|
+ Show Spoiler +On January 01 2014 10:25 Slaughter wrote:Show nested quote +On January 01 2014 07:10 Kevin_Sorbo wrote:On January 01 2014 05:40 JimmyJRaynor wrote: a constant stream of rhetoric about tightening up the rules ( including paying closer attention to diving) is always announced on teh agenda of the tiny perfect commissioner. they have to justify all the money they spend on officiating.
i don't pay much attention to the NHL any more. But, from what i've seen, after 2010 it was still a dive-fest.
hell, the 2011 Vancouver Canucks were a whole team of flopers, divers, and complainers.
the NHL's "focus on diving" is working out about as well as their crusade to "minimize head injuries".
he is "the face of Canadian hockey" and the most accurate touch passer in the game's history, but , hardly the "greatest player of all time"
as far as the greatest goalie of all time... Mike Palmateer is making a run for that distinction with these amazing saves in the ALumni game... for a 2nd there i thought i was watching the 1978 playoffs I dont want to start an argument but saying Gretzky isnt the best player of all time seems inapropriate to say the least. Calling any other goalie outside of Roy or Brodeur the best is a travesty as well. ( imo ) Those guys didnt need alumni games to showcase themselves.
Um terry Sawchuck and tretiak from the Russian team.would like to have a word with you.
yes you are right. Tretiak was epic. Lets throw in Dryden if you want to... but honestly Palmateer best goaltender of alltimes cause hes sharp playing vs mummies?? lmao
|
On January 01 2014 07:10 Kevin_Sorbo wrote:Show nested quote +On January 01 2014 05:40 JimmyJRaynor wrote: a constant stream of rhetoric about tightening up the rules ( including paying closer attention to diving) is always announced on teh agenda of the tiny perfect commissioner. they have to justify all the money they spend on officiating.
i don't pay much attention to the NHL any more. But, from what i've seen, after 2010 it was still a dive-fest.
hell, the 2011 Vancouver Canucks were a whole team of flopers, divers, and complainers.
the NHL's "focus on diving" is working out about as well as their crusade to "minimize head injuries".
he is "the face of Canadian hockey" and the most accurate touch passer in the game's history, but , hardly the "greatest player of all time"
as far as the greatest goalie of all time... Mike Palmateer is making a run for that distinction with these amazing saves in the ALumni game... for a 2nd there i thought i was watching the 1978 playoffs I dont want to start an argument but saying Gretzky isnt the best player of all time seems inapropriate to say the least. Calling any other goalie outside of Roy or Brodeur the best is a travesty as well. ( imo ) Those guys didnt need alumni games to showcase themselves. The Mike Palmateer thing was 100% joke. C'mon man the Canadiens undressed him every game. However, Vladislav Tretiak stopped them. The 1972 Summit Series is not even close if Dryden doesn't play like shit and Tretiak does not stand on his head. There is a reason why Ed Belfour changed his number to 20 guy.
Tretiak does not need an alumni game.
On to the Gretzky comment: Bobby Orr thinks Wayne Gretzky is an incomplete hockey player. which is dead bang on correct. he never dug a puck out of a corner ever. Orr went on to state that Gretzky was "very talented", but not the greatest of all time.
Orr stated this in his 1 hour interview with Bob Costas.
So I think saying "Gretzky is not the greatest of all time" is a reasonable stance.
Gretzky also brings whining, moaning, crying, and complaining about referee-ing to untold proportions. During the 2002 Olympics Gretzky set up an entire press conference for the biggest whining session in the history of hockey.
|
Gretzky owns every points record for career and single season. Goals and assists > digging a puck out of a corner or standing front of a net.
Bobby Orr is right. He may not have been a complete player but no one is and Gretzkys numbers are better then everyone elses so he musta been doing something right
|
Yea, I'll take the guy who has more assists than anyone else has total points. You might argue that he wasn't great defensively or whatever, but that level of production more than makes up for any deficiencies.
|
On January 02 2014 04:44 sharkeyanti wrote: Yea, I'll take the guy who has more assists than anyone else has total points. You might argue that he wasn't great defensively or whatever, but that level of production more than makes up for any deficiencies.
ya, unfortunately, they do not award the stanley cup during the NHL regular season. during much of Gretzky's prime 16 out of 21 teams made the playoffs, making the regular season have little meaning.
i'll go with Bobby Orr's judgement.
a guy who got to watch Gretzky game in and game out when he was in his prime rather than these "stats experts" who over value the NHL REGULAR SEASON. and a fuck-tonne of Gretzky's "2nd assists" are dubious at best.
Gretzky was not even the best player on the Oilers. Messier was more important to Edmonton, and a more complete hockey player than Gretzky.
|
On January 02 2014 05:19 JimmyJRaynor wrote:Show nested quote +On January 02 2014 04:44 sharkeyanti wrote: Yea, I'll take the guy who has more assists than anyone else has total points. You might argue that he wasn't great defensively or whatever, but that level of production more than makes up for any deficiencies. ya, unfortunately, they do not award the stanley cup during the NHL regular season. during much of Gretzky's prime 16 out of 21 teams made the playoffs, making the regular season have little meaning. i'll go with Bobby Orr's judgement. a guy who got to watch Gretzky game in and game out when he was in his prime rather than these "stats experts" who over value the NHL REGULAR SEASON. and a fuck-tonne of Gretzky's "2nd assists" are dubious at best. Gretzky was not even the best player on the Oilers. Messier was more important to Edmonton, and a more complete hockey player than Gretzky.
All you sound like is a really obnoxious hockey hipster. You're clinging to one guy's opinion like it's scripture. Former players haven't been shown to be significantly more trustworthy in their analysis than anyone else.
|
On January 02 2014 06:35 Stratos_speAr wrote:Show nested quote +On January 02 2014 05:19 JimmyJRaynor wrote:On January 02 2014 04:44 sharkeyanti wrote: Yea, I'll take the guy who has more assists than anyone else has total points. You might argue that he wasn't great defensively or whatever, but that level of production more than makes up for any deficiencies. ya, unfortunately, they do not award the stanley cup during the NHL regular season. during much of Gretzky's prime 16 out of 21 teams made the playoffs, making the regular season have little meaning. i'll go with Bobby Orr's judgement. a guy who got to watch Gretzky game in and game out when he was in his prime rather than these "stats experts" who over value the NHL REGULAR SEASON. and a fuck-tonne of Gretzky's "2nd assists" are dubious at best. Gretzky was not even the best player on the Oilers. Messier was more important to Edmonton, and a more complete hockey player than Gretzky. All you sound like is a really obnoxious hockey hipster. You're clinging to one guy's opinion like it's scripture. Former players haven't been shown to be significantly more trustworthy in their analysis than anyone else. 1 guy? Bobby Orr ? LOL
Bobby Orr was a more complete hockey player than Wayne Gretzky.
no i'm going by my own judgement combined with what other guys say. as opposed to blindly reading the stats sheets... also, i added my own points about how meaningless the NHL regular season was in the 80s and how much more scoring there was when Gretz was in his prime.
furthermore, what i specifically object to is the comment that my opinion "seems inapropriate to say the least.".
sry guy .. but plenty of guys who watched hockey very closely in the 80s think either Orr or Howe were the greatest of all time.
myself, i think Mario Lemieux is the GOAT. he could do everything Gretzky could do and more. hell even Claude Lemieux was a better playoff goal scorer than Gretzky.
|
Bah, Team USA should have taken Braun from the Sharks as one of the D-men.
|
On January 02 2014 05:19 JimmyJRaynor wrote:Show nested quote +On January 02 2014 04:44 sharkeyanti wrote: Yea, I'll take the guy who has more assists than anyone else has total points. You might argue that he wasn't great defensively or whatever, but that level of production more than makes up for any deficiencies. ya, unfortunately, they do not award the stanley cup during the NHL regular season. during much of Gretzky's prime 16 out of 21 teams made the playoffs, making the regular season have little meaning. i'll go with Bobby Orr's judgement. a guy who got to watch Gretzky game in and game out when he was in his prime rather than these "stats experts" who over value the NHL REGULAR SEASON. and a fuck-tonne of Gretzky's "2nd assists" are dubious at best. Gretzky was not even the best player on the Oilers. Messier was more important to Edmonton, and a more complete hockey player than Gretzky.
I think that Gretzky did pretty well in the playoffs as well, given that he also has the most playoff points of all time and won the Conn Smythe twice.
|
USA should have taken fucking Matt Carle. Cam Fowler and Brooks Orpik? puh-lease!
|
Uhh, more like where's Yandle?
|
Yeah Yandle is the biggest omission.
Ryan is a rather large one as well. But at the same time, if he isn't gonna be in your top six for scoring, he's not exactly reliable defensively in the way that some of the other wingers are
|
Not easy picking a team for the USA anymore. That's a good problem to have. You could make several cases for many guys. To me it looks like they valued skating ability and chemistry. Fowler is really good. I don't mind that pick at all and a lot of these guys are experienced on the bigger ice surface. USA will be hard to beat. The question is who gets the start. Quick or Miller?
|
On January 02 2014 05:19 JimmyJRaynor wrote:Show nested quote +On January 02 2014 04:44 sharkeyanti wrote: Yea, I'll take the guy who has more assists than anyone else has total points. You might argue that he wasn't great defensively or whatever, but that level of production more than makes up for any deficiencies. ya, unfortunately, they do not award the stanley cup during the NHL regular season. during much of Gretzky's prime 16 out of 21 teams made the playoffs, making the regular season have little meaning. i'll go with Bobby Orr's judgement. a guy who got to watch Gretzky game in and game out when he was in his prime rather than these "stats experts" who over value the NHL REGULAR SEASON. and a fuck-tonne of Gretzky's "2nd assists" are dubious at best. Gretzky was not even the best player on the Oilers. Messier was more important to Edmonton, and a more complete hockey player than Gretzky. Your right. The stanley cup is awarded during the playoff so lets look at Gretzkys playoff stats: 208GP(15th) 122G(1st), 260A(1st), 382P(1st),34PPG (T-3rd) 11 SHG (2nd), 24 GWG (T-1st), 3 OTG(T-10). Points are king.
And most 2nd assists are questionable.
|
I find it really funny how upset Avs fans are that EJ didn't make the team.
|
Johnson has played pretty well. And Orpik isn't exactly a prime upgrade on EJ. He and Hejda have formed a really great pair so far this year.
|
Orr was a great player. I could say Bossy was the best player of all times.
doesnt make it true.
Wayne was the Great One for 20 years.
|
I dunno. Orpik doesn't get a lot of love because he's a big dude, but he's a pretty decent skater and i've never seen him caught out of position. They're roughly similar imo. And basing on that, if you're gonna take one or the other, you're gonna take the dude who plays with Martin, who also made the team.
The two things I have a hard time reconciling is how Ryan and Yandle did not make the team. Ryan would be the third best pure offensive forward on the team behind Kane and Kessel. I get that the team was trying to build the top six to be scoring and the bottom six to be more defensively reliable, but I have a hard time buying that Ryan is not better than JVR (who I do like though).
I would have much preferred Schneider over Howard, but I doubt either would sniff playing time behind Miller and Quick.
Parise-Kesler-Kane JVR-Pavelski-Kessel Pacioretty-Stepan-Callahan Brown-Backes-Oshie
Wheeler and Statsny (Don't know offhand who plays what side fwiw) Suter-McDonagh Carlson-Shattenkirk Martin-Orpik
Faulk- Fowler
Miller-Quick-Howard
Found this... Long read, but gives a lot of insight on the picks
http://espn.go.com/olympics/hockey/story/_/id/10195703/how-us-hockey-team-bound-sochi-olympics-was-named
|
Goes back to what I said before about JVR. He's a much better skater and he'll create more problems in front of the net than Ryan ever could. Heck, JVR puts himself in better positions and has a lot of experience on the bigger ice surface. Don't get me wrong, I like Bobby. I wouldn't give him JVR's spot though especially when you look at the other factor. Chemistry. Putting Kessel together with him is a natural fit. They know how to find one another and Kessel has added another dimension to his game, which makes it a little harder for guys to read. Only question is who plays center for them?
The USA have a lot of speed not only on their front end, but their back end too. They'll be fun to watch.
|
This Czech Republic v. Finland game is great hockey. So far the WJHC has been great all around.
|
|
|
|
|
|