Ubisofts new IP Watch Dogs! Looks amazing. - Page 13
Forum Index > General Games |
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
| ||
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
| ||
Atticus.axl
United States456 Posts
On June 01 2014 01:36 Torte de Lini wrote: Silly question, but how do I get to inside people's houses and their conversations/mannerisms? There are ctOS towers (red) on your map that once accessed give you some eyeball markers on your map. | ||
Capped
United Kingdom7236 Posts
On May 29 2014 23:26 Tresher wrote: The guy who made this video is a retard. He has some valid points here and there like the effects on water when you shoot it. Something like that shouldnt be 2014. But man this must be the whiniest nitpicker I´ve seen in a long time. Worst thing is that 3000+ people jump on the hatetrain so easy without trying it themselves. Some people just dont want to have fun and have a good time. Some points are just stupid he made: - Yes it has bugs and glitches but show me one game that doesnt have that nowadays. I think the only games that are bugfree are Nintendo games or a good amount of japanese games in general. If its not game breaking its not that bad. And its nothing that cant be patched. - He refers to PS 2 when he thinks something looks bad (when it actually isnt that bad). Most ragdolls in games look kinda silly. The only games where it looked somewhat realistic was GTA 4 and 5 cause of Euphoria. PS 2 was pretty good for its time so I dont get why people always mention "Playstaion 2 graphics" when it clearly isnt. - No Cheat Codes..... Really? What have Cheat Codes to do with "Next gen"? (Ignoring the fact that it isnt Next gen atleast for PC. TB made that point). This is one of the guys that plays Gta or any other sandbox game with cheats and then throws it into a corner cause its boring. If you think this is a bad PC Port. DONT PLAY IT ON PC GODDAMNIT. If you think its not worth 60 € or your regional equivalent. Dont buy it on the first day. Especially for PC where prices for games get lowered really fast anyways. Games are way overpriced anyways these days and you should only pay so much for a game when you really are a fanboy and have waited long for a game and you really want it. Test it before you buy it. Ask a friend if hes got the game and give it a go(Cause demos are really rare these days). And to the guy some posts above saying "consoles kill games". No. Just No. Thats not the problem. The problem are developers that think its a good idea to port every game for every system. It mostly started when Microsoft wanted some of the pie too and decided to throw a console on the market. Before it was way better. Only buy exclusives for PC and exclusives for Console. I do that too and I have no problems. Some games are better on Console (racing games and fighting games) and some are better on PC (Fps or mostly shooters in general and Strategy games). I have both PC and Playstation and Im totally fine with both of them. As long as you play the right games on the right systems. Some of that shit is absolutely awful lol. | ||
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
| ||
Tula
Austria1544 Posts
On June 01 2014 08:01 Torte de Lini wrote: What can you buy in this game? I have about 78k just from fucking around and I never figured out what to buy except guns (but I like the silencer pistol...) guns and the parts to build equipment (IED etc.) are the only usefull moneysinks I have found. Yes you can "buy" cars through the app, but considering how fast they get "lost" during missions, I've almost never used that. Short review, in general the game is fun and runs better than I expected (PS3 version), the loadtimes are very long, but since I had my doubts if it would even run properly that is no problem. The physics are a little disappointing, but it is good enough to have fun. In general the engine seems a bit behind the GTA5 engine, but comparing it to GTA3 is frankly insulting. The hacking itself and "interaction" with the city is fun and makes car chases less tedious than they were in GTA, but I dearly wish I could shoot out of my car. Gunplay seems fairly standard console level, imho better than GTA 5. Fighting itself during the scripted campaign missions is the right mix of hacking stuff, straight up shooting or sneaking depending on your preferences. The story (spoiler free) is a little disappointing, I expected a bit more of Vigilante fighting against "the corporation" from the trailers, instead it was a decent tale about one man and his ghosts, but many things about bloom and ctos in general were not resolved at all (heck they were only hinted at in the game itself). Multiplayer seems fun on the console, and the integration of invasions (had 5 during my playthrough) is very smooth. The only thing I really dislike is how little you can actually do during matchmaking (no shopping is my major gripe). Basically i waste my time during matchmaking hacking random people and finding landmarks (btw, whoever coded the "landmark loading script" on the PS3 deserves to be fired. that datapacket should not be above 5kb in size, so why exactly does it take 25 seconds to load each landmark?). All in all it was a great game, but it is not the milestone we have been hoping for (basically the same feeling i had about AC 3 and 4). | ||
Connor987
United Kingdom103 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0086396/?ref_=tt_cl_t4 Voice actress is Trois Rivieres rofl | ||
rebuffering
Canada2436 Posts
On June 02 2014 05:58 Torte de Lini wrote: Shit man, Clara's voice is so off-putting. It's Quebecois, but her pronunciation of Quebec profanities is so fucking off. http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0086396/?ref_=tt_cl_t4 Voice actress is Trois Rivieres rofl Yeah the way she says "Calisse" is awful, its pronounced "câlice", for a french studio, i don't know how you fuck that up. | ||
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On June 02 2014 13:07 rebuffering wrote: Yeah the way she says "Calisse" is awful, its pronounced "câlice", for a french studio, i don't know how you fuck that up. I don't know either since she's from Quebec, but she sounds just absolutely wrong. | ||
Judicator
United States7270 Posts
Anyways finished up the game, Ubisoft does have a nice base to build on here. Assassin's Creed was underwhelming when it first came out too (Prince of Persia in 3D!!!) but that franchise has redeemed itself since its launch title. If the driving gets tuned, the online stuff gets fixed/removed, then it was a pretty good game. As for people saying some of the factions are under-involved in the story, I think that's the point? Like it's easy to get caught up in the single man versus the world and that's a bit unrealistic since his motivations aren't that grandiose. The disconnect is that midway through the story and especially towards the end, Aiden's dialogue kind of shifted towards adapting that vigilante persona. I enjoyed it, probably will finish the game and attempt at 100% when I have time. | ||
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
Also, what's the point of reputation scale? | ||
Enox
Germany1667 Posts
| ||
Enox
Germany1667 Posts
On June 03 2014 00:08 Judicator wrote: Chicago got to her. (I have no idea what and if even a Chicago accent exists) Anyways finished up the game, Ubisoft does have a nice base to build on here. Assassin's Creed was underwhelming when it first came out too (Prince of Persia in 3D!!!) but that franchise has redeemed itself since its launch title. If the driving gets tuned, the online stuff gets fixed/removed, then it was a pretty good game. As for people saying some of the factions are under-involved in the story, I think that's the point? Like it's easy to get caught up in the single man versus the world and that's a bit unrealistic since his motivations aren't that grandiose. The disconnect is that midway through the story and especially towards the end, Aiden's dialogue kind of shifted towards adapting that vigilante persona. I enjoyed it, probably will finish the game and attempt at 100% when I have time. whats the problem with the online modes? imo they are really fun and you are never forced to play them. why should additional content be removed if its completely optional? | ||
HeeroFX
United States2704 Posts
| ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21675 Posts
On June 04 2014 02:45 HeeroFX wrote: Rented the game yesterday. Just completed act 1. I don't want to sound like a troll or anything. But I feel like the game was a bit over hyped. Hacking, and combat stuff are fun. The story is pretty interesting so far. Graphically the PS3 version seems really...bad. But that could be that I was expecting it to be like GTA V. The characters all seem pretty interesting. I honestly feel like I have no reason to dive deeper into exploring the city and doing side missions. The game was hyped because it showed great potential. And then they released a distinctly mediocre game | ||
Human41
Gabon8 Posts
On June 04 2014 02:45 HeeroFX wrote: Graphically the PS3 version seems really...bad. But that could be that I was expecting it to be like GTA V. Are you drunk? GTA5 on consoles looks like horseshit. I could never play it, the graphics are worse than PC Games from 2005. Not even to mention the FPS slowdowns under 25 and all the aliasing. User was banned for this post. | ||
Thalandros
Netherlands1151 Posts
On June 04 2014 02:45 HeeroFX wrote: Rented the game yesterday. Just completed act 1. I don't want to sound like a troll or anything. But I feel like the game was a bit over hyped. Hacking, and combat stuff are fun. The story is pretty interesting so far. Graphically the PS3 version seems really...bad. But that could be that I was expecting it to be like GTA V. The characters all seem pretty interesting. I honestly feel like I have no reason to dive deeper into exploring the city and doing side missions. There's not a single game that doesn't look shit compared to current AAA games on PC, really. Watch Dogs was a bit underwhelming on PC aswell, but not nearly enough as the consoles (yes, even PS4 and Xbox one) the consoles just have huge limitations though. If you're playing for graphics, don't play on console, simple as that. (neither should you for any other reason but we'll leave that for another time ![]() The game looked okay ish to me, I didn't mind, it's an open world game, and I really didn't care as much about how pretty as it is as I did about the mechanics. Witcher 3 is a game where I'm going to care about pretty stuff! | ||
Thalandros
Netherlands1151 Posts
On June 04 2014 02:45 HeeroFX wrote: Rented the game yesterday. Just completed act 1. I don't want to sound like a troll or anything. But I feel like the game was a bit over hyped. Hacking, and combat stuff are fun. The story is pretty interesting so far. Graphically the PS3 version seems really...bad. But that could be that I was expecting it to be like GTA V. The characters all seem pretty interesting. I honestly feel like I have no reason to dive deeper into exploring the city and doing side missions. There's not a single game that doesn't look shit compared to current AAA games on PC, really. Watch Dogs was a bit underwhelming on PC aswell, but not nearly enough as the consoles (yes, even PS4 and Xbox one) the consoles just have huge limitations though. If you're playing for graphics, don't play on console, simple as that. (neither should you for any other reason but we'll leave that for another time ![]() The game looked okay ish to me, I didn't mind, it's an open world game, and I really didn't care as much about how pretty as it is as I did about the mechanics. Witcher 3 is a game where I'm going to care about pretty stuff! | ||
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Really? Love interest between Aiden and Clara and Aiden is still a massive nerdy shy ass? He's got both a "badass" voice and a shy guy who can't make the moves on a girl who obviously wants to stay? Goddamn | ||
| ||