late at night. They do this where I live, it just baffles me that they didn't do it in Colorado.
|
|
|
|