EPTThis is the true implications of war...People need to realize these are the sorts of things that happen and we cannot continue this policy of invading countries in the name of "freedom".
![[image loading]](http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/img/ya4eead6f7.png)
Republican nominations - Page 178
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
BobTheBuilder1377
Somalia335 Posts
This is the true implications of war...People need to realize these are the sorts of things that happen and we cannot continue this policy of invading countries in the name of "freedom". | ||
Falling
Canada11373 Posts
| ||
|
BobTheBuilder1377
Somalia335 Posts
| ||
|
ryanAnger
United States838 Posts
On December 16 2011 16:03 BobTheBuilder1377 wrote: These idiots are scared of Iran getting together a nuclear bomb when we have 40+ bases around it.... ![[image loading]](http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/390444_10150520544160802_207770190801_10779412_403641272_n.jpg) If the most powerful military in the world had 40 bases surrounding my house, I'd want nukes too. | ||
|
_Darwin_
United States2374 Posts
On December 16 2011 16:03 BobTheBuilder1377 wrote: That shit would make me angry. Knowing a wall of bunkers with siege tanks and sensor towers was surrounding my third... | ||
|
julianto
2292 Posts
On December 16 2011 17:05 _Darwin_ wrote: That shit would make me angry. Knowing a wall of bunkers with siege tanks and sensor towers was surrounding my third... You can deny them from teching up to nuke by stealing their vespene gas. | ||
|
_Darwin_
United States2374 Posts
On December 16 2011 17:10 julianto wrote: You can deny them from teching up to nuke by stealing their vespene gas. I would, but they killed my drone scout. + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2011/12/6bddb0761f346c9cb62f015af9527b48.png) | ||
|
BobTheBuilder1377
Somalia335 Posts
On December 16 2011 17:10 julianto wrote: You can deny them from teching up to nuke by stealing their vespene gas. I know I shouldn't laugh but I did! xD man I'm going to hell for sure. | ||
|
gruff
Sweden2276 Posts
| ||
|
kwizach
3658 Posts
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/16/opinion/gop-monetary-madness.html | ||
|
nebffa
Australia776 Posts
On December 16 2011 19:31 kwizach wrote: Nice column by Paul Krugman about Ron Paul's off-the-mark economic ideas. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/16/opinion/gop-monetary-madness.html Just so everyone knows, in this article the guy plays down claims made by Peter Schiff about the economy. So that everyone knows, Peter Schiff was the main outspoken person prior to the mortgage crisis who predicted that there would be a market crash. He has consistently said since that like the housing market bubble, there is another bubble building in the treasury bond market. Though this has yet to pop, it is coming - he says. The author of this article says that the crash not happening is evidence that Peter Schiff is wrong. However, Schiff has not said specifically when these things will happen, just general trends. Yes, I watch Peter Schiff's videos - but only because his predictions about the economy come true. No economic adviser should be worth listening to if their predictions don't come true. This is one of the fewwwwwwwwwwwww people that has been a leader in getting it right the last couple of years. So I don't easily buy an article that goes to say Peter Schiff is wrong, along with Ron Paul | ||
Whitewing
United States7483 Posts
On December 16 2011 20:43 nebffa wrote: Just so everyone knows, in this article the guy plays down claims made by Peter Schiff about the economy. So that everyone knows, Peter Schiff was the main outspoken person prior to the mortgage crisis who predicted that there would be a market crash. He has consistently said since that like the housing market bubble, there is another bubble building in the treasury bond market. Though this has yet to pop, it is coming - he says. The author of this article says that the crash not happening is evidence that Peter Schiff is wrong. However, Schiff has not said specifically when these things will happen, just general trends. Yes, I watch Peter Schiff's videos - but only because his predictions about the economy come true. No economic adviser should be worth listening to if their predictions don't come true. This is one of the fewwwwwwwwwwwww people that has been a leader in getting it right the last couple of years. So I don't easily buy an article that goes to say Peter Schiff is wrong, along with Ron Paul To be fair, Krugman is completely correct about the inflation, and about the predictions about it. Inflation has not been, nor would it become an issue here. I'm not certain I agree with Keynesian economics, but in general it seems more reasonable than Austrian economics, which is pretty damn opposed to expansion policies that we needed and continue to need. | ||
|
gchan
United States654 Posts
| ||
|
aksfjh
United States4853 Posts
On December 16 2011 20:43 nebffa wrote: Just so everyone knows, in this article the guy plays down claims made by Peter Schiff about the economy. So that everyone knows, Peter Schiff was the main outspoken person prior to the mortgage crisis who predicted that there would be a market crash. He has consistently said since that like the housing market bubble, there is another bubble building in the treasury bond market. Though this has yet to pop, it is coming - he says. The author of this article says that the crash not happening is evidence that Peter Schiff is wrong. However, Schiff has not said specifically when these things will happen, just general trends. Yes, I watch Peter Schiff's videos - but only because his predictions about the economy come true. No economic adviser should be worth listening to if their predictions don't come true. This is one of the fewwwwwwwwwwwww people that has been a leader in getting it right the last couple of years. So I don't easily buy an article that goes to say Peter Schiff is wrong, along with Ron Paul Schiff spends his days spouting nonsense that we're going to have another bust, every day! He's bound to be right eventually. If I keep liquibetting on the underdog in major tournaments, I'm sure I'll get a few right. Doesn't mean I know the next up-and-comer (or anything about SC2 for that matter). | ||
|
julianto
2292 Posts
well played, sir xD | ||
|
scaban84
United States1080 Posts
On December 16 2011 22:37 aksfjh wrote: Schiff spends his days spouting nonsense that we're going to have another bust, every day! He's bound to be right eventually. If I keep liquibetting on the underdog in major tournaments, I'm sure I'll get a few right. Doesn't mean I know the next up-and-comer (or anything about SC2 for that matter). Lol, he called the mortage crisis a year before it happened. You call that 'non-sense'? He has explained in detail why our debt situation is unsustainable. All the Keynesians have been saying the past 4 years is that the government needs to spend more money. Well, we tried that. And it didn't create a single up-tick in employment and business investment. Yet they continue to push for stimulus. This is insanity, Krugman needs to stop. | ||
|
HardlyNever
United States1258 Posts
On December 16 2011 15:01 Wegandi wrote: Well, I don't know, maybe Iranians should embrace the West and Americans after-all, they've only had Western backed Coups to bring about a very repressive Regime in 1953 and ousted the democratically elected Mossadegh. Perhaps people should have a proper understanding of Middle Eastern history and especially Iranian in regard to Western actions in the region, both overt and covert. Before the US it was the British that held Imperial sway over Iran and Iran to this day still resents Britain more than America (you know the whole taking Iranian land and natural resources bit...). I wonder why Iranians have animosity towards the West... I'm well aware of the CIA's operations in Iran in the early 50's. No where did I say Iran didn't have a reason to distrust America/the West. Giving it a "good reason," doesn't change the action itself. | ||
|
Treemonkeys
United States2082 Posts
On December 16 2011 17:05 _Darwin_ wrote: That shit would make me angry. Knowing a wall of bunkers with siege tanks and sensor towers was surrounding my third... It's their main though, and they can't exp. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
WASHINGTON -- Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney told voters on the campaign trail in Iowa today that before he entered the world of politics, he never quite understood the difference between Medicare and Medicaid -- the two government-funded health care programs that serve the elderly and the poor, respectively. "I have to admit, I didn't know all the differences between these things before I got into government," said Romney. "And then I got into it and understood that Medicaid is the health care program for the poor, by and large." It was a throwaway line, coming in the thirty-eighth minute of a roughly 45-minute town hall affair. And Romney didn't really have to say it. He was in the midst of talking up the similarities between his plan for Medicare reform and the plan introduced yesterday by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), and had soon meandered on to other topics. But within minutes the admission had turned into a headache. Romney, as Talking Points Memo noted, had taken over health care companies while at the head of private equity firm Bain Capital. As Reason magazine noted, he also talked up his time as "a young consultant to a health-care company in the late 1970s" in his own book, No Apology. As a senate candidate in 1994, he spoke in detail about Medicaid policy, specifically with respect to whether federal funds could be used from it to fund abortion. Source | ||
|
ampson
United States2355 Posts
| ||
| ||
