EPTSuperBowl 2012 - Page 44
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
BlackJack
United States10574 Posts
| ||
|
rOse_PedaL
Korea (South)450 Posts
| ||
|
xccam
Great Britain1150 Posts
Is there any way to watch past games online as the new season isnt on untill september? Thanks, xccam | ||
|
BlackJack
United States10574 Posts
On February 07 2012 00:45 xccam wrote: Hey guys, watched this last night and got really into it, never watched AF before. Is there any way to watch past games online as the new season isnt on untill september? Thanks, xccam NFL.com has something called "Game Pass" where you can watch every game of the last season for pretty cheap, like $15 | ||
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
On February 07 2012 00:30 BlackJack wrote: @RCMDVA yup, and Brady was throwing behind people all game instead of hitting them in stride. Combine that with the Gronk underthrow interception and the safety on the first play, and it's incredibly annoying when you hear his trophy wife saying "my husband can't throw the ball AND catch it!" hahahaha easy with the trophy wife, she probably makes more money than he does  oh wait i guess trophy wife doesn't necessarily mean she's a digger | ||
|
xccam
Great Britain1150 Posts
| ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
On February 07 2012 00:30 BlackJack wrote: @RCMDVA yup, and Brady was throwing behind people all game instead of hitting them in stride. Combine that with the Gronk underthrow interception and the safety on the first play, and it's incredibly annoying when you hear his trophy wife saying "my husband can't throw the ball AND catch it!" Considering how he played vs the Ravens and the Giants and who makes more money in that relationship, I'd say Brady is the trophy husband. And I can't believe wtf Michaels and Collinsworth were talking about during that interception. They were claiming that interception happened because Gronk wasn't healthy. He managed to still get behind the LB and would've had a td if Brady didn't underthrow him. | ||
|
Gann1
United States1575 Posts
| ||
|
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
| ||
|
sc4k
United Kingdom5454 Posts
| ||
|
nemY
United States3119 Posts
On February 07 2012 00:30 BlackJack wrote: @RCMDVA yup, and Brady was throwing behind people all game instead of hitting them in stride. Combine that with the Gronk underthrow interception and the safety on the first play, and it's incredibly annoying when you hear his trophy wife saying "my husband can't throw the ball AND catch it!" Tom Brady is WHIIPPPED | ||
|
Rkie
United States1278 Posts
That guy hates the Patriots for some reason. He is the guy that took out Brady in '08 and Wes Welker in '09. Then Gronkzilla this year. What did they ever do to him? | ||
|
dp
United States234 Posts
On February 06 2012 17:06 LF9 wrote: Officiating needs to be better, first. And second, playoffs need to be bo3 or something. Every year, at least one flukey team makes it to the super bowl and it turns into a bad game. This year, TWO flukey teams made it to the super bowl on flukey wins, and it turned out to be a joke game of a team with the worst defense in the NFL (who got there because of a blown call) playing against a 9-7 team. The playoff system needs to be changed, because the super bowl always sucks. Teams play 16 games and go through all this hooplah every year, and then it take 2 (3 at MOST) simple wins to get to the super bowl. Most of your posts here are pointless, but this one is just annoying. Neither of the two teams were flukey. The patriots in the superbowl is never a fluke. (Five out of ten in the last ten years..) Mentioning the Giants regular season record as if that is a determinant of how the team played in the playoffs is just bullshit. Held the Falcons to 2 points, beat the Packers by 17, and took out the 49ers who had one of the best defenses I have seen in some time. Both teams deserved to be there, by doing what the other teams did not.. winning. We get it, your team lost and you are personally hurt. Stop complaining. That is how the game works, and any team can come out and win on any given sunday. If you don't like that concept, watch a different sport. BO3 playoffs? LOL. Never. | ||
|
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
| ||
|
SpeaKEaSY
United States1070 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 07 2012 06:00 SpeaKEaSY wrote: It was total bullshit that the Patriots just gave up playing defense on that Bradshaw touchdown. It's like they took their hands off the keyboard. If that was a Korean football team out there, they would have been ran out of the stadium. It was probably the best choice they had. It was a mistake for the Bradshaw to score and if you watch the replay, you can tell he was trying to stop himself but he fell in. Otherwise, they could have ran the clock down to next to nothing and kicked the easy field goal for the win. Instead, the Pats gave themselves a full minute to drive down the field and they got a hail marry attempt out of it. | ||
|
ZasZ.
United States2911 Posts
On February 07 2012 06:00 SpeaKEaSY wrote: It was total bullshit that the Patriots just gave up playing defense on that Bradshaw touchdown. It's like they took their hands off the keyboard. If that was a Korean football team out there, they would have been ran out of the stadium. ? Do you realize that they did it on purpose? If they had played tough defense, the Giants could have run another ~45 seconds off the clock and still scored 3 or 7 points, giving Brady absolutely no time to engineer a game-winning drive. By letting them score, you give up the 7 points, but gain a minute of game time. At that point, since the Patriots were incapable of playing defense between the 20's, it was better to just get the ball back with enough time to score. And no, a team will never be run out of the stadium for making a choice that will ultimately improve their chances of winning. Even if it doesn't work. | ||
|
Elurie
4716 Posts
On February 06 2012 12:47 Amber[LighT] wrote: Regardless of the intention this is the most epic moment of the game Haha, most memorable moment of this SB for sure. Initially I thought it was a show-off/celebration move. The people I was watching the game with were screaming at the TV - baffled at Bradshaw's "sit". Everyone finally settled down once they learned it was unintentional. The part where Pats were told by their coach to let Giants score reminisce about Favre's Packers letting Elway's Broncos score just to get the ball back. | ||
|
RandomAccount#49059
United States2140 Posts
| ||
|
PH
United States6173 Posts
On February 07 2012 06:12 ZasZ. wrote: ? Do you realize that they did it on purpose? If they had played tough defense, the Giants could have run another ~45 seconds off the clock and still scored 3 or 7 points, giving Brady absolutely no time to engineer a game-winning drive. By letting them score, you give up the 7 points, but gain a minute of game time. At that point, since the Patriots were incapable of playing defense between the 20's, it was better to just get the ball back with enough time to score. And no, a team will never be run out of the stadium for making a choice that will ultimately improve their chances of winning. Even if it doesn't work. That still doesn't explain why they allowed the Giants to make it all the way across the field so quickly and efficiently, though. Manning was on a tear the entire game, but the Pats really didn't put up a very good fight to stop him. They held decently when it was getting closed and forced turnovers, but WOW, their receiver coverage was horrible. | ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/pcn1V.gif)
