1.13am GMT: The latest from the Fukushima reactors is that the government is now saying that there has been "no radioactive leak so far" at the nuclear plants. That seems to contradict an earlier statements by Japan's nuclear safety agency and the Tokyo Electric Power company.
Crisis in Japan - Page 62
Forum Index > General Forum |
Thread is about the various issues surrounding Japan in the aftermath of the recent earthquake. Don't bring the shit side of the internet to the thread, and post with the realization that this thread is very important, and very real, to your fellow members. Do not post speculative and unconfirmed news you saw on TV or anywhere else. Generally the more dramatic it sounds the less likely it's true. | ||
![]()
Spica
United States5582 Posts
| ||
shadymmj
1906 Posts
On March 12 2011 10:51 Zocat wrote: You seem to know more about this. Assuming that there is a meltdown - how big would the damage be? there is a concrete shell, so if there is a crack in it, which does not seem to be the case, it would be devastating. if not, that place would be sealed and the boffins will start scratching their head as to how to get rid of the reactor. | ||
VabuDeltaKaiser
Germany1107 Posts
On March 12 2011 10:49 Yttrasil wrote: Greenpeace is not a good source for this... and news has a way of reporting facts but not in an explanatory nor comparable way to what actually is dangerous. The chance of a meltdown is minimalistic and if it were to happen the damage would still be minimal and not like with Chernobyl. id love to go into facts, with nuclear plants, my uncle invented most of the structures and i followed his experiences. you said "That and you are proposterous, read some about nuclear power plants and how they are constructed before scaring people to death with non facts the next time." that are your arguement, that is what you are saying! you give no facts at all! nothing! not a single arguement for your point. erm... any smart guy would kick your ass right here. anytime. .... you are a joke. User was warned for this post | ||
LoLAdriankat
United States4307 Posts
On March 12 2011 10:35 slimshady wrote: Dustin Browder: terrible, terrible damage. Sorry, I couldn't resist. Anyway, do we know how many deaths there are? My local news site says 300 now, but it may exceed 1000. There were about 88,000 people reported missing. Hopefully a major chunk of the missing people are still alive and just haven't been able to report in to their families, friends, etc. | ||
a176
Canada6688 Posts
On March 12 2011 11:01 VabuDeltaKaiser wrote: id love to go into facts, with nuclear plants, my uncle invented most of the structures and i followed his experiences. you said "That and you are proposterous, read some about nuclear power plants and how they are constructed before scaring people to death with non facts the next time." that are your arguement, that is what you are saying! you give no facts at all! nothing! not a single arguement for your point. erm... any smart guy would kick your ass right here. anytime. .... you are a joke. calm down, please have a positive demeanor. this is not the place for insults or useless debate. | ||
dump
Japan514 Posts
| ||
tenacity
1587 Posts
"It allows authorities to take additional measures," he told BBC News. "It empowers officials in the local region, such as the fire service, police etc to take the action they need to take, but at this stage it is purely precautionary." Under Japanese law, a nuclear emergency must be declared if there is a release of radiation, if there is a dangerous level of water in the reactor, or if the cooling mechanisms fail. "It is important to remember that for a large reactor like that, it would have a number of diesel generators that are supposed to start up automatically, when the plant is disconnected from the grid," Mr Gordon said. source:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12711707 | ||
dump
Japan514 Posts
MAP 6.8 2011/03/12 01:47:16 37.588 142.682 24.8 OFF THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN MAP 6.0 2011/03/12 01:34:10 38.748 142.853 24.5 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN MAP 6.1 2011/03/12 01:19:07 -16.727 -173.174 10.9 TONGA 6.8 and 6.0 aftershocks in Japan, 6.1 in Tonga. | ||
Consolidate
United States829 Posts
On March 12 2011 10:43 VabuDeltaKaiser wrote: simply research the impact of chernobyl. russia is a mass area country, but even in germany we had an impact. japan is a super compact country, and since it is lika line, the weather is able to kill that line. (dont forget, i think about a worst case cenario with nuclear dangers. possibilities... dont get crazy, or confuse it) Chernobyl is in Ukraine, not Russia. I don't think you're educated enough to be speculating about 'worst case scenarios'. | ||
Zyte
Netherlands564 Posts
On March 12 2011 11:17 Consolidate wrote: Chernobyl is in Ukraine, not Russia. I don't think you're educated enough to be speculating about 'worst case scenarios'. It was part of the USSR back then, but ok, fair enough. | ||
Deception-35
United States113 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
LanTAs
United States1091 Posts
| ||
![]()
Spica
United States5582 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + 1.35am GMT: The two nuclear plants currently having difficulties need some explaining, to keep everything clear. Here's what we know: • Diesel generators that normally would have worked as back-ups to keep cooling systems running had been disabled by tsunami flooding. • Power supply systems that would provide emergency electricity for the plant were being put in place, the World Nuclear Association said • Both plants are light water reactors operated by the Tokyo Electric Power company (or Tepco): Fukushima Daiichi (No 1) plant: - has six reactors, three of which were shut down for maintainence. Two of the remaining reactors, Unit 1 has significant problems with a rising temperature and in another the operator says it has lost cooling ability. – the Unit 1 reactor has seen radiation levels inside its control room rise, and slightly higher radiation levels have been detected outside the reactor. Pressure inside the reactor is twice the normal level, and the operator has been forced to vent radioactive vapor to relieve the pressure. Fukushima Daini (No 2) plant – has four reactors, and in units 1, 2 and 4 of them the operator has said it has lost cooling ability. – Tepco says pressure is stable inside the reactors of the Daini plant but rising in the containment vessels. • Both plants have been declared to be in a state of emergency by the government, and residents moved outside of a 10km zone around both plants. | ||
dkim
United States255 Posts
On March 12 2011 11:31 LanTAs wrote: no tsunami damage here in the sunset district in SF one death in the bay area (SF, CA) http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/03/11/BAEU1I9993.DTL&tsp=1 | ||
Fruscainte
4596 Posts
What a guy. + Show Spoiler + ![]() | ||
kaisen
United States601 Posts
http://youropenbook.org/?q=pearl harbor&gender=any User was warned for this post | ||
BlueBird.
United States3889 Posts
On March 12 2011 11:41 kaisen wrote: LOL, these guys are funny: http://youropenbook.org/?q=pearl harbor&gender=any I can't even comprehend that thought process | ||
![]()
Spica
United States5582 Posts
1.53am: Some updated information on nuclear reactor situation unfolding in Japan. The Japanese government has been holding an emergency meeting on the Fukushima nuclear plants. Reuters has quoted an expert as saying that while some radiation may leak from the Fukushima nuclear power plant, a major disaster is unlikely. Naoto Sekimura, a professor at the University of Tokyo says "No Chernobyl is possible at a light water reactor." Loss of coolant means a temperature rise, but it also will stop the reaction. Even in the worst-case scenario, that would mean some radioactive leakage and equipment damage, but not an explosion. If venting is done carefully, there will be little leakage. Certainly not beyond the 3 km radius. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2011/mar/12/japan-tsunami-earthquake-live-coverage | ||
Serejai
6007 Posts
On March 12 2011 11:41 kaisen wrote: LOL, these guys are funny: http://youropenbook.org/?q=pearl harbor&gender=any Yeah... linking to a facebook page with a bunch of racist teenagers telling Japan they got what they deserved probably doesn't belong in this thread... | ||
Serejai
6007 Posts
On March 12 2011 11:43 Spica wrote: Apparently, a large-scale explosion like Chernobyl is unlikely to happen: So basically, we're back where we started... what, like six hours ago? I'm glad they took precautions with the evacuations, but the news really blew this out of proportion =/ | ||
| ||