EPTWould you have reported him for griefing/intentional feeding there?
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion - Page 10392
| Forum Index > Dota 2 General |
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34495 Posts
Would you have reported him for griefing/intentional feeding there? | ||
|
teddyoojo
Germany22369 Posts
i had a 2-18 skywrath who got reported for scripting lmfao | ||
|
PassiveAce
United States18076 Posts
| ||
|
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34495 Posts
Just put on probation maybe | ||
|
PassiveAce
United States18076 Posts
| ||
|
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34495 Posts
On January 31 2021 23:03 PassiveAce wrote: I think the guy reporting his teammates in a 2-30 stomp should be banned lol I agree | ||
|
Erasme
Bahamas15899 Posts
just bad players being bad | ||
|
PassiveAce
United States18076 Posts
| ||
|
cecek
Czech Republic18921 Posts
On February 01 2021 07:25 PassiveAce wrote: Do you guys view bad/meme builds as reportable in ranked? I usually only care to report someone if theyr being a huge dick in chat or actively griefing (feeding, tossing teammates into towers, etc) Is this really even a question? 1000% is a bad build not reportable, come on dude. | ||
|
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
| ||
|
teddyoojo
Germany22369 Posts
| ||
|
PassiveAce
United States18076 Posts
| ||
|
OfficeRefurbishment
1 Post
| ||
|
Faruko
Chile34171 Posts
| ||
|
harodihg
Japan1344 Posts
On January 31 2021 20:17 Firebolt145 wrote: I got an overwatch case where a team was losing 2-30 at 15 minutes into the game, 2 rax down, everyone on the team was roughly 0-6 or 0-8 or so, and the mid SF was 1-6 or something. No one had any significant items or counterplay and the game was obviously over. At 15 minutes the mid SF sold his boots, bottle and wraith band so he could afford Shadow Amulet. I couldn't watch after but the game ended 2-3 minutes later, and presumably he afk'd invisible in the fountain. Would you have reported him for griefing/intentional feeding there? Technically, yes. That's why this system is so absurd. There isn't much room for gray areas yet there are more than enough that could be named. Let's say you have someone screaming at you and doing virtually everything that they can to make your game horrible, so you go afk. Are you the bad guy? Yes. They might be the bad guy as well, but there's no room left for "it wasn't a bad deal" or "obviously reporting for this is absurd". | ||
|
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34495 Posts
But technically, the definition they use for griefing includes 'selling/destroying items' so I had no choice to vote yes. | ||
|
PassiveAce
United States18076 Posts
On February 01 2021 20:02 Firebolt145 wrote: Ya I really don't like the black and white 'guilty or not guilty' options. Were they flaming him all game? Was he flaming back? All I know was that everyone on the team was doing shit in a completely lost game that was 2 minutes away from over. Not like an SF can turn that game around. But technically, the definition they use for griefing includes 'selling/destroying items' so I had no choice to vote yes. Funny enough, this problem is pretty similar to a dynamic I see a lot in my reading for law school. A lower court will feel like it has to use a strict application of a rule that winds up causing an obviously unjust result. Except in law there's usually a higher court to reinterpret the rule to get a better result :p | ||
|
Erasme
Bahamas15899 Posts
On February 01 2021 20:02 Firebolt145 wrote: Ya I really don't like the black and white 'guilty or not guilty' options. Were they flaming him all game? Was he flaming back? All I know was that everyone on the team was doing shit in a completely lost game that was 2 minutes away from over. Not like an SF can turn that game around. But technically, the definition they use for griefing includes 'selling/destroying items' so I had no choice to vote yes. Why do you think humans are reviewing the cases ? If somebody destroys all their items while the throne is dying that doesn't mean u should vote yes | ||
|
teddyoojo
Germany22369 Posts
| ||
|
cecek
Czech Republic18921 Posts
There's a fuckton of fluff and bloat in the game. Talents, neutral items, outposts, aghanims shard,,backpack slots. All that is just change for the sake of change. They have to do stuff like this otherwise the game gets stale. But the game is so in-elegant right now. It's even bad for watching the game, nobody remembers all the talents in the game. I don't even know the new neutral items from the recent update. Dota 3 would allow Valve to slim the game down. And at the same time blow it all up and do gigantic changes to concept they haven't ever touched. Keep the visuals and cosmetic items, but change the fundamentals of the game. Change the way the inventory works, maybe you don't have 6 slots, but you have a head slots, body slot, like in RPGs. (Obviously not exactly that, but something of that magnuitude, you get it) Get rid of Agi, Str, Int and replace it all with a new system. and most importantly, remove all that bullshit bloat I talked about. I would love that. | ||
| ||
