EPTWhich isn't in the game yet. Have they talked about when 1.1 will be implemented?
Diablo III General Discussion - Page 569
| Forum Index > General Games |
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34495 Posts
Which isn't in the game yet. Have they talked about when 1.1 will be implemented? | ||
|
javy_
United States1677 Posts
On June 06 2012 17:22 Firebolt145 wrote: Which isn't in the game yet. Have they talked about when 1.1 will be implemented? Their goal is by the end of the year....lol | ||
|
Silidons
United States2813 Posts
| ||
|
javy_
United States1677 Posts
good writeup explaining all of the problems with melee class right now in inferno. As a barb, I don't feel like spending 50-75mill+ improving my build to clear acts 3&4. Going to start DH tomorrow and try barb again in a few months. | ||
|
wintergt
Belgium1335 Posts
On June 06 2012 17:37 javy925 wrote: http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/5642264212 good writeup explaining all of the problems with melee class right now in inferno. As a barb, I don't feel like spending 50-75mill+ improving my build to clear acts 3&4. Going to start DH tomorrow and try barb again in a few months. I played alongside a barb in the ends of act 2, he actually had very nice gear, over 700 resist all, but he couldn't tank elites/rares for more than a few seconds. i can only imagine how he'd get pounded into the ground if it was 4 players instead of 2. Blizzard really need to do something about mob damage scaling up so much in coop games. | ||
|
Stratos.FEAR
Canada706 Posts
On June 06 2012 17:57 wintergt wrote: I played alongside a barb in the ends of act 2, he actually had very nice gear, over 700 resist all, but he couldn't tank elites/rares for more than a few seconds. i can only imagine how he'd get pounded into the ground if it was 4 players instead of 2. Blizzard really need to do something about mob damage scaling up so much in coop games. if the 30% melee class damage reduction bonus scaled with the amount of players in the party it would promote more team play and allow them to tank for the team. im a little annoyed how i can only do inferno solo now | ||
|
UniversalSnip
9871 Posts
On June 06 2012 17:57 wintergt wrote: I played alongside a barb in the ends of act 2, he actually had very nice gear, over 700 resist all, but he couldn't tank elites/rares for more than a few seconds. i can only imagine how he'd get pounded into the ground if it was 4 players instead of 2. Blizzard really need to do something about mob damage scaling up so much in coop games. 2 players is suicide, it's the hardest number. I wouldn't be surprised if he did a lot better solo. 1 > 3 > 4 > 2 | ||
|
ControlMonkey
Australia3109 Posts
| ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On June 06 2012 18:12 UniversalSnip wrote: 2 players is suicide, it's the hardest number. I wouldn't be surprised if he did a lot better solo. 1 > 3 > 4 > 2 Agree with this. 2 players has to deal with the scaling penalties, but also doesn't get the benefits of in-combat ressing. | ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
On June 06 2012 18:08 Stratos.FEAR wrote: if the 30% melee class damage reduction bonus scaled with the amount of players in the party it would promote more team play and allow them to tank for the team. im a little annoyed how i can only do inferno solo now i dont think it needs to scale because in bigger groups you can cc things more, but i think it should be 40% instead of 30% for all groups | ||
|
NeedsmoreCELLTECH
Netherlands1242 Posts
| ||
|
Unentschieden
Germany1471 Posts
On June 06 2012 21:08 turdburgler wrote: i dont think it needs to scale because in bigger groups you can cc things more, but i think it should be 40% instead of 30% for all groups Coop in higher difficulties expects synergetic gameplay. It seems people treat their Monk/Barb to basically be a more durable Templar. | ||
|
Elegance
Canada917 Posts
preview into 1.03. discuss EDIT: Personally, not changing a thing about class balance was stupid, but we will see how the lowered difficulty of act 2, 3 and 4 will factor into that | ||
|
matiK23
United States963 Posts
| ||
|
coopes
United States144 Posts
On June 06 2012 23:21 Elegance wrote: http://us.battle.net/d3/en/blog/6262208/Patch_103_Design_Preview-6_6_2012#blog preview into 1.03. discuss EDIT: Personally, not changing a thing about class balance was stupid, but we will see how the lowered difficulty of act 2, 3 and 4 will factor into that Wow that new loot system..interesting...the best items could have a small chance in act 1 | ||
|
Elegance
Canada917 Posts
On June 06 2012 23:29 coopes wrote: Wow that new loot system..interesting...the best items could have a small chance in act 1 Yeah that's what got me excited mostly | ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
i like the changes to NV though. | ||
|
Heh_
Singapore2712 Posts
On June 07 2012 00:03 turdburgler wrote: +300% mf ac1 will have equal drop chance to 0% mf act3 for the best items, and considering you can kill things so much faster, i think this could be a step too far. now obviously people can switch to mf gear at the last moment but still. i like the changes to NV though. Chest farming is still viable. Hello underbridge. I'm glad I spent a week farming to get there, and it's not going to be nerfed. | ||
|
NotSorry
United States6722 Posts
To put it in perspective the current best farming in game requires a less than 1page text script that takes you about 5-6mins to write. A combat bot that had to actively search for elite packs and efficiently kill them would be massive and take botter groups weeks to write and weeks to test/debug and still probably wouldn't be equal to real players. | ||
|
Sif_
Brazil3106 Posts
im gonna be SO POOR | ||
| ||
