
Pokemon X and Y [3DS] - Page 20
Forum Index > General Games |
![]()
ETisME
12306 Posts
![]() | ||
TMG26
Portugal2017 Posts
On September 12 2013 22:53 AwayFromLife wrote: Also a Dragon/Fairy type might be broken OP... Yeah, Puck is a pretty strong mid. | ||
Archas
United States6531 Posts
On September 17 2013 22:39 ETisME wrote: still not sure how I feel about them messing with the older pokemon, they are classic for a reason ![]() The first-gen Pokémon have received numerous alterations in every subsequent set of games, from type changes to new evolutions to movepool expansions. Why is the concept of Mega evolution for a select few Pokémon now the tipping point? If you view that as "messing with them", then you ought to realize that they've been messed with in every new generation. I love Red and Blue, but nostalgia takes a back seat to innovation and variety here. | ||
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
rofl. | ||
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On September 17 2013 22:39 ETisME wrote: still not sure how I feel about them messing with the older pokemon, they are classic for a reason ![]() Too much power creep in pokemon not to change them. They may be classic but around 130 of them are useless. | ||
![]()
ETisME
12306 Posts
On September 17 2013 22:51 Archas wrote: The first-gen Pokémon have received numerous alterations in every subsequent set of games, from type changes to new evolutions to movepool expansions. Why is the concept of Mega evolution for a select few Pokémon now the tipping point? If you view that as "messing with them", then you ought to realize that they've been messed with in every new generation. I love Red and Blue, but nostalgia takes a back seat to innovation and variety here. because they were the originals and charizard especially has a special spot in every kid's heart because it was a damn cool badass dragon ![]() I even prefer that chubby pikachu than the newer slimmed diet pikachu oh well, time flies and things change I guess T T | ||
![]()
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES49507 Posts
On September 17 2013 19:55 Drazerk wrote: Fuck yeah mega heracross because of TheAntz I strangely see myself reading that as "Reach just got more manly" | ||
Archas
United States6531 Posts
On September 17 2013 23:24 Drazerk wrote: Too much power creep in pokemon not to change them. They may be classic but around 130 of them are useless. Far fewer than that if you count Little Cup. You're right, though: too many Gen 1 Pokémon simply aren't relevant because of typing or BST limitations. Lapras, for example, should be an absolute monster on paper, but its shoddy typing holds it back immeasurably. If it got a Mega evolution that made it Water/Dragon, I guarantee that it would instantly become amazing. | ||
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On September 17 2013 23:29 Archas wrote: Far fewer than that if you count Little Cup. You're right, though: too many Gen 1 Pokémon simply aren't relevant because of typing or BST limitations. Lapras, for example, should be an absolute monster on paper, but its shoddy typing holds it back immeasurably. If it got a Mega evolution that made it Water/Dragon, I guarantee that it would instantly become amazing. Hopefully they will nerf stealth rock in gen 6 to solve the horrible type issues like that. But yeah I completely forgot little cup existed after Stadium 2. | ||
XaCez
Sweden6991 Posts
| ||
Cubu
1171 Posts
| ||
![]()
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On September 17 2013 23:24 Drazerk wrote: Too much power creep in pokemon not to change them. They may be classic but around 130 of them are useless. And that's not counting the fact that Dream World abilities already single-handedly made a couple "classics" playable again. | ||
Zinnwaldite
Norway1567 Posts
| ||
![]()
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On September 18 2013 02:02 Zinnwaldite wrote:Let's make...an earwax pokemon. I'd use it. | ||
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
![]() | ||
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On September 18 2013 02:11 VayneAuthority wrote: the people that complain about the garbage bag are hilarious considering grimer/muk...the pokemon first gen hipsters are the only thing annoying about this game ![]() I like grimer / muk ![]() Also the fact the great ball wasn't based on electrode... Seriously why isn't that already a thing? | ||
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
On September 18 2013 02:20 Drazerk wrote: I like grimer / muk ![]() Also the fact the great ball wasn't based on electrode... Seriously why isn't that already a thing? I don't mind any of the designs, Im only ever concerned about the difficulty and the amount of features in each gen. Just making the point that grimer/muk is the blueprint for the garbage bag dudes and they are essentially identical. | ||
IntoTheEmo
Singapore1169 Posts
On September 17 2013 23:27 ETisME wrote: because they were the originals and charizard especially has a special spot in every kid's heart because it was a damn cool badass dragon ![]() I even prefer that chubby pikachu than the newer slimmed diet pikachu oh well, time flies and things change I guess T T :s Charizard wasn't my favourite Pokemon as a kid (Jolteon was), but now the first thing that comes to mind with Charizard is 4x Stealth Rock weakness! It's almost here! Less than a month to go. Haven't been this pumped up for a new game since they announced vanilla World of Warcraft. | ||
![]()
MoonBear
Straight outta Johto18973 Posts
Meowstick is also pretty cute. | ||
VashTS
United States1675 Posts
On September 18 2013 02:35 MoonBear wrote: The list of Mega Evos VashTS posted is supposedly faked due to the inconsistent usage of kanji instead of katakana and other stuff. Meowstick is also pretty cute. Fuck. | ||
| ||