i doubt this can live up to the original (which was really surprisingly good, i always thought its a cheap action flick until i saw it)
also, i generally dislike this whole 3d trend. im pretty sure this will also contain useless distracting 3d-showoff scenes. they are making everything to look like the trailer for a video game
althought i might be biased against 3d since the only two 3d movies i saw so far were both bad (alice and avatar)
although "bad" is a severe understatement in the case of "avatar". it was an abomination
It's not like you are ever going to re-watch the original for whatever reason. Some older movies (<1990) you can re-watch and still be awed by it's brilliance. Conan the Barbarian (1982) is defiantly not one of those.
I've definitely caught one Conan movie or another on cable at least a dozen times and happily sat there and watched them. It may be a fine "Conan-ish" type of movie, I'm just hoping that they don't cameo Arnold in it, at least not without a sufficient degree of awesome.
Based on Conan canon I would have to say that the movie is going to be completely terrible, and that's why we're going to watch it. It should have at least one scantily clad woman, and will offer gratuitous violence. It will be popular, for the entire five minutes it deserves. (the pun was too strong to resist.)
On May 14 2011 04:45 Herrk wrote: but but... arnold? ...
why do they have to remake everything?
Because they are too stupid to come up with something on their own and unwilling to risk money on other stories which are already written.
All this "3D hype" is just the newest technical gadget which doesnt improve the movie automatically just like animations and computer tricks didnt help make movies like "Clash of the titans" any good. Too bad they are investing money in new technology when it doesnt actually work well (too often you still see the computer graphics even if they are rendered perfectly).
Remake of the movie? Or reinterpretation of the comics? Anyway...
This is the same issue with the Charlie and Chocolate Factory. People can't get over their nostalgia for older flick. I liked them both and the newer one was more faithful to the source material anyway. I will see this movie as cheaply as possible and enjoy it for it's own merits. K thnx bai
In my opinion trailer seemed quite uninteresting, first Conan was epic on its own way and this will do no justice for it, same goes for nearly all remakes.
The only good thing about them remaking something like this is reminding everyone to go watch the old one and see how fucking awesome it is. because its so good.
ARNIE KNOCKS OUT A CAMEL. A FUCKING CAMEL. HOLY SHIT conan so good
i kind of got a problem with the conan actor for not being white enough
i don't mean that in any racist way, it's just that shit dudes, conan is cimmerian. he dont look like no mascara wearing arab warrior. it's wrong, just saying it
other than that, first movie is completely fucking awesome. i watch it at least once a year. of course the acting is quite bad but that's not really the point. the conan universe IS the most bad ass fantasy stuff ever made and that film actually captures that well, even with bad actors.
On May 14 2011 19:51 ULTRAmarine wrote: i kind of got a problem with the conan actor for not being white enough
i don't mean that in any racist way, it's just that shit dudes, conan is cimmerian. he dont look like no mascara wearing arab warrior. it's wrong, just saying it
other than that, first movie is completely fucking awesome. i watch it at least once a year. of course the acting is quite bad but that's not really the point. the conan universe IS the most bad ass fantasy stuff ever made and that film actually captures that well, even with bad actors.
They should instead make a "Conan's grandchildren" movie where Arnie can be an old Conan to introduce new characters. That way the color of their skin doesnt matter really since it is 30 years later and Conan might even have gotten a tan and muscles arent needed that much since he is older (but wiser and still respected). I think that solution would solve several problems at once.
On May 14 2011 04:53 Narwhal wrote: I sense a bad remake, lot like most remakes of classics.
It will be
* Very corny. * Mediocre acting. * Over-blown visual effects and fight scenes. * Aimed towards people that like WWE * Shallow and predictable story. * Nothing like the original.
Just sayin.
I think your last prediction contradicts some of your other predictions!
Spot on.
It's not like you are ever going to re-watch the original for whatever reason. Some older movies (<1990) you can re-watch and still be awed by it's brilliance. Conan the Barbarian (1982) is defiantly not one of those.
You guys do realize that this is made for new audiences not directly for those who hold the old Conen in high regard.. and the new audience happens to be the age that like visually entertaining movies..
On May 14 2011 19:51 ULTRAmarine wrote: i kind of got a problem with the conan actor for not being white enough
i don't mean that in any racist way, it's just that shit dudes, conan is cimmerian. he dont look like no mascara wearing arab warrior. it's wrong, just saying it
other than that, first movie is completely fucking awesome. i watch it at least once a year. of course the acting is quite bad but that's not really the point. the conan universe IS the most bad ass fantasy stuff ever made and that film actually captures that well, even with bad actors.
They should instead make a "Conan's grandchildren" movie where Arnie can be an old Conan to introduce new characters. That way the color of their skin doesnt matter really since it is 30 years later and Conan might even have gotten a tan and muscles arent needed that much since he is older (but wiser and still respected). I think that solution would solve several problems at once.
If thats the case theres a billion other stories/books with muscle men with swords they can make into movies. The new generation doesn't know what Conan is, and if they do they probably think its just some lame 80s movie.
Just like The Thing, that's my favorite horror movie of all time, and they're going to ruin it later this year by adding terrible CG and a love story.
this sucks. original conan was perfect and i don't want no stupid cgi effects destroying a cult-hit. It's just like with the a-team remake üaarghh... there should be a law against badly remaking classic movies.
edit: i hope that 3d doesn't become "standart" in the next years, I think it really adds nothing to movies and to me it seems, that if they do 3d movies they think they can put less emphasis on story etc. because the visuals are "impressive"....
On May 14 2011 19:51 ULTRAmarine wrote: i kind of got a problem with the conan actor for not being white enough
i don't mean that in any racist way, it's just that shit dudes, conan is cimmerian. he dont look like no mascara wearing arab warrior. it's wrong, just saying it
other than that, first movie is completely fucking awesome. i watch it at least once a year. of course the acting is quite bad but that's not really the point. the conan universe IS the most bad ass fantasy stuff ever made and that film actually captures that well, even with bad actors.
They should instead make a "Conan's grandchildren" movie where Arnie can be an old Conan to introduce new characters. That way the color of their skin doesnt matter really since it is 30 years later and Conan might even have gotten a tan and muscles arent needed that much since he is older (but wiser and still respected). I think that solution would solve several problems at once.
On May 14 2011 22:51 Horiz0n wrote: Arnold killed Robert E Howards Conan, I hope Jason will do a better job, to bad they aint using one of Howards stories for inspiration :<
On May 14 2011 19:51 ULTRAmarine wrote: i kind of got a problem with the conan actor for not being white enough
i don't mean that in any racist way, it's just that shit dudes, conan is cimmerian. he dont look like no mascara wearing arab warrior. it's wrong, just saying it
other than that, first movie is completely fucking awesome. i watch it at least once a year. of course the acting is quite bad but that's not really the point. the conan universe IS the most bad ass fantasy stuff ever made and that film actually captures that well, even with bad actors.
They should instead make a "Conan's grandchildren" movie where Arnie can be an old Conan to introduce new characters. That way the color of their skin doesnt matter really since it is 30 years later and Conan might even have gotten a tan and muscles arent needed that much since he is older (but wiser and still respected). I think that solution would solve several problems at once.
Read the comics. He's always been dark skinned.
Yepp, Conan is described as being bronze-skinned.
How did Arnold kill REH's Conan? The only things that were wrong: hair and eye colour. REH was a big bodybuilding fan (that's why he made Conan so) and who better to portray his character than a former bodybuilding champion?
I just wish someone would go a bit further and give him a badass beard. That's the only thing Conan is lacking. Just look how badass Stella Skarsgard looked as Cerdic in King Arthur: