|
On February 06 2012 04:09 sleigh bells wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 04:08 DEN1ED wrote:On February 06 2012 04:06 Klive5ive wrote:On February 06 2012 04:04 sleigh bells wrote:On February 06 2012 04:01 OneOther wrote: Flacco played superbly in the first three quarters (better than Tom) and he's certainly above average. What the fuck are you talking about? Can you name 16 quarterbacks who are better than Flacco?
Denver relies on low scoring games with defense playing well and grinding out the clock with its running game. Well, its defense failed so they got destroyed. why yes http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/quarterbackRating/seasontype/2 Lol that is a pretty epic comeback. You've even got 1 QB to spare! Any statistic that has Romo at 4th is clearly flawed. http://footballoutsiders.com/stats/qbi guess they're ALL flawed you should publish your personal rankings because your eyes are OP
There is more to being a QB then just numbers...
|
On February 06 2012 04:08 DEN1ED wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 04:06 Klive5ive wrote:On February 06 2012 04:04 sleigh bells wrote:On February 06 2012 04:01 OneOther wrote: Flacco played superbly in the first three quarters (better than Tom) and he's certainly above average. What the fuck are you talking about? Can you name 16 quarterbacks who are better than Flacco?
Denver relies on low scoring games with defense playing well and grinding out the clock with its running game. Well, its defense failed so they got destroyed. why yes http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/quarterbackRating/seasontype/2 Lol that is a pretty epic comeback. You've even got 1 QB to spare! Any statistic that has Romo at 4th is clearly flawed. Tony Romo isn't shit and sure he puts up good numbers but he isnt even in the top 10 QBs. Maybe once he stops throwing games away. Yeah, you're just delusional if you think Romo isn't at minimum a top 10 in this league. Care to name a QB that isn't: both Manning brothers/Brady/Rodgers/Roethlisburger/Brees/Stafford who is better than him? I'll lol if you say Rivers as he is now. And oh wait, that's only 8 people better than him!
|
On February 06 2012 04:11 GARO wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 04:08 DEN1ED wrote:On February 06 2012 04:06 Klive5ive wrote:On February 06 2012 04:04 sleigh bells wrote:On February 06 2012 04:01 OneOther wrote: Flacco played superbly in the first three quarters (better than Tom) and he's certainly above average. What the fuck are you talking about? Can you name 16 quarterbacks who are better than Flacco?
Denver relies on low scoring games with defense playing well and grinding out the clock with its running game. Well, its defense failed so they got destroyed. why yes http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/quarterbackRating/seasontype/2 Lol that is a pretty epic comeback. You've even got 1 QB to spare! Any statistic that has Romo at 4th is clearly flawed. Tony Romo isn't shit and sure he puts up good numbers but he isnt even in the top 10 QBs. Maybe once he stops throwing games away. Yeah, you're just delusional if you think Romo isn't at minimum a top 10 in this league. and joe fucking flacco is above average? seriously.
|
United States10774 Posts
On February 06 2012 04:06 Klive5ive wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 04:04 sleigh bells wrote:On February 06 2012 04:01 OneOther wrote: Flacco played superbly in the first three quarters (better than Tom) and he's certainly above average. What the fuck are you talking about? Can you name 16 quarterbacks who are better than Flacco?
Denver relies on low scoring games with defense playing well and grinding out the clock with its running game. Well, its defense failed so they got destroyed. why yes http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/quarterbackRating/seasontype/2 Lol that is a pretty epic comeback. You've even got 1 QB to spare! Epic comeback? Are you like...serious? I thought you just made a point earlier about statistics being a bad measurement. This is the worst example possible. I don't understand how you make a statistical argument one way then use the same thing the other way hahaha. Ironic much.
You have guys like Moore, Kolb and Cutler (who is a good quarterback but got injured halfway) up there with fewer than 200 passes attempted than Flacco. Vick? 100 fewer passes, fewer touchdowns and more interceptions than Flacco. Same story for Hasselback.
|
United States10774 Posts
Romo is a good quarterback. I would put Brady/Brees/Rodgers/Stafford/Manning above him, personally. Then the next tier with Romo/Big Ben/Rivers.
Also, according to that ranking you posted, Flacco is above average, no?
|
On February 06 2012 04:11 GARO wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 04:08 DEN1ED wrote:On February 06 2012 04:06 Klive5ive wrote:On February 06 2012 04:04 sleigh bells wrote:On February 06 2012 04:01 OneOther wrote: Flacco played superbly in the first three quarters (better than Tom) and he's certainly above average. What the fuck are you talking about? Can you name 16 quarterbacks who are better than Flacco?
Denver relies on low scoring games with defense playing well and grinding out the clock with its running game. Well, its defense failed so they got destroyed. why yes http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/quarterbackRating/seasontype/2 Lol that is a pretty epic comeback. You've even got 1 QB to spare! Any statistic that has Romo at 4th is clearly flawed. Tony Romo isn't shit and sure he puts up good numbers but he isnt even in the top 10 QBs. Maybe once he stops throwing games away. Yeah, you're just delusional if you think Romo isn't at minimum a top 10 in this league. Care to name a QB that isn't both Manning brothers/Brady/Roethlisburger/Brees/Stafford who is better than him? I'll lol if you say Rivers as he is now.
Top QBs lead their teams to the playoffs. There is no way cowboys should not make the playoffs with the talent they have and how "awesome" their QB is. Romo can put up all the numbers he wants but until he stops making terrible decisions with the game on the line it doesn't matter.
|
On February 06 2012 04:13 OneOther wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 04:06 Klive5ive wrote:On February 06 2012 04:04 sleigh bells wrote:On February 06 2012 04:01 OneOther wrote: Flacco played superbly in the first three quarters (better than Tom) and he's certainly above average. What the fuck are you talking about? Can you name 16 quarterbacks who are better than Flacco?
Denver relies on low scoring games with defense playing well and grinding out the clock with its running game. Well, its defense failed so they got destroyed. why yes http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/quarterbackRating/seasontype/2 Lol that is a pretty epic comeback. You've even got 1 QB to spare! Epic comeback? Are you like...serious? I thought you just made a point earlier about statistics being a bad measurement. This is the worst example possible. I don't understand how you make a statistical argument one way then use the same thing the other way hahaha. Ironic much. You have guys like Moore, Kolb and Cutler (who is a good quarterback but got injured halfway) up there with fewer than 200 passes attempted than Flacco. Vick? 100 fewer passes, fewer touchdowns and more interceptions than Flacco. Same story for Hasselback. you use numbers to fight numbers? you ignore flacco's dinky ass 6.6 YPA which means that he has those mediocre TD/INT and 57.6% completion rate even while playing the bus driver? that means he plays safer than even alex fucking smith...and still sucks.
and any team would be stark raving mad to take flacco over andy dalton
|
On February 06 2012 04:16 DEN1ED wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 04:11 GARO wrote:On February 06 2012 04:08 DEN1ED wrote:On February 06 2012 04:06 Klive5ive wrote:On February 06 2012 04:04 sleigh bells wrote:On February 06 2012 04:01 OneOther wrote: Flacco played superbly in the first three quarters (better than Tom) and he's certainly above average. What the fuck are you talking about? Can you name 16 quarterbacks who are better than Flacco?
Denver relies on low scoring games with defense playing well and grinding out the clock with its running game. Well, its defense failed so they got destroyed. why yes http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/quarterbackRating/seasontype/2 Lol that is a pretty epic comeback. You've even got 1 QB to spare! Any statistic that has Romo at 4th is clearly flawed. Tony Romo isn't shit and sure he puts up good numbers but he isnt even in the top 10 QBs. Maybe once he stops throwing games away. Yeah, you're just delusional if you think Romo isn't at minimum a top 10 in this league. Care to name a QB that isn't both Manning brothers/Brady/Roethlisburger/Brees/Stafford who is better than him? I'll lol if you say Rivers as he is now. Top QBs lead their teams to the playoffs. There is no way cowboys should not make the playoffs with the talent they have and how "awesome" their QB is. Romo can put up all the numbers he wants but until he stops making terrible decisions with the game on the line it doesn't matter. HAVE YOU SEEN OUR DEFENSE? DOES ROMO PLAY CB??
|
Flacco is like Sanchez, carried by his defense. Tho, if Ravens can get rid of Cam Cameron, I think flacco can progress to be a solid qb. Not a Rodgers/Brady/Brees type, but a qb that can win you some games.
|
On February 06 2012 04:16 DEN1ED wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 04:11 GARO wrote:On February 06 2012 04:08 DEN1ED wrote:On February 06 2012 04:06 Klive5ive wrote:On February 06 2012 04:04 sleigh bells wrote:On February 06 2012 04:01 OneOther wrote: Flacco played superbly in the first three quarters (better than Tom) and he's certainly above average. What the fuck are you talking about? Can you name 16 quarterbacks who are better than Flacco?
Denver relies on low scoring games with defense playing well and grinding out the clock with its running game. Well, its defense failed so they got destroyed. why yes http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/quarterbackRating/seasontype/2 Lol that is a pretty epic comeback. You've even got 1 QB to spare! Any statistic that has Romo at 4th is clearly flawed. Tony Romo isn't shit and sure he puts up good numbers but he isnt even in the top 10 QBs. Maybe once he stops throwing games away. Yeah, you're just delusional if you think Romo isn't at minimum a top 10 in this league. Care to name a QB that isn't both Manning brothers/Brady/Roethlisburger/Brees/Stafford who is better than him? I'll lol if you say Rivers as he is now. Top QBs lead their teams to the playoffs. There is no way cowboys should not make the playoffs with the talent they have and how "awesome" their QB is. Romo can put up all the numbers he wants but until he stops making terrible decisions with the game on the line it doesn't matter. Wow, are you actually trying to tell me Sanchez and Tebow are better QBs than Romo now because of the 'MAKE playoffs' criteria?
Hahahaha, and it's not like Dallas had a straight up terrible D this year or anything, this coming from someone who lives in fucking New York and watched Wrecks Ryan's defense this year.
And for the record, I believe Flacco has the potential to be far better than he is now for sure.
|
The only way I'm going to actually enjoy watching football is with copious amounts of alcohol and with that it's not even guaranteed. Fingers crossed.
|
On February 06 2012 03:47 Skeggaba wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 03:45 OneOther wrote:On February 06 2012 03:44 Skeggaba wrote: Am i allowed to ask about possible streaming possibilites? Can´t watch it on TV (dont have one) and im not sure i am able to pay for the stream on NFL.com (bc it costs money as far as i understood) . http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/NBC streams all its games, and luckily Super Bowl is on NBC this year! Does it work for "foreigners" as well? Usually american website restricts it to only US residents ..
Nope, it doesnt work for foreigners.
|
On February 06 2012 04:13 OneOther wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 04:06 Klive5ive wrote:On February 06 2012 04:04 sleigh bells wrote:On February 06 2012 04:01 OneOther wrote: Flacco played superbly in the first three quarters (better than Tom) and he's certainly above average. What the fuck are you talking about? Can you name 16 quarterbacks who are better than Flacco?
Denver relies on low scoring games with defense playing well and grinding out the clock with its running game. Well, its defense failed so they got destroyed. why yes http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/quarterbackRating/seasontype/2 Lol that is a pretty epic comeback. You've even got 1 QB to spare! Epic comeback? Are you like...serious? I thought you just made a point earlier about statistics being a bad measurement. This is the worst example possible. I don't understand how you make a statistical argument one way then use the same thing the other way hahaha. Ironic much. You have guys like Moore, Kolb and Cutler (who is a good quarterback but got injured halfway) up there with fewer than 200 passes attempted than Flacco. Vick? 100 fewer passes, fewer touchdowns and more interceptions than Flacco. Same story for Hasselback. Obviously QB rating is somewhat flawed. But you made it sound like it was impossible to consider Flacco average, like "lol you'll never name 16 QBs better than him" and then the NFLs own rating system has him at number 18. We're miles off topic now.
|
Get NFL gamepass if you want something legit
|
On February 06 2012 04:19 GARO wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 04:16 DEN1ED wrote:On February 06 2012 04:11 GARO wrote:On February 06 2012 04:08 DEN1ED wrote:On February 06 2012 04:06 Klive5ive wrote:On February 06 2012 04:04 sleigh bells wrote:On February 06 2012 04:01 OneOther wrote: Flacco played superbly in the first three quarters (better than Tom) and he's certainly above average. What the fuck are you talking about? Can you name 16 quarterbacks who are better than Flacco?
Denver relies on low scoring games with defense playing well and grinding out the clock with its running game. Well, its defense failed so they got destroyed. why yes http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/quarterbackRating/seasontype/2 Lol that is a pretty epic comeback. You've even got 1 QB to spare! Any statistic that has Romo at 4th is clearly flawed. Tony Romo isn't shit and sure he puts up good numbers but he isnt even in the top 10 QBs. Maybe once he stops throwing games away. Yeah, you're just delusional if you think Romo isn't at minimum a top 10 in this league. Care to name a QB that isn't both Manning brothers/Brady/Roethlisburger/Brees/Stafford who is better than him? I'll lol if you say Rivers as he is now. Top QBs lead their teams to the playoffs. There is no way cowboys should not make the playoffs with the talent they have and how "awesome" their QB is. Romo can put up all the numbers he wants but until he stops making terrible decisions with the game on the line it doesn't matter. Wow, are you actually trying to tell me Sanchez and Tebow are better QBs now because of the 'MAKE playoffs' criteria? Hahahaha, and it's not like Dallas had a straight up terrible D this year or anything, this coming from someone who lives in fucking New York and watches both the Giants and the Jets. it's his magic eyeball man. his eyeballs are better than any stat.
don't forget alex smith is beastly too. alex smith, sanchez, TEBOW, and flacco are gods among men. no way none of those teams would drop them in a heartbeat if tony romo came a-calling.
|
On February 06 2012 04:07 GARO wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 04:04 DEN1ED wrote:On February 06 2012 04:01 OneOther wrote: Flacco played superbly in the first three quarters (better than Tom) and he's certainly above average. What the fuck are you talking about? Can you name 16 quarterbacks who are better than Flacco?
Denver relies on low scoring games with defense playing well and grinding out the clock with its running game. Well, its defense failed so they got destroyed. Ya pretty much. He clearly hasn't looked at the list of starting QBs in the NFL recently. Sure Flacco isn't an elite QB but he is definitely above average. Tony Romo is 4th on the list of best QB ratings.... Wait, you think Romo is a shit QB? Just lol. And clearly Romo being 4th in QBR means something is wrong with the world, hurr. Romo is a shit QB. The longer he is the starting QB for Dallas, the better.
And about NE's defense. Look, everyone had the Packers as the favorites to win the Super Bowl going into the playoffs. Guess which team allowed more yards than the Pats? The Packers. No one would say a thing about the Packers defense being terrible though.
Defensive rankings of YPG is stupid. Go off what matters, how many points you allow. The Pats are 15th at 21.4ppg while the Giants are 25th at 25ppg.
This is a very close match up. Neither defense is dominate.
|
anyway my prediction for the game: giants prove once again that in this NFL, pass rush is everything
|
On February 06 2012 04:21 rod- wrote: Get NFL gamepass if you want something legit
15euros for one game QQ
|
please win by 4 Patriots, pleaseeee, bet my entire paycheck.
|
On February 06 2012 04:24 gds wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 04:21 rod- wrote: Get NFL gamepass if you want something legit 15euros for one game QQ How much is a flight to England? You can come to my house and watch in on the BBC.
|
|
|
|