• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:35
CEST 18:35
KST 01:35
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Fresh Flow0[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy21ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30
Community News
$5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy4GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding7Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win0[BSL22] RO32 Group Stage5Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Quebec Clan still alive ? BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win
Tourneys
$5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 520 Moving Fees Mutation # 519 Inner Power Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone
Brood War
General
[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Fresh Flow ASL21 General Discussion BW General Discussion JD's Ro24 review BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group F [BSL22] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CEST
Strategy
Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates Muta micro map competition What's the deal with APM & what's its true value
Other Games
General Games
Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread The China Politics Thread Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How Streamers Inspire Gamers…
TrAiDoS
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Electronics
mantequilla
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2455 users

[DreamLeague] Day 3 Kick-off Season Finals - Page 29

Forum Index > Dota 2 Tournaments
Post a Reply
Prev 1 27 28 29 30 31 50 Next All
SilverStar
Profile Joined January 2012
Sweden18511 Posts
November 30 2013 20:04 GMT
#561
May your nightmare never end. GNAHAHAHAHHA
SKC
Profile Joined October 2010
Brazil18828 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-30 20:06:04
November 30 2013 20:05 GMT
#562
On December 01 2013 05:04 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2013 05:00 SKC wrote:
On December 01 2013 04:57 TheYango wrote:
On December 01 2013 04:53 SKC wrote:
Fixing a sympton is fine. Plenty of heroes received no changes and were suddenly overpowered or underpowered because of changes to the gameplay. They were often nerfed/buffed to compensate. The question should be whether the change that made Midas so good was good for the game and whether there is a good change to the game that can also help fixing Midas. If that's not the case, there is no reason why you cannot nerf an item that became good because of how the gameplay developed. There is nothing inheremtly wrong with fixing symptons.

Well, no, because if what makes Midas boring is that lull in the action that promotes its use (an item being boring by itself makes no sense, only the gameplay associated with it can be boring), nerfing Midas won't fix that.

The question is whether you can easily fix that lull in the action. It's mostly because of the increase in difficulty of pushing into higher tiers of towers, requiring the winning team to play passive and prepare better before pushing. A change that promotes pushing your advantage immediatly may also cause the game to be more snowbally and diminish the defenders advantage that creates amazing comebacks and great games. Changing Midas is a easier and less impactfull choice than changing the core of how the game is played, specially so soon after a major patch. It's a safer choice and I really wouldn't be surprised to see it nerfed.

The causal relationship is important here. Seeing 5 Midases in a game is not what's boring. Seeing 5 Midases and people farming for 5-10 minutes with them (or alternatively just losing the game when they can't win a fight) is boring. But the question is, are people farming for 5-10 minutes because they're buying Midas because it's too strong? Or are they buying Midas because some other factor compels them to farm for 5-10 minutes, and Midas is naturally the item to buy for that? Because if it's the latter, nerfing Midas won't stop people from farming for 5-10 minutes, which is the real gameplay problem that bothers people.

It's not that I think fixing the symptom is worse--I think fixing the symptom doesn't do ANYTHING. Nerfing or removing Midas doesn't alter the need for a farming phase to build up a larger item advantage before pushing. In fact, without a tool to accelerate farm from an advantage, it's actually possible that the farming phase could be even more drawn out.

And wasn't it common for teams to farm for 5-10 minutes or a Rosh before pushing high ground before the Midas craze? Yet far less people complained about it than they do about Midas. It's a much harder issue to fix.
WindWolf
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
Sweden11767 Posts
November 30 2013 20:05 GMT
#563
In-game lagging for anyone else?
EZ4ENCE
ymir233
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States8275 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-30 20:07:18
November 30 2013 20:06 GMT
#564
On December 01 2013 05:00 SKC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2013 04:57 TheYango wrote:
On December 01 2013 04:53 SKC wrote:
Fixing a sympton is fine. Plenty of heroes received no changes and were suddenly overpowered or underpowered because of changes to the gameplay. They were often nerfed/buffed to compensate. The question should be whether the change that made Midas so good was good for the game and whether there is a good change to the game that can also help fixing Midas. If that's not the case, there is no reason why you cannot nerf an item that became good because of how the gameplay developed. There is nothing inheremtly wrong with fixing symptons.

Well, no, because if what makes Midas boring is that lull in the action that promotes its use (an item being boring by itself makes no sense, only the gameplay associated with it can be boring), nerfing Midas won't fix that.

The question is whether you can easily fix that lull in the action. It's mostly because of the increase in difficulty of pushing into higher tiers of towers, requiring the winning team to play passive and prepare better before pushing. A change that promotes pushing your advantage immediatly may also cause the game to be more snowbally and diminish the defenders advantage that creates amazing comebacks and great games. Changing Midas is a easier and less impactfull choice than changing the core of how the game is played, specially so soon after a major patch. It's a safer choice and I really wouldn't be surprised to see it nerfed.


The reason why midas isn't punished as well and passive play is preferred instead is that people are still pretty sloppy in timings in Dota 2 (as well as timings being more fuzzy overall within the game), so if you don't have too many overlapping midases it's hard to punish when you don't know the timings unless you're constantly roaming around causing pressure/chaos like Na'Vi do (hence Aui's comments and also n0tail's comments about "good/bad midas"). I'm not sure if I would support a midas change just because people are too lazy to learn more precise timings.
Come motivate me to be cynical about animus at http://infinityandone.blogspot.com/ // Stork proxy gates are beautiful.
SilverStar
Profile Joined January 2012
Sweden18511 Posts
November 30 2013 20:07 GMT
#565
On December 01 2013 05:05 WindWolf wrote:
In-game lagging for anyone else?

Yeah
SKC
Profile Joined October 2010
Brazil18828 Posts
November 30 2013 20:07 GMT
#566
On December 01 2013 05:06 ymir233 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2013 05:00 SKC wrote:
On December 01 2013 04:57 TheYango wrote:
On December 01 2013 04:53 SKC wrote:
Fixing a sympton is fine. Plenty of heroes received no changes and were suddenly overpowered or underpowered because of changes to the gameplay. They were often nerfed/buffed to compensate. The question should be whether the change that made Midas so good was good for the game and whether there is a good change to the game that can also help fixing Midas. If that's not the case, there is no reason why you cannot nerf an item that became good because of how the gameplay developed. There is nothing inheremtly wrong with fixing symptons.

Well, no, because if what makes Midas boring is that lull in the action that promotes its use (an item being boring by itself makes no sense, only the gameplay associated with it can be boring), nerfing Midas won't fix that.

The question is whether you can easily fix that lull in the action. It's mostly because of the increase in difficulty of pushing into higher tiers of towers, requiring the winning team to play passive and prepare better before pushing. A change that promotes pushing your advantage immediatly may also cause the game to be more snowbally and diminish the defenders advantage that creates amazing comebacks and great games. Changing Midas is a easier and less impactfull choice than changing the core of how the game is played, specially so soon after a major patch. It's a safer choice and I really wouldn't be surprised to see it nerfed.


The reason why midas isn't punished as well and passive play is preferred instead is that people are still pretty sloppy in timings in Dota 2 (as well as timings being more fuzzy overall within the game), so if you don't have too many overlapping midases it's hard to punish when you don't know the timings unless you're constantly roaming around causing pressure/chaos like Na'Vi do. I'm not sure if I would support a midas change just because people are too lazy to learn more precise timings.

You are saying nothing needs to be fixed. Yango is saying the core gameplay needs to be fixed, not Midas. Diferent things.
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17720 Posts
November 30 2013 20:07 GMT
#567
On December 01 2013 04:48 SKC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2013 04:46 Manit0u wrote:
On December 01 2013 04:37 govie wrote:
On December 01 2013 04:28 trinxified wrote:
Hence why Midas ruins games now. Imagine if item was removed. Heroes will actually get their core items now without having to debate if Midas is better.


I dont agree. The midas gives the supports more farm, making the game more dynamic. There is more damage then just a carry, semi carry. I think midas is a blessing for supports and a more dynamic dota2 teamfight.


They should do it the way HoN did. Support gold for kills. You get the gold (and it's as much as 150g) if you participated in the kill (if you hit the hero that dies later with one auto-attack for example or if you cast a spell on him). And you get this gold regardless if you're anywhere near the kill (you can even be dead at the time). This helps supports with their farm immensely and makes for faster item progression overall and thus more dynamic environment.

Support gold exists, and it can be quite meaningful. But you get it from being near a kill instead of getting an assist.


And that's the problem. With you getting gold from assist (as opposed to being near the kill) it's much easier for squishy supports to get it.
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
ymir233
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States8275 Posts
November 30 2013 20:09 GMT
#568
On December 01 2013 05:07 SKC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2013 05:06 ymir233 wrote:
On December 01 2013 05:00 SKC wrote:
On December 01 2013 04:57 TheYango wrote:
On December 01 2013 04:53 SKC wrote:
Fixing a sympton is fine. Plenty of heroes received no changes and were suddenly overpowered or underpowered because of changes to the gameplay. They were often nerfed/buffed to compensate. The question should be whether the change that made Midas so good was good for the game and whether there is a good change to the game that can also help fixing Midas. If that's not the case, there is no reason why you cannot nerf an item that became good because of how the gameplay developed. There is nothing inheremtly wrong with fixing symptons.

Well, no, because if what makes Midas boring is that lull in the action that promotes its use (an item being boring by itself makes no sense, only the gameplay associated with it can be boring), nerfing Midas won't fix that.

The question is whether you can easily fix that lull in the action. It's mostly because of the increase in difficulty of pushing into higher tiers of towers, requiring the winning team to play passive and prepare better before pushing. A change that promotes pushing your advantage immediatly may also cause the game to be more snowbally and diminish the defenders advantage that creates amazing comebacks and great games. Changing Midas is a easier and less impactfull choice than changing the core of how the game is played, specially so soon after a major patch. It's a safer choice and I really wouldn't be surprised to see it nerfed.


The reason why midas isn't punished as well and passive play is preferred instead is that people are still pretty sloppy in timings in Dota 2 (as well as timings being more fuzzy overall within the game), so if you don't have too many overlapping midases it's hard to punish when you don't know the timings unless you're constantly roaming around causing pressure/chaos like Na'Vi do. I'm not sure if I would support a midas change just because people are too lazy to learn more precise timings.

You are saying nothing needs to be fixed. Yango is saying the core gameplay needs to be fixed, not Midas. Diferent things.


I said midas shouldn't be changed so casually like that and you threw my suggestion onto the roadside - good thing you put words into my mouth for me - ______ -
Come motivate me to be cynical about animus at http://infinityandone.blogspot.com/ // Stork proxy gates are beautiful.
TheYango
Profile Joined September 2008
United States47024 Posts
November 30 2013 20:09 GMT
#569
On December 01 2013 05:05 SKC wrote:
And wasn't it common for teams to farm for 5-10 minutes or a Rosh before pushing high ground before the Midas craze? Yet far less people complained about it than they do about Midas. It's a much harder issue to fix.

I think that's a difference in expectation. High ground defender's advantage has always been that large. It's normal to people to have that lull prior to a high ground push and it's usually accompanied by gem+aggressive ward map pressure, so it's not really passive in the same way.

A lull in action from pushing T1->T2 is weird for people, especially since for the most of DotA 2, a team being able to steamroll directly from T1 to T2 with their advantage was the norm.
Moderator
Faruko
Profile Joined April 2013
Chile34173 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-30 20:10:11
November 30 2013 20:09 GMT
#570
One "off-topic" question, whats the typical age Dota/Dota2 players retire ? Loda/Xboct are 25
Ross was right // "Jesus Christ nahaz is doing shots before my eyes" (Sn0_Man, 2018)
WindWolf
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
Sweden11767 Posts
November 30 2013 20:09 GMT
#571
Trixi overextending
EZ4ENCE
SKC
Profile Joined October 2010
Brazil18828 Posts
November 30 2013 20:10 GMT
#572
On December 01 2013 05:09 Faruko wrote:
One "off-topic" question, whats the typical age Dota 2 players retire ? Loda/Xboct are 25

Dota players don't retire. Hard to answer it.
TheYango
Profile Joined September 2008
United States47024 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-30 20:11:03
November 30 2013 20:10 GMT
#573
On December 01 2013 05:07 Manit0u wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2013 04:48 SKC wrote:
On December 01 2013 04:46 Manit0u wrote:
On December 01 2013 04:37 govie wrote:
On December 01 2013 04:28 trinxified wrote:
Hence why Midas ruins games now. Imagine if item was removed. Heroes will actually get their core items now without having to debate if Midas is better.


I dont agree. The midas gives the supports more farm, making the game more dynamic. There is more damage then just a carry, semi carry. I think midas is a blessing for supports and a more dynamic dota2 teamfight.


They should do it the way HoN did. Support gold for kills. You get the gold (and it's as much as 150g) if you participated in the kill (if you hit the hero that dies later with one auto-attack for example or if you cast a spell on him). And you get this gold regardless if you're anywhere near the kill (you can even be dead at the time). This helps supports with their farm immensely and makes for faster item progression overall and thus more dynamic environment.

Support gold exists, and it can be quite meaningful. But you get it from being near a kill instead of getting an assist.


And that's the problem. With you getting gold from assist (as opposed to being near the kill) it's much easier for squishy supports to get it.

1300 range is extremely lenient. For the most part it's actually easier to be in 1300 range when the enemy hero dies than to have actually contributed something directly to the kill.
Moderator
Lucumo
Profile Joined January 2010
6850 Posts
November 30 2013 20:11 GMT
#574
That nice camera work...
Jehct
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
New Zealand9115 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-30 20:13:09
November 30 2013 20:12 GMT
#575
On December 01 2013 05:07 Manit0u wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2013 04:48 SKC wrote:
On December 01 2013 04:46 Manit0u wrote:
On December 01 2013 04:37 govie wrote:
On December 01 2013 04:28 trinxified wrote:
Hence why Midas ruins games now. Imagine if item was removed. Heroes will actually get their core items now without having to debate if Midas is better.


I dont agree. The midas gives the supports more farm, making the game more dynamic. There is more damage then just a carry, semi carry. I think midas is a blessing for supports and a more dynamic dota2 teamfight.


They should do it the way HoN did. Support gold for kills. You get the gold (and it's as much as 150g) if you participated in the kill (if you hit the hero that dies later with one auto-attack for example or if you cast a spell on him). And you get this gold regardless if you're anywhere near the kill (you can even be dead at the time). This helps supports with their farm immensely and makes for faster item progression overall and thus more dynamic environment.

Support gold exists, and it can be quite meaningful. But you get it from being near a kill instead of getting an assist.


And that's the problem. With you getting gold from assist (as opposed to being near the kill) it's much easier for squishy supports to get it.

what

the gold aoe is huge (1300 range)

hows landing a spell or right click easier than just being in the area
"You seem to think about this game a lot"
Daralii
Profile Joined March 2010
United States16991 Posts
November 30 2013 20:13 GMT
#576
On December 01 2013 05:09 Faruko wrote:
One "off-topic" question, whats the typical age Dota/Dota2 players retire ? Loda/Xboct are 25

25 is pretty normal. I imagine Loda and Hvost are gonna stick around until they stop getting paid, though.
Fear is freedom! Subjugation is liberation! Contradiction is truth!
_SpiRaL_
Profile Joined December 2012
Afghanistan1636 Posts
November 30 2013 20:13 GMT
#577
On December 01 2013 05:09 Faruko wrote:
One "off-topic" question, whats the typical age Dota/Dota2 players retire ? Loda/Xboct are 25


I think Dota does not require as young an age as things like FPS and RTS. Even in Starcraft WhiteRa, Nestea etc show you can definitely go until 30.
Red and yellow are all I see
cecek
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Czech Republic18921 Posts
November 30 2013 20:13 GMT
#578
Freezing Field, motherfucker.
super gg
WindWolf
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
Sweden11767 Posts
November 30 2013 20:14 GMT
#579
In-game starting to lag more and more Wonder if the streams are any better
EZ4ENCE
Spicy_Curry
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States10573 Posts
November 30 2013 20:14 GMT
#580
Well the meta will evolve to punish the midas kinda like the EE stack strat or it becomes more passive. Its far too early to tell. Midas also makes alot more heroes viable. It might be easier to make midas cheaper but give less gold and the same amount of xp.
High Risk Low Reward
Prev 1 27 28 29 30 31 50 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
13:00
King of the Hill #243
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .319
BRAT_OK 94
trigger 94
Codebar 82
Railgan 27
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 36819
Calm 3475
Bisu 3303
Shuttle 1069
EffOrt 762
Mini 718
ggaemo 513
BeSt 464
Light 355
actioN 352
[ Show more ]
Hyuk 323
Rush 283
ZerO 255
firebathero 128
Barracks 103
Aegong 84
Shinee 60
Nal_rA 59
Killer 49
Movie 42
Hyun 29
Rock 29
soO 27
Sexy 23
Terrorterran 21
scan(afreeca) 18
Hm[arnc] 17
yabsab 14
GoRush 9
ivOry 9
NotJumperer 8
Dota 2
Gorgc6629
qojqva3045
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor211
MindelVK15
Other Games
singsing2010
Grubby1872
Liquid`RaSZi1425
FrodaN1249
B2W.Neo963
RotterdaM269
Sick92
QueenE77
Mew2King53
ZerO(Twitch)32
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL790
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 21
• Adnapsc2 19
• Reevou 2
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 2
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2029
• TFBlade1804
Other Games
• Shiphtur193
• tFFMrPink 14
Upcoming Events
BSL
2h 25m
Sterling vs Azhi_Dahaki
Napoleon vs Mazur
Jimin vs Nesh
spx vs Strudel
IPSL
2h 25m
Artosis vs TBD
Napoleon vs TBD
Replay Cast
16h 25m
Wardi Open
17h 25m
Afreeca Starleague
17h 25m
Soma vs YSC
Sharp vs sSak
Monday Night Weeklies
23h 25m
OSC
1d 7h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 17h
Snow vs PianO
hero vs Rain
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
1d 17h
GSL
1d 19h
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
2 days
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
3 days
Escore
4 days
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
5 days
IPSL
5 days
WolFix vs nOmaD
dxtr13 vs Razz
BSL
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
6 days
Ladder Legends
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W2
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W3
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
RSL Revival: Season 5
WardiTV TLMC #16
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.