is it ok to like a slut?

On August 06 2003 15:03 ObsoleteLogic wrote:
Stupid, stupid, and uh... stupid. I know I'm in the extreme minority on this forum, being a conservative, but for god's sake... can't you people keep it in your pants? Think with your head, not with your cock. Not with BigBalls cock, either. By "take advantage of it", he really means, "take advantage of her." If you're going to have cheap, meaningless sex, find a prostitute. That way you're only inflicting idiocy on yourself.

On August 06 2003 15:10 BigBalls wrote:


not take advantage of her, take advantage of the situation

heres a kidwhois16yearsold that probably doesnt have significant amounts of sexual experience. what he needs is a girl to basically make a man out of him. (sorryfor thistypingbullshit thiskeyboard fucking sucksandthespacebar and theL key fucking jam)

he sayshelikesthegirl, so go outwith her, havesex with her andhave agood time. you dontwant to regret thislater, take advantageofopportunities thatarise(nopun intended)

OMFG THISFUCKING SPACEBAR ISDRIVINGMETHROUGH THEROOF

butyeah,if youre looking for adeep platonic meaningful relationship, then youre gay.

sex is an integral part to love, and you seem to like this girl. go out with her, fuck her, have fun with her, youll mature both sexually and in a relationship sense, i see no reason to not go out with her besides a possible STD (which i highly doubt considering your age)

On August 06 2003 15:16 GoSexyPerli wrote:
Big Balls = genious

On August 06 2003 15:17 ObsoleteLogic wrote:


Clever twist of words, same meaning.



Get a flat-head screwdriver, pry it out, clean it, and put it back in.



I take offense to that. Sorry I see women as more than giant cock-mittens.



Grow in a relationship sense? What, a sense of hollow, purely hedonistic relations? Life isn't all fun and games.

On August 06 2003 15:20 BigBalls wrote:
i had a "real relationship" with a girl that ended about a year ago

we went out for a long time, probably about 18 months. she wasnt a slut, but im about 90% sure she cheated on me (the day after we broke up she had a new boyfriend) i went off to college 6 hours from home, you can kind of put 2 and 2 together.

i really hate her guts to this day but Im glad I went out with her. I got lots more sexual experience than I had, and I got a good sense of relationships.

i really dont see many negative aspects to you going out with her, she could break your heart, but the benefits outweigh the consequences (and if she does break your heart, you learn a lot from a relationship of that type)

On August 06 2003 15:26 ObsoleteLogic wrote:


That sucks dude, and I know real relationships can bring a lot of heartbreak, but also that good can come out of that pain. But you can either seek the good after the bad in life, or you can start going for the good right away. You're making sexual experience out to inherently be good, because it is pleasurable. But that doesn't make it so; perfectly normal people have admitted to enjoy violence, that release of aggression, but its results are not purely beneficial, regardless of circumstances. Sometimes it is necessary, but only because of unfortunate situations. Anyways, my point is that just because you enjoy something, doesn't mean its good.

On August 06 2003 15:31 BigBalls wrote:


who cares about morals man. The purpose of being alive is to have fun. We only live one life, everyones driving purpose behind EVERY ACTION is fun. why work a shitty job that pays well? So one can have fun in retirement.

Every action has an intention of ending with some type of fun activity. Who cares if its morally wrong to have sex. If he enjoys it, go for it (as long as its within legal limits). If something he is doing is bringing harm to others, then its a bad action.

If his definition of sex is rape, then surely it is not good. But if he isnt kobe bryant, and he thinks sex is not ass raping a girl in a hotel room, then hes seeking pleasure out of it, and his partner is getting pleasure out of it. It is a good thing.


and getting sexual experience early is also a good thing. once you get to college you dont want to be a little 2 pump chump hornball that turns off all the girls he meets.

On August 06 2003 15:36 GoSexyPerli wrote:


basically everything but sex.

On August 06 2003 15:57 Liquid`Drone wrote:
"the right thing" obsoletelogic would be fucking the lady who wants to be fucked.

not denying her of the same pleasure you also want.
its not a fucking rape we are talking about here yo.

On August 06 2003 15:41 ObsoleteLogic wrote:


Did you just read the last sentence, or the whole paragraph? Hitler enjoyed masturbating while a prostitute kicked him. He also enjoyed killing Jews. The basis of your argument is legality, but why? You just said who cares about morals. Legislature is a form of instilling and regulating proper moral conduct.

As for caring about morality, cultures which started with moral affluence, rose to great things, but ultimately fell apart when they became morally lax. Just look at ancient Rome; they started with a strong military and strong virtues. Paederasty wasn't a cornerstone of their lifestyles (as it was of the Greeks, who never held on to much for long), they had strong religious virtues. But as their coffers grew, their moral backbone bent. Infanticde, homosexuality, pedophilia in general, all became commonplace and were never fully eradicated from the Empire, particularly in the Eastern (post Constantine, naturally). Just an observation (I did a report on this a few years ago)


EDIT: Forgot to quote
EDIT: P.S., not every action is driven by fun. Man saves child from a burning house! Doesn't sound like a fun-based activity, to me.

On August 06 2003 16:15 ObsoleteLogic wrote:
Anyways, I've got to get to work, and this argument is starting to boil down to semantics (bleh). So, fun argument, and Perli... DO THE RIGHT THING! -_-

On August 06 2003 16:10 ObsoleteLogic wrote:
Balls, you could connect saving a childs life to eating a french fry if you wanted to, but it wouldn't really be pertinent. If you want more examples from the Roman Empire: leniency, sloth, greed, slavery, adultery and all manner of extramarital affairs, and religious laxity.

Infanticide is the same principle as abortion; aside from the fact that there were about 30 minutes difference between the execution (of the action) of one and the other.

But I am religious, and that is the basis for my arguments.

On August 06 2003 16:50 [pG]Rekrul wrote:
All guys are sluts, why can't girls be?

On August 06 2003 16:13 ObsoleteLogic wrote:
SurG, ever stop to think that maybe every time you wnat to fuck your girlfriend, it is objectification?

On August 06 2003 15:03 ObsoleteLogic wrote:
Stupid, stupid, and uh... stupid. I know I'm in the extreme minority on this forum, being a conservative, but for god's sake... can't you people keep it in your pants? Think with your head, not with your cock. Not with BigBalls cock, either. By "take advantage of it", he really means, "take advantage of her." If you're going to have cheap, meaningless sex, find a prostitute. That way you're only inflicting idiocy on yourself.

On August 06 2003 15:06 Liquid`Drone wrote:
yeah obsolete thats a stupid attitude.

go for it, you're gonna regret it if you don't. ^_^

On August 06 2003 17:23 C)R wrote:
k for 16 that is pretty good, just use her for a bit, if you don't u'll regret it, trust me. It seems harsh but when you get older u'll realise that people use eachother all the time

On August 06 2003 18:13 Maenander wrote:


I dont like such thoughts

On August 06 2003 18:18 Maenander wrote:
Some people here speak of using girls, or taking advantage of them, or "objectification".
Ever heard of women thinking for themselves, who maybe want sex like in this case ?

On August 06 2003 17:47 GoSexyPerli wrote:
i have stated that i dont like her only for her hotness.... She has a great personality, easy to talk to, funny, etc. Its icing on the cake.

On August 06 2003 18:54 Capn wrote:

Then go for it. How is this using the girl? She wants him, he wants her...sounds pretty simple to me what you should do.


Plus, you're in high school...have some fun. You don't need to be searching for the perfect relationship right now.

On August 06 2003 18:47 Lockdown- wrote:
Obsolete Logic i admire your morals and values


i completly agree

On August 06 2003 18:34 ObsoleteLogic wrote:
That would be objectification of the man. It works both ways.

On August 06 2003 19:03 ObsoleteLogic wrote:
Don't take relationship advice from a guy who has "From personal experience, i have come to the conclusion that there is no such thing as real love, only a strong sense of infatuation and likeness towards another individual," as his signature...

On August 06 2003 19:23 Liquid`Drone wrote:
* I do not want anyone to use anyone *.

she wants sexual contact with him. he wants sexual contact with her. why should they not have sexual contact with eachother? ^_^

there's nothing keeping the girl from not having sexual contact with him and there's nothing keeping him from not having sexual contact with her, if there's anything they don't want to do then they can just tell eachother ! ! ! !

On August 06 2003 20:17 ObsoleteLogic wrote:
Eri, have you ever heard of those things called "families" ? ):

Life isn't all fun and games.

On August 06 2003 20:33 ObsoleteLogic wrote:
Or in the case of your parents nazgul, the mistake t.t

On August 06 2003 19:26 Vharon wrote:

he asked a question.. "Is it ok to like a slut?" i was just saying... NO it's not ok. =]

On August 06 2003 20:45 Vicious)Soul wrote:
More seriously, to answer the question, you obviously like her

Now ignore all of these kids posting shit about how you should not have sex cuz it's wrong and the other ones saying you should be a man and go for it. This isn't exactly a topic you should present to a buncha SC nerds.

On August 06 2003 20:57 ObsoleteLogic wrote:


You are better.... how?

On August 06 2003 20:47 YouTopia[SB] wrote:
Hahahha BigBalls's comments are fun to read just because of that spacebar :-o

On August 06 2003 19:03 Maenander wrote:

So sex is all "objectification" in ur eyes. Hmmm.
Not for me.

On August 06 2003 21:07 ObsoleteLogic wrote:


No; sex between two people who sincerely love each other is not. However, I feel as though there is some discord on what mine and your defintions of love would be.

In my eyes:

The only thing that is truely 100% ours, that can't be taken away from us, is our will (except perhaps by death, but no one knows). You can give someone your mind, your body, all your thoughts, everything in the world, but all of that can be taken away, perverted, twisted, or turned malign. Thus the only thing you can really give someone, that no one else can stop you from, is your will. To go ahead and make the choice to continue acting with love towards that person, even though you don't feel like it. Because, face it - some days, some weeks, months, or even years, you may not feel like it. Ask any couple that has been together long enough, and they'll say that its true. In archaic languages, such as Greek and Aramaic, they had multiple words for "love"; eros - physical, philios - fraternal, and agave (agape) - choice.

Conclusion - Love, true love, has all three qualities. Each requires the other to function as it should, within the whole.

On August 06 2003 20:59 Vicious)Soul wrote:


didn't claim to be

but at least everyone else here is just giving advice, you're trying to force an ideal down his throat and that's not exactly the most moral action either.

On August 06 2003 21:11 ObsoleteLogic wrote:
Lust is purely physical. True love is physical, fraternal (not actually brotherly, but, you know what I mean. The love you have for a friend), and the love of choice (so that you act within the first two even when you don't feel like it)

On August 06 2003 21:10 ObsoleteLogic wrote:


I'm not trying to force it down his throat, and the manner in which I am speaking is no different than BigBalls. You just disagree with me, so you resort to the age old attack of, essentially, calling me a moral fascist.

On August 06 2003 21:12 BigBalls wrote:


wrong, spitting, swallowing and gargling

muahahhahaha

On August 06 2003 21:17 ObsoleteLogic wrote:
Well you certainly insinuated it. Theres a fine line between advice and opinions, but I think its already pretty clearly established that we're hardly even talking about the original post anymore (:

800th post :O

On August 06 2003 21:19 Vicious)Soul wrote:
People never learn from the lives of others.

On August 06 2003 21:24 ObsoleteLogic wrote:
The founding fathers of our country weren't individuals? Gandhi, Joan of Arc, Henry VIII, Luther, Calvin, Muhammed, Constantine, Jesus, Moses?!?!? Please (: Any basis in character education is based around the strong examples of individuals who accomplished great things; society is reflective only of those individuals which it is comprised of.

On August 06 2003 21:27 BigBalls wrote:


im going to learn a lot more if i try something and fail than if someone tells me it doesnt work or i read something from 3000 years ago that failed.

On August 06 2003 21:29 BigBalls wrote:
how about all those eastern religions that have men at a certain age going out into a forest for weeks on end to find them true selves? people going to the edge of life, starving themselves, almost dying, just to find out what someone else who did it could tell them?

On August 06 2003 21:29 Vicious)Soul wrote:
Bigballs, I find it surprising that we're arguing the same point. Maybe I shouldn't

On August 06 2003 21:30 BigBalls wrote:


i think its safe to say this is the fastest growing thread in the history of TL (minus the play by play starleague stuff)

i type something and by the time i post it you have already posted the same thing :/

On August 06 2003 21:26 Vicious)Soul wrote:
Society is comprised of individuals, but it doesn't work backwards. The society created by the individuals isn't the individual, but that's the best we have to work off of. And on the indivudal level, it's not good enough

On August 06 2003 21:31 esk0 wrote:
go have a church wedding or whatever...

On August 06 2003 21:30 ObsoleteLogic wrote:
I really don't know where you're pulling this from. My life has been most inspired by others examples. And while its true that we can't understand the motives behind every action, we can understand their actions themselves. I mean, maybe Constantine was really just looking to A: get rich and B: get his mother off his back, but what he did put an end to thousands of brutal deaths, and terrible suffering in the Roman Empire. And when you give advice, it can be based off what other people have told you/written as well. I'm not just going off my limited personal experience, but that of my large family and the writings of philosophers and such.

On August 06 2003 21:33 ObsoleteLogic wrote:


One piece of a puzzle with the wrong image can make the whole puzzle look bad; similarly, one bad person in a group makes the group, as a whole, depreciate in value. Not that the others are bad as individuals, but by association with the one corrupted individual... you get the picture.

On August 06 2003 21:33 BigBalls wrote:
However, the side obsolete is arguing isnt bad either. "The only reason I have accomplished anything is because I stood on the shoulders of giants" - Newton

On August 06 2003 21:37 Chibi[OWNS] wrote:
ObseleteLogic wrote


This guy is 16. He went to a mates house and touched up a girl. She wanted him to.

If they officially date, then there might be a bit more to it. They might have to, you know, talk more and spend money. They might just have a bit of fun in the park or after class, like most teen couples.

They might go chill on the wall watching the sk8rs.

But, I can assure you, sex for fun is not an inherently bad thing.
Ten billion people will tell you this. Ten billion people have gone through fun and hardship, and I'm pretty sure most would prefer that little extra risk[1] if it meant they can have their cock sucked one more time.

And dude, this guy isn't even talking about dating seriously. He wants some pussy. It's not taking advantage. The bird was on HIM, remember.
Don't be daft.

Okay, I'm gonna go read the rest of this garbage :p

[1] OMG THEY MITE HAEV A FIGHT AND BRAKE UP AFTER TOO WEKEKS WTF

On August 06 2003 21:39 C)R wrote:
can u guys get any more nerdy beating the shit outta this thing?

On August 06 2003 21:36 DReaMe wrote:
that was fucking hilariuos, you little pussy...hahaha
alcohol as a reason to _NOT_ get sex?

hahahahaha

On August 06 2003 21:41 Ion)Positive wrote:
I only read about the first 10 posts, but from what I read I say "nice" to ObsoleteLogic.
Seems most men think of girls as cock mittens but i'm glad there are still some real men alive.

On August 06 2003 21:46 Liquid`Ninja wrote:

I do NOT agree with obsolete logic with almost everything he says, in that... his approach with relationships sounds so politically correct, so right, it's like so respectful I can smell boredom from a mile away!

On August 06 2003 21:46 ObsoleteLogic wrote:
Haha. I work at home. Its wonderful (:

"Another buy-in to the stereotypes of teen life. Wake up buddy"

Sad, isn't it?

On August 06 2003 21:46 Liquid`Ninja wrote:
I do NOT agree with obsolete logic with almost everything he says, in that... his approach with relationships sounds so politically correct, so right, it's like so respectful I can smell boredom from a mile away!

On August 06 2003 21:52 GoSexyPerli wrote:



NTC_LUKE Mr.Korean(lol)

you have to realize that most people on this forum probably aernt religous =[

On August 06 2003 21:54 Vicious)Soul wrote:

You forget that to a christian, hell exists whether or not you're religious

On August 06 2003 21:55 Liquid`Ninja wrote:
sure does!
at least im enjoying my life

now where did i mention that i needed sex to not make my life boring?
i was stating how his approach to relationships sound so boring... objectify... using examples from 3000 years old roman empires... wth dude? its good to have morals and all, but. you should know... that it is all for the kid's own good for him to acquire as much experience as he can, it will serve him later in life

On August 06 2003 21:56 Ion)Positive wrote:
I don't understand why not being religious means its worth the risk. I mean if your a murderer is it really worth it even if you don't believe it that there is a chance you will suffer forever as a consequence of your actions.. But its still worth it not to live a good and honest life?

On August 06 2003 22:19 Imperium wrote:
it's hard to have a serious relationship with a slut

On August 06 2003 22:25 Ion)Positive wrote:

unless your a pimp?

On August 06 2003 15:16 GoSexyPerli wrote:
Big Balls = genious

Muhweli = homo

of course her house's name isnt kate you gay.=[
stop trying to make things hard... just get off battle.net for a week or so and you might see what i mean with this post. And i see more " off the wall" subjects on this forum then the one i made so just stfu

=[

On August 07 2003 01:30 story wrote:
you're 16 and only in biology?

On August 07 2003 02:19 NeX[CHaP]ReaPeR wrote:
I want Rekrul to post in this thread, then things will be interesting...

On August 06 2003 21:48 Vicious)Soul wrote:

lol owned..

You need sex to make your life not boring? Sucks to be you

On August 07 2003 01:01 travis wrote:
i didn't read much of this, i stopped when obsoletelogic started making stupid ass posts.

My suggestion: make your pee-pee turn boner, then stick it inside of her.

On August 07 2003 05:01 [pG]Rekrul wrote:
Obsolete I thought you were gunna stop posting after your little tournament?

Everyone of your ignorance filled posts are annoying :[

I do not judge people by their belief in Christianity + other religions.

But I do judge their intelligence off of those beliefs. You sir, are lacking.


jk;ladsfjdsakl;dfajdsakl;j

On August 07 2003 05:21 Ion)Positive wrote:
Do you _love_ her? If you do then go ahead and do whatever you want with her.

On August 07 2003 05:24 ProudToBeANoob wrote:
there is no girl on this site ? I think a girl's advice could bring more to anybody here than those ceaseless freeposts...

On August 07 2003 05:24 ProudToBeANoob wrote:
there is no girl on this site ? I think a girl's advice could bring more to anybody here than those ceaseless freeposts...

On August 07 2003 04:57 [pG]Rekrul wrote:


I already did.

On August 07 2003 07:59 harhar wrote:

if monkeys can do it then we can too

On August 07 2003 07:59 harhar wrote:
logic is a pussy. just fuck her. its pussy.
if monkeys can do it then we can too

On August 07 2003 08:06 NeX[CHaP]ReaPeR wrote:


I'm glad you are trying to reduce us to that level.

If Logic is a pussy you should just fuck him then, maybe you will be kept busy and never make another sorry ass post like that again.

On August 07 2003 07:27 NeX[CHaP]ReaPeR wrote:

I personally wouldn't because it would spoil the experience with whoever you end up marrying, because it wouldn't be "special". Also, there is the STD risk.

But I really don't give a shit what you do. Just remember, use the rubber .

On August 07 2003 11:27 MaZgOt wrote:
If this girl is so friendly then u have to watch out for sexually transmitted diseases... VD, gonnaria etc. (not to mention aids although at that age they havent copped enough roots to get aids).

Make sure u use a condom and make sure she washes her cunt. and also make sure she understands that it's supposed to be a fun relationships. You'll be amazed how bitchy chicks get after they've fucked a guy.. they think they own him or something.. unless of course u do a good job and she likes it so much that she becomes your slave... this is the best. I.E. My best friend's girlfriend told him "I like it when you insult me sometime in front of friends"

WHY ANYONE WOULD SAY THAT IS BEYOND ME.. but then again my friend is a fairly tall long dicked guy... and sex is sex.. so go for it.. seriously... DO U WANK? YES. WOULD SHE FUCK ANOTHER GUY? YES. SO SHE'S FUKCING OTHER GUYS AND YOU'RE WANKING... I'D RATHER REPLACE WANKING WITH FUCKING AND THE "OTHER GUYS" WITH YOU :D

On August 07 2003 11:36 Kobayashi wrote:


you describe this girl as the lowest possible example of a human being just because she sleeps around, yet anyone can see by your post that you would fuck any girl you could find...aren't you the hypocrite

On August 07 2003 11:36 Kobayashi wrote:


you describe this girl as the lowest possible example of a human being just because she sleeps around, yet anyone can see by your post that you would fuck any girl you could find...aren't you the hypocrite

On August 07 2003 12:24 Abang_Zealot wrote:
"Omgh wtf you gotta be kidding! This is 2 0 0 3 and you wanna wait untill you get married?!?!?!? No offence, actually lots of respect for you man but no? If you want to marry virgin you would probably want to marry a virgin as well - well you just eliminated 99.99% of the western women. And STD risk? If you are gonna worry about that all the time - you'll never have any fun"

hm.. imo ppl who cant stay virgin till theyre married are weak. not just coz of my religious belief but also anyway there are still plenty of asian women around

Omgh wtf you gotta be kidding! This is 2 0 0 3 and you wanna wait untill you get married?!?!?!? No offence, actually lots of respect for you man but no? If you want to marry virgin you would probably want to marry a virgin as well - well you just eliminated 99.99% of the western women.

On August 07 2003 13:56 Bill307 wrote:
PS: Wait, just a quick note about STDs. Aids, Hepatitis, and Herpes cannot be cured, so if you get stuck with one those, you're stuck with it for life. Then there's Gonnohrea (or however it's spelled) which, as I learned, would require a tool to be inserted up your penis to take a sample of its inner lining to confirm the infection's prescence. In brief, you want to avoid STDs like your life depends on it (and in some cases, it does).

On August 07 2003 05:01 [pG]Rekrul wrote:
Obsolete I thought you were gunna stop posting after your little tournament?

Everyone of your ignorance filled posts are annoying :[

I do not judge people by their belief in Christianity + other religions.

But I do judge their intelligence off of those beliefs. You sir, are lacking.


jk;ladsfjdsakl;dfajdsakl;j

On August 07 2003 14:29 ObsoleteLogic wrote:





NICE! I love your horrible grammar whilst belittling my intelligence, ye harlequin!

Now, explain to me how old fashioned values are creating a depravity in my intellect? I, unlike some of you, have a brain in addition to a cock; and I figured out which is supposed to be for thinking.

P.S., as for an earlier comment regarding the downfall of the Roman Empire, military service was avoided by young men who sought to enjoy the pleasures of the high life. The army was downsized, not trained as well (leniency in the officers - they came from the same generation as the whiny soldiers, after all), and with a lack of fighting spirit.

On August 07 2003 13:56 Bill307 wrote:


Anyways, Perli, I can't give any specific advice on what to do with this girl because it would depend mainly on what you'd be looking to "get out of her", so to speak. So depending on what you want, this is what I'd recommend:

On August 07 2003 14:29 ObsoleteLogic wrote:



NICE! I love your horrible grammar whilst belittling my intelligence, ye harlequin!

Now, explain to me how old fashioned values are creating a depravity in my intellect? I, unlike some of you, have a brain in addition to a cock; and I figured out which is supposed to be for thinking.

P.S., as for an earlier comment regarding the downfall of the Roman Empire, military service was avoided by young men who sought to enjoy the pleasures of the high life. The army was downsized, not trained as well (leniency in the officers - they came from the same generation as the whiny soldiers, after all), and with a lack of fighting spirit.

On August 07 2003 15:05 iGgs wrote:


(o)h (m)y (g)od stop talking!

(Ban)

On August 07 2003 15:24 Vharon wrote:

idiot...

On August 07 2003 16:00 Staind wrote:
Going out with someone just for sex is pretty low.

On August 07 2003 16:00 Staind wrote:
Going out with someone just for sex is pretty low.

On August 07 2003 16:35 TeCh)PsylO wrote:
if kate was 25 it would be reasonable to just have some sex. im assuming kate is 16. that is not reasonable.

On August 07 2003 16:40 TeCh)PsylO wrote:
im thinking along the lines of mauturity levels. a 16 year old girl that is already sleeping around probably has some emotional issues. i dont think it is best to add to that problem.

On August 07 2003 16:40 TeCh)PsylO wrote:
im thinking along the lines of mauturity levels. a 16 year old girl that is already sleeping around probably has some emotional issues. i dont think it is best to add to that problem.

On August 07 2003 14:29 ObsoleteLogic wrote:



NICE! I love your horrible grammar whilst belittling my intelligence, ye harlequin!

Now, explain to me how old fashioned values are creating a depravity in my intellect? I, unlike some of you, have a brain in addition to a cock; and I figured out which is supposed to be for thinking.

P.S., as for an earlier comment regarding the downfall of the Roman Empire, military service was avoided by young men who sought to enjoy the pleasures of the high life. The army was downsized, not trained as well (leniency in the officers - they came from the same generation as the whiny soldiers, after all), and with a lack of fighting spirit.

On August 07 2003 16:40 TeCh)PsylO wrote:
im thinking along the lines of mauturity levels. a 16 year old girl that is already sleeping around probably has some emotional issues. i dont think it is best to add to that problem.

On August 07 2003 16:44 [pG]Rekrul wrote:


All I'm saying is that if you believe in one of those religions there is something wrong with your brain : - ).