EPT[wow] Warlords of Draenor - Page 195
| Forum Index > General Games |
Add yourself to the player list | ||
|
Atreides
United States2393 Posts
| ||
|
farvacola
United States18876 Posts
| ||
|
m4ini
4215 Posts
edit: just had a brief check, that's actually even dumber than i thought it would be. I briefly logged onto my 85 shaman, to check how much XP he needs to lvl 86, and that would be 517.000. My mage from level 68 to 69 needs 288.000 already. On 85, every quest turned in gives you roughly 2,5% of your level, on 68 it's roughly 0.6%. No wonder that it takes ages. edit 2: i lied, hm. It's actually less than 0.6%, a turned in quest gives you 12k/288k. More like 0.4%. | ||
|
RvB
Netherlands6326 Posts
On October 22 2014 04:40 Atreides wrote: For a lot of people, myself included, 60-70 is one of the most enjoyable leveling ranges just because we loved that expansion and there is a lot of nostalgia. It is not necessarily because of ease of leveling. I actually despise all of 80-90 leveling for the same reason. I still remember all the bitching in TBC about how vanilla was way better and now it's the best expansion apparently. | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands22706 Posts
On October 22 2014 04:59 RvB wrote: I still remember all the bitching in TBC about how vanilla was way better and now it's the best expansion apparently. Pff Wotlk was the most hated shit I have ever seen and now its also seen as great. | ||
|
Godwrath
Spain10168 Posts
On October 22 2014 04:59 RvB wrote: I still remember all the bitching in TBC about how vanilla was way better and now it's the best expansion apparently. TBC It is the best expansion, but Vanilla was better :D | ||
|
m4ini
4215 Posts
In reality, vanilla is the best.  BC is by far the worst, since like 87% of people lvling there are deafknights. At least, were. edit: obviously it's just my opinion. But i really miss 40s. | ||
|
Ethelis
United States2400 Posts
| ||
Teoita
Italy12248 Posts
| ||
|
m4ini
4215 Posts
On October 22 2014 05:22 Teoita wrote: Dk's didn't exist in BC.... Didn't know that they don't need to level through BC. Because that's what i said..................... | ||
|
Teoita
Italy12248 Posts
| ||
|
m4ini
4215 Posts
| ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands22706 Posts
On October 22 2014 05:26 m4ini wrote: Yeah, that's the reason why i hate WotLK, because it introduced them - at a time where i was playing restodruid. And they kinda made restodruids completely useless (old plague strike, still can't get over it how a designteam has to work for them to wave it through in that form). The same way a design team made the 100's of stupid choices they did with the class remakes for WOD :p | ||
|
m4ini
4215 Posts
On October 22 2014 05:27 Gorsameth wrote: The same way a design team made the 100's of stupid choices they did with the class remakes for WOD :p Well to be fair, as retarded as the class-changes are (i still stand firm behind that opinion), i yet have to see a skill or something that renders another spec completely useless. It wasn't even a balancing issue back in the day, it was the fact that a resto had to heal via HoTs (the strong instants weren't there yet) - and another class removed all of them with a spamable skill. That one skill in it's original form basically made another class (spec, rather) completely unplayable. Not because it was hard to play around it (like warris in arenas could/can play around frostmages), but because you simply could not play around it. It's not like DKs didn't do damage either, they hitted harder than any other meleeclass. Sorry for the rant, but honestly, that one for me takes the cake for the most retarded decision the designteam ever did. Up to today that pisses me off kinda :D edit: and i know that priests/shamans could dispel HoTs as well, but they procced the endheal of Lifebloom, plague strike didn't. It just removed everything, and on top of that, it was part of their "damagerotation" anyway, so they didn't even have to make a concious decision to remove stuff "now", it just happened. | ||
|
Duka08
3391 Posts
In every other expansion+vanilla*, I have zones I love and zones I hate, so it all smears out a bit. TBC content is still reliably entertaining, if not for the change of pace alone after doing the "clumpy"/regionalized end of Azeroth. *sans Pandaria, which I universally hate just for it's monotony and drabness. I actually didn't hate MoP (expansion) as much as a lot of people seemed to; I thought it introduced a lot of good new ideas and quality of life stuff that will be great moving forward. I just disliked Pandaria itself quite a bit. | ||
|
m4ini
4215 Posts
It's my preferred way of questing, and is insanely fast these days with heirlooms Not true anymore. By experience, just started blades edge now - went through all quests in nagrand (like an hour ago) and barely reached 68 (started at 66). Full heirlooms. edit: apart from that, you're right. I'm sick of TBC because i've literally seen everything there. Millions of times. There's where things differ though: i like the small questhubs, 5 quests, kill stuff, collect things, turn in quests, next 5 please. My prefered way of questing. Most likely that's part of my aversion for TBC too. | ||
|
Catch]22
Sweden2683 Posts
| ||
|
Teoita
Italy12248 Posts
My favourite quest chain is still the Thorim one in storm peaks though. | ||
|
ViperPL
Poland1775 Posts
On October 22 2014 04:33 Godwrath wrote: If you can reliabily queue up for dungeons, do it. It is much faster imo to level up that way at those levels. ViperPL, do you mean post patch ? Because XP changed a lot. I never did TBC levels post 6.0 so don't know if it changed, but before the patch it was very fast, unlike 85-90, which took forever. Now, after 6.0 I only did 85-90 and it was a breez, but no idea about Outland. | ||
|
m4ini
4215 Posts
On October 22 2014 06:28 ViperPL wrote: I never did TBC levels post 6.0 so don't know if it changed, but before the patch it was very fast, unlike 85-90, which took forever. Now, after 6.0 I only did 85-90 and it was a breez, but no idea about Outland. It basically is the other way around now. 85-90 is almost too fast, and 65-70 takes waay too long now. | ||
| ||
