EPTUS Politics Mega-thread - Page 3271
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
FiWiFaKi
Canada9859 Posts
| ||
|
trulojucreathrma.com
United States327 Posts
On March 11 2016 12:18 AXygnus wrote: The way Trump said "deal" some 15 times in a couple of minutes was annoying. Maybe they should stop asking the same question over and over again? | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On March 11 2016 12:18 AXygnus wrote: The way Trump said "deal" some 15 times in a couple of minutes was annoying. We need a president who wrote "The Art of the Deal." | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
| ||
|
FiWiFaKi
Canada9859 Posts
On March 11 2016 12:20 Mohdoo wrote: Is Rubio seriously denying climate change? Good lord, at least go center if you're gonna have no nuts the whole night. All of them will. Trump will say people are responsible for some of it. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
On March 11 2016 12:19 trulojucreathrma.com wrote: Maybe they should stop asking the same question over and over again? Um, this is his answer to pretty much every policy question he's ever been asked. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On March 11 2016 12:12 oneofthem wrote: developing new tech especially new paradigm (beyond visual range combat) is hard. it is a strategically important system if they can get it off the ground. the planners aren't morons No one thinks otherwise. However, the government provides every incentive for defense companies to severely overcharge. The reason they get away with it is because that spending does create high-quality jobs, so state governments are willing to spend federal money to prop up defense jobs in their own states. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On March 11 2016 12:20 Mohdoo wrote: Is Rubio seriously denying climate change? Good lord, at least go center if you're gonna have no nuts the whole night. he is really the face of political corruption. | ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
Germany is a disaster and Russia is doing well? | ||
|
trulojucreathrma.com
United States327 Posts
On March 11 2016 12:20 On_Slaught wrote: Um, this is his answer to pretty much every policy question he's ever been asked. No one forced them to invite him. Btw, all 17 GOP candidates denied global warming. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On March 11 2016 12:21 LegalLord wrote: No one thinks otherwise. However, the government provides every incentive for defense companies to severely overcharge. The reason they get away with it is because that spending does create high-quality jobs, so state governments are willing to spend federal money to prop up defense jobs in their own states. it seems like a big developmental process problem, not necessarily nefarious. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Introvert
United States4951 Posts
hm, think I'm 60 sec behind. | ||
|
Slaughter
United States20255 Posts
On March 11 2016 12:10 LegalLord wrote: All of the US technology is pretty inefficient, it's just planes that get the most attention. The US needs to stop buying stupidly expensive technology that is worth 10% of what it actually costs. Cut out the incentives that make it that way and it will allow huge cost savings, and even will allow the military to be expanded in the right ways if it needs to be done. Its inefficient because the tech level is so high. Its diminishing returns and we have long past the point where increases in technology can be done in a cost efficient manner, | ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
| ||
|
FiWiFaKi
Canada9859 Posts
On March 11 2016 12:27 Plansix wrote: Germany is a disaster? They're holding all of Europe on their back, I think that's what Trump is getting at. | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On March 11 2016 12:28 Jibba wrote: How the fuck are you going to stop another country, especially the #2 economy in the world, from manipulating their currency? It's been a staple of their economics for 50 years. magical taxes on imports that are not tariffs. | ||
|
FiWiFaKi
Canada9859 Posts
On March 11 2016 12:28 FiWiFaKi wrote: They're holding all of Europe on their back, I think that's what Trump is getting at. On March 11 2016 12:28 Jibba wrote: How the fuck are you going to stop another country, especially the #2 economy in the world, from manipulating their currency? It's been a staple of their economics for 50 years. If 20% of China's exports are to US, I think they can have some influence - as well as if the US can convince some of the EU groups to not stand up for this. | ||
| ||
