EPT![[image loading]](http://i55.tinypic.com/33p7a04.jpg)
Scheduled for 19th of August 2011, Conan the Barbarian in 3D.
Trailer:
Website:
http://conanthebarbarianin3d.com/
Pictures:
![[image loading]](http://www.yellmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/conan-the-barbarian-2011.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ODkXAyTW0DQ/TZDSI8IpelI/AAAAAAAAAM0/JuCZgcVO9Bk/s1600/Conan-The-Barbarian-2011-Movie-Poster-4.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.beyondhollywood.com/uploads/2010/04/Rachel-Nichols-in-Conan-The-Barbarian-2011-Movie-Image-2.jpg)
+ Show Spoiler [wallpaper 1600x1200] +
May the hype begin!
[Movie] Conan the Barbarian
| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
|
Manit0u
Poland17553 Posts
Scheduled for 19th of August 2011, Conan the Barbarian in 3D. Trailer: Website: http://conanthebarbarianin3d.com/ Pictures: + Show Spoiler [wallpaper 1600x1200] + May the hype begin! | ||
|
Herrk
Sweden271 Posts
 why do they have to remake everything? | ||
|
Shockk
Germany2269 Posts
I'll probably watch it anyway, but it's not neccessary to remake / reboot every single movie/franchise :/. | ||
|
MLG_Wiggin
United States767 Posts
| ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17553 Posts
On May 14 2011 04:46 Shockk wrote: Dunno. The trailer wasn't too impressive, and without Arnie, it isn't Conan. I'll probably watch it anyway, but it's not neccessary to remake / reboot every single movie/franchise :/. Check this out (still in production though): ![[image loading]](http://www.collider.com/uploads/imageGallery/Red_Sonja/red_sonja_movie_poster_teaser.jpg) They ARE remaking everything... | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
Rose McGowan? Really? | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
Narwhal
United Kingdom314 Posts
It will be * Very corny. * Mediocre acting. * Over-blown visual effects and fight scenes. * Aimed towards people that like WWE * Shallow and predictable story. * Nothing like the original. Just sayin. | ||
|
Doppelganger
488 Posts
On May 14 2011 04:53 Narwhal wrote: I sense a bad remake, lot like most remakes of classics. It will be * Very corny. * Mediocre acting. * Over-blown visual effects and fight scenes. * Aimed towards people that like WWE * Shallow and predictable story. * Nothing like the original. Just sayin. well the overblown effects can already be seen in the trailer... so i guess you are right. | ||
|
clusen
Germany8702 Posts
| ||
|
Geo.Rion
7377 Posts
| ||
|
Narwhal
United Kingdom314 Posts
On May 14 2011 04:57 Doppelganger wrote: well the overblown effects can already be seen in the trailer... so i guess you are right. Hollywood know how to sell and market movies that airheads will enjoy. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On May 14 2011 04:57 clusen wrote: I haven't even seen the original movie..Do I have to be embarrassed now? Yes. You have something to do now. | ||
NonY
8751 Posts
On May 14 2011 04:53 Narwhal wrote: I sense a bad remake, lot like most remakes of classics. It will be * Very corny. * Mediocre acting. * Over-blown visual effects and fight scenes. * Aimed towards people that like WWE * Shallow and predictable story. * Nothing like the original. Just sayin. I think your last prediction contradicts some of your other predictions! | ||
|
Narwhal
United Kingdom314 Posts
On May 14 2011 05:00 Liquid`Tyler wrote: I think your last prediction contradicts some of your other predictions! yes the original was corny and the acting was lack luster but that is what made the movie a cult hit, this is different. But you raise a good point. | ||
|
j2choe
Canada243 Posts
| ||
|
Gorg
Germany261 Posts
nuff said. they will never reach the epicness that is the old classic. | ||
|
trias_e
United States520 Posts
On May 14 2011 05:00 Liquid`Tyler wrote: I think your last prediction contradicts some of your other predictions! The original was much better than many people give it credit for. Has one of the best film scores of all time IMO. Although the acting certainly did range from passable to terrible, at least they had the good sense to pretty much never let Arnold speak. | ||
|
BeMannerDuPenner
Germany5638 Posts
...or maybe just the best part in a 10min loop | ||
|
Shinobi1982
1605 Posts
On May 14 2011 05:00 Liquid`Tyler wrote: I think your last prediction contradicts some of your other predictions! Spot on. It's not like you are ever going to re-watch the original for whatever reason. Some older movies (<1990) you can re-watch and still be awed by it's brilliance. Conan the Barbarian (1982) is defiantly not one of those. | ||
| ||
