![[image loading]](http://2.media.bustedtees.cvcdn.com/c/-/bustedtees.aaf1ddbc-59c4-4d7b-aa23-4bd9457dfa2c.jpg)
NFL 2012 Season - Page 206
Forum Index > General Games |
![]()
GTR
51486 Posts
![]() | ||
corpuscle
United States1967 Posts
Also, I just have to say, if my fantasy team had played this week, I would have had 157 points. | ||
BloodNinja
United States2791 Posts
Week 1: #1 and #2 seeds have a bye. #6 at #3 #5 at #4 Week 2: Lowest seed remaining at #1 2nd lowest at #2 Week 3: NFC/AFC Championship games Week 4: SuperBowl | ||
darthfoley
United States8004 Posts
The Panthers will be in playoff contention if they play like they did the 2nd half of the season The Saints will be also once they get Sean Payton and an improved defense The Falcons will be similar to this year The Bucs will still be shit lol | ||
![]()
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
| ||
tuho12345
4482 Posts
On January 02 2013 01:34 darthfoley wrote: the NFC south will be the toughest division in football next year. The Panthers will be in playoff contention if they play like they did the 2nd half of the season The Saints will be also once they get Sean Payton and an improved defense The Falcons will be similar to this year The Bucs will still be shit lol NFC west is the toughest, sorry lol. | ||
Sermokala
United States14017 Posts
Packers bears vikings and the lions? even our shitty team is miles ahead of other divisions shitty teams. | ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
On January 02 2013 04:47 Sermokala wrote: the AFC north is was and shall continue to be the toughest division in professional football thank you very much. Packers bears vikings and the lions? even our shitty team is miles ahead of other divisions shitty teams. NFC north? | ||
Sermokala
United States14017 Posts
| ||
darthfoley
United States8004 Posts
On January 02 2013 04:47 Sermokala wrote: the AFC north is was and shall continue to be the toughest division in professional football thank you very much. Packers bears vikings and the lions? even our shitty team is miles ahead of other divisions shitty teams. The Lions went 4-12... | ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
Megatron was madden cursed though. Next year... 3000 yards 30 tds ![]() in seriousness though, the Lions have a decent roster. I was a little surprised they only went 4-12 | ||
thuracine
United States582 Posts
they also played a tough schedule. 9 games versus teams that made the playoffs and 2 bears game who just missed a spot. | ||
semantics
10040 Posts
On January 02 2013 05:50 Shellshock1122 wrote: Megatron was madden cursed though. Next year... 3000 yards 30 tds ![]() in seriousness though, the Lions have a decent roster. I was a little surprised they only went 4-12 Problem in their coaching, talents there but all they do is chuck the ball all day easy to put up large throwing and reciveing stats when it's all you do. And i do mean chuck the ball they throw that deep ball like once every 2 downs. I mean when you look at the teams with just a passing attack and a mediocre ground game, Cowboys, Lions, Saints all top 3 in number of throws made a game, Cowboys only one that seemed like real contenders throughout the season even if they were bottom barrel post season team because it has a defense behind that. But when you're chuck it all day you throw picks. Saints did a little better in that chuck the ball first offense because they have brees who is a monster, although their problems also some what come from brees and his contract eating up a large chunk of the cap, and poor coaching on defense side which was unable to deal with the new players on that defense, thanks to brees scraping the bottom of the barrel to get some players. | ||
Ferrose
United States11378 Posts
On January 02 2013 06:14 thuracine wrote: they also played a tough schedule. 9 games versus teams that made the playoffs and 2 bears game who just missed a spot. They had the toughest strength of schedule in the entire NFL, and they were competitive in every game in the fourth quarter, except the Arizona and Atlanta games. They'd be a playoff team again if they didn't choke in every game. Looks like Andy Reid might become the next coach of the Cardinals. | ||
DannyJ
United States5110 Posts
| ||
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
Cincinnati over Houston: The Bengals have been surprisingly good recently. Conversely, when was the last time that Houston played a good game? If you look at their record since their bye week, there's a lot to be desired. They have three convincing wins over the Colts, Titans, and Bills. They have OT wins against the Jags and Lions. They have a 13-6 win against the Bears. Then, they have three losses against playoff teams, including beatings that were handed out by the Vikings and Pats. Don't get me wrong. I'm not sold on the Bengals being a "good" team. However, I think that they are playing better than the Texans right now. Baltimore over Indianapolis: The Ravens have not been too hot recently, but their losses over the past month have all been to decent/playoff teams (Steelers, Skins, Broncos, Bengals [though that game didn't count]). I still think that they are better than the Colts. In fact, I think that the Colts have been remarkably fortunate this year, and their team is not as good as their record reflects. I can see the Colts winning this, but I expect the Ravens to. Besides, who doesn't want to see Pats-Ravens? Green Bay over Minnesota: The Vikings barely squeaked by the Packers last week with a superhuman effort from Peterson and homefield advantage. This next one is at Lambeau. I can't imagine that the Packers would lose twice in a row to the Vikes. Seattle over Washington: Seattle is just the better team, period. That said, I can totally see Seattle laying an egg on the road as they have been prone to do this year. | ||
Intact
Sweden634 Posts
| ||
semantics
10040 Posts
On January 02 2013 10:16 Intact wrote: AD has 409 yards in 2 games vs packers this season. I'm not convinced they can stop him. It all depends on ponder last game he didn't play poorly and he was able to get passing td's in and take care of the ball the game where the vikes lost he played like shit. So what do you have more faith in? Rodgers being slowed down by vikes def or ponder being able to play well against the packers again. | ||
Sermokala
United States14017 Posts
that being said though Minnesota Has a huge advantage in defense and special teams. A miracle can happen. | ||
QuanticHawk
United States32081 Posts
I think the AFC teams pretty easily handle their games. The NFC ones will be much more tight. I can see being totally wrong on both of those NFC games, but it is just a hunch. Those picks are mostly that I think Peterson is gonna absolutely light up that Packer D early, meaning they'll be playing from ahead. I think the Vikes are very average otherwise besides him and Harvin, but Peterson is that damn good that with a 2 score lead they can chew the clock and hang on. I think the Seahawks are much much better at home. I think RG3 just gets an early lead and Wilson isn't good enough yet to come from behind. The AFC is gonna be really interesting in the next round. Any como of houston, baltimore, denver and new england is gonna be awesome. I will probably be rooting for Houston and Baltimore. Love houston's style of play, and I wanna see heads explode by Flacco getting to the big dance and being called elite | ||
| ||