• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:39
CEST 21:39
KST 04:39
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway132v2 & SC: Evo Complete: Weekend Double Feature3Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy9uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event18Serral wins EWC 202549
Community News
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris10Weekly Cups (Aug 11-17): MaxPax triples again!13Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple6SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 195Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up6
StarCraft 2
General
Geoff 'iNcontroL' Robinson has passed away RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Weekly Cups (Aug 11-17): MaxPax triples again! What mix of new and old maps do you want in the next 1v1 ladder pool? (SC2) : I made a 5.0.12/5.0.13 replay fix
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 487 Think Fast Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Maps with Neutral Command Centers Victoria gamers [ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway How do the new Battle.net ranks translate?
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues The Casual Games of the Week Thread [ASL20] Ro24 Group C
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Path of Exile Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
High temperatures on bridge(s) Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment"
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale
Blogs
Breaking the Meta: Non-Stand…
TrAiDoS
INDEPENDIENTE LA CTM
XenOsky
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1097 users

Ukraine Crisis - Page 455

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 453 454 455 456 457 577 Next
There is a new policy in effect in this thread. Anyone not complying will be moderated.

New policy, please read before posting:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=21393711
radiatoren
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Denmark1907 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-26 14:35:28
April 26 2014 14:25 GMT
#9081
Oh yeah. Now we know what we are dealing with, regarding the Slovyansk OSCE situation:
..."We arrested some NATO spies... they will be exchanged for our own prisoners. I don't see any other way they will be freed," Denis Pushilin, the head of the insurgents' self-declared Donetsk Republic, told reporters in the town on Saturday....

..."We believe an OSCE mission does not imply the participation of military personnel entering our territory unimpeded and studying our facilities."(Red: said by Vyacheslav Ponomarev, the soap manufaturer mayor)...

...The Russian foreign ministry later issued a statement appearing to lay the blame for the monitors' detention at Ukraine's feet.

"They were invited by the Ukrainian authorities" on the basis of a Vienna treaty, and "in accordance with this document, ensuring the safety of monitors rests fully with the receiving side," the ministry said.

Moscow suggested Kiev's authorities should have agreed the scope of the OSCE's work in regions where they "do not control the situation, and where a military operation against residents of their own country is taking place"...

source

Help those freedom fighters! Bad Ukraine, the separatists are only doing their job... Thx, Russia.
Btw. reading russian media about this is hillarious, I haven't seen mention of release of prisoners in any of the 5-6 I have read...
Repeat before me
Deleted User 137586
Profile Joined January 2011
7859 Posts
April 26 2014 14:36 GMT
#9082
Anyone want to translate into text and check the plausibility?

Cry 'havoc' and let slip the dogs of war
nunez
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Norway4003 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-26 15:16:15
April 26 2014 15:09 GMT
#9083
that's a very negative spin radi, allthough residents of their own country is... well.

russia states they want the delegation to be released and will take all possible steps to make that happen whilie critizizing kiev for letting this happen, referring to the vienna doc where it states the hosting nation is responsible for security. it was reckless to bring them into slavyansk, where they 'do not control the situation, and where a military operation against residents of their own country is taking place'.

sounds like a very reasonable response, now they gotta deliver.

Military personnel from Denmark, Germany, Poland, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria I think and -- from somewhere else, I can't immediately recall -- have been detained

getting closer to the turk.
conspired against by a confederacy of dunces.
radiatoren
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Denmark1907 Posts
April 26 2014 15:20 GMT
#9084
On April 27 2014 00:09 nunez wrote:
that's a very negative spin radi.

russia states they want the delegation to be released and will take all possible steps to make that happen whilie critizizing kiev for letting this happen, referring to the vienna doc where it states the hosting nation is responsible for security. it was reckless to bring them into slavyansk, where they 'do not control the situation, and where a military operation against residents of their own country is taking place'.

sounds like a very reasonable response, now they gotta deliver.

Show nested quote +
Military personnel from Denmark, Germany, Poland, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria I think and -- from somewhere else, I can't immediately recall -- have been detained

getting closer to the turk.

If Russia wanted to resolve the situation in Slavyansk they would be more exact in the way they address the rebels. The way they have been acting in terms of never publically critizising the rebels and accepting them as a partner in negotiations, they are giving the rebels credibility and accepting their actions as legitimate. Hostage exchanges and murders of "untruth"-tellers and political opponents is absolutely not an acceptable way of "negotiating". If Russia didn't approve of these things I would expect them to address them properly instead of pussyfooting around them and critizising anyone opposing them.
Repeat before me
Mc
Profile Joined March 2010
332 Posts
April 26 2014 15:20 GMT
#9085
In response to the random phone survey, if they choose the phone numbers at random, it is random but it does have two inherent biases:
1.) Not everyone has a phone. That's not a huge issue imo but still is an issue. It would be an issue if pro-Russia *local* supporters tend to have phones more often than pro-Ukrainians (or vice-versa). This could be the case if pro-Russia supporters were in general older, and tend to have land-lines rather then young people who might have cell phones but no land-line. Wealth/age might factor in to who gets sampled and wealth/age might have a bias towards being pro-Russian or pro-Ukrainian.

2.) Pro-Russia supporters might be more suspicious of the survey and thus not answer.

So the phone-survey definitely does have issues with it, but I think it can still shed some light on the situation as long as you consider that there might be a significant bias.

As to a door-to-door survey, it faces similar issues : suspicion of surveyors amongst one group of supporters, and older people being at home more often. One could avoid point two by making sure to interview representative amounts of each age group, but it still faces other bias issues.
5hh.gg
nunez
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Norway4003 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-26 15:28:07
April 26 2014 15:25 GMT
#9086
@radi
they will jump at any chance to piss on kiev, this time it's justified, they are to blame for gift wrapping up foregin military and handing them over to the dellusional mayor.
when you say rebels do you mean specifically the mayor and his cronies in slovyansk or are you referring to all the anti-maidans?

what murders are you referring to? the two found in the river?
conspired against by a confederacy of dunces.
Deleted User 137586
Profile Joined January 2011
7859 Posts
April 26 2014 15:30 GMT
#9087
On April 27 2014 00:20 Mc wrote:
In response to the random phone survey, if they choose the phone numbers at random, it is random but it does have two inherent biases:
1.) Not everyone has a phone. That's not a huge issue imo but still is an issue. It would be an issue if pro-Russia *local* supporters tend to have phones more often than pro-Ukrainians (or vice-versa). This could be the case if pro-Russia supporters were in general older, and tend to have land-lines rather then young people who might have cell phones but no land-line. Wealth/age might factor in to who gets sampled and wealth/age might have a bias towards being pro-Russian or pro-Ukrainian.

2.) Pro-Russia supporters might be more suspicious of the survey and thus not answer.

So the phone-survey definitely does have issues with it, but I think it can still shed some light on the situation as long as you consider that there might be a significant bias.

As to a door-to-door survey, it faces similar issues : suspicion of surveyors amongst one group of supporters, and older people being at home more often. One could avoid point two by making sure to interview representative amounts of each age group, but it still faces other bias issues.


Considering that some regions gave strictly pro-Russia responses with impunity, I don't think there's any reason to think people had problems responding in a pro-Russia manner.

Also, Ukraine has 125 phones per 100 people. Source. I'm sure there are some people somewhere that do not have a phone, but it's going to be so negligible that you can ignore it. I mean, the phone coverage is roughly the same as in France, should we ignore polling in France I mean, they reach a few percentage points of accuracy in their election polling...

So slap on the usual 3-5% fluctuation, and voila, you get an idea what's going on in Ukraine now. Considering there are tens of percentage points in swings between regions, whatever methodological considerations there might be, it will not affect the conclusions.
Cry 'havoc' and let slip the dogs of war
radiatoren
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Denmark1907 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-26 15:54:46
April 26 2014 15:40 GMT
#9088
On April 27 2014 00:25 nunez wrote:
@radi
they will jump at any chance to piss on kiev, this time it's justified, they are to blame for gift wrapping up foregin military and handing them over to the dellusional mayor.
when you say rebels do you mean specifically ones in slovyansk or are you referring to all the anti-maidans?

I mean specifically those in Slovyansk in this case since the other cities seems to be mostly peacefully opposed to Kyiv.

Anti-Maidan is not really catching the groups. Some are peacefully demonstrating which I think should be encouraged. More of that! Some are forcefully taking over buildings which is problematic, but since it is close to what happened during Maidan Kyiv cannot justify opposing it. The last groups are militant rebels with guns and with a range of demands. Needless to say that they are illegitimate in their actions. Since Kyiv has given into a negotiation on something close to what most of the rebels are fighting for, that seems to have been more or less sufficiently resolved to be able to hold an acceptable election and have meaningful discussions anywhere but in Slovyansk.

Ukraine has some blame to take, absolutely, but Russias lack of critique of the actions of the other side of the issue is the real problem. Russia could have said that taking hostages was inappropriate or some similarly weak critique of the specific actions, but they haven't.
Repeat before me
Mc
Profile Joined March 2010
332 Posts
April 26 2014 15:46 GMT
#9089
On April 27 2014 00:30 Ghanburighan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 27 2014 00:20 Mc wrote:
In response to the random phone survey, if they choose the phone numbers at random, it is random but it does have two inherent biases:
1.) Not everyone has a phone. That's not a huge issue imo but still is an issue. It would be an issue if pro-Russia *local* supporters tend to have phones more often than pro-Ukrainians (or vice-versa). This could be the case if pro-Russia supporters were in general older, and tend to have land-lines rather then young people who might have cell phones but no land-line. Wealth/age might factor in to who gets sampled and wealth/age might have a bias towards being pro-Russian or pro-Ukrainian.

2.) Pro-Russia supporters might be more suspicious of the survey and thus not answer.

So the phone-survey definitely does have issues with it, but I think it can still shed some light on the situation as long as you consider that there might be a significant bias.

As to a door-to-door survey, it faces similar issues : suspicion of surveyors amongst one group of supporters, and older people being at home more often. One could avoid point two by making sure to interview representative amounts of each age group, but it still faces other bias issues.


Considering that some regions gave strictly pro-Russia responses with impunity, I don't think there's any reason to think people had problems responding in a pro-Russia manner.

Also, Ukraine has 125 phones per 100 people. Source. I'm sure there are some people somewhere that do not have a phone, but it's going to be so negligible that you can ignore it. I mean, the phone coverage is roughly the same as in France, should we ignore polling in France I mean, they reach a few percentage points of accuracy in their election polling...

So slap on the usual 3-5% fluctuation, and voila, you get an idea what's going on in Ukraine now. Considering there are tens of percentage points in swings between regions, whatever methodological considerations there might be, it will not affect the conclusions.


The 125 phones per 100 people includes cellphones. How the heck can you have more than one land-line per person. I assume they only called landlines since cell-phones are hard to pin-down to regions.

The difference between France and Ukraine is mostly the 'refusal to answer' bias - this is such a heated topic, and it concerns 'trusting the surveyor'. Anti-west/Pro-Russia people could refuse to answer a survey that they deem related to the 'illegitimate government' or 'western propaganda'.

I'm not saying too ignore the results, but factor in these biases that are not insignificant. What would really help is if they wrote how many people refused to conduct the survey - "hi may I take a survey?" : "no, bye". This could give us an idea if their was a refusal-to-answer bias.
5hh.gg
Mc
Profile Joined March 2010
332 Posts
April 26 2014 15:58 GMT
#9090
On April 26 2014 23:36 Ghanburighan wrote:
Anyone want to translate into text and check the plausibility?

https://twitter.com/PaulSonne/status/460064327165554688

+1, I'd really appreciate a translation (maybe just more significant parts).Thanks!
5hh.gg
kukarachaa
Profile Joined February 2011
United States284 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-26 18:05:36
April 26 2014 18:02 GMT
#9091
On April 27 2014 00:58 Mc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 26 2014 23:36 Ghanburighan wrote:
Anyone want to translate into text and check the plausibility?

https://twitter.com/PaulSonne/status/460064327165554688

+1, I'd really appreciate a translation (maybe just more significant parts).Thanks!


1) Who are the armed people in Slovyansk, there are opinions that they are Russian spetznaz or GRU agents, could you explain to us?

Of course we consist of mostly locals, with a mix of people from surrounding regions. Regarding my unit specifically, I won't hide it, it was formed in Crimea. Mostly, about 2/3 of the unit are volunteers who are Ukrainian citizens from various Ukrainian regions, with combat experience in the Ukrainian Army, Russian army, Yougoslavia, Chechnya, Iraq. It was their initiative to come to Slavyansk. He doesn't say where the other 1/3 of his Unit is from, but its safe to assume its probably Russia.

2) If its not a secret, where did you get your weapons?

On the first day we disarmed a police building in Slavyansk, where we confiscated a large number of firearms. Later we disarmed several units of the 25th Army Brigade, we disarmed several border control units. In total we were able to acquire about 150 firearms, several grenade launchers, and lot of ammo, as well as 6 armored troop vehicles.

3) We see a strange tactic from Ukrainian side, several armored vehicles approach a block post, open fire ( sometimes there are casualties ), as far as I understand, you do not shoot to kill why?

We have very good intel, we know exactly who is against us. When it comes to Ukrainian army we are up against 25th Dnepropetovsk mobile brigade and 95th Zhitomerskya mobile brigade. Those brigades mostly consist of soldiers from South East Ukraine, most them are here against their will. There are no volunteers among them, the ones that came to fight for either money or ideological principles. We understand if we shift out strategy and start killing them, we'll be killing our brothers and in turn change their perception of us as well.
Ukrainian commanders understand that as well, so they send army units first knowing that we won't engage. Set up a block post, then either national guard units, right sector, contractors or SBU troops move in and occupy the block post under the protection of the army. For now we will not engage if there is a risk of harming the regular army troops, however things might change.

Regarding the destroyed helicopter in Kramatorsk.

We were observing Kramatorsk airfield for several days, we had many opportunities to shoot down helicopters with their crews on board. After watching the helicopters come and go, we picked a helicopter that was loaded with ammo, and had no crew inside. That's how we plan on conducting our further actions as well, with minimal loss of human lives. However this is a war situation, and no one can predict what will happen tomorrow.

Do you get saboteurs, such as right sector or other organizations?

Yes, sometimes we catch them, some of them we already showed to the people. Some have died in shoot outs.

Regarding the members of OSCE that have been detained what can you tell us about them?

According the Ukrainian officer that was with them, the goal of this delegation is to go along the border and observe the location and status of the Russian troops. What are they doing in a Kramatorsk, no one can answer. Either while hiding under diplomatic status they wanted to gather intel and help out Ukranian army, or something that is a lot more likely it is just another great fuck up by the Ukrainian army, which has no clue where militias block posts are located. He thinks its the later one, since when the bus was stopped by militia and they were boarding the bus, Ukrainian officers were frantically trying to hide their military identifications and basically were caught by surprise.

What is the primary goal of the militia?

The main goal is we don't want to be dependent on Kiev, about 80% would like Donetsk People's Republic to be part of Russia, as an autonomous republic. Part of us don't want to join Russia, but want more autonomy within Ukraine. A lot of people among us, don't want to stop in just Donetsk but keep going to Kiev and liberate Ukraine.
I am a realist, Russia hasn't lifted a finger to help us, didn't give a single gun, a single bullet. Everything that we have was a gift from Ukrainian Army and from the local police forces. For that I want to thank them and hopefully in the future they will keep helping us.

And he finishes, ranting about disinformation war. There are no Russian channels, Ukraine channels brainwashing people, people from central and western Ukraine that they meet, tell them that Ukrainian SMI describes them as Russian troops, GRU officers, they getting paid to be there, killing civilians, bombing cities and so on.


Deleted User 137586
Profile Joined January 2011
7859 Posts
April 26 2014 18:05 GMT
#9092
Thanks Kukarachaa!
Cry 'havoc' and let slip the dogs of war
Mc
Profile Joined March 2010
332 Posts
April 26 2014 18:08 GMT
#9093
@kukarachaa

Thank you!
5hh.gg
Saryph
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1955 Posts
April 26 2014 18:24 GMT
#9094
Found a translated article from a Ukrainian paper by a Belarusian journalist who traveled to Slovyansk with a French photographer and an Italian journalist. It is a little on the long side so I put it in spoilers. I also bolded a section that seemed particularly disturbing in the English version.

Translated article
+ Show Spoiler +
Slavyansk is the center of the Bermuda Triangle, which is now located in the Donbas. We arrived there from Donetsk at somewhere around eight a.m. At this hour, the city looked like a ghost town, rather scary: There was no one on the streets, the streets were completely empty, just some people or other at the roadblocks.

Q: What kind of people?

A: It depends which ones you are talking about. They were all different; whether or not they were locals is unclear. They were dressed variously and armed with various weapons. Some with clubs of some kind, others with catapults, and others still with knives. And there were genuine military formations, military groups.

Q: Supporting Ukraine?

A: No, no, nothing at all remains of Ukraine in Slavyansk apart from a Ukrainian flag on the building of Donetsk Pedagogical University. There are no Ukrainian police there at all.

There has been some kind of MVD [Ministry of Internal Affairs] statement that there are no witnesses to our arrest or witnesses to our presence in Slavyansk. This is altogether strange for me to hear, because no one from the law enforcement organs has contacted us, and there were no police at all there in Slavyansk. Accordingly, there can have been no proceedings, no investigation, or anything else.

Q: You spoke about military personnel, did they have marks of identification?

A; Of course, I cannot claim with absolute certainty that they are Russian military. But there were situations when there was an opportunity to exchange a couple of words with these people, and we asked: “And where are you from anyway, guys?” What is wrong with this? you might think. But not one person said that he was from Slavyansk. Only one person replied that he was from the Donbas; well, of course, the Donbas is a big place.

In addition, the local inhabitants, literally all of them, spoke about these people as having arrived from somewhere or other, of having turned up out of the blue. But not as being their fellow townsfolk.

Q: Tell me about your arrival in Slavyansk in a little more detail…

A: There was nobody by city hall, it was barricaded, and it was impossible to get in. We went to the SBU building. There was an impressive barricade there, guarded by one person wearing camouflage and carrying a Kalashnikov, and a person in ordinary dress, a bearded man wearing an orange t-shirt. We addressed ourselves to him and asked whether we could come in. He took passports from the foreign journalists and said that he would go and see the commander and find out what he could do.

Incidentally, this bearded man in the t-shirt said that his mom lives in Rome, that they are in touch, and that he was here in support of Russia. So he went off to see his commander and returned with him half an hour later.

The commander, in my view, was a Russian, both in speech and in appearance. For about 20 or 30 minutes, he took us around the site. They have armed vehicles that had been seized or handed over without a fight – I don’t know. The commander showed them to us with great pride and said that these vehicles would force a passage across the Dnieper in order to break Kyiv.

Q: What kind of armored vehicles, and how many?

A: In my opinion, there were four infantry fighting vehicles. At that moment, only two vehicles were manned. At the entrance to the SBU building, people dressed in black with modern weapons went past under a Russian flag. The commander categorically forbade us to photograph these people, saying that if we did so, they would begin to shoot.

Q: Black uniforms? Like Alfa [FSB special operations forces]?

A: Yes, the uniform of some kind of special unit. The commander took us around for half an hour, then said that the audience was over and told us to go on our way. He looked like an important officer, almost a general. And I asked whether he could give us permission for us to go peacefully around the town and take pictures. He replied that he could not, that he was commander only in this small area, and that his command did not extend to all the other places.

An interesting observation: The people stationed there, from whom we simply wanted to find out who they were and why they were there, answered in military fashion: “We are not authorized…”

In Kyiv, it was possible to talk with anyone who was in the mood to converse, and not once did anyone reply: “I am not authorized.” Everyone came to the Maydan, with some kind of truth and idea of his own, but here people responded purely in military style.

These people are copying the Maydan in its entirety. Even their barricades are the same as on the Maydan. And they try to serve you tea and some kind of food in exactly the same way.

There were women here who, learning that we were foreign journalists, began to chase away the drunks. There are a fairly large number of drunks there. They began to hiss at them, to drive them away – go away, they said, don’t spoil the picture! They served us tea and coffee, and we had a good sit down and relaxed completely. Very much mistakenly, as it turned out.

After this, we wanted to get to a district densely inhabited by Roma. We wanted to know whether there had really been any pogroms. We traveled for a long time on foot, speaking with people whom we met along the way. When we crossed the big bridge in Slavyansk, we took photographs of a plate with the inscription: “Mines.” We did not photograph anything else, even the roadblock through which we had passed.

But suddenly, people wearing camouflage appeared. I would describe them as “amateurs.” They were not military personnel. One was armed with either a musket or a sawed-off shotgun. Another was armed with a knife. A third with – I don’t remember with what.

They came up to us and said that we were spying, that we were carrying out some kind of secret filming. I replied that we were doing nothing of the sort. I invited them to look at the photographs. But nevertheless, they replied that we should wait, that a vehicle was coming — there would be an investigation.

The vehicle arrived, we were squeezed onto the back seat and taken away to a third roadblock.

Q: And who was with you?

A: Italian photographer Cosimo Attanasio and French journalist and photo-correspondent Paul Gogo – both freelancers.

They brought us in, and there the vehicle was surrounded by a group of ten people who literally thrust their mask-covered heads into the windows. They asked who we were, what we are doing, demanded that we hand over our cameras, and threatened to take them and smash them. In short, they behaved very unpleasantly. The guys were really frightened, and I was too.

Q: And the guys do not speak Russian? You translated for them?

A: No, they do not speak Russian at all, I was also their translator.

They took our passports and cameras from us to check them. They hauled us out, without documents and equipment: “Stand here.” They themselves gathered at about fifteen meters from us. This was a group of people dressed in military camouflage -not like the “amateurs”; they were armed with Kalashnikov assault rifles, to all appearances, but of a new model. I am not very well versed in these matters, but Cosimo said that they were not ordinary AK-47’s, but some kind of new model of Kalashnikov that is only in the inventory of the Russian Army.

Incidentally, when the atmosphere had become a little less tense, we asked what kind of weapons they were. They said that they had been issued for temporary use, but gave no further details.

At some moment or other, as if at someone’s command, they abruptly changed their attitude toward us. It was as though someone had given an order, or as though they had found out that this was the policy of behaving with foreign journalists – in short, they suddenly became concerned about their image. And they decided to show what white and fluffy bunnies they were: “Please excuse us, you understand, martial law and all that.” Then they released us.

Q: Did they give you back your passports and cameras?

A: Yes, everything was returned. And thinking that now everything was in order, we set off along the same route – across the bridge. But we were stopped at another roadblock on the other side.

This cannot be described as an arrest, they simply caught us, and we showed them the photos that we had taken at the third roadblock. We said that we had been seen, checked out, and authorized to go on our way. And we received the answer: “We do not know who checked you out. We will do so for ourselves. If you do not have permission from our authorities – take a hike! Or go and get it from the city council!”

Regarding the city council: I had heard from many journalists, including from Paul Gogo, who had tried to get into the building three days before this, but had been unable to so, that it was impossible to obtain permission. During the same attempt, a Moscow Times journalist, Oleg Sukhov, was arrested as a member of Right Sector. He was even taken into some kind of room where opposite him sat, evidently, Serhiy Lefter [Ukrainian journalist previously arrested]; his hands were bound to the chair, and he was guarded by a ‘little green man’ with an assault rifle. Therefore we naturally did not go to seek some kind of bogus accreditation. This is laughable – there is no authority there, but who knows what.

Also, when we had turned around and were walking back from the second roadblock near the bridge, a jeep painted in the colors of the Russian flag pulled up alongside us on the road. In the jeep sat people in a brand new military uniform, wearing masks and carrying weapons, and, let us put it like this, they looked at us very sternly. This was the last straw, we decided to get out of there while we were still in one piece.

Q: And were the jeep’s license plates Russian or Ukrainian?

A: I think that this jeep had no license plates at all, but I could be wrong. But it was painted all over in the colors of the Russian flag.

Incidentally, about the license plates. Not far from the SBU building I saw a vehicle with battered license plates, but with some kind of Russian decal on the window – a proof of vehicle inspection, I think. A piece of paper with the Russian flag on it was stuck to the glass. Moreover, not a sticker, but something official. And in the city I noticed several police vehicles, apparently Ukrainian ones, in which armed people wearing this same camouflage were sitting.

That is to say, they are in complete control of the city; Slavyansk is occupied.

Q: And what do they call themselves, these armed men?

A: They do not introduce themselves. They have signs everywhere saying “Donbas People’s Militia.” But no one introduced himself to us. No one said anything about himself.

The only person who spoke to us was a civilian who was standing at these roadblocks with a ribbon of St. George [symbol of loyalty to Russia] and without a mask. Some kind of hardcore Orthodox fundamentalist. Only with him was it clear who he was, that he was a local; he even showed his passport – he has retained a Soviet passport in which there was a column for nationality; in it was written: “Russian.” He is proud of this. And he says that we are all Orthodox Russians here. That means, we do not want this “European plague.”

Only he spoke with us in a normal way, and told us about his motives at least. Incidentally, among these people there are many with beards, but not because they have not shaved for many days, but really long beards, as if they were some kind of Orthodox brotherhood. Many say they are from Slavyansk, I do not know.

There are very many people of a frankly antisocial appearance – drunks, criminal elements. This is the second group.

And the third group are military persons. The usual military types. With the military bearing and all the other attributes.

Q: So this is the Russian Army on Ukrainian territory?

A: Yes, I think so. I am afraid so, yes. If they had wanted to refute this, they would have told us this. But they say nothing about themselves, they do not show their passports, and they do not introduce themselves. They cannot even bring themselves to say that they are from Slavyansk.

What is one to think in that case?! Only one conclusion remains. Especially seeing that the local inhabitants do not regard them as fellow countrymen.

Q: But do they support them?

A: You know, their attitude to the occupiers is as if to some kind of bad weather. Look – a thunderstorm, a tempest, or a gale has hit: What can you do about it?! They do not support this, they simply have to resign themselves to it.

I heard various people utter the phrase: “Everything was okay before their arrival.” In a certain sense, this can be assessed as support for Ukraine. Naturally, it is weak. A person will probably not fight for this, and will even submit if the territory is occupied.

But nevertheless, I did not meet a single person who said: “Yes, they are my protectors, they are standing up for us here. And just you get out of here, European villains!”

Not one person said this.

Q: Were there any other encounters?

A: We crossed the bridge without problems, took a taxi, went to the station, and there, completely by chance, we met the last Roma left in Slavyansk.

This person was terribly scared. He had come back to fetch some children’s things or other, and was in a state of genuine terror. I stopped him and asked him to tell me what was going on.

It turned out that, a day before this, the entire Roma community had left the town en masse. Because, in his words, their homes had been fired on from the street. And all representatives of the community had received threats that they would be destroyed en masse, including the children, unless they fled.

This man said that the armed men want only Russians to remain in the city.

This has affected not only the Roma. For example, he cited the example of his neighbors, who speak Ukrainian in everyday usage; they too have received similar threats.


The person from the Roma community asked us to help him to somehow get to see Rinat Akhmetov [Ukrainian oligarch]; he wanted to talk to him, he said.

That is to say, Rinat Akhmetov is perceived here as some kind of arbiter and de facto ruler. Although, for example, the separatists in the Donetsk Oblast Administration regarded the fact that at the last Dinamo-Shakhtar [football] match there were Ukrainian flags in the stand of the Shakhtar fans. They believe that in this way Akhmetov betrayed them. But nevertheless, they see him as tsar, as a prince.

So we missed the train, took a taxi, and went to Kramatorsk. En route, at some roadblock on a country road there was a group of frankly marginal types who said that we were spies for the European Union and found fault with the passports of the Italian and the Frenchman, even though it was the first time that they had seen what an Italian or a French passport look like.

And later, sixteen kilometers from Donetsk, I saw a very strange roadblock at which seemingly Ukrainian military persons were standing under a Russian flag and a flag of St. George along with so-called volunteer militiamen.

Q: I want to clarify one thing about the military: Did they have marks of identification?

A: Yes, yes, they had Ukrainian insignia. This is simply amazing. What kind of antiterrorism operation is it possible to speak of..?!

This is a Bermuda Triangle – Slavyansk is unraveling on all sides. And it is necessary do to something abut this urgently; otherwise things will be bad.

Q: How long were you in Slavyansk?

A: In total, we spent around ten hours in Slavyansk. And we were detained for not longer than two hours.

Q: Were you beaten?

A: No, at first they grabbed us by the arm, but things went no further than that.

Q: Have you been in Ukraine for long?

A: I have been in Ukraine since 8 March. First Kharkiv, then Donetsk, Dnipropetrovsk, Odessa, Kherson, Zhytomyr Oblast, Novohrad-Volnynskiy, Kyiv, Kharkiv, and Donetsk, a kind of circle.

Q: And have you been in the Crimea?

A: After a “conversation” with the SBU in Donetsk at the beginning of March, I understood for myself that I occupy a very pro-Ukrainian position, a very clear position, despite the fact that I am a journalist. Therefore I understood that it was better for me not to poke my head in the Crimea. Especially seeing that I had met guys who had been held in captivity for two weeks in the Crimea, and who had remained in Kherson for operations.

In Donetsk an episode happened to me – I was detained by the SBU. I lived in the same room as a GRU agent; at that time it was still Ukraine here. And this detention at the hands of the SBU – well, I do not know, it was on the whole a nice affair, I was actually reassured that some kind of services were working here, that they were exposing some people, detecting some kind of bombs.

But what is there now, it is difficult for me to say.


Original article
+ Show Spoiler +

– Славянск – это центр Бермудского треугольника, который теперь находится на Донбассе. Приехали мы туда из Донецка где-то около восьми часов утра. Город в это время выглядел призраком, жутковато: на улицах никого, улицы совершенно пустые, только на блокпостах были какие-то люди.
– Какие люди?
– Смотря на каких. Все они разные, местные или нет – не ясно. Одеты кое-как, вооружены – кто чем. Какими-то дубинами, рогатками, ножами. А есть настоящие военные формирования, военные группы.
– Поддерживающие Украину?
– Нет-нет, от Украины в Славянске не осталось вообще ничего, кроме украинского флага на здании донецкого педагогического университета. Милиции украинской там нет вообще.
Было какое-то заявление МВД, что нет свидетелей нашего задержания, свидетелей нашего пребывания в Славянске. Мне это вообще странно слышать, поскольку с нами никто из правоохранительных органов не выходил на контакт, а там, в Славянске, не было вообще никакой милиции. Соответственно, и дела никакого не могло быть, никакого расследования и прочего.
– Ты говорил о военных, были ли у них опознавательные знаки?
– Я, конечно, не могу утверждать со всей уверенностью, что это российские военные. Но были ситуации, когда была возможность перекинуться с этими людьми парой слов, и спрашивали: "А вы, ребята, вообще, откуда?" Что тут, казалось бы, такого? Но, ни один человек не сказал, что он из Славянска. Только один отвечал, что с Донбасса, ну Донбасс, понятно, большой.
Кроме того, местные жители – буквально все – говорили об этих людях, как о пришедших откуда-то, свалившихся на них с неба. Но не как о своих согорожанах.
– Расскажи подробнее о прибытии в Славянск...
– Возле городской мэрии не было никого, она была забаррикадирована, зайти было нельзя. Мы пошли к зданию СБУ. Там стояла внушительная баррикада, охранял ее один человек в камуфляже с калашниковым в руках и человек в обычной одежде, бородатый такой, в оранжевой майке. К нему и обратились, спросили – можем ли зайти. Он взял паспорта у иностранных журналистов, сказал, что пойдет к командиру, узнать, что может сделать.
Кстати, этот бородач в майке рассказал, что его мама живет в Риме, они поддерживают связь, а он стоит тут за Россию. Вот он и отправился к командиру, вернулся с ним через полчаса.
Командир, на мой взгляд, был россиянином, и по говору, и по виду. Поводил нас в течение минут двадцати-тридцати по расположению. У них стоит бронетехника, захваченная или отданная без боя – я не знаю. Командир с большой гордостью показал эту технику, говорил, что она будет форсировать Днепр, чтобы ломать Киев.
– Какая бронетехника и сколько ее?
– По-моему, там было четыре машины БМП. На тот момент экипаж был только в двух машинах. На входе в здании СБУ под российским флагом прошли люди, одетые в черное, с продвинутым оружием. Этих людей он нам категорически запретил снимать, сказал, если мы будем это делать, они начнут стрелять.

Сепаратисты на украинских БМД возле СБУ в Славянске. Фото Анастасии Березы
– Черная форма? Как у "Альфы"?
– Да, какая-то форма спецподразделений.
Командир поводил нас полчаса, говорит, аудиенция окончена, идите дальше. Он выглядел, как важный офицер, почти генерал. И я спросил, не может ли он нам дать разрешение, чтобы мы спокойно ходили в городе и снимали. Он ответил – нет, он командует только на этом пятачке, а на все остальные места его командование не распространяется.
Интересное наблюдение: люди, которые там стояли, у которых мы просто хотели узнать, кто они, что, почему там стоят, – отвечали по-военному: "Мы не уполномочены".
В Киеве можно было поговорить с любым, кто был настроен общаться, и никто ни разу не ответил: "Я не уполномочен". На Майдан каждый пришел с какой-то своей правдой и мыслью, а тут люди отвечали чисто по-военному.
Эти люди полностью копируют Майдан. И баррикады у них такие же, как на Майдане. И точно также они стараются там угощать чаем, какой-то едой.
Здесь были женщины, которые, узнав, что мы иностранные журналисты, стали разгонять пьяных. Пьяных там изрядное количество. Стали на них шикать, гнать – мол, кыш отсюда, не порти картинку! Угостили нас чаем-кофе, и мы прекрасно посидели, расслабились совершенно. Оказалось, очень зря.
После этого хотели попасть в район, где компактно жили ромы. Хотели узнать, были ли погромы в действительности. Шли очень долго, говорили по дороге со встречными людьми. Когда переходили через большой мост в Славянске – сфотографировали табличку с надписью "Мины". Больше ничего мы не снимали, даже блокпост, через который прошли.
Но тут появились люди в камуфляже. Я их для себя называю "любители". Это не военные. Один был вооружен то ли мушкетом, то ли обрезом. Другой – ножом. Третий – уже не помню, чем.
Они подошли, сказали, что мы шпионим, ведем какую-то скрытую съемку. Я им ответил, что ничего подобного мы не делаем. Предложил посмотреть фотографии. Но, тем не менее, нам ответили, чтобы мы ждали, приедет машина – будет разбираться.
Приехала машина, нас запихнули на заднее сиденье и отвезли на третий блокпост.
– А кто был с тобой?
– Итальянский фотограф Коссимо Аттанасио и французский журналист и фотокорр Поль Гого – оба фрилансеры.
Нас привозят, а там машину окружает группа из десяти человек, которые буквально засовывают в окна головы в масках. Спрашивают – кто мы, что мы, требуют, чтобы отдали камеру, угрожают, что заберут и разобьют. В общем, очень неприятно себя вели. Ребята были сильно напуганы, я не меньше.
– А ребята по-русски не говорят? Ты им переводил?
– Нет, совершенно не говорят, я заодно еще был у них переводчиком.
У нас забрали паспорта и фотокамеры для проверки. Вывели – без документов и техники – "стойте здесь". Сами они собрались метрах в пятнадцати от нас. Это была группа одетых в военный камуфляж – не как "любители" – вооружены они были АК, по всей видимости, новой модели. Я в этом не очень разбираюсь, но Коссимо сказал, что это не обычный АК-47, а какая-то новая модель калашникова, который на вооружении только у российской армии.

Баррикада на одной из улиц Славянка. Фото ИТАР-ТАСС/Михаил Почуев
Мы, кстати, когда обстановка немного разрядилась, спросили, что это за оружие. Они сказали, что его выдали на временное пользование, но больше никаких подробностей.
В какой-то момент, как по чьей-то команде, они резко изменили к нам отношение. Им будто кто-то дал приказ, либо они узнали, что политика поведения с иностранными журналистами такова – в общем, вдруг озаботились своим имиджем. И решили показать, какие они белые и пушистые: "Вы уж извините, поймите, военное положение и прочее". И отпустили.
– Отдали паспорта, камеры?
– Да, все вернули. И мы, думая, что теперь уж все в порядке, пошли по тому же маршруту – по мосту. Но были остановлены на другом блокпосте по другую сторону.
Это уже нельзя назвать задержанием, нас просто поймали, мы показали им фото, сделанные на третьем блокпосте. Сказали, что нас смотрели, проверяли, разрешили идти дальше. И получили ответ: "Мы не знаем, кто вас проверял. Мы сами по себе. Если у вас нет разрешения от наших властей – гуляйте! Либо получите его в горсовете!"
Насчет горсовета. Слышал от многих журналистов, в том числе, от Поля Гого, который пытался попасть в здание, но не смог этого сделать за три дня до этого, – что получить разрешение невозможно. Во время такой же попытки журналист газеты Moscow Times – Олег Сухов – был задержан как член "Правого Сектора". Его даже привели в какую-то комнату, где напротив, сидел, видимо, Сергей Лефтер (похищенный ранее украинский журналист – ред.), руки у него были привязаны к стулу, его охранял зеленый человечек с автоматом.
Потому, естественно, мы не пошли ни за какой липовой аккредитацией. Это смешно – там не власть, а непонятно что.
И еще по дороге, когда мы уже развернулись и шли назад от второго блокпоста под мостом, возле нас притомозил джип, раскрашенный в цвета российского флага. Там сидели люди в очень новенькой военной форме, в масках, с оружием и, скажем так, строго на нас посмотрели. Это стало последней каплей, мы решили подобру-поздорову оттуда уехать.
– А номера джипа российские или украинские?
– По-моему, этот джип был без номеров, могу ошибаться. Но он был весь раскрашен в цвета российского флага.
Кстати, насчет номеров. Неподалеку от здания СБУ я видел машину со сбитыми номерами, но с российским каким-то пропуском на стекле, кажется, техосмотром. К стеклу была приклеена бумага с российским флагом. Причем, не наклейка, а что-то официальное. И по городу я заметил несколько милицейских машин, вроде как украинских, в которых сидели люди в этом же камуфляже, с оружием.
То есть, они полностью контролируют город, Славянск оккупирован.

Славянск. Сепаратист. Фото uainfo.org
– А как себя называют эти вооруженные люди?
– Они не представляются. У них всюду написано "Народное ополчение Донбасса". Но нам никто не представлялся. Ничего о себе не говорил.
Единственный, кто поговорил с нами, – гражданский, который стоял на этих блокпостах, с георгиевской ленточкой, без маски. Такой матерый православный фундаменталист. Только с ним было понятно, кто он, что он: местный, даже показал свой паспорт, сохранил советский, где была графа "национальность", в ней написано: "русский". Он этим гордится. И говорит, что мы все тут православные русские. Значит, не хотим этой "европейской заразы".
Только он с нами нормально поговорил, рассказал хотя бы о своих мотивах. Среди этих людей, кстати, много бородатых, но не потому, что они не брились много дней, а действительно, с большими бородами, как будто какое-то православное братство. Может быть, они из Славянска, не знаю.
Очень много людей откровенно маргинального вида, пьяницы, криминальные элементы. Это вторая группа.
И третья – военные. Военные как военные. С выправкой, все как надо.
– Получается, это российская армия на территории Украины?
– Полагаю, что да. Боюсь, что да. Если бы хотели это опровергнуть, они бы нам это рассказали. Но они ничего о себе не говорят, не показывают паспортов, не представляются. У них даже язык не поворачивается сказать, что они из Славянска.
Что думать тогда?! Остается только одно. Тем более, местные жители не считают их земляками.
– А поддерживают?
– Знаете, у них отношение к захватчикам, как к какому-то ненастью. Вот, нашла гроза, буря или шторм: что же с этим поделаешь?! Они это не поддерживают, им приходится просто мириться.
От разных людей прозвучала фраза: "До их прихода все было нормально". В каком-то смысле это можно расценивать как поддержку Украины. Она, естественно, слабая. Человек не будет, наверное, за это воевать и даже смирится, если территорию оккупируют.
Но, тем не менее, я не встретил ни одного человека, кто сказал бы: "Да, это мои защитники, они стоят здесь за нас. А вы отсюда уходите, негодяи европейские!"
Ни один это не сказал.
– Были еще какие-то встречи?
– Мы без проблем перешли мост, взяли такси, поехали на вокзал и здесь совершенно случайно встретили последнего рома, который находился в Славянске.
Этот человек был страшно напуган. Он вернулся забрать какие-то детские вещи, пребывал в настоящем ужасе. Я его остановил, попросил рассказать, что происходит.
Как оказалось, вся ромская община за день до того в полном составе покинула город. Потому что, по его словам, дома были обстреляны с улицы. И все представители общины получали угрозы, что будут уничтожены полным составом, включая детей, если не уберутся.
Как говорил этот человек, вооруженные люди хотят, чтобы в городе остались только русские.
Это коснулось не только ромов. Он, например, приводил в пример своих соседей, в быту говорящих по-украински, они тоже получали аналогичные угрозы.
Человек из цыганской общины просил нас помочь как-то выйти на Рината Ахметова, говорил, что хочет поговорить с ним.
То есть, Ринат Ахметов здесь воспринимается как некий третейский судья и фактически правитель. Хотя, например, сепаратисты в Донецкой обладминистрации сочли предательством, что на последнем матче Динамо-Шахтер на трибуне шахтерских болельщиков были украинские флаги. Они считают, Ахметов их таким образом предал. Но все-таки воспринимают его как царя, как князя.
В итоге мы опоздали на электричку, взяли такси и поехали в Краматорск. По пути на каком-то блокпосте проселочной дороги стояла откровенная группа маргиналов, которые сказали, что мы – шпионы Евросоюза, предъявляли претензии к итальянцу и французу насчет их паспортов, хотя впервые видели, как выглядит итальянский или французский паспорт.
И дальше, на 16-м километре от Донецка, я видел очень странный блокпост, на котором вроде бы стояли украинские военные под российским и георгиевским флагом, стояли вместе с так называемыми ополченцами.

Засланные казачки держат оборону на одном из блокпостов. Фото: Эксперт.онлайн
– Хочу уточнить про военных: у них были опознавательные знаки?
– Да-да, у них были украинские шевроны. Это просто что-то поразительное. О какой антитеррористической операции можно говорить?!..
Этот бермудский треугольник – Славянск – расползается повсюду. И с этим что-то нужно делать срочно, иначе будет плохо.
– Сколько вы пробыли в Славянске?
– В общей сложности в Славянске мы были около десяти часов. А задержали нас не более чем на два часа.
– Били?
– Нет, поначалу хватали руками, но на этом все закончилось.
– Давно ты в Украине?
– В Украине я с восьмого марта. Сначала Харьков, потом Донецк, Днепропетровск, Одесса, Херсон, Житомирщина, Новоград-Волнынский, Киев, Харьков, Донецк, вот такой круг.
– В Крыму ты был?
– После "общения" с СБУ в Донецке в начале марта, уяснил для себя, что занимаю очень проукраинскую позицию, очень четкую, несмотря на то, что я журналист. Потому понял, что в Крым лучше не соваться. Тем более, я встречался с ребятами, которые были две недели в крымском плену, которые остались в Херсоне на операцию.
В Донецке со мной произошла история – был задержан СБУ. Жил в одной комнате с агентом ГРУ, тогда еще тут была Украина. И вот это задержание СБУ – ну не знаю, было вообще милым делом, я скорее успокоился, что тут работают какие-то службы, кого-то выявляют, какие-то бомбы.
А вот что там сейчас, мне сложно сказать.


Original source.
Deleted User 137586
Profile Joined January 2011
7859 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-26 20:15:20
April 26 2014 19:20 GMT
#9095
Sanctions for dummies, presented by the US gov:



***
Looooool, the doublespeak is strong in this one. I present to you, the warning that isn't a warning:


The Russian Foreign Ministry has no intention of intimidating with warnings about trips abroad but urges Russian to be cautious in this regard, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said.
Source.

Cry 'havoc' and let slip the dogs of war
nunez
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Norway4003 Posts
April 26 2014 19:24 GMT
#9096
for dummies indeed.
conspired against by a confederacy of dunces.
Deleted User 137586
Profile Joined January 2011
7859 Posts
April 26 2014 19:50 GMT
#9097
^Must.. not...make...obvious...comment...

***


Joint statement by MoD and MFA on capturing of OSCE inspection team in Slovyansk

We strongly condemn the capture and detention by pro-Russian separatists of members of the OSCE inspection team in eastern Ukraine. The inspection was organised pursuant to the Vienna Document of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe. The purpose of the inspection is to carry out a thorough and objective observation of the military situation in the region, and the main organiser of the inspection is Germany. We confirm that among the detainees is a citizen of the Republic of Poland, a regular officer of the Polish Army.
We call on the abductors to immediately and unconditionally release the persons they hold and on the international community to increase efforts leading to their release. We hope that all the sides of the conflict will take all the necessary steps to free the inspectors. Our common objective is the earliest possible release of the captured persons and the continuation by the OSCE of its activities to support a resolution of the crisis.

Diplomacy and other ministries are engaged in all possible actions leading to the release of the Polish citizen in close cooperation with foreign partners. Publicising them would in no way aid efforts to release the hostages, neither will using this case in current political games.
We call on the media to respect the sensitivity of the family of the captured Pole and refrain from publishing his data and image.



Jacek Sońta
MoD Spokesman

Marcin Wojciechowski
MFA Spokesman
Source.
Cry 'havoc' and let slip the dogs of war
Roman666
Profile Joined April 2012
Poland1440 Posts
April 26 2014 22:05 GMT
#9098
On April 27 2014 04:50 Ghanburighan wrote:
^Must.. not...make...obvious...comment...

***

+ Show Spoiler +

Joint statement by MoD and MFA on capturing of OSCE inspection team in Slovyansk

We strongly condemn the capture and detention by pro-Russian separatists of members of the OSCE inspection team in eastern Ukraine. The inspection was organised pursuant to the Vienna Document of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe. The purpose of the inspection is to carry out a thorough and objective observation of the military situation in the region, and the main organiser of the inspection is Germany. We confirm that among the detainees is a citizen of the Republic of Poland, a regular officer of the Polish Army.
We call on the abductors to immediately and unconditionally release the persons they hold and on the international community to increase efforts leading to their release. We hope that all the sides of the conflict will take all the necessary steps to free the inspectors. Our common objective is the earliest possible release of the captured persons and the continuation by the OSCE of its activities to support a resolution of the crisis.

Diplomacy and other ministries are engaged in all possible actions leading to the release of the Polish citizen in close cooperation with foreign partners. Publicising them would in no way aid efforts to release the hostages, neither will using this case in current political games.
We call on the media to respect the sensitivity of the family of the captured Pole and refrain from publishing his data and image.



Jacek Sońta
MoD Spokesman

Marcin Wojciechowski
MFA Spokesman
Source.

Sigh, Polish ministries. Always wake up too late. All of their identities are widely known since yesterday evening...
Deleted User 137586
Profile Joined January 2011
7859 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-26 22:12:58
April 26 2014 22:12 GMT
#9099
I think we can pretty much conclude that the captured military observers are in fact the OSCE mission.


Latest from the Special Monitoring Mission in Ukraine - based on information received up until 25 April 2014, 19:00 (Kyiv time)
This update is provided for the media and the public.

Western and Central Ukraine, including Kyiv, as well the southern part of the country, remained calm. The situation continued to be tense in Luhansk region and particularly tense in Donetsk region. The Special Monitoring Mission got confirmation that the military observers carrying out an inspection under the OSCE Vienna Document had been taken captive by forces of the self-proclaimed mayor of Sloviansk.

Police presence in Kharkiv was notably reduced as compared to previous days. The Regional Administration building was guarded by about ten police officers in riot gear. The team went to Izium, close to the administrative border between the Kharkiv and Donetsk regions. The head of the Regional Administration in the city complained about the increase of police and military forces in the area. On the way back to Kharkiv the team saw seven additional military vehicles with armed personnel and communication equipment heading to Izium.

In Luhansk, the team observed reinforcement with barbed wire of the barricade in front of the occupied state security service (SBU) building, despite alleged ongoing negotiations reported in the media to vacate the building. The monitors were approached by one of the occupiers, who invited them to witness the release of a young supporter of a unitary Ukraine. The young man had a bruise under his left eye and a bloody nose. He was forced to read a statement to the media, and allowed afterwards to leave the SBU building area with his mother.

In addition, the team patrolled the vicinity of the Ukrainian-Russian border in the southeast part of the Luhansk region in the morning. Very good visibility and open terrain in various places made it possible to see a wide area. No military activity was observed during the patrolling. Border crossing between Ukraine and Russia appeared to be routine.

The overall situation within the Donetsk region remained tense, with many administrative buildings continuing to be occupied by opponents of the government and many roadblocks manned by unarmed or armed supporters of the so-called “Donetsk People’s Republic”. Barricades remained both around the Donetsk City Administration and Donetsk Regional Administration buildings. There was no indication that any of the floors of the latter had been returned. During the afternoon the team observed enhanced suspicion and alert on the part of Ukrainian police, especially at check points in the immediate aftermath of the abduction of members of the unarmed OSCE military verification mission in Sloviansk. The City Administration Building in Mariupol (113 km south of Donetsk) remained occupied.

In Sloviansk, the barricades on the outskirt of the city were manned with less people than in previous days and access to the city was uninterrupted. The team heard reports that no administrative services were being provided by the local administration.

The general situation remained largely unchanged in Dnepropetrovsk, Kherson, Mykolaiv, and the surrounding areas and was assessed as calm. The Kherson team went to Mykolaiv to discuss with the local rabbi the situation after the firebombing incident against the local synagogue on 19 April 2014. The rabbi expressed his view that a thorough police investigation had not been carried out. According to the rabbi, another incident had occurred– hate messages were painted on a Shoah memorial with paint spray on 24 April in the outskirts of Mykolaiv.

The situation in the Odessa region was marked by an explosion on the night of 24 to 25 April at the roadside checkpoint named “the 7th Kilometer”. Six Self-Defence volunteers and one Ukrainian policeman were injured. At the reporting time the police investigation of the incident was still ongoing.

The situation remained calm in Chernivtsi, Ivano-Frankivsk and Lviv region. However, the appointment of the new head of local administration in Kolomyia (60 km north of Ivano-Frankivsk) provoked protests by the Right Sector and Self-Defence, with 100 protestors blocking the local administration building. The protestors, which were unarmed and mostly dressed in camouflage with Right Sector flags, prevented some local officials from entering their workplaces. In Lviv, local authorities increased police presence and check points in and around the city as well as in the region in anticipation of May holiday. Local government authorities issued statements urging people not to join mass protests in order not to provide with arguments to opponents of unitary Ukrainian state. The representatives of the Right Sector in Lviv also called for calm.

The capital city was calm. The Kyiv Maidan was cleaner than the previous day. The team observed the ongoing refurbishment of the Kyiv City Administration’s building. The team made demarches in order to visit Pavlo Hubariev (in Russian: Pavel Gubariev), a self-proclaimed governor of Donetsk region, detained since 6 March.
Source.
Cry 'havoc' and let slip the dogs of war
nunez
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Norway4003 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-04-26 22:38:09
April 26 2014 22:27 GMT
#9100
huh? they are in fact the osce mission? the fuck are you talking about, they're not part of the osce mission, which russia approved, for ukraine. nothing new is reflected in the statement you posted.

so far it seems like a german led military observation team, invitied by the govt in kiev, under the osce vienna doc. seperate from the osce mission. given up as hostages to hoodlooms in slovyansk due to the incompetence said govt.
conspired against by a confederacy of dunces.
Prev 1 453 454 455 456 457 577 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 15h 21m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
JuggernautJason112
Livibee 76
MindelVK 62
ForJumy 20
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 3491
Bisu 1127
Shuttle 782
firebathero 475
ggaemo 282
Soulkey 182
Dewaltoss 142
Hyuk 95
JYJ23
scan(afreeca) 20
[ Show more ]
HiyA 17
Dota 2
monkeys_forever169
League of Legends
Reynor60
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K377
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King40
Other Games
gofns7673
FrodaN1166
C9.Mang0189
Trikslyr62
PPMD20
ZombieGrub3
Sick1
Organizations
StarCraft 2
angryscii 49
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 22 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• musti20045 76
• davetesta40
• OhrlRock 1
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• Pr0nogo 42
• 80smullet 14
• FirePhoenix1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21204
• WagamamaTV731
League of Legends
• Doublelift1743
• TFBlade811
Counter-Strike
• Shiphtur190
Other Games
• imaqtpie1094
Upcoming Events
LiuLi Cup
15h 21m
BSL Team Wars
23h 21m
Team Hawk vs Team Dewalt
Korean StarCraft League
1d 7h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 14h
SC Evo League
1d 16h
WardiTV Summer Champion…
1d 17h
Classic vs Percival
Spirit vs NightMare
CSO Cup
1d 20h
[BSL 2025] Weekly
1d 22h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
SC Evo League
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL Team Wars
2 days
Team Bonyth vs Team Sziky
Replay Cast
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Queen vs HyuN
EffOrt vs Calm
Wardi Open
3 days
RotterdaM Event
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Rush vs TBD
Jaedong vs Mong
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
herO vs TBD
Royal vs Barracks
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Jiahua Invitational
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20
CSL Season 18: Qualifier 1
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

CSLAN 3
CSL Season 18: Qualifier 2
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
EC S1
Sisters' Call Cup
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.