EPTUS Politics Mega-thread - Page 3357
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18864 Posts
| ||
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
would be interesting though I guess. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
Edit: And it looks like Trump all but said that brokered convention = third party run. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
On March 16 2016 23:15 Kipsate wrote: Sounds like political suicide of the Republican party would be interesting though I guess. Having Boehner endorse Ryan gives the establishment a chance to see how the idea does. No one is *actually* expecting a Ryan run, yet. Boehner is a great choice for giving the idea a spotlight without commitment. edit: I think the bigger deal is the fact that the establishment is STILL not willing to work with Cruz | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
At the end of the day Trump will probably be 20-30 delegates short of where he wants to be, which is enough to make the path forward difficult but not enough to guarantee an contested convention (yet). I wonder if Kasich staying in hurts Trump more than Cruz. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On March 16 2016 23:21 Mohdoo wrote: Having Boehner endorse Ryan gives the establishment a chance to see how the idea does. No one is *actually* expecting a Ryan run, yet. Boehner is a great choice for giving the idea a spotlight without commitment. edit: I think the bigger deal is the fact that the establishment is STILL not willing to work with Cruz You can bet that Limbaugh, et al. will be up in arms today. And rightfully so. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-to-skip-next-republican-debate/ Donald Trump announced Wednesday that he will not be attending Fox News' debate next week, citing prior commitments to speak "in front of an important group of people." Trump told "Fox and Friends" during a phone interview that he was "was very surprised when I heard that Fox called for a debate." "I think we have had enough debates," he said. "We have had 11 or 12 debates. I did really well on the last one. I think I have done well in all the debates...But I think we've had enough. How many times can the same people ask you the same question?" | ||
|
Sent.
Poland9316 Posts
| ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
He did have a coy non-denial today. "Anything can happen". He'd a fool for to fall on the sword for a bunch of old men who can't admit they're losers though. | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
frazzle
United States468 Posts
ScotusBlog ranked him as the most conservative of Obama's potential picks and he seems to be regarded as a moderate. So, will the Republicans take the moderate now, or hold out and risk a liberal later? I wouldn't be surprised if they change course given the state of the election. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18864 Posts
On March 16 2016 23:56 frazzle wrote: Obama's nominee for the court is Merrick Garland. ScotusBlog ranked him as the most conservative of Obama's potential picks and he seems to be regarded as a moderate. So, will the Republicans take the moderate now, or hold out and risk a liberal later? I wouldn't be surprised if they change course given the state of the election. Dude clerked for Brennan, so I don't know how conservative he'll end up being  | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
I don't care if this guy is moderate or even a bit conservative. It'd be taking the high road and offering the GOP an olive branch. I do believe in a certain balance to the court. Hillary will give us some more liberal justices though (but not too left). We won't see another Scalia for a long time, if ever. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18864 Posts
 | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
reading his 1986 antitrust and state action defending antitrust regulation. http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/796502.pdf would like to see someone stand up for broadening standing for antitrust but w/e that's not happening anyway | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States46140 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States46140 Posts
| ||
| ||
