|
On August 20 2011 08:57 Risen wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2011 08:50 Arkless wrote:On August 20 2011 08:49 Disarray wrote: are you people serious ? Saw this movie a couple days ago, and thought it was a great action movie. If you were expecting some Chris Nolan plot movie, wtf is wrong with you ? This was the first action movie I've seen in a long time that held nothing back, from start to finish. Lol...... it just came out in theatres today. If you actually did see it (which you didn't) You wouldn't be sayin what you just said....... Put that in your pipe and smoke it! You're an idiot if you think theaters don't do early release. That said, movie was trash :<
Maybe a midnight release, sure. But it's illegal to show a movie before the release date. Thanks for calling me an idiot, idiot. So a few days ago???/ Nope, sorry
And yes it was uber trash
|
can we just agree that the movie was terrible and Hollywood needs to stop pulling this retarded/remake/rehash/unoriginal shit on us...
|
Just saw it, and yeah it's not the epic adventure that the original was, but I still liked it for what it was. Essentially it's a good D&D type adventure story that's a metric fuckton better then Conan the Destroyer was, but it's not much more then that
|
guaranteed it will be shit
|
|
|
Me no like. It was Hollywoodish to the point of puking and really just fealt like "Khal Drogo - The Early Years".
+ Show Spoiler + They could've at least made it so that Malavia would indeed possess Tamara and Conan would be forced to kill her in an epic battle. This could save the movie a bit.
On August 20 2011 10:25 kudlaty_true wrote:Speaking of remakes of Arnie's films: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1386703/Kate beckinsale I'm up for. Very up. But Colin Farell as Arnold? HAH!!!!
Maybe this time at least they're going to get the story right...
|
This is just about the most ridicolous thing I have ever seen get so much attention.
Yeah I am totally gonna see it.
|
On August 20 2011 08:50 Arkless wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2011 08:49 Disarray wrote: are you people serious ? Saw this movie a couple days ago, and thought it was a great action movie. If you were expecting some Chris Nolan plot movie, wtf is wrong with you ? This was the first action movie I've seen in a long time that held nothing back, from start to finish. Lol...... it just came out in theatres today. If you actually did see it (which you didn't) You wouldn't be sayin what you just said....... Put that in your pipe and smoke it!
A radio station gave away early screening tickets, are you really that dense ?
Also, if anyone LIKED the new rambo movie that came out, but HATED this new conan movie, i'd like to know why
|
On August 20 2011 14:08 Disarray wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2011 08:50 Arkless wrote:On August 20 2011 08:49 Disarray wrote: are you people serious ? Saw this movie a couple days ago, and thought it was a great action movie. If you were expecting some Chris Nolan plot movie, wtf is wrong with you ? This was the first action movie I've seen in a long time that held nothing back, from start to finish. Lol...... it just came out in theatres today. If you actually did see it (which you didn't) You wouldn't be sayin what you just said....... Put that in your pipe and smoke it! A radio station gave away early screening tickets, are you really that dense ? Also, if anyone LIKED the new rambo movie that came out, but HATED this new conan movie, i'd like to know why
I know people who liked the new Rambo movie when it came out. Probably because they were preparing to take the anatomy exam at medical univ at the time.
|
What kind of retarded logic is "WEOW CONAN IS WEARING MASCARA THIS MOVE IS GONNA SUCK!"?
I saw it last night and it was fkn badass.
|
korgoth of barbaria is still better
|
I saw it last week and besides me and my friend there was only one other guy in the entire theater (3d showing, premiere time). Pretty sad, it certainly wasn't the worst movie ive seen, at the very least it was entertaining for what it was.
Well atleast its certain that Conan is pretty much a dead franchise.
|
Okay.....so they were like hyping Conan so bad like so bad in the beginning of the movie and everything. The actor looked like an arrogant prick with cheesed up lines. The Guvernator must be dissapointed as I was I. Give me back my money Cineplex!!
|
They'd better not skimp on the female nudity where he's "fed" women who are basically there to get inseminated by him to make more of him, or the part where he bangs a soul sucking spirit chick, etc etc.
In other words, it'd better be Game of Thrones status and not get neutered by the retarded PC culture of the world.
|
On September 03 2011 08:50 Truedot wrote: They'd better not skimp on the female nudity where he's "fed" women who are basically there to get inseminated by him to make more of him, or the part where he bangs a soul sucking spirit chick, etc etc.
In other words, it'd better be Game of Thrones status and not get neutered by the retarded PC culture of the world.
There was.....no nudity as far as I remembered lol And if you are comparing this to GoT, you will be GREATLY disappointed, try to compare it to.....Clash of the Titans!
|
United Kingdom16710 Posts
I think I'll skip it and just go through Howard's short stories again.
|
There was tons of breasts, but thats about it.
Oh, also, implied incest. There was that too.
|
On September 03 2011 08:54 Xiphos wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2011 08:50 Truedot wrote: They'd better not skimp on the female nudity where he's "fed" women who are basically there to get inseminated by him to make more of him, or the part where he bangs a soul sucking spirit chick, etc etc.
In other words, it'd better be Game of Thrones status and not get neutered by the retarded PC culture of the world. There was.....no nudity as far as I remembered lol And if you are comparing this to GoT, you will be GREATLY disappointed, try to compare it to.....Clash of the Titans!
wtf hollywood. who's running it now? some PC butchers from MADD?
|
One of the worst movies of the year. Walked out and I never do that.
|
On September 03 2011 08:59 Truedot wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2011 08:54 Xiphos wrote:On September 03 2011 08:50 Truedot wrote: They'd better not skimp on the female nudity where he's "fed" women who are basically there to get inseminated by him to make more of him, or the part where he bangs a soul sucking spirit chick, etc etc.
In other words, it'd better be Game of Thrones status and not get neutered by the retarded PC culture of the world. There was.....no nudity as far as I remembered lol And if you are comparing this to GoT, you will be GREATLY disappointed, try to compare it to.....Clash of the Titans! wtf hollywood. who's running it now? some PC butchers from MADD?
Dude if I am you, I would see Final Destination 5. At least the creator of that show KNOW that they are doing this for the graphics and explicit material. Conan did have GREAT 3D but it wasn't like in your face. I HATE how nowadays they have this 3D where everything sinks in and like you are looking through a box to see what's inside. OR wait until Dark Knight Rises come out.
|
|
|
|
|
|