|
United States10774 Posts
On February 06 2012 03:44 Skeggaba wrote:
Am i allowed to ask about possible streaming possibilites? Can´t watch it on TV (dont have one) and im not sure i am able to pay for the stream on NFL.com (bc it costs money as far as i understood) .
http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/
NBC streams all its games, and luckily Super Bowl is on NBC this year!
|
On February 06 2012 03:45 OneOther wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 03:44 Skeggaba wrote:
Am i allowed to ask about possible streaming possibilites? Can´t watch it on TV (dont have one) and im not sure i am able to pay for the stream on NFL.com (bc it costs money as far as i understood) . http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/NBC streams all its games, and luckily Super Bowl is on NBC this year!
Does it work for "foreigners" as well? Usually american website restricts it to only US residents ..
|
On February 06 2012 03:42 OneOther wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 03:31 Klive5ive wrote:
Giants are good on both side of the ball. Patriots only have a good offence.
All they have to do is smack Brady a few times and Eli and his plethora of weapons should take it home.
Giants 30 - 20 Patriots However, in the playoffs, the Patriots defense have ranked 1st overall while the Giants were 4th.
They played Tim Tebow and Joe Flacco! whilst the Giants played the Packers at home.
Talk about lies, dam lies and statistics; that's some epic cherry picking.
Plus you know the Giants had key players back from injury towards the end of the season.
We'll see anyway.
|
United States10774 Posts
On February 06 2012 03:47 Skeggaba wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 03:45 OneOther wrote:On February 06 2012 03:44 Skeggaba wrote:
Am i allowed to ask about possible streaming possibilites? Can´t watch it on TV (dont have one) and im not sure i am able to pay for the stream on NFL.com (bc it costs money as far as i understood) . http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/NBC streams all its games, and luckily Super Bowl is on NBC this year! Does it work for "foreigners" as well? Usually american website restricts it to only US residents ..
I don't know, but it is by far your best bet lol
You can alsoy try www.atdhe.tv but the quality is pretty bad.
|
On February 06 2012 03:50 OneOther wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 03:47 Skeggaba wrote:On February 06 2012 03:45 OneOther wrote:On February 06 2012 03:44 Skeggaba wrote:
Am i allowed to ask about possible streaming possibilites? Can´t watch it on TV (dont have one) and im not sure i am able to pay for the stream on NFL.com (bc it costs money as far as i understood) . http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/NBC streams all its games, and luckily Super Bowl is on NBC this year! Does it work for "foreigners" as well? Usually american website restricts it to only US residents .. I don't know, but it is by far your best bet lol You can alsoy try www.atdhe.tv but the quality is pretty bad.
Well i could buy it from the swedish site, but 10 dollars and swedish commentators which sucks. Thanks for the help, i guess ill just wait (nfl video works so the stream should be fine as well i guess, just nervous).
GOGO GIANTS GO UPSET!
|
United States10774 Posts
On February 06 2012 03:50 Klive5ive wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 03:42 OneOther wrote:On February 06 2012 03:31 Klive5ive wrote:
Giants are good on both side of the ball. Patriots only have a good offence.
All they have to do is smack Brady a few times and Eli and his plethora of weapons should take it home.
Giants 30 - 20 Patriots However, in the playoffs, the Patriots defense have ranked 1st overall while the Giants were 4th. They played Tim Tebow and Joe Flacco; whilst the Giants played the Packers at home! Talk about lies, dam lies and statistics; that's some epic cherry picking.
So because the Giants gave up a lot more yardage to the Packers while Patriots got things done versus a solid running team in Denver (Tebow doesn't fucking matter, Denver was always a running team) and Ray Rice of Ravens (one of the most dangerous running backs and a very competent quarterback in Flacco) somehow make your argument of Giants beating the Pats because of a "good" defense makes sense? I am sorry, but it really doesn't.
I feel that both defenses are playing well enough. Hopefully the Pats offensive line can get its job done protecting Brady.
|
On February 06 2012 03:53 OneOther wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 03:50 Klive5ive wrote:On February 06 2012 03:42 OneOther wrote:On February 06 2012 03:31 Klive5ive wrote:
Giants are good on both side of the ball. Patriots only have a good offence.
All they have to do is smack Brady a few times and Eli and his plethora of weapons should take it home.
Giants 30 - 20 Patriots However, in the playoffs, the Patriots defense have ranked 1st overall while the Giants were 4th. They played Tim Tebow and Joe Flacco; whilst the Giants played the Packers at home! Talk about lies, dam lies and statistics; that's some epic cherry picking. So because the Giants gave up a lot more yardage to the Packers while Patriots got things done versus a solid running team in Denver ( Tebow doesn't fucking matter, Denver was always a running team) and Ray Rice of Ravens (one of the most dangerous running backs and a very competent quarterback in Flacco) somehow make your argument of Giants beating the Pats because of a "good" defense makes sense? I am sorry, but it really doesn't.
hahaha. denver has a horrible offense and flacco is borderline competent at best (is below average)
|
LOL the media makes such a big deal about how the patriots have the "worst defense ever to make a superbowl." It's a bunch of BS. Sure they ranked last in yards allowed but they were in the top half in points allowed. Who gives a shit how many yards you give up? What a useless stat. Last time I checked games are decided by the score.
|
On February 06 2012 03:53 OneOther wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 03:50 Klive5ive wrote:On February 06 2012 03:42 OneOther wrote:On February 06 2012 03:31 Klive5ive wrote:
Giants are good on both side of the ball. Patriots only have a good offence.
All they have to do is smack Brady a few times and Eli and his plethora of weapons should take it home.
Giants 30 - 20 Patriots However, in the playoffs, the Patriots defense have ranked 1st overall while the Giants were 4th. They played Tim Tebow and Joe Flacco; whilst the Giants played the Packers at home! Talk about lies, dam lies and statistics; that's some epic cherry picking. So because the Giants gave up a lot more yardage to the Packers while Patriots got things done versus a solid running team in Denver (Tebow doesn't fucking matter, Denver was always a running team) and Ray Rice of Ravens (one of the most dangerous running backs and a very competent quarterback in Flacco) somehow make your argument of Giants beating the Pats because of a "good" defense makes sense? I am sorry, but it really doesn't.
You know the weakness of the Patriots defence is their pretty terrible secondary. Tebow couldn't exploit that because his throwing offence is very simple and Flacco actually did put up a surprising amount of points against the Patriots and they almost won the game.
How is run defence even relevant when playing the Giants? They barely have a running game. What matter is if you can stop the pass and this season the Patriots have shown that they can't stop the pass.
On the other hand the Giants defence shut down Atlanta to 2 points, held Green bay AT HOME to 20 and managed to hold out against the 49ers as well. That's far more impressive than what New England have done.
|
United States10774 Posts
Flacco played superbly in the first three quarters (better than Tom) and he's certainly above average. What the fuck are you talking about? Can you name 16 quarterbacks who are better than Flacco?
Denver relies on low scoring games with defense playing well and grinding out the clock with its running game. Well, its defense failed so they got destroyed.
|
|
|
United States10774 Posts
On February 06 2012 04:00 Klive5ive wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 03:53 OneOther wrote:On February 06 2012 03:50 Klive5ive wrote:On February 06 2012 03:42 OneOther wrote:On February 06 2012 03:31 Klive5ive wrote:
Giants are good on both side of the ball. Patriots only have a good offence.
All they have to do is smack Brady a few times and Eli and his plethora of weapons should take it home.
Giants 30 - 20 Patriots However, in the playoffs, the Patriots defense have ranked 1st overall while the Giants were 4th. They played Tim Tebow and Joe Flacco; whilst the Giants played the Packers at home! Talk about lies, dam lies and statistics; that's some epic cherry picking. So because the Giants gave up a lot more yardage to the Packers while Patriots got things done versus a solid running team in Denver (Tebow doesn't fucking matter, Denver was always a running team) and Ray Rice of Ravens (one of the most dangerous running backs and a very competent quarterback in Flacco) somehow make your argument of Giants beating the Pats because of a "good" defense makes sense? I am sorry, but it really doesn't. You know the weakness of the Patriots defence is their pretty terrible secondary. Tebow couldn't exploit that because his throwing offence is very simple and Flacco actually did put up a surprising amount of points against the Patriots and they almost won the game. How is run defence even relevant when playing the Giants? They barely have a running game. What matter is if you can stop the pass and this season the Patriots have shown that they can't stop the pass. On the other hand the Giants defence shut down Atlanta to 2 points, held Green bay AT HOME to 20 and managed to hold out against the 49ers as well. That's far more impressive than what New England have done.
The Pats secondary is indeed bad, but the pass-rushers have been playing really well in the playoffs, which has helped cover the secondary. I could say similar things about the Giants. I am not trying to argue that the Pats have a good defense (they don't, lol) but you are making the discrepancy between the Pats D and the Giants D far bigger than it actually is. Giants have good pass-rushers, but their secondary? Lol.
|
On February 06 2012 04:01 OneOther wrote:
Flacco played superbly in the first three quarters (better than Tom) and he's certainly above average. What the fuck are you talking about? Can you name 16 quarterbacks who are better than Flacco?
Denver relies on low scoring games with defense playing well and grinding out the clock with its running game. Well, its defense failed so they got destroyed.
why yes
http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/quarterbackRating/seasontype/2
|
On February 06 2012 04:01 OneOther wrote:
Flacco played superbly in the first three quarters (better than Tom) and he's certainly above average. What the fuck are you talking about? Can you name 16 quarterbacks who are better than Flacco?
Denver relies on low scoring games with defense playing well and grinding out the clock with its running game. Well, its defense failed so they got destroyed.
Ya pretty much. He clearly hasn't looked at the list of starting QBs in the NFL recently. Sure Flacco isn't an elite QB but he is definitely above average.
Tony Romo is 4th on the list of best QB ratings....
|
On February 06 2012 04:00 DEN1ED wrote:
LOL the media makes such a big deal about how the patriots have the "worst defense ever to make a superbowl." It's a bunch of BS. Sure they ranked last in yards allowed but they were in the top half in points allowed. Who gives a shit how many yards you give up? What a useless stat. Last time I checked games are decided by the score.
Yeah you can exaggerate or you can call a spade a spade.
The Patriots defence is reasonabe overall but lacking especially in pass defence. It's probably not "the worst defence ever" but it's certainly in the bottom half of SuperBowl teams.
|
On February 06 2012 03:42 OneOther wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 03:31 Klive5ive wrote:
Giants are good on both side of the ball. Patriots only have a good offence.
All they have to do is smack Brady a few times and Eli and his plethora of weapons should take it home.
Giants 30 - 20 Patriots Uhhh no. New England ranked 31st during the regular season in defense, sure, but the Giants were 27th. That's not much of a difference. However, in the playoffs, the Patriots defense have ranked 1st overall while the Giants were 4th. Both defenses have made big plays when it matters the most, which is why these two teams are in the Super Bowl. So to say that the Giants are going to win because their defense is awesome while the Pats defense is nonexistent sounds ridiculous. I mean, people used to say that defense wins championships, but I don't even really believe in that anymore. Elite quarterbacks win championships, and catching fire at the right time / defense making big plays wins championships. http://www.coachescorner.com/n_input/nnweb/scores/header_nfl_def_rank.htmPats 33 - Giants 28
FO rankings makes much more sense than these. Pats = 30th, Giants = 20th during regular season.
http://footballoutsiders.com/stats/teamdef
|
On February 06 2012 04:04 sleigh bells wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 04:01 OneOther wrote:
Flacco played superbly in the first three quarters (better than Tom) and he's certainly above average. What the fuck are you talking about? Can you name 16 quarterbacks who are better than Flacco?
Denver relies on low scoring games with defense playing well and grinding out the clock with its running game. Well, its defense failed so they got destroyed. why yes http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/quarterbackRating/seasontype/2
Lol that is a pretty epic comeback. You've even got 1 QB to spare!
|
On February 06 2012 04:04 DEN1ED wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 04:01 OneOther wrote:
Flacco played superbly in the first three quarters (better than Tom) and he's certainly above average. What the fuck are you talking about? Can you name 16 quarterbacks who are better than Flacco?
Denver relies on low scoring games with defense playing well and grinding out the clock with its running game. Well, its defense failed so they got destroyed. Ya pretty much. He clearly hasn't looked at the list of starting QBs in the NFL recently. Sure Flacco isn't an elite QB but he is definitely above average. Tony Romo is 4th on the list of best QB ratings....
Wait, you think Romo is a shit QB? Just lol.
And clearly Romo being 4th in QBR means something is wrong with the world, hurr.
|
On February 06 2012 04:06 Klive5ive wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 04:04 sleigh bells wrote:On February 06 2012 04:01 OneOther wrote:
Flacco played superbly in the first three quarters (better than Tom) and he's certainly above average. What the fuck are you talking about? Can you name 16 quarterbacks who are better than Flacco?
Denver relies on low scoring games with defense playing well and grinding out the clock with its running game. Well, its defense failed so they got destroyed. why yes http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/quarterbackRating/seasontype/2 Lol that is a pretty epic comeback. You've even got 1 QB to spare!
Any statistic that has Romo at 4th is clearly flawed. Tony Romo isn't shit and sure he puts up good numbers but he isnt even in the top 10 QBs. Maybe once he stops throwing games away.
|
On February 06 2012 04:08 DEN1ED wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2012 04:06 Klive5ive wrote:On February 06 2012 04:04 sleigh bells wrote:On February 06 2012 04:01 OneOther wrote:
Flacco played superbly in the first three quarters (better than Tom) and he's certainly above average. What the fuck are you talking about? Can you name 16 quarterbacks who are better than Flacco?
Denver relies on low scoring games with defense playing well and grinding out the clock with its running game. Well, its defense failed so they got destroyed. why yes http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/quarterbackRating/seasontype/2 Lol that is a pretty epic comeback. You've even got 1 QB to spare! Any statistic that has Romo at 4th is clearly flawed.
http://footballoutsiders.com/stats/qb
i guess they're ALL flawed
you should publish your personal rankings because your eyes are OP
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
