LOTV macro imbalance oversight from blizzard - Page 3
Forum Index > Closed |
FabledIntegral
United States9232 Posts
| ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16387 Posts
i'm open to a complete overhaul of all macro-mechanics for all races as DK alluded they MIGHT revisit when they were really mucking around with the economy during the LotV beta. | ||
BreakfastBurrito
United States893 Posts
| ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16387 Posts
On June 16 2016 10:42 BreakfastBurrito wrote: anyone looking for the next level of comedy, imagine he just lost a game to P and try reading the whole thing in his voice i'm watching the OJ documentary thing... i'm imagining David Kim in the white ford bronco with all of Avi-Nation tracking him down in Avi-Nation police vehicles and an Avilo-Copter overhead filiming the action as DK is fleeing.... and for audio Avilo himself is cross-examing DK's balance decisions via cell phone. its all part of the most important documentary of SC2... Avilo : Made In America | ||
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On June 16 2016 08:15 _Darwin_ wrote: It's really difficult to take you seriously when you use hyperbole like this. Avolis posts make a lot more sense if you replace "terran" with "me". Maybe we can have an auto-replace hardcoded into TL for him? ![]() | ||
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
| ||
avilo
United States4100 Posts
On June 16 2016 09:07 Parcelleus wrote: Lets balance the game for avilo, yeah right. pfff How does Protoss having 400-500 extra minerals every game early game have anything to do with "balance for avilo?" lol | ||
Fatam
1986 Posts
| ||
ecnahc
United States395 Posts
On June 16 2016 11:23 avilo wrote: How does Protoss having 400-500 extra minerals every game early game have anything to do with "balance for avilo?" lol define early game, define the number of probes lotv-toss has over hots-toss, define how this effects the balance of the tvp matchup in your opinion. start here and maybe you can formulate an argument. | ||
Lightrush
Bulgaria164 Posts
| ||
Sapphire.lux
Romania2620 Posts
| ||
Scarlett`
China2371 Posts
On June 16 2016 11:40 Fatam wrote: @ the people wanting to remove macro mechanics altogether, it could cause some serious problems with regards to scans.. Any kind of banshee/DT/burrow plays would be completely dead because you have tons of scans available. Terran could be even lazier about scouting because there would be no drawback to scanning liberally whenever (even super early) to see what you need to see. Basically scan would have to be completely reworked. well people would not always skip making scvs to make orbital | ||
Thinh123456
70 Posts
| ||
feanaro
United States123 Posts
| ||
Qwyn
United States2779 Posts
Avilo, I think your points are legit, but you post this knowing that you're going to get a ton of the usual shit...which sucks! >> There's only one thing that the new chrono is really good at now, and that's boosting workers. But since it does that constantly from the beginning of the game, that means that Protoss is able to keep up in workers with the other two races (especially important in PvZ) all game long, which ends up accelerating everything else. I believe there was a thread on BNET a month or two ago that did some fancy math to show that it actually ends up doing this better than HOTS chrono. | ||
TheWinks
United States572 Posts
On June 16 2016 12:58 Scarlett` wrote: well people would not always skip making scvs to make orbital By 'not always' it would be 'amost never' | ||
TelecoM
United States10646 Posts
Well played, would read again, although it should be in blogs man. Of course Protoss will always have their 3rd Nexus up before you in PvT because of the way you play, lol. EDIT : Protoss does not have this fast 3rd Nexus advantage over Zerg really at this point, as well as I am pretty sure they don't vs Terran either. There are plenty of openings and styles as Terran that allow you to have your 3rd before Protoss in many situations, usually going Avilo style Mech is not one of them. | ||
todespolka
221 Posts
New chrono: 15*(20+45)*2/3 = 650 Old chrono: 50*20*2/3= 666.67 That shows that the old chrono was slightly better, which makes sense, because the old one was harder to use. The difference is very small. I suppose, the timing mistakes had a bigger impact. | ||
TedBurtle
Belarus201 Posts
![]() | ||
TaShadan
Germany1960 Posts
This. But i guess this will never happen. | ||
| ||