EPTor maybe make a little qualifier for the invites for the League Stage Like you would pick 45 players and other 5 would get in league by qualifiers
NASL Details - Page 2
| Forum Index > Community News and Headlines |
|
GizmoPT
Portugal3040 Posts
or maybe make a little qualifier for the invites for the League Stage Like you would pick 45 players and other 5 would get in league by qualifiers | ||
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
- How does the NASL foresee bringing in players from different continents? Will the league make accommodations, or will that be the sole responsibility of the their teams? - How does the NASL anticipate having to compete against the GSL? Are you expecting both to co-exist, or are you intending to compete against them? | ||
|
Kyhol
Canada2575 Posts
| ||
|
Froadac
United States6733 Posts
On February 22 2011 10:34 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: I don't get the maximum 5 players per team thing wouldn't mind hearing more on it. I can think of maybe two teams who can line up 6 players that can all make a deep run in such a tournament. This whole rule seems to have a rather small impact on the tournament but it badly hurts a few individual players, and I don't see the gain in removing 2 world class players from your tournament because they share a team tag with 5 others. If they're good enough they're good enough. Probably missing something about this rule but can't figure out what. Yeah. It did strike me as strange. Few teams can field that many guys. Let alone of "Code S" quality. | ||
|
holy_war
United States3590 Posts
On February 22 2011 10:33 drewbie.root wrote: so will the player list be invite or will it come down to the voting? ;D anyways thx a lot motbob for this ! Quote from iNcontroL from the other thread: The voting is a fun way to get involved and support your favorite players. It helps but by no means WHAT SO EVER decides who gets selected. Please stop looking for ways to make this a bad thing. | ||
|
aristarchus
United States652 Posts
On February 22 2011 10:35 sylverfyre wrote: 9 weeks of divisional play!!?!? ... whoa. This isn't some single-elim slugfest, this is the real deal! I love it! Also I love hearing that MLG has been cooperating strongly - this isn't competition over the esports scene, the scene needs to cooperate to grow :D I wouldn't be so sure MLG's cooperation is charity on their part. This tournament is offering much more prize money than they are, and if they didn't cooperate it could very well be MLG that ended up not getting any good players. I actually think the western scene has too many "big" tournaments and no one with the sort of huge prestige that winning GSL gives you (and therefore no tournament with that level of attention). I wouldn't mind a little more competition. | ||
|
mprs
Canada2933 Posts
On February 22 2011 10:32 tok wrote: I hope it's not another GSL. I will admit I am looking forward to it, mlg has been real boring lately and GSTL was a bit of a snoozefest. MLG can't be boring when it is not on. | ||
Brad
2754 Posts
On February 22 2011 10:06 iNcontroL wrote: The voting is a fun way to get involved and support your favorite players. It helps but by no means WHAT SO EVER decides who gets selected. Please stop looking for ways to make this a bad thing. | ||
|
DeltruS
Canada2214 Posts
| ||
|
ffadicted
United States3545 Posts
On February 22 2011 10:34 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: I don't get the maximum 5 players per team thing wouldn't mind hearing more on it. I can think of maybe 2-3 teams who can line up 6 players that can all make a deep run in such a tournament. This whole rule seems to have a rather small impact on the tournament but it badly hurts a few individual players, and I don't see the gain in removing 2 world class players from your tournament because they share a team tag with 5 others. If they're good enough they're good enough. Probably missing something about this rule but can't figure out what. Can't wait for additional information to come out. Agreed completely. This is the one thing I'm not liking about the whole annoucement. If a team has good players, it has good players. It's unfair for a better player to be left out simply because they're in the same team as 5 other good players. Not only is it unfair, but it also decreases the overall quality of players in the tournament On February 22 2011 10:32 tok wrote: I hope it's not another GSL. I will admit I am looking forward to it, mlg has been real boring lately and GSTL was a bit of a snoozefest. You must not follow eSports at all lol There has been no MLG lately, and to not want something of GSL caliber and to call the GSTL a snoozefest is ludicrous | ||
|
IPA
United States3206 Posts
| ||
|
Oxb
199 Posts
I also feel that the voting isn't the best idea, I'm a 'fan' of trump, or atleast his stream so I voted for him but if i'd be objectively he might not be a 'top 50 player'. Then again it gets all the players people want to see so, that's a good think I suppose :D. Go go NASL! Edit: I, and I think many others, miss understood this then or just were to lazy to read everything and to eager to start voting :D | ||
|
krews
United States1308 Posts
On February 22 2011 10:34 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: I don't get the maximum 5 players per team thing wouldn't mind hearing more on it. I can think of maybe 2-3 teams who can line up 6 players that can all make a deep run in such a tournament. This whole rule seems to have a rather small impact on the tournament but it badly hurts a few individual players, and I don't see the gain in removing 2 world class players from your tournament because they share a team tag with 5 others. If they're good enough they're good enough. Probably missing something about this rule but can't figure out what. Can't wait for additional information to come out. thats a rule thats definitely gonna have to change. I understand why they wanted it, no team killing in any division but its going to cause teams to split just so players can compete. | ||
|
Brad
2754 Posts
On February 22 2011 10:40 DeltruS wrote: I really like how involved justin.tv is in this. How many viewers did we have for the showmatch? 20k? I also really like how fast Justin.tv gets vods up, and their quality. I know some people who hate the GSL stream because of it's low quality, but that doesn't sound like it is going to be a problem for anybody. By the looks of it, alot more. Pushing 25k i bet. | ||
|
GeneralissimoNero
United States236 Posts
On February 22 2011 10:34 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: I don't get the maximum 5 players per team thing wouldn't mind hearing more on it. I can think of maybe 2-3 teams who can line up 6 players that can all make a deep run in such a tournament. This whole rule seems to have a rather small impact on the tournament but it badly hurts a few individual players, and I don't see the gain in removing 2 world class players from your tournament because they share a team tag with 5 others. If they're good enough they're good enough. Probably missing something about this rule but can't figure out what. Can't wait for additional information to come out. Couldn't agree more. Haypro, who deserves to be in this more than anyone will most likely end up with the short end of the stick here, as he isn't as popular as the other liquid guys. But he is a far superior player to many people on the list. | ||
|
GizmoPT
Portugal3040 Posts
:O 1 in 1000 that will discourage lot of players | ||
|
Karthane
United States1183 Posts
| ||
|
Doraemon.doraemon
United States335 Posts
| ||
|
Pinith
651 Posts
| ||
|
MaestroSC
United States2073 Posts
What about other tournaments? This tournament is going to have games daily, 5 days a week. Kind of closes the doors for other tournaments who want the same competitors at their events. These also seem like relatively long seasons, which is both a positive and a negative. a Positive for the fans but seems like players will have to dedicate months at a time to this competition, closing the doors for chances of another tournament/series. any comments any1? | ||
| ||
