Anyways has anyone found out what the cap for item power is?
Diablo IV - Page 96
Forum Index > General Games |
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Anyways has anyone found out what the cap for item power is? | ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16647 Posts
well, 50 hours in ... D4 has been awesome. However, AEW Fight Forever is too good and is much more of the game type i prefer and it just came out. I don't see myself touching D4 again for at least 6 months. I gotta credit ATVI's marketing team... they reeled me in. ![]() This is hilarious. ATVI prolly loves this... My favourite satanic happening ever... was there any whining about this show? | ||
0x64
Finland4536 Posts
On July 11 2023 14:01 JimmyJRaynor wrote: and here you are 20 years later talking about it. LOL. they've done a great job the last 20 years with the franchise. well, 50 hours in ... D4 has been awesome. However, AEW Fight Forever is too good and is much more of the game type i prefer and it just came out. I don't see myself touching D4 again for at least 6 months. I gotta credit ATVI's marketing team... they reeled me in. ![]() This is hilarious. ATVI prolly loves this... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9JZBh_eJJ8 My favourite satanic happening ever... was there any whining about this show? What's AEW? Sorry been way from gaming for a long time. | ||
izutkhjkjh
1 Post
| ||
Manit0u
Poland17237 Posts
The damage could be a bit better but at least it doesn't feel as janky as frost. Especially bosses take longer to kill now but it's no problem because I don't have to aim anything, just drop firewalls and hydras and focus on dodging mechanics while the boss dies. | ||
Latham
9558 Posts
On July 11 2023 22:07 Manit0u wrote: I must say D4 is really weirdly balanced. I've switched from shards back to fire and now my sorceress gameplay is pretty enjoyable. Compared to frost build the clear time is much slower but on the upside I never run out of health or mana so can just freely spam hydras and firewalls while everything around me dies slowly. The damage could be a bit better but at least it doesn't feel as janky as frost. Especially bosses take longer to kill now but it's no problem because I don't have to aim anything, just drop firewalls and hydras and focus on dodging mechanics while the boss dies. I would highly recommend the ice shard/blizzard hybrid build, instead of pure ice shards. A little bit slower, but safer and can push both high NM dungeons & uber lilith. | ||
Manit0u
Poland17237 Posts
On July 11 2023 22:39 Latham wrote: I would highly recommend the ice shard/blizzard hybrid build, instead of pure ice shards. A little bit slower, but safer and can push both high NM dungeons & uber lilith. I haven't finished Act III yet (lvl 45) so NM dungeons and ubers are not on my radar ![]() I'm taking it super casually, just want to finish the campaign and get all the altars before the season starts and I make a serious character. | ||
Archeon
3253 Posts
On July 11 2023 05:00 uummpaa wrote: that "imo" is the key here. for me D3 is a better game then D2, as is Last epoch. and just by player numbers alone a lot of people prefer PoE over D2. i am firmly convinced a lot of the love for D2 is because it was by far the best ARPG when LoD was released and we all loved it back then, not because it holds up all that great, but thats my very personal "imo" no wonder, D2 was done for me after they introduced waay to powerful runeword combinations (with spamable spells from other classes) and the lack of endgame (for me at least running the same paths with the same monsters over and over is no satisfactory endgame). D3 has greater rifts, and by that alone it has better endgame then D2. plus a bunch of other little reasons i dont need to go into cause its offtopic in a D4 thread But there is no point in shouting each others opinions at each other, my point was just that for a full priced game D4 is quite underwhelming and D3s terrible launch should be a dreadful exception that shouldnt be repeated at all costs, not an excuse for releasing games that will hopefully be good 1-2 years from now I think it depends on what you want to play. I enjoy ARPGs the most during the journey when the build comes together piece by piece and in regards to monster, level design and atmosphere imo no ARPG beats D2. But I agree that it's lategame was certainly lacking and if you play ARPGs for lategame and just rush through the story to hit max level then PoE, LE and probably even D3 are better games. I just don't really enjoy lategame in ARPGs, LE and PoE are the best in that regard and I still don't really enjoy it there. I also don't think current player numbers tell the whole story, I could only name a handful of males my age that haven't played D2, totally different story for PoE. PoE has definitely a greater player retention, which isn't that surprising considering it's 10 years of content updates and heavy focus on lategame (not trying to shit on them, they are doing a great job). That being said if I had to name a game that I'd vote over D2 I agree that it'd be LE. That one is another good example of a mediocre start (early access admittedly) but good development in an ARPG too though, so there's definitely enough precedent. | ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16647 Posts
On July 11 2023 16:54 0x64 wrote: What's AEW? Sorry been way from gaming for a long time. AEW Fight Forever is a pro wrestling game. the producer of the game is the producer of the much loved AKI series of pro wrestling games that includes WCW Revenge, WWF No Mercy , and Def Jam Fight For New York. Def Jam Fight For NY came out in 2004 and the combat was incredible. People have been waiting 20 years for the next game since EA severed their relationship with AKI. Also, the game is out on Switch and the multiplayer has low latency. the multiplayer combat is great. On July 11 2023 05:00 uummpaa wrote: that "imo" is the key here. for me D3 is a better game then D2, as is Last epoch. and just by player numbers alone a lot of people prefer PoE over D2. no wonder, D2 was done for me after they introduced waay to powerful.... But there is no point in shouting each others opinions at each other, .... long term engagement is objective proof of quality. For example, games like Super Tecmo Bowl and NHL '94 Hockey have flaws one can whine about forever. One can yap away about how one's theories about what "real fun" is ... is all that matters... but it doesn't. I chose two 30+ year old games to take the emotion out of the discussion. The long term engagement #s of these games prove their greatness. due to long term engagement #s... PoE is a great game... same goes for D3. Blizzard did a great job on D3. | ||
Archeon
3253 Posts
On July 12 2023 00:16 JimmyJRaynor wrote: AEW Fight Forever is a pro wrestling game. the producer of the game is the producer of the much loved AKI series of pro wrestling games that includes WCW Revenge, WWF No Mercy , and Def Jam Fight For New York. Def Jam Fight For NY came out in 2004 and the combat was incredible. People have been waiting 20 years for the next game since EA severed their relationship with AKI. Also, the game is out on Switch and the multiplayer has low latency. the multiplayer combat is great. long term engagement is objective proof of quality. For example, games like Super Tecmo Bowl and NHL '94 Hockey have flaws one can whine about forever. One can yap away about how one's theories about what "real fun" is ... is all that matters... but it doesn't. I chose two 30+ year old games to take the emotion out of the discussion. The long term engagement #s of these games prove their greatness. due to long term engagement #s... PoE is a great game... same goes for D3. Blizzard did a great job on D3. No offense, but you're the only person I ever hear talk about Super Tecmo Bowl and NHL 94. Like without you I wouldn't even know these games exist. Maybe I'm just a gen younger than you or it's a USA thing, but at least here in Germany they didn't play a role at all in the mid nineties. I don't disagree on your point though, but the fact that D2 continues to have a semi-active playerbase while it was released 23 years ago, had it's last content update 22 years ago and had it's last major patch 20 years ago is a pretty good statement about long term engagement imo. I know maybe four other games from that era that still are somewhat active (Sc1, Wc3, SSBM and AoE2) and all the others are PvP games. | ||
ProMeTheus112
France2027 Posts
| ||
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
On July 11 2023 22:07 Manit0u wrote: I must say D4 is really weirdly balanced. I've switched from shards back to fire and now my sorceress gameplay is pretty enjoyable. Compared to frost build the clear time is much slower but on the upside I never run out of health or mana so can just freely spam hydras and firewalls while everything around me dies slowly. The damage could be a bit better but at least it doesn't feel as janky as frost. Especially bosses take longer to kill now but it's no problem because I don't have to aim anything, just drop firewalls and hydras and focus on dodging mechanics while the boss dies. Ice shards is extremely good at clearing but has survivability and sustain issues once you start pushing higher NM dungeons. Same issues in more sustained encounters like bosses, events and packs of multiple elite mobs. It's pretty much a burst damage build. Later on, against mobs, frost nova (w/ ice shards enchantment) is your main mob clearer. Ice shards build runs into some aiming weirdness that D4 currently has. Sometimes it feels like my sorc shoots ice shards in totally unintended directions (rogue suffers from the same thing). When those damn flies and some charging/leaping monsters get in your face, you can miss them when shooting at point blank range. You have to reposition to hit them. | ||
Manit0u
Poland17237 Posts
On July 12 2023 03:26 andrewlt wrote: Ice shards is extremely good at clearing but has survivability and sustain issues once you start pushing higher NM dungeons. Same issues in more sustained encounters like bosses, events and packs of multiple elite mobs. It's pretty much a burst damage build. Later on, against mobs, frost nova (w/ ice shards enchantment) is your main mob clearer. Ice shards build runs into some aiming weirdness that D4 currently has. Sometimes it feels like my sorc shoots ice shards in totally unintended directions (rogue suffers from the same thing). When those damn flies and some charging/leaping monsters get in your face, you can miss them when shooting at point blank range. You have to reposition to hit them. Yes, I run into the same issues with shards and with fireball. That's why I'm using firewall instead (I don't use any core skill and it's perfectly fine). https://d4builds.gg/skill-trees/sorcerer/?skills=0000000011100000000000000000000030000000000110111011000000001511030000000001330000000000032251100000000000000011133030000000000001 This is what I'm using. Enchants being Teleport (dunno how people can live without it, much nice) and Firewall. | ||
Latham
9558 Posts
| ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16647 Posts
On July 12 2023 02:11 Archeon wrote: No offense, but you're the only person I ever hear talk about Super Tecmo Bowl and NHL 94. Like without you I wouldn't even know these games exist. Maybe I'm just a gen younger than you or it's a USA thing, but at least here in Germany they didn't play a role at all in the mid nineties. I don't disagree on your point though, but the fact that D2 continues to have a semi-active playerbase while it was released 23 years ago, had it's last content update 22 years ago and had it's last major patch 20 years ago is a pretty good statement about long term engagement imo. I know maybe four other games from that era that still are somewhat active (Sc1, Wc3, SSBM and AoE2) and all the others are PvP games. i'm 35. i've been playing NHL '94 since i was 8. When I was 8 there was a giant NHL '94 tournament in a big shopping mall near me that attracted hundreds of competitors. It was wild. NHL '94 tourneys continue to this day. I selected those 2 games because they are indisputably great games because there is still a competitive scene for both of those games. Released in '91 ... and this commercial was ~ 2017. Tecmo Bowl is a timeless classic. On July 12 2023 02:11 Archeon wrote: No offense, but you're the only person I ever hear talk about Super Tecmo Bowl and NHL 94. Like without you I wouldn't even know these games exist. A lot of people on this forum don't know much about the history of the video game industry. However, they have some very loud opinions. I find the industry and its history, dating back to the 70s, to be super fascinating. | ||
Fleetfeet
Canada2522 Posts
I have heard of tecmo bowl outside of these circles, though never played any of them. Being honest, sports games died alongside couch co-op for me. | ||
Harris1st
Germany6818 Posts
| ||
Archeon
3253 Posts
All my friends back then didn't care much for football back in the day, so we weren't exactly the target audience to begin with. I'm sorry I doubted you JimmyRaynor. I grew up with Wc2, AoE1, Majora's Mask and Super Mario World 1 and 2. Good times. | ||
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
| ||
0x64
Finland4536 Posts
On July 13 2023 06:07 andrewlt wrote: I'm 39 and I was 13 when Diablo was released. Still managed to get a copy that year. I was 15, got it in Hawaii for my birthday, we were 3 weeks there for holiday, I played also a high level chess tournament. Rest of the time, played... Diablo :D Damn it was good. | ||
| ||