|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On March 16 2016 13:34 oBlade wrote:Show nested quote +On March 16 2016 13:29 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On March 16 2016 13:18 thePunGun wrote: I don't know who started this nonsense, but this is NOT THE MEN VS FEMINISM DEBATE CLUB! So could we get back on track to U.S. POLITICS?! While we spent a few pages just now talking about that topic, keep in mind that it's not completely unrelated to politics. Hillary Clinton and Carly Fiorina are/ were presidential nominees, and they received their fair share of prejudicial remarks based on their sex. Furthermore, I'd argue that civil rights and sex/ gender equality are relevant to political discussions too, even if not directly about a presidential candidate. But I'm fine with changing the subject Your starting point might be a biased lens if you think it's a sexist comment when people make fun of Carly Fiorina's face but not Ted Cruz's. Yes, i recall plenty of people calling John Kerry "horse face".
|
On March 16 2016 13:15 ticklishmusic wrote:Show nested quote +On March 16 2016 13:04 Plansix wrote:
I think they are just less open about it. All of my female friend are very open about guys they think are hot enough to fuck. Like super blunt about it. It's weird, it's like almost more acceptable because if guys do it it sounds sexist. I don't care though. Show nested quote +On March 16 2016 13:08 GreenHorizons wrote:On March 16 2016 12:44 ticklishmusic wrote:On March 16 2016 12:40 GreenHorizons wrote:On March 16 2016 12:30 oneofthem wrote:On March 16 2016 12:16 ticklishmusic wrote:Also, legit terrifying. Not confirmed if it's real, but Bernie people on Reddit doing some crazy manipulation + Show Spoiler + lol i know where you got this from lol. That people think that's remotely serious, but the video taped breaking of rules is some sort of a conspiracy, is this campaign in a nutshell. Deflection is all ya got left it seems. It's okay, message me for actual factual Hillary chat if you're ever interested. Lol deflection of what? If you had any idea what was actually going on on the subreddit you would realize how ridiculous that post was in the first place. I was just merely pointing out how absurd the post was when compared to the obvious documented manipulation the Clinton campaign has done. Turns out it's more than likely fake *shrugs and crumples up tinfoil hat* Both campaigns do dirty stuff GH. Generally speaking, I don't find it worth mentioning. I mean, you guys made a fake Hillary/ Rahm ad (not that it won Illinois). Neck in neck in MO. 49 to 49.8 right now.
mmhmm.
What "fake" ad?
|
On March 16 2016 13:35 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:Show nested quote +On March 16 2016 13:34 oBlade wrote:On March 16 2016 13:29 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On March 16 2016 13:18 thePunGun wrote: I don't know who started this nonsense, but this is NOT THE MEN VS FEMINISM DEBATE CLUB! So could we get back on track to U.S. POLITICS?! While we spent a few pages just now talking about that topic, keep in mind that it's not completely unrelated to politics. Hillary Clinton and Carly Fiorina are/ were presidential nominees, and they received their fair share of prejudicial remarks based on their sex. Furthermore, I'd argue that civil rights and sex/ gender equality are relevant to political discussions too, even if not directly about a presidential candidate. But I'm fine with changing the subject Your starting point might be a biased lens if you think it's a sexist comment when people make fun of Carly Fiorina's face but not Ted Cruz's. Yes, i recall plenty of people calling John Kerry "horse face". Well, to be fair he kinda looks like a horse 
|
Clinton up in MO as of now boys
|
So what are we calling Bernie's demise? #Bernout?
|
On March 16 2016 13:34 oBlade wrote:Show nested quote +On March 16 2016 13:29 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On March 16 2016 13:18 thePunGun wrote: I don't know who started this nonsense, but this is NOT THE MEN VS FEMINISM DEBATE CLUB! So could we get back on track to U.S. POLITICS?! While we spent a few pages just now talking about that topic, keep in mind that it's not completely unrelated to politics. Hillary Clinton and Carly Fiorina are/ were presidential nominees, and they received their fair share of prejudicial remarks based on their sex. Furthermore, I'd argue that civil rights and sex/ gender equality are relevant to political discussions too, even if not directly about a presidential candidate. But I'm fine with changing the subject Your starting point might be a biased lens if you think it's a sexist comment when people make fun of Carly Fiorina's face but not Ted Cruz's.
A fair point, as Trump's remark about Carly's face didn't explicitly target her sexuality iirc, although Trump's remarks about Megyn Kelly being on her period and the earlier remarks he made about women in general (that Megyn brought up the first time around) were clearly sexist.
|
On March 16 2016 13:39 xDaunt wrote: So what are we calling Bernie's demise? #Bernout? #BernVoyage
|
On March 16 2016 13:39 xDaunt wrote: So what are we calling Bernie's demise? #Bernout?
We were all feeling the bern... but it turned out it was just a UTI
|
On March 16 2016 13:42 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On March 16 2016 13:39 xDaunt wrote: So what are we calling Bernie's demise? #Bernout? We were all feeling the bern... but it turned out it was just a UTI
Speak for yourself. I expect a pretty big win in WA and for the next several states in a row. He hasn't given up on our insatiatiably stubborn asses I aint givin up on him. #BerninStrong
|
On March 16 2016 13:45 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On March 16 2016 13:42 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On March 16 2016 13:39 xDaunt wrote: So what are we calling Bernie's demise? #Bernout? We were all feeling the bern... but it turned out it was just a UTI Speak for yourself. I expect a pretty big win in WA and for the next several states in a row. He hasn't given up on our insatiatiably stubborn asses I aint givin up on him. #BerninStrong
#BerningBright
|
On March 16 2016 13:45 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On March 16 2016 13:42 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On March 16 2016 13:39 xDaunt wrote: So what are we calling Bernie's demise? #Bernout? We were all feeling the bern... but it turned out it was just a UTI Speak for yourself. I expect a pretty big win in WA and for the next several states in a row. He hasn't given up on our insatiatiably stubborn asses I aint givin up on him. #BerninStrong
I don't know why you guys bother anymore, Bernie is cool and all, but he has no chance.
Like I said previously, Hillary could leave the face of the planet for 3 months, and still easily win the nomination.
|
All the people with the Bernie tattoos will now be remembered as #Bernvictims They will be identified by their special mark + Show Spoiler +
|
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
Guys, the pledged delegate count between Hillary and Bernie isn't that big.
If Bernie wins 100% of California delegates we got this.
|
Really happy right now. Let's win this general election. If Democrats play their cards right, not only will Hillary be in the White House but they have a shot at getting back quite a few seats in Congress as well. The Supreme Court fight will similarly be won by the left. Things are looking bright -- let's do this
|
lol is it really getting called Lady and the Trump
|
On March 16 2016 13:25 xDaunt wrote: What I'm looking forward to is the next generation of Bernie Sanders politicians that will be springing up in the years to come. He's spawning the democrats' own version of a Tea Party.
We already had that, it was/is the Occupy movement. And before that, it was Howard Dean. In general, the Tea Party crowd have been far more effective in pulling their party to the fringe and getting actual electoral representation for themselves than the populist leftists. My pet theory is that Occupy is easier for Democrats to co-opt because they already have some decent ideological ties with that crowd through the union angle, and both groups at least agree on social issues, whereas the difference between the Chamber of Commerce Republicans/neoconservative Republicans and the Tea Party Republicans is night and day, with the evangelicals caught awkwardly in the middle.
I also think that if the economy continues to improve, the appeal of Sanders-esque politicians will die down some; and the opposite if things take another dip.
|
On March 16 2016 13:50 Doraemon wrote: lol is it really getting called Lady and the Trump
Oh man, I wish we could have gotten the alternate headline "Bernie and the Jets" after a Missouri win showing him in front of Boeing
|
Missouri LITERALLY being 40.8% vs 40.7% (REP) and 49.6% vs 49.4% (DEM). Drama incomming
|
Dewey Defeats Truman. Heh.
IDK how it was so close in MO, this is insane.'
EDIT: they changed the article.
|
Washington Post now lists all 3041 precincts as having reported their results. Hillary and Trump seem to be the winners, by razor-thin margins.
|
|
|
|
|
|