|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On June 07 2017 08:19 Danglars wrote:
This is really part of why the obstruction stuff is a big deal.
I honestly don't think Trump colluded with the Russians. He's too dumb (or at the very least has none of the long-term planning ability necessary). He might have been manipulated, but that's not really a crime. What is a crime is attempts to impede the investigation into his cronies because the mainstream media is making him feel bad about himself.
|
|
On June 07 2017 08:31 TheTenthDoc wrote:This is really part of why the obstruction stuff is a big deal. I honestly don't think Trump colluded with the Russians. He's too dumb. He might have been manipulated, but that's not really a crime. What is a crime is attempts to impede the investigation into his cronies because the mainstream media is making him feel bad about himself. At worst someone like Trumps son in law unknowingly crossed into criminal wrongdoing because he is a complete novice. Or listened to bad advice from Flynn or some other goon. I was kinda surprised it went beyond Flynn and Manafort.
|
Well then. So does all this end with Trump and Bannon being the last two in the West Wing? Also, is Pence just hiding in a fall out shelter?
|
On June 07 2017 08:06 IgnE wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2017 05:42 KwarK wrote:On June 07 2017 05:36 biology]major wrote:On June 07 2017 05:23 Schmobutzen wrote: Kwark, you just make it too easy. Of course no, not all white people are complicit in the systemic racial problems against the blacks! That is an oversimplification! And yes, such a statement can be seen as racist as well.
Not the level of annoying behaviour whilst protesting is the point, although there is a point when the means override the ends, rather the demands and underlying racist policy of it.
I like my world in spe without racism, so I think of any movement in that direction should begin with the mindset of eradication of that and not taking some of those principles and turn them, to a further usage as a weapon. Yup, GH uses broad brush labels and then assigns guilt to people based on skin color etc. It is racism, but ofc with enough definition twisting and making up new words, you can easily escape labels. I'd like to say that I'm not complicit in American racism, after all, I've only been here a few years and I'm not allowed to vote. But on the other hand it's not like I'm trying especially hard to do anything about it. It doesn't really impact me, I can go through my daily life without really seeing it, whenever I encounter racism I'm the beneficiary of it and I don't notice it because to me it's just how the world has always treated me. I'm certainly not trying very hard to do anything about it, when I get the vote I'll not vote for white supremacists but that's about the extent of my commitment to the cause. Whether or not that makes me complicit, well, that's up to you and your definition. But I think it's unlikely that I'd be so indifferent if it actually impacted me on a day to day basis. please explain to me how you are less complicit than a white person born in this country in 1997, 20 years? your complicity, if most native-born white americans can be said to be complicit, is substantially the same: you take advantage of white supremacism without attempting to dismantle it. maybe you disagree that most native born whites are complicit. or maybe you think most native born whites are considerably more racist than you. but the number of years youve been here seems to have little relevance to your "complicity"
This discussion is a bit weird to me and probably a discussion many non americans will find difficult to understand,i will just leave it with responding to this one post.
you take advantage of white supremacism without attempting to dismantle it.
I don't think he is taking advantage,he is enjoying/experiencing the advantage. Its a small difference to me. Taking advantage to me would mean to actively seek to benefit from, or exploit, a certain situation. It is an unnecessary strong and negative wording.
|
|
hiding is clearly the best strategy; as it has been for a year or so now. so it seems likely.
|
I get the feeling Trump is asking Sessions to do things that would basically come down to falling on the sword.
|
Didn't realize the sessions tension was that bad, but I'll buy it if he actually resigns. No one is gonna want to work for Trump if Sessions bails
|
On June 07 2017 08:43 zlefin wrote:hiding is clearly the best strategy; as it has been for a year or so now. so it seems likely. Pence can stay there. And I would be more than happy to see Session and his aggressive indifference to civil rights issues leave the justice department. Rod Rosenstei seems like a totally acceptable civil servant. It isn't like Trump will nominate anyone else.
On June 07 2017 08:46 Mohdoo wrote:I get the feeling Trump is asking Sessions to do things that would basically come down to falling on the sword.
Trump is pissed that Sessions didn't seek approval to recuse himself. Which isn't surprising since Trump has almost no understanding of the agencies he is supposed to oversee. The AG isn't the president's lawyer, that is the White House counsel.
|
Sessions is already playing with fire with regards to his recusal from the russian investigation, what with Comey's resignation and that letter the justice department wrote.
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
At this point the luckiest Trump loyalist is probably Chris Christie. Thrown off the Trump train before it derailed, saving him the perils of going down with the train.
|
Better grease up those spinning wheels fellas! Anonymous sources! Fake News! MSM! Only Hannity tells the truth! Deep State! Senior Officials just beneath the Trump appointed DNI will say anything because they are Democrats! Nothing that hurts my biases is reality!
Pompeo or Coats are testifying this week under oath. Comey wasn't the only one Trump leaned on in order to kill the Flynn/Manafort/Page/Trump FBI investigation.
The nation’s top intelligence official told associates in March that President Trump asked him if he could intervene with then-FBI Director James B. Comey to get the bureau to back off its focus on former national security adviser Michael Flynn in its Russia probe, according to officials.
On March 22, less than a week after being confirmed by the Senate, Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats attended a briefing at the White House together with officials from several government agencies. As the briefing was wrapping up, Trump asked everyone to leave the room except for Coats and CIA Director Mike Pompeo.
The president then started complaining about the FBI investigation and Comey’s handling of it, said officials familiar with the account Coats gave to associates. Two days earlier, Comey had confirmed in a congressional hearing that the bureau was probing whether Trump’s campaign coordinated with Russia during the 2016 race.
After the encounter, Coats discussed the conversation with other officials and decided that intervening with Comey as Trump had suggested would be inappropriate, according to officials who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive internal matters.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/top-intelligence-official-told-associates-trump-asked-him-if-he-could-intervene-with-comey-to-get-fbi-to-back-off-flynn/2017/06/06/cc879f14-4ace-11e7-9669-250d0b15f83b_story.html?utm_term=.28bef87d38a7
|
|
|
So if Sessions knew Trump was asking to obstruct the investigation does that make him also guilty by association?
|
Comey told Sessions : Don't Leave Me Alone With Trump [...] Mr. Comey believed Mr. Sessions should protect the F.B.I. from White House influence, the officials said, and pulled him aside after a meeting in February to tell him that private interactions between the F.B.I. director and the president were inappropriate. But Mr. Sessions could not guarantee that the president would not try to talk to Mr. Comey alone again, the officials said.
Mr. Comey did not reveal, however, what had so unnerved him about his Oval Office meeting with the president: Mr. Trump’s request that the F.B.I. director end the investigation into the former national security adviser, Michael T. Flynn, who had just been fired. By the time Mr. Trump fired Mr. Comey last month, Mr. Comey had disclosed the meeting to a few of his closest advisers but nobody at the Justice Department, according to the officials, who did not want to be identified discussing Mr. Comey’s interactions with Mr. Trump and Mr. Sessions. [...]
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/06/us/politics/comey-sessions-trump.html?_r=1
(only a portion quoted because it's a royal PITA to copy from NYT)
|
On June 07 2017 09:33 Nevuk wrote:Show nested quote + Comey told Sessions : Don't Leave Me Alone With Trump [...] Mr. Comey believed Mr. Sessions should protect the F.B.I. from White House influence, the officials said, and pulled him aside after a meeting in February to tell him that private interactions between the F.B.I. director and the president were inappropriate. But Mr. Sessions could not guarantee that the president would not try to talk to Mr. Comey alone again, the officials said.
Mr. Comey did not reveal, however, what had so unnerved him about his Oval Office meeting with the president: Mr. Trump’s request that the F.B.I. director end the investigation into the former national security adviser, Michael T. Flynn, who had just been fired. By the time Mr. Trump fired Mr. Comey last month, Mr. Comey had disclosed the meeting to a few of his closest advisers but nobody at the Justice Department, according to the officials, who did not want to be identified discussing Mr. Comey’s interactions with Mr. Trump and Mr. Sessions. [...]
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/06/us/politics/comey-sessions-trump.html?_r=1(only a portion quoted because it's a royal PITA to copy from NYT)
WASHINGTON — The day after President Trump asked James B. Comey, the F.B.I. director, to end an investigation into his former national security adviser, Mr. Comey confronted Attorney General Jeff Sessions and said he did not want to be left alone again with the president, according to current and former law enforcement officials.
i'd laugh my ass off if former law enforcement official was jim comey
|
On June 07 2017 09:10 LegalLord wrote: At this point the luckiest Trump loyalist is probably Chris Christie. Thrown off the Trump train before it derailed, saving him the perils of going down with the train.
It's a sad day when the luckiest member is a governor with an 18 percent approval rating.
|
|
|
|
|