EPTSecret are fine and will still be challenging for the title at TI5.
Team Secret Discussion - Page 34
| Forum Index > Dota 2 Player & Team Discussion |
|
FuzzyJAM
Scotland9300 Posts
Secret are fine and will still be challenging for the title at TI5. | ||
|
Vankuga
Panama2005 Posts
| ||
|
WolfintheSheep
Canada14127 Posts
Compared to teams like EG or VG who certainly can be figured out, but have enough versatility that their performance isn't heavily dependent on a few hero picks. | ||
|
Faruko
Chile34171 Posts
finally nevermind, bad music again | ||
|
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
On March 02 2015 08:24 Faruko wrote: rtz streaming and his music is actually not crap finally nevermind, bad music again Pretty sure his favorite part of streaming is making people listen to shit music. Had to tune out the other day when he played some super racist cover of Gangham Style. Kids, man. | ||
|
Faruko
Chile34171 Posts
On March 02 2015 08:34 FHDH wrote: Pretty sure his favorite part of streaming is making people listen to shit music. Had to tune out the other day when he played some super racist cover of Gangham Style. Kids, man. has to otherwise i dont see how can people hear that "music" | ||
|
Faruko
Chile34171 Posts
lol | ||
|
Nerfed
Russian Federation1132 Posts
| ||
|
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
On March 02 2015 23:19 Nerfed wrote: I do not get that, if rtz has already decided on moving, then why not to move in eu? if he likes freezing weather he can settle in Norway np lol I don't know. Young/stupid people tend to have an outsized sense of nationalism. I love my country and everything but there's no question there are many places not in the US I would be happy living, and would happily move to if I had a good professional reason to do so. Especially when he plans to retire after another couple of years, I don't get the big deal. | ||
|
dmnum
Brazil6910 Posts
| ||
|
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
On March 03 2015 00:10 dmnum wrote: Has he actually said he won't move because of 'nationalism'? Yes he literally used the word "nationalism". No. | ||
|
dmnum
Brazil6910 Posts
This sounds to me just like your "I always suspected funn1k had a mental issue" bullshit. | ||
|
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
On March 03 2015 00:15 dmnum wrote: That's why I used nationalism with quotes. This sounds to me just like your "I always suspected funn1k had a mental issue" bullshit. Up to you bro. Not gonna serve up a reference sheet every time I say something about a player. Not gonna stop talking about players either. | ||
|
dmnum
Brazil6910 Posts
| ||
|
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
On March 03 2015 00:25 dmnum wrote: That's fine "bro", but the shit overflows when you talk about a reference sheet in the abstract sense as a way to validate your speculative drivel. The shit overflows more when I say something and the usual suspects come around to challenge it just because I'm the one who said it. I always, always have bases for the things I say. If I choose to share them the same people will tell me my reasoning is inadequate, for totally nebulous reasons. If I don't people will say I'm talking out of my ass. It's fine and not something I'm going to allow to be my problem. | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
No personal attacks | ||
|
dmnum
Brazil6910 Posts
I asked you first what were your reasons for saying RTZ won't move to Europe and you went on the defensive, do you honestly expect to not be challenged on your claims when you don't provide support for them? | ||
|
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
On March 03 2015 00:34 dmnum wrote: How the hell am I one of the "usual suspects" when I barely even post here? I asked you first what were your reasons for saying RTZ won't move to Europe and you went on the defensive, do you honestly expect to not be challenged on your claims when you don't provide support for them? No, what I expect is for people to keep up on the facts if they want to have a debate. I have zero interest in litigating every statement I make, even less if the person in question apparently isn't even familiar with the basic current information on the subjects in question, which is the case here. If you want to challenge me, feel free. But I don't owe you anything. | ||
|
Beirut
United States673 Posts
Really didn't feel like the recent TL article had a lot of substance. It felt like the "counters" to Team Secret's strategy were literally just general dota tips. Another big weakness lies in the way that Secret relies on their players during certain periods of the game. Earlygame Secret relies heavily on its supports to secure exp and farm on heroes that might struggle in lane versus the enemy team, while in the midgame the team relies on Zai to pave the way for s4 and RTZ to get farm. I mean these are more or less the default roles, but they're construed here as some kind of weaknesses. Supports secure exp and farm on heroes that might struggle in lane and the offlaner has a big role in the midgame. There are other examples. It just felt like the first section about their playstyle was a lot more insightful than the second, which focuses on their counters. Really liked the note about how defensively they play in the early game, and their preference for tri-core. What is tri-core, anyway? When does a strong initiator/utility non-carry NOT qualify as a core? | ||
|
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
Not sure if it's a case of people abusing terminology or a lack of comprehension.of what they mean. | ||
| ||
