• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 23:37
CET 05:37
KST 13:37
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
[BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)1Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win1RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge2[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation14
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest 2025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death
Brood War
General
Data analysis on 70 million replays 2v2 maps which are SC2 style with teams together? [BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D) soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft What happened to TvZ on Retro?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group B - Sun 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group A - Sat 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
How to stay on top of macro? Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Nintendo Switch Thread Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Health Impact of Joining…
TrAiDoS
Dyadica Evangelium — Chapt…
Hildegard
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2122 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 3327

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 3325 3326 3327 3328 3329 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12363 Posts
March 15 2016 19:45 GMT
#66521
Meanwhile,

On March 16 2016 04:15 Nebuchad wrote:
Can we get an acknowledgement that "I think he was justified to incite violence" is different from the "he didn't incite violence" that you were pushing earlier? Do you think that would be fair?

No will to live, no wish to die
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
March 15 2016 19:47 GMT
#66522
On March 16 2016 04:32 oBlade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 16 2016 04:18 ticklishmusic wrote:
You can say Kissinger was (is) a bastard, but you can't deny he played a very real role in establishing American pre-eminence. I don't really see a problem with getting advice from him, or being friends with him. He's a real person, you know, like Antonin Scalia was. Frankly, the idea that you can't be friends with someone or that their perspective is worthless because of an ideological gap is pretty stupid. People were complaining that Hillary seemed to be on okay terms with Dubya at Nancy Reagan's funeral, geez.

It's not merely an ideological gap but the fact that he is responsible for the deaths of human beings. The context this came up in is that for some reason it's fashionable to hold Trump at "fault" because one white supremacist or another that before this election nobody (rightly) was paying any attention to or knew their names, complimented Trump. But there's no such scandal in the mass media. And Clinton actually likes Kissinger. There is apparently no reciprocal admiration between Trump and a white supremacist. This is the left, for fuck's sake. Kissinger, as in Vietnam, which is either the most unpopular war in US history or tied for it. It would be like a Democratic candidate in 30 years chatting with G.W. Bush and the mass media being filled with gossip about how some racist radio host in bumfuckville said he was voting for Robert Paul. The point is that there is an inconsistency or even hypocrisy going on.


I think the difference here is that the white supremacists were preaching a hateful ideology and don't bring anything valuable to the table. Kissinger is Machiavellian and the embodiment of realpolitik.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15725 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-03-15 19:51:36
March 15 2016 19:51 GMT
#66523
Things I'm looking forward to today:

Bernie falling further behind

Things I'm not looking forward to today:

"Bernie Sanders manages AMAZING upset by only falling 10 points further behind! Can you say WHITE HOUSE? Say goodbye to the 1% and click here to see HOW Sanders is CHANGING modern day politics and destroying OLIGARCHY"
Naracs_Duc
Profile Joined August 2015
746 Posts
March 15 2016 19:53 GMT
#66524
On March 16 2016 03:30 IgnE wrote:
Down with IP. Down with Monsanto.


Always funny that its the people without the IP rights that complain the most about others having IP rights.
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28715 Posts
March 15 2016 19:54 GMT
#66525
On March 16 2016 04:44 SK.Testie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 16 2016 04:36 Gorsameth wrote:
Oh so not its ok when he advocates violence. Instead of never doing it. Well any progress is welcome I guess.

Have you read the quote? No where does it say someone is punching anyone else. Security told Trump someone might have some tomatoes and if the crowd saw anyone getting ready to throw one they should get punched out.

No one in this quote and its context is swinging fists at anyone other then Trump asking his supporters to do so.


It's actually illegal to protest in the vicinity of the secret service. I'm amazed people haven't died. Obama installed this law because I imagine it makes their job a lot harder.

Show nested quote +
On March 16 2016 04:34 Liquid`Drone wrote:
How is Kasich more dishonest or sleazier than Trump? How was Jeb Bush more dishonest or sleazier? Hell, how about Lindsay Graham? Note that I have big problems on policy with all three of these - but when it comes to 'honesty' or 'non-sleaziness of character', they all vastly, vastly outperform Trump. I get Cruz, absolutely, and I can also understand that Rubio would give you those vibes, but you're generalizing to the point where your statements don't make sense.. Trump flat out lies whenever he wants to, with no remorse, no regret, no hesitation and without blinking an eye. Then, he combines this with being 'willing to say what nobody else wants to say out loud' and people consider him 'trustworthy' because of it. It's fucking mind-numbing.


They are all completely bought and owned by corporate masters and they are all part of the "establishment". The people are so against the establishment (especially the Republican side) for their notorious lying history. All the people you mentioned are completely bought and owned.

Out of those Kasich might be more honest, but he grants amnesty to illegals. That ends this election. People simply do not want that. Hell, your own countries are getting more right wing because of the Migrant crisis. That's only 1.6 million Muslims so far compared to the 11-30 million Illegals. And your own media is being exposed as constant liars trying to suppress information which is REALLY disconcerting. That same thing has been happening in America for a long, long time. And people are saying, "We're really fucking tired of this". People dislike having foreign gangs in their lands.


Once again, you're just supporting my notion that it's not that Trump is trustworthy or honest. You just agree with him on a major piece of policy. To me, my impression is that your support of Trump is based on two things; he's the one most adamant about securing the border, and he is the one most hostile towards Muslims, and following this, you've decided to mentally leap towards 'he must be trustworthy and honest' even though he keeps lying and lying and lying and lying and lying.

If you agree with him that border must be secured and that the 11 million illegals (where do you have 30 million from? Did he or a supporter of his just throw out an 11-30 million number because 'well if it's 11 million then saying it's between 11 and 30 million is still technically correct' and you just bought it? ) must be deported and that there's a fundamental, unsolvable conflict between 'Islam' and the west, that's fair enough, but don't go around claiming that Trump is honest or trustworthy. He is a sociopathic liar.
Moderator
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28715 Posts
March 15 2016 19:55 GMT
#66526
On March 16 2016 04:47 ticklishmusic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 16 2016 04:32 oBlade wrote:
On March 16 2016 04:18 ticklishmusic wrote:
You can say Kissinger was (is) a bastard, but you can't deny he played a very real role in establishing American pre-eminence. I don't really see a problem with getting advice from him, or being friends with him. He's a real person, you know, like Antonin Scalia was. Frankly, the idea that you can't be friends with someone or that their perspective is worthless because of an ideological gap is pretty stupid. People were complaining that Hillary seemed to be on okay terms with Dubya at Nancy Reagan's funeral, geez.

It's not merely an ideological gap but the fact that he is responsible for the deaths of human beings. The context this came up in is that for some reason it's fashionable to hold Trump at "fault" because one white supremacist or another that before this election nobody (rightly) was paying any attention to or knew their names, complimented Trump. But there's no such scandal in the mass media. And Clinton actually likes Kissinger. There is apparently no reciprocal admiration between Trump and a white supremacist. This is the left, for fuck's sake. Kissinger, as in Vietnam, which is either the most unpopular war in US history or tied for it. It would be like a Democratic candidate in 30 years chatting with G.W. Bush and the mass media being filled with gossip about how some racist radio host in bumfuckville said he was voting for Robert Paul. The point is that there is an inconsistency or even hypocrisy going on.


I think the difference here is that the white supremacists were preaching a hateful ideology and don't bring anything valuable to the table. Kissinger is Machiavellian and the embodiment of realpolitik.


To me, a disenfranchised white supremacist is much less dangerous than a Machiavellian American secretary of state.
Moderator
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
March 15 2016 19:56 GMT
#66527
I just find it endlessly amusing that many of the people who are taking Trump to task are the same people who were more than willing to turn a blind eye to BLM or any of the race riots that we have seen recently.
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15725 Posts
March 15 2016 19:58 GMT
#66528
On March 16 2016 04:56 xDaunt wrote:
I just find it endlessly amusing that many of the people who are taking Trump to task are the same people who were more than willing to turn a blind eye to BLM or any of the race riots that we have seen recently.


"Don't you know? When no one is taking notice, your only option is to MAKE people notice, however it is you need to get that done. It is worth it for the sake of ending oppression! People thought racism was dead in the 60s!! That means it is not dead today AT ALL and is WORSE so we need to make people LATE TO WORK!!"
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23491 Posts
March 15 2016 19:58 GMT
#66529
On March 16 2016 04:51 Mohdoo wrote:
Things I'm looking forward to today:

Bernie falling further behind

Things I'm not looking forward to today:

"Bernie Sanders manages AMAZING upset by only falling 10 points further behind! Can you say WHITE HOUSE? Say goodbye to the 1% and click here to see HOW Sanders is CHANGING modern day politics and destroying OLIGARCHY"


What do you think is going to happen state by state? I sense an upset or two in the making. Also gaining 20+ points in several states even if he doesn't win is a pretty big deal.

Put another way, losing 20% in a couple weeks isn't a positive sign for a potential nominee.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18839 Posts
March 15 2016 19:59 GMT
#66530
"Turning a blind eye"=\=regarding BLM/"race riots" differently than you
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15725 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-03-15 20:08:57
March 15 2016 20:01 GMT
#66531
On March 16 2016 04:58 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 16 2016 04:51 Mohdoo wrote:
Things I'm looking forward to today:

Bernie falling further behind

Things I'm not looking forward to today:

"Bernie Sanders manages AMAZING upset by only falling 10 points further behind! Can you say WHITE HOUSE? Say goodbye to the 1% and click here to see HOW Sanders is CHANGING modern day politics and destroying OLIGARCHY"


What do you think is going to happen state by state? I sense an upset or two in the making. Also gaining 20+ points in several states even if he doesn't win is a pretty big deal.

Put another way, losing 20% in a couple weeks isn't a positive sign for a potential nominee.


I think Bernie will win all the states that he is slightly to somewhat behind in. I think Clinton will handily win Florida and that she will continue to have the dominance she needs, while still not having much more.

I think this elections is just straight up different. People won't coalesce around a candidate until another drops out. I expect Clinton to get the nomination with 105% of the needed delegates.

Edit: As I have said before, this is our country's first 4 party election. However, it is being run as a 4 person tournament. Winner of the "left" election faces the winner of the "right" election, but they are actual full on elections. Not just feeling out who seems good and then calling it.

Edit #2: Not that it means much, but my mom has been a Bernie nut up until a couple days ago. She said Bernie officially went too insane and isn't actually making sense. She appreciates his message, but finally said he's just too far out there. My conversations with her went similar to my conversations with GH until now.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
March 15 2016 20:02 GMT
#66532
On March 16 2016 04:59 farvacola wrote:
"Turning a blind eye"=\=regarding BLM/"race riots" differently than you

I probably should have said "justified" instead of "turned a blind eye."
wei2coolman
Profile Joined November 2010
United States60033 Posts
March 15 2016 20:08 GMT
#66533
On March 16 2016 04:53 Naracs_Duc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 16 2016 03:30 IgnE wrote:
Down with IP. Down with Monsanto.


Always funny that its the people without the IP rights that complain the most about others having IP rights.

Well, it's also cuz people with IP rights, especially that in the food industry are amazing at screwing over farmers.
liftlift > tsm
SK.Testie
Profile Blog Joined January 2007
Canada11084 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-03-15 20:16:33
March 15 2016 20:11 GMT
#66534
On March 16 2016 04:45 Nebuchad wrote:
Meanwhile,

Show nested quote +
On March 16 2016 04:15 Nebuchad wrote:
Can we get an acknowledgement that "I think he was justified to incite violence" is different from the "he didn't incite violence" that you were pushing earlier? Do you think that would be fair?



That's somewhat fair, but it's reactionary and not deliberately aggressive. Because the media paints him as, "This incendiary violent rhetoric. This constant violence coming out of Trump rallies".

All rallies where protesters show up and don't start acting like savages, are extremely peaceful. Despite every colour and creed being there. Something tells me if 3,000 Trump supporters were calling Trumps name at a Bernie rally, and constantly interrupting him at every single turn you'd see something similar.

For instance, you say Trumps positions are inflaming their feelings and they have a right to go protest. Sure. Outside the building a safe distance away. It is literally illegal for them to protest within the vicinity of the secret service remember.

Now:
One could argue that Bernie being a socialist whom has defended communism on video is inflammatory in itself. People have seen how most socialist states work out, devolves into communism, lots of people die or starve, then communists say, "communism has never been tried correctly!". People could protest the very thought of this very strongly because there's a long history of socialism destroying communities. Sweden was a socialist paradise that Bernie pointed to, now because it didn't defend it's borders and give incentives for their own populace to repopulate but instead invited a foreign hostile population, you have a large, uneducated group of people whom are in the country not knowing the language living off government assistance.

On March 16 2016 04:54 Liquid`Drone wrote:
Once again, you're just supporting my notion that it's not that Trump is trustworthy or honest. You just agree with him on a major piece of policy. To me, my impression is that your support of Trump is based on two things; he's the one most adamant about securing the border, and he is the one most hostile towards Muslims, and following this, you've decided to mentally leap towards 'he must be trustworthy and honest' even though he keeps lying and lying and lying and lying and lying.

If you agree with him that border must be secured and that the 11 million illegals (where do you have 30 million from? Did he or a supporter of his just throw out an 11-30 million number because 'well if it's 11 million then saying it's between 11 and 30 million is still technically correct' and you just bought it? ) must be deported and that there's a fundamental, unsolvable conflict between 'Islam' and the west, that's fair enough, but don't go around claiming that Trump is honest or trustworthy. He is a sociopathic liar.


The possible 30 million figure comes from Ann Coulter in her book Adios America. She cites the problems with the 11 mill figure. Remember it's 11mill TO 30 million. That could mean there's 12 million instead of 11. But it seems more likely that it's much higher.
A quick tl;dr on the book, but the book is much more in depth and is very well cited. Ann may be a known bigot, but she's an informed bigot with a doctorate.


Yes, but the thing is most people view the others as even more dishonest because they would not even address those issues if not for Trump. Then (the next runner up Ted Cruz) they tried to copy Trump. He's immediately seen as the leader. Also, he completely played the media and was constantly 2 steps ahead of them on every attack. He talks like a stupid man so that the average voter understands him, but he has proven he is far from stupid.

To get a better understanding of Trumps base, you have to read what they are saying. They're surprisingly intelligent and not just well informed, but many are hyper informed reactionaries. I do not see a sociopathic liar in Trump. I see that in Cruz because he actively looks like he's enjoying every lie he's telling. LYIN' TED. I think Trump's most definitely lying for political gain, but they all are proven liars by now. All of them. It's just what issues are most important to Americans right now.
Social Justice is a fools errand. May all the adherents at its church be thwarted. Of all the religions I have come across, it is by far the most detestable.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
March 15 2016 20:22 GMT
#66535
The upside to Trump explicitly justifying violence (and let's not pretend he's saying "only use violence if they swing first") is that the other candidates walked back their unconditional support of the Republican nominee. I really want to see three candidates in the general.
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21965 Posts
March 15 2016 20:23 GMT
#66536
On March 16 2016 05:22 Doodsmack wrote:
The upside to Trump explicitly justifying violence (and let's not pretend he's saying "only use violence if they swing first") is that the other candidates walked back their unconditional support of the Republican nominee. I really want to see three candidates in the general.

I would laugh like never before if the GOP runs someone 3e party just to torpedo Trump.

God that would be so funny.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
March 15 2016 20:26 GMT
#66537
On March 16 2016 05:11 SK.Testie wrote:
I think Trump's most definitely lying for political gain, but they all are proven liars...It's just what issues are most important to Americans right now.


It seems your argument has a tendency to change in response to the counter points from others. Before you said the others were decidedly sleazier than Trump. It appears to me you have such a preconceived opinion against the establishment and media that Trump is an outlet for people like you to just be defiant. In the process, as an informed political activist you make incredible sacrifices in the quality of your candidate (assuming you support Trump) in order to fight against the establishment and media.
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
March 15 2016 20:26 GMT
#66538
if hillary wins the republicans will face the interesting question of how much to work with her on a variety of projects. would the cracks exposed by the presidential election affect the war strategy of the party in the congress?
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
ErectedZenith
Profile Joined January 2016
325 Posts
March 15 2016 20:26 GMT
#66539
On March 16 2016 05:23 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 16 2016 05:22 Doodsmack wrote:
The upside to Trump explicitly justifying violence (and let's not pretend he's saying "only use violence if they swing first") is that the other candidates walked back their unconditional support of the Republican nominee. I really want to see three candidates in the general.

I would laugh like never before if the GOP runs someone 3e party just to torpedo Trump.

God that would be so funny.


They can't.

Trump have leaked all of their resources without spending much himself.

Its the nature of the beast.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
March 15 2016 20:27 GMT
#66540
On March 16 2016 05:23 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 16 2016 05:22 Doodsmack wrote:
The upside to Trump explicitly justifying violence (and let's not pretend he's saying "only use violence if they swing first") is that the other candidates walked back their unconditional support of the Republican nominee. I really want to see three candidates in the general.

I would laugh like never before if the GOP runs someone 3e party just to torpedo Trump.

God that would be so funny.


I would liken it to the events depicted in the movie Valkyrie LOL.
Prev 1 3325 3326 3327 3328 3329 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
23:00
OSC Elite Rising Star #17
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 3080
ggaemo 59
Icarus 6
Dota 2
monkeys_forever405
NeuroSwarm149
League of Legends
JimRising 823
Trikslyr56
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox611
C9.Mang0400
Other Games
summit1g10860
WinterStarcraft472
Maynarde123
missharvey30
trigger6
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1218
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream355
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 14
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush985
• Lourlo611
• Stunt253
Other Games
• Shiphtur125
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
7h 23m
PiGosaur Cup
20h 23m
Replay Cast
1d 4h
Wardi Open
1d 7h
OSC
1d 8h
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
1d 19h
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
OSC
3 days
LAN Event
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

SOOP Univ League 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
META Madness #9
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.