Btw: Can you solve the "Templars Nightmare" (the one were you don't get a new form) whiteout the spirit form? I was stuck in there for a pretty long time having all the other forms until i just went on to another dream and everything became easy.
On November 13 2009 01:13 Velr wrote: Btw: Can you solve the "Templars Nightmare" (the one were you don't get a new form) whiteout the spirit form? I was stuck in there for a pretty long time having all the other forms until i just went on to another dream and everything became easy.
You have to go through a Spirit Door to finish it, so you need Spirit Form.
Going to have to agree with annoying level scaling. It takes out a lot of fun from the games (sadly a lot of bioware games have scaling in one form or another, mass effect suffers from this too as does KOTOR2), and all your efforts in pimping your character with the best items in game are actually near pointless in the end (btw magic items suck in this game, there's only maybe 5-6 really epic items and even they don't decide the outcome of the battle as much as proper fireball placements).
Why bother getting exp and leveling when you can beat the final boss with an iron dagger (maybe not that drastic, but you get the idea).
I guess the dumb console kiddies can't handle being manhandled by a dragon (as you would in BG2 frequently), so they had to make sure you had a chance even if you were absolutely terrible.
My computer has an AMD Athlon XP 3200 (yes, its old), an nVidia GeForce 6600, and 2 GB of RAM. What are the chances I would be able to run this game decently at the lowest settings?
On November 13 2009 02:26 TarsTarkas wrote: My computer has an AMD Athlon XP 3200 (yes, its old), an nVidia GeForce 6600, and 2 GB of RAM. What are the chances I would be able to run this game decently at the lowest settings?
You probably won't even at lowest settings, you are below the minimum requirements.
On November 12 2009 22:04 Velr wrote: Btw: TOB was lacking and was bad compared to BG2.
I agree that ToB has a terrible linear scenario with a lot of non sense ( wtf Sarevok LOL ). It is also highly power gaming oriented. However gameplay and fights are GREAT.
I honestly think that the quality of scenarios in the BG serie is BG1> BG2 > ToB ( who cares about ToSC it has none lol ). I really enjoyed how you had to find why you are hunted by bounty hunters in BG1, also the revelation about your identity + all the Iron Throne machinations are great.
BG2 offers some better banters, decent class quests and way more interesting fights gameplay wise but its scenario isn't as interesting. It is basicly runing after Irenicus ( Sarevok was a way better badass boss btw ).
On November 13 2009 00:07 Velr wrote: (Severance: Blade of Darkness shows how it has to be done to be truly awesome).
Rune too ( love this game <3 )
On November 13 2009 00:07 Velr wrote: What Dragon Age lacks a bit, from what ive seen, is the *exploring* of BG2... BG2 had damn many buildings you could just enter... Some had nothing in them... Some had enemys... Some had damn hard enemies... Some had decent loot whiteout a fight at all. Thats the only thing i feel is really lacking, if a house is not needed for a quest, you can't get in.
The funny thing is that BG1 had even more zone to explore. One of my problems with BG2 is that it was too "urban". No more countryside zones
On November 13 2009 03:30 Velr wrote: I never liked the countryside zones. I really loved everything that was outside but kinda urban or in houses... BG2 had plenty of that .
Countryside zones with a level 1-3 group + this music was definitly one of the thing i enjoyed the most in BG1.
( and getting raped by wolves / ogres / Flind / Xvarts :D ) The lack of level scaling made your first run of the game REALLY hard and awesome because you could wander into "death zones" ( remember the maps with sirens / vampire wolves / basilics ? :p ). You could really feel the weakness of a beginner group. Also some encounters were really awesome ( Poe in Flammevin, Albert+Ruffie, Larry etc .. )
If you think about it, BG1 was actually much more massive in scale than DA:O. I mean, here I get to the capital market and it has like 4 houses I can enter, 2 of which are shops (lol) and 3 quest back alleys and 1 tavern/brothel.
In BG1 when you get to actual Baldur's Gate, the city is like what 6-7 areas, and then you have houses and sewers and temples in every area, it actually feels like a real medieval city. It felt so much more like a free world, and modern rpgs have very few areas where you can actually explore. Instead it feels very MMO-ized, NPCs have quest marks over their heads, they are all bunched up together in one location and most of the buildings are just for show.
On November 13 2009 08:18 Sadistx wrote: If you think about it, BG1 was actually much more massive in scale than DA:O. I mean, here I get to the capital market and it has like 4 houses I can enter, 2 of which are shops (lol) and 3 quest back alleys and 1 tavern/brothel.
In BG1 when you get to actual Baldur's Gate, the city is like what 6-7 areas, and then you have houses and sewers and temples in every area, it actually feels like a real medieval city. It felt so much more like a free world, and modern rpgs have very few areas where you can actually explore. Instead it feels very MMO-ized, NPCs have quest marks over their heads, they are all bunched up together in one location and most of the buildings are just for show.
Golden age of RPG is gone
On one hand I agree with you, on the other, it could get very tedious on subsequent playthroughs to reexplore every area again.
On November 12 2009 22:04 Velr wrote: Btw: TOB was lacking and was bad compared to BG2.
I agree that ToB has a terrible linear scenario with a lot of non sense ( wtf Sarevok LOL ). It is also highly power gaming oriented. However gameplay and fights are GREAT.
I honestly think that the quality of scenarios in the BG serie is BG1> BG2 > ToB ( who cares about ToSC it has none lol ). I really enjoyed how you had to find why you are hunted by bounty hunters in BG1, also the revelation about your identity + all the Iron Throne machinations are great.
BG2 offers some better banters, decent class quests and way more interesting fights gameplay wise but its scenario isn't as interesting. It is basicly runing after Irenicus ( Sarevok was a way better badass boss btw ).
edit: hunted by hunters lol
I agree, ToB still has some of the most epic fights ever conceived, although some were downright insane (that dragon that turned invisible every few seconds).
My best memories of ToB were playing it on LAN with my brother, only 2 party members each, and no pausingXD.
whats with all the enemies in the final battle having like 10 hp. They all drop in one hit exept the yellow and red ones. I doubt this was what they intended since it makes it laughably easy.
Think about it like an action movie gameguard. You commonly see your heroes slaying the lesser beasts in large battles with one stroke. I believe this is trying to simulate that atmosphere
god this game is so frustrating... It has been crashing at least 50 times now and I've lost about 10 hours of gameplay just replaying area after area. Am I really the only one having problem with constant crashes here? It seems so unlikely...
On November 14 2009 04:56 Shauni wrote: god this game is so frustrating... It has been crashing at least 50 times now and I've lost about 10 hours of gameplay just replaying area after area. Am I really the only one having problem with constant crashes here? It seems so unlikely...
Where did you buy the game from? Have you patched it to version 1.01?