EPTobjectifying somebody doesn't mean fucking and vice versa!
is it ok to like a slut? - Page 3
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
SurG
Russian Federation798 Posts
objectifying somebody doesn't mean fucking and vice versa! | ||
|
ObsoleteLogic
United States3676 Posts
| ||
|
BigBalls
United States5354 Posts
On August 06 2003 15:41 ObsoleteLogic wrote: Did you just read the last sentence, or the whole paragraph? Hitler enjoyed masturbating while a prostitute kicked him. He also enjoyed killing Jews. The basis of your argument is legality, but why? You just said who cares about morals. Legislature is a form of instilling and regulating proper moral conduct. As for caring about morality, cultures which started with moral affluence, rose to great things, but ultimately fell apart when they became morally lax. Just look at ancient Rome; they started with a strong military and strong virtues. Paederasty wasn't a cornerstone of their lifestyles (as it was of the Greeks, who never held on to much for long), they had strong religious virtues. But as their coffers grew, their moral backbone bent. Infanticde, homosexuality, pedophilia in general, all became commonplace and were never fully eradicated from the Empire, particularly in the Eastern (post Constantine, naturally). Just an observation (I did a report on this a few years ago) EDIT: Forgot to quote EDIT: P.S., not every action is driven by fun. Man saves child from a burning house! Doesn't sound like a fun-based activity, to me. just because hitler likes A and likes B doesnt mean all people who like A like B. Its logically incorrect to jump from a single case to a general case and compare his psychotic nature with anyone else. When I said who cares about morals, I was referring to you bringing up violence as an example to sex. Who cares if he has sex with this girl, as long as everything he does is within legal limits. Hes not dealing with something along those lines. hes dealing with intercourse. is that legal? yes, the age of consent is 16. is it morally correct? its not morally wrong, it may not be the best thing to do, but there isnt anything wrong with it (im not a believer in religion) as for the morality of a society causing its downfall, you mentioned 3 things, infanticide, homosexuality, pedophilia. 2 of these are illegal. one is a legal but a psychological problem. and none of these can be attributed to directly causing the downfall of an empire. just because a correlation exists, there doesnt have to be a cause-effect. as for the situation regarding a man saving a childs life, I would write a proof showing how it can lead to fun, but I dont have time. someone wants me to copy shit for them and mail it out, and help them take stuff out of their car, so ill do it later | ||
|
ObsoleteLogic
United States3676 Posts
Infanticide is the same principle as abortion; aside from the fact that there were about 30 minutes difference between the execution (of the action) of one and the other. | ||
|
SurG
Russian Federation798 Posts
| ||
|
ObsoleteLogic
United States3676 Posts
| ||
|
ObsoleteLogic
United States3676 Posts
| ||
|
Macrophage
Germany730 Posts
| ||
|
SurG
Russian Federation798 Posts
On August 06 2003 16:15 ObsoleteLogic wrote: Anyways, I've got to get to work, and this argument is starting to boil down to semantics (bleh). So, fun argument, and Perli... DO THE RIGHT THING! -_- even if it is, she likes it. That's the point. Ever stop to think that sometimes people want to be treated like objects in some ways? | ||
|
Yarertz
Djibouti1891 Posts
| ||
|
SurG
Russian Federation798 Posts
| ||
|
Orlandu
China2450 Posts
| ||
|
BigBalls
United States5354 Posts
On August 06 2003 16:10 ObsoleteLogic wrote: Balls, you could connect saving a childs life to eating a french fry if you wanted to, but it wouldn't really be pertinent. If you want more examples from the Roman Empire: leniency, sloth, greed, slavery, adultery and all manner of extramarital affairs, and religious laxity. Infanticide is the same principle as abortion; aside from the fact that there were about 30 minutes difference between the execution (of the action) of one and the other. and of course all of those made them get taken over by the germanic tribes. their lack of morals made them inept at war | ||
|
Funktion
Australia156 Posts
Right or wrong doesn't come into it anyway. Do you both want to get it on? THEN GO FOR IT. For all you know she could of posted on some other forum "Is it wrong to hook up with some pissed cunt just for sex?". But I am religious, and that is the basis for my arguments. Didn't see that coming a mile away. | ||
|
radiaL
Andorra2690 Posts
btw, best post was BigBalls' second  hahah still laughin about that one  {edit} 2nd, thought it was first | ||
|
BigBalls
United States5354 Posts
| ||
Rekrul
Korea (South)17174 Posts
| ||
|
radiaL
Andorra2690 Posts
althou im not sure about logic here, he seems to be an impotent | ||
|
BigBalls
United States5354 Posts
On August 06 2003 16:50 [pG]Rekrul wrote: All guys are sluts, why can't girls be? cause double standards are the best thing since sliced bread | ||
|
TeCh)PsylO
United States3552 Posts
as a young man being naturally more emotionally stable than a young woman, i think its partially your responsibility to be protective of a girl who most likely has got alot of problems. sex is good, but it is not worth being part of a regrettable past and alot of emotional turmoil. if u really "like" her, u should take care of her, by looking out for her emotionally, not by looking out for you or her physically. i suspect if u get into a relationship with such a girl, in the end u will both just be hurt. you by knowing that you will never have anything from her that other people havnt had, and her by looking for attention in all the wrong places. if u stay away, u will just have a good friend, and in the back of your head u will always know u did the right thing | ||
| ||
