EPT![[image loading]](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ODkXAyTW0DQ/TZDSI8IpelI/AAAAAAAAAM0/JuCZgcVO9Bk/s1600/Conan-The-Barbarian-2011-Movie-Poster-4.jpg)
What a joke, why the fuck is Conan wearing eye liner??? So cheesy, so lame.. I hate this movie already, some treasures should just be left burried
[Movie] Conan the Barbarian - Page 2
| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
|
ELA
Denmark4608 Posts
What a joke, why the fuck is Conan wearing eye liner??? So cheesy, so lame.. I hate this movie already, some treasures should just be left burried | ||
|
mordek
United States12704 Posts
| ||
|
progeny
Sweden43 Posts
no arnold no conan | ||
|
trias_e
United States520 Posts
On May 14 2011 05:14 Shinobi1982 wrote: Spot on. It's not like you are ever going to re-watch the original for whatever reason. Some older movies (<1990) you can re-watch and still be awed by it's brilliance. Conan the Barbarian (1982) is defiantly not one of those. I disagree. It's a damn good epic adventure/fantasy flick with a score that kills almost anything from this era. Does no one else love this movie? | ||
|
SonicTitan
United States249 Posts
And I know you're saying to yourself, "But Sonic, what does a movie's rating have to do with anything?!?" In this case, goddamned everything. Listen, I'm not against a remake of Conan. What I want, though, is a real director with the balls to make a real Conan film. What I mean is cut the cheese from the 1982 original, slather on the gore, tits and irresponsible violence. Have a scene where Conan cuts off a king's head (doesn't matter which, any king will do) burns his castle to the ground, salts his fields and then impregnates the former king's queen-cum-love-slave. (See what I did there?) Once again, I may be wrong, because I don't know anything beyond the trailer, but from what I've seen they're turning Conan into some sort of hero figure, which is completely bass-ackwards: Conan was the coolest anti-hero ever. You know what made R. E. Howard's pulp fiction so deliciously, sleazily, under-the-radar awesome? It was the fact that Conan was a total amoral jackhole. He did what he wanted, and he mostly did it out of three motivations: hungry, angry, or horny. And by making this complete degenerate the main character of a story, Howard was implicitly saying that this was cool by him, at least in fantasy. Dear GOD don't turn Conan into a pussy. | ||
|
Brethern
231 Posts
The original conan was a masterpiece | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
and while it was okay, i was hoping it was going to be epic i have a feeling this won't be as good as i want it to either =/ when's another historical war epic coming out ffs | ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17238 Posts
On May 14 2011 05:29 SonicTitan wrote: I'm not saying I know anything about the rating, and I may be wrong, but I'm guessing...PG-13. And I know you're saying to yourself, "But Sonic, what does a movie's rating have to do with anything?!?" In this case, goddamned everything. Listen, I'm not against a remake of Conan. What I want, though, is a real director with the balls to make a real Conan film. What I mean is cut the cheese from the 1982 original, slather on the gore, tits and irresponsible violence. Have a scene where Conan cuts off a king's head (doesn't matter which, any king will do) burns his castle to the ground, salts his fields and then impregnates the former king's queen-cum-love-slave. (See what I did there?) Once again, I may be wrong, because I don't know anything beyond the trailer, but from what I've seen they're turning Conan into some sort of hero figure, which is completely bass-ackwards: Conan was the coolest anti-hero ever. You know what made R. E. Howard's pulp fiction so deliciously, sleazily, under-the-radar awesome? It was the fact that Conan was a total amoral jackhole. He did what he wanted, and he mostly did it out of three motivations: hungry, angry, or horny. And by making this complete degenerate the main character of a story, Howard was implicitly saying that this was cool by him, at least in fantasy. Dear GOD don't turn Conan into a pussy. My thoughts exactly. I mean, even the MMO got it right. They made it 18+, with excessive violence, nudity and foul language. The way it should be. | ||
|
Hakker
United States1360 Posts
| ||
|
SoylentCreep
Korea (South)176 Posts
On May 14 2011 05:29 SonicTitan wrote: Conan was the coolest anti-hero ever. Dear GOD don't turn Conan into a pussy. I couldn't agree more. The Conan movies from the 80's did a good job of depicting the true Conan from Howard's stories published in the "Weird Tales" magazines. Although they had this classic homoerotic cheesiness (trademark of 80's action movies) to it they were probably one of the best action fantasy movies created during that era. The remake, however, looks like a stillbirth in the tradition of lesser contributions to mankind like "the scorpion king" etc. I hope they at least get Conan's character right, and for the love of cinema, I hope this movie is actually better than I expect it to be. Keep your fingers crossed :D Khan:“What is best about life?” Conan:“Crush your enemies. See them driven before you; hear the lamentations of the women.” | ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
On May 14 2011 05:14 ELA wrote: What a joke, why the fuck is Conan wearing eye liner??? So cheesy, so lame.. I hate this movie already, some treasures should just be left burried he doesnt look big enough to be a barbarian either : l just because he has "rebellious" long hair | ||
|
CannonFodder
United States17 Posts
BTW, I thought it was understood that Conan the Barbarian was an amazing film. There are people out there who think it's bad? Even the sequel, despite being pretty ridiculous and campy, has it's charms. | ||
|
Thrill
2599 Posts
My faith in developer hype was crushed with AoC. I was seriously a believer before but that game crushed my innocence and the naivety of my soul. This movie? It good does not look. I mean wtf, is the Conan actor wearing mascara? | ||
|
DaCruise
Denmark2457 Posts
| ||
|
VPCursed
1044 Posts
| ||
|
HeIios
Sweden2523 Posts
On May 14 2011 07:14 CannonFodder wrote: I get the feeling Conan is going to be more like a feral beast in this movie; and won't be talking as much as Arnold did. I'm going to give this a chance while praying it doesn't use excessive CGI or somehow ruin the previous films. BTW, I thought it was understood that Conan the Barbarian was an amazing film. There are people out there who think it's bad? Even the sequel, despite being pretty ridiculous and campy, has it's charms. Conan the Barbarian is hands down the best fantasy movie of all time. I won't watch this though. | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On May 14 2011 07:16 DaCruise wrote: This will blow if he doesn´t punch a camel like he did in the original. Dear God, someone make this guy a directing consultant! | ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
On May 14 2011 05:08 Gorg wrote: nuff said. they will never reach the epicness that is the old classic. Before every raid in wow I ever partook in I had a macro that yelled this whole thing out. Good times | ||
|
Rednaxela_19
United States150 Posts
Hollywood, leave our classics alone! | ||
|
CursOr
United States6335 Posts
It's actually THAT bad... ... and part of Conan's original charm was its cheap/low budget feel. You almost had to use your imagination to fill in the gaps while watching it. This is just another overdone bullshit wannabe epic movie that wants to be the next LoTR. I'm so glad I don't watch movies or TV anymore... thanks for the reminder of why ^.^ | ||
| ||
