EPTAnd it's called PvM not PvE goddammit.
Diablo III General Discussion - Page 12
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
YejinYejin
United States1053 Posts
And it's called PvM not PvE goddammit. | ||
|
Dankmids
United States316 Posts
On October 25 2010 05:59 Manit0u wrote: Not to mention the amount of advertising it received... You can also take a look at Sims series, which aren't a great game, yet they're selling like hot buns in the morning. Why is that? The sims is selling good because of the nostalgia and the fact its a very simple game and been around for years. | ||
|
alexanderzero
United States659 Posts
| ||
|
Senx
Sweden5901 Posts
Even the diablo 2 act cinematics looks better than these. | ||
|
TheGreenMachine
United States730 Posts
On October 24 2010 02:09 Urnhardt wrote: so is blizzard gonna try to shove this game out this year? been in dev since 2001 if i remember reading correctly. heard a few days ago that the WOW expansion Cataclysm is coming out this year, which a lot of people were wondering about. they gonna try for 3 huge games in one year or just save this one for next year? Jay Wilson says the beta will come out about 6 months before release so we have a while to wait... -Source @5:12 That same interview in part 3 says Diablo 3 might be pay-to-play in certain regions. He was very vague though. He also reconfirms that Diablo 3 PvP will not be "competitively balanced as an Esport". And I totally agree that the cinematics could look much better, especially the wizard one. I liked the first cinematic for the game though with the candles and "I have seen what the darkness hides". I also didn't mind the new demon hunter cinematic. Personally I think shes an awesome new class. | ||
|
Dr.Kill-Joy
United States627 Posts
Looks better than the D2 | ||
|
alexanderzero
United States659 Posts
| ||
|
Doraemon
Australia14949 Posts
On October 25 2010 03:38 anch wrote: my thoughts exactly. to me its like a bowZon + trap assn mix. the no-cocking was wtf, muti arrows was okay. Demo was horrible, if you guy played DH on single player; she can barely kills stuff. overall i did not find a replacement weapon, i had to use the default no stats dual xbow. I think shes missing the variety of weapon that can be used. Monk/barb use can use swords,axe,etc. WD, wizard use 2h staff or 1h staff. DH only gets the dual xbow skills. i LOVEDDD bowazons, it was my first ladder char (lvl 97), but like you said, it looks like bowazon with some tacky grenades. i found the demo horrible as well =[ shes going to have trouble with crowd control as always, i guess the nades will help :S nevertheless, i'm eagerly anticipating this game. | ||
|
eggs
1011 Posts
On October 25 2010 14:13 Doraemon wrote: i LOVEDDD bowazons, it was my first ladder char (lvl 97), but like you said, it looks like bowazon with some tacky grenades. i found the demo horrible as well =[ shes going to have trouble with crowd control as always, i guess the nades will help :S nevertheless, i'm eagerly anticipating this game. i also found it awful to play in the demo. Multi Shot did no damage, my trap seemed to have 0 radius and the mob literally had to walk over it to set it off, and it just felt clunky overall. even the previewed abilities made it seem too much like relying on things like Assassin traps, setting them up then backing up to lure monsters into them, which would be awful when power-running or even in a 4-player game where you just power through the dungeons. i feel like it would be as useless as Witch Doctor in the battle arena too. Monk, Wizard, and Barb were very enjoyable though. | ||
|
o3.power91
Bahrain5288 Posts
On October 25 2010 13:44 TheGreenMachine wrote: Jay Wilson says the beta will come out about 6 months before release so we have a while to wait... -Source @5:12 That same interview in part 3 says Diablo 3 might be pay-to-play in certain regions. He was very vague though. He also reconfirms that Diablo 3 PvP will not be "competitively balanced as an Esport". And I totally agree that the cinematics could look much better, especially the wizard one. I liked the first cinematic for the game though with the candles and "I have seen what the darkness hides". I also didn't mind the new demon hunter cinematic. Personally I think shes an awesome new class. I hope this doesn't happen. This is part of the reason I loved D2 so much. I'm so hyped up for D3 but no way am I paying a subscription fee for a non-MMORPG. Hell, I won't even want to pay a subscription fee for an MMORPG -_- | ||
|
eggs
1011 Posts
On October 25 2010 14:40 o3.power91 wrote: I hope this doesn't happen. This is part of the reason I loved D2 so much. I'm so hyped up for D3 but no way am I paying a subscription fee for a non-MMORPG. Hell, I won't even want to pay a subscription fee for an MMORPG -_- they know D3 won't survive with a monthly subscription. they're probably covering their bases in case they decide to have a different model for Latin America like they're doing with SC2 (base client is very cheap, but monthly fee to continue playing online). | ||
|
anch
United States5457 Posts
| ||
|
bakedace
United States672 Posts
also, hardcore characters will die in pvp | ||
|
iCanada
Canada10660 Posts
On October 25 2010 15:15 bakedace wrote: Just to clear it up, they said that certain abilities will change (balance) when you enter PvP. also, hardcore characters will die in pvp Have they confirmed how HC is going to work? I was under the impression that HC characters and regular characters would play in the same realm this time around, like in the original... If that is the case, then having PvP arenas spell the end for HC characters is stupid. | ||
|
bakedace
United States672 Posts
On October 25 2010 14:45 eggs wrote: they know D3 won't survive with a monthly subscription. they're probably covering their bases in case they decide to have a different model for Latin America like they're doing with SC2 (base client is very cheap, but monthly fee to continue playing online). I think its pay-to-play for a limited amount of regions... As I may recall, the Russian Starcraft 2 server is pay-to-play. | ||
|
protoss22
United States41 Posts
"3:34 Q: MP question: Will the player amount per game remain the same? Saturday October 23, 2010 3:34 3:34 A: It could change, but it's been playing really well with a 4p cap. " 4 Player cap, for a game with more than 4 classes announced seems kind of silly. | ||
|
eggs
1011 Posts
On October 25 2010 15:37 protoss22 wrote: I don't know if you guys noticed yet, but "3:34 Q: MP question: Will the player amount per game remain the same? Saturday October 23, 2010 3:34 3:34 A: It could change, but it's been playing really well with a 4p cap. " 4 Player cap, for a game with more than 4 classes announced seems kind of silly. i was playing the demos with a group of 4, and 4 seemed like too much honestly. it was frustrating getting through doorways so we just split up into 2 pairs until we spawned the events/bosses. keep in mind that you get individual loot drops, so when you split up and clear different rooms you have to go back to what the other guys cleared to see your loot. at blizzcon the playtime was limited and the characters were throwaways so i didn't care too much about drops, but in a real game it would not be fun to play in a game with 8 people spreading out and then going through the entire empty dungeon just to make sure you didn't miss a Unique. | ||
|
exitusnow
28 Posts
| ||
|
Randomaccount#77123
United States5003 Posts
| ||
|
mav451
United States1596 Posts
| ||
| ||
