EPT[UPDATE-March 15] Hwaseung Oz Uniforms - Page 17
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Dandy4
United States493 Posts
| ||
|
Ruken
United States858 Posts
| ||
lilsusie
3861 Posts
I'll see what I can do in the next few days, but I'm gonna have to refund payment to those people if I can't change the order. I'll email some people individually. | ||
|
chichom27
Ecuador56 Posts
| ||
|
Djzapz
Canada10681 Posts
On January 20 2010 16:13 Flushot wrote: This has been discussed to death my friend. There are other ways for you to test the sizes, for example, dress shirts, in that scale. Find the neck size, arm length, and shoulder breadth at a department store and match it to your size. I don't get it. If the S, M, L, XL, scale doesn't make sense for you, switch to another, more precise scale and do some measuring on your own. It's the best way to get it closest to the size you want. I know it has been discussed a lot and I read the whole thread or at least most of it. There's no absolute answer, or so it seems to me. The S, M, L, XL scale makes sense to me - however, people say that 105 is a bit smaller than L and 110 is a bit smaller than XL. Others trust the scale. At first I picked a 105 because I wanted a Large which is good for me according to the scale, but then I'm told 105 is more like Medium which would be too small for me. This leads to the dilemma, trust the people who trust the scale or trust the people who have had ANOTHER product and have found out that the scale is a bit off. I prefer to just take a 110 and that'll be fine. It's not standardized you know, 105 isn't exactly Large, so even though it has been discussed to death, I don't think anybody here knows without the shadow of a doubt what 105 is compared to Large. That's why I asked. I didn't know where to side. And IDK how to measure clothes, suppose I could've done that but eh. Anywho, it's done and 110 will be just fine. | ||
|
Lt_Anarchy
United States38 Posts
| ||
|
Flushot
United States218 Posts
On January 21 2010 02:30 Djzapz wrote: I know it has been discussed a lot and I read the whole thread or at least most of it. There's no absolute answer, or so it seems to me. The S, M, L, XL scale makes sense to me - however, people say that 105 is a bit smaller than L and 110 is a bit smaller than XL. Others trust the scale. At first I picked a 105 because I wanted a Large which is good for me according to the scale, but then I'm told 105 is more like Medium which would be too small for me. This leads to the dilemma, trust the people who trust the scale or trust the people who have had ANOTHER product and have found out that the scale is a bit off. I prefer to just take a 110 and that'll be fine. It's not standardized you know, 105 isn't exactly Large, so even though it has been discussed to death, I don't think anybody here knows without the shadow of a doubt what 105 is compared to Large. That's why I asked. I didn't know where to side. And IDK how to measure clothes, suppose I could've done that but eh. Anywho, it's done and 110 will be just fine. Yeah, I didn't mean to rag on you or anything, but it seems that the consensus is going a little higher. Asian body frames (and thus their scales) tend to be on the lower than Western sizes, so I think you went the safe route by going a little larger. The thing is the website includes the dress shirt size scale. All you would need to do is go to a department store and try on dress shirts until one fits the way you would want a jacket to fit. Then compare the number to the conversion scale and use that as a reference. I'll admit since I am small, things were simple for me, not to mention Susie had only one size around that area. It's difficult but hopefully after this run, we can help scale things for the next swag sale, if there is one  | ||
|
Djzapz
Canada10681 Posts
| ||
|
lilsusie
3861 Posts
158 jackets, 214 shirts, 246 orders total. Oh god. | ||
|
Khul Sadukar
Australia1735 Posts
credit card or cash/bank transfer ppl! | ||
Hyde
Australia14568 Posts
On January 21 2010 12:53 lilsusie wrote: Final Tally: 158 jackets, 214 shirts, 246 orders total. Oh god. Is that a record? Thank you so much Susie for all your hardwork! We really appreciate it. | ||
|
Khul Sadukar
Australia1735 Posts
On January 21 2010 12:53 lilsusie wrote: Final Tally: 158 jackets, 214 shirts, 246 orders total. Oh god. oh man, gl with that suzie! just out of curiosity are the team directly benefited by this or just like the sponsor hwaseung? | ||
|
lilsusie
3861 Posts
| ||
|
iMarshall
Norway190 Posts
| ||
|
Khul Sadukar
Australia1735 Posts
| ||
|
Magnitude
6 Posts
| ||
|
NoeNoe
Netherlands76 Posts
Now lets wait till march, i got time now to hit the gym until then so i can actualy fit in the one i ordered | ||
|
kOre
Canada3642 Posts
On January 21 2010 15:26 Khul Sadukar wrote: ok cool. was just thinking of how many nice meals the team could buy from the proceeds lol. seriously every interview they talk about food, what are they feeding them in those houses?!? lots and lots of ramen and kim-chee-jee-gae. 2 of the easiest things to make as far as good tasting food goes I could probably eat kim-chee-jee-gae for a month or so for every meal and not get sick of it | ||
|
torm3ntin
Brazil2534 Posts
| ||
|
banana
Netherlands1189 Posts
On January 21 2010 12:53 lilsusie wrote: Final Tally: 158 jackets, 214 shirts, 246 orders total. Oh god. Oh wow... crazy. | ||
| ||
